Devskiller

von Devskiller

5 / 5 28 Bewertungen
Devskiller

Wer nutzt diese Software?

IT-Unternehmen und Unternehmen mit IT-Abteilung zum Testen von Entwicklern im Rekrutierungsprozess, Kodierungsschulen und IT-Dozenten für Bildungs-, Bewertungs- und Zertifizierungszwecke

Durchschnittliche Bewertung

28 Bewertungen
  • Gesamt 5 / 5
  • Benutzerfreundlichkeit 4.5 / 5
  • Kundenservice 4.5 / 5
  • Funktionen 4.5 / 5
  • Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis 4.5 / 5

Produktdetails

  • Startpreis $199/Monat
  • Kostenlose Version Nein
  • Kostenlose Testversion Ja
  • Einsatz Cloud, SaaS, Web
  • Training Live Online
    Webinare
    Dokumentation
  • Kundenbetreuung Online

Angaben zum Hersteller

  • Devskiller
  • https://devskiller.com/
  • Gegründet 2013

Über Devskiller

Devskiller ist eine Plattform zum Entwickler-Screening und Online-Interviews, die auf der RealLifeTesting-Methode basiert. Mit diesem Tool kannst du Entwickler mit den richtigen Fähigkeiten finden und deine Zeit bis zur Einstellung um 60 % verkürzen. Die Programmiertests spiegeln den ersten Tag der Berufserfahrung wider, um Spitzenkandidaten zu ermitteln. Sie gehen über das Testen von Sprachen hinaus, indem sie Frameworks, Bibliotheken und Datenbanken testen.

Devskiller Funktionen

  • Anpassbare Teste
  • Autorensoftware-Tests
  • Bewerber-Management
  • Echtzeit-Berichterstattung
  • Eignungs-Test
  • Fähigkeiten testen
  • Kandidatenvergleich
  • Online-Tests
  • Persönlichkeitstest
  • Vorgefertigte Testbibliothek
  • Workflow-Management

Die hilfreichsten Reviews für Devskiller

Pre-screen candidates with relevant questions

Mit Google übersetzen Bewertet am 20.4.2018
Bryan W.
Software Engineer
Kunst & Handwerk, 201-500 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Quelle des Nutzers 
5/5
Gesamt
5 / 5
Benutzerfreundlichkeit
4 / 5
Eigenschaften & Funktionalitäten
4 / 5
Kundenbetreuung
4 / 5
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Wahrscheinlichkeit der Weiterempfehlung:
Unwahrscheinlich Äußerst wahrscheinlich

Kommentare: We've cut down the amount of in-person interviews we need to hold by 65+% by being able to realize what the level of experience the candidate demonstrates within code very similar to our own. When we do bring in a candidate, we have a good baseline idea of where their skillset it at, and can tailor the in-person interview to allow us to determine the candidate's rate-of-growth and dive deeper into what they know.

Vorteile: Out of the box, we're supplied with relevant questions and programming solutions we can customize a test with. It didn't take long at all for us to get a list of questions the team liked together in a test, and start testing candidates in our funnel. There's a large pool of format of questions- we don't need to format the coding questions into weird multiple choice questions where you select the correct code as other platforms have you do. Along the same vein, we can have the candidate complete coding projects that are similar to work our developers do each day: find and fix the existing bug(s), implement a new feature, or perform a code review (similar to Bitbucket or Github pull request code reviews). We ended up writing a few of our own questions, which wasn't difficult, that allowed us to test candidates how they'd perform against some of our own code. The code reviews especially have been great at determining the candidate's skill level based on the feedback they give. Being able to have the candidate download/upload code from Devskiller so they can modify it in their own IDE, or allowing them to grab the code from a temporary Github repository is a big plus.

Nachteile: Some bugs had come up, such as not being able to turn on/off an option in a test question. These were resolved quickly in a few hours after sending an email to the support email. The test isn't fully automated for some types of questions (as you would expect for code reviews), but there's also not a way to give automatic partial credit on multiple-choice questions. This requires us to go through the test questions individually to give partial credit (4 / 5 correct doesn't seem like a 0% to us), but the time isn't significant. Brackets seem to break the SQL questions, which is odd and hangs some candidates up.

Intuitive, practical and with a great support team

Mit Google übersetzen Bewertet am 7.5.2019
Recruiter
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 201-500 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Quelle des Nutzers 
5/5
Gesamt
4 / 5
Benutzerfreundlichkeit
4 / 5
Eigenschaften & Funktionalitäten
5 / 5
Kundenbetreuung
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Wahrscheinlichkeit der Weiterempfehlung:
Unwahrscheinlich Äußerst wahrscheinlich

Kommentare: With Devskiller we’re able to evaluate candidate’s technical skills in a more efficient and faster way. It saves time not only from the recruitment process, but from the seniors developers that used to have to manually create and correct the tests before we started using Devskiller.

Vorteile: Devskiller has really contributed to improve the performance of our Recruitment Team. One of its advantage is the possibility to create custom tests to evaluate candidates in all sorts of levels and technologies, saving us time during the recruitment process.
Another great benefit is the customer Support team, who are very fast and effective! Always solving our problems and quickly answering our questions and doubts.

Nachteile: When the same candidate answer more than one test, it doesn’t shows the results separately, only the average score, which can be a little confusing.

Lies weitere Bewertungen