--- description: Detaillierte Informationen über Fluxx Grantmaker zu Benutzerfreundlichkeit, Funktionen, Kosten, Vor- und Nachteilen aus verifizierten Nutzer-Erfahrungen. Lies Ratings & Bewertungen und entdecke ähnliche Tools. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Fluxx Grantmaker Erfahrungen, Vor- und Nachteile – Capterra Deutschland 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Startseite](/) > [Fördermittelverwaltung Software](/directory/30567/grant-management/software) > [Fluxx Grantmaker](/software/146625/fluxx-software-for-grantmakers) # Fluxx Grantmaker Canonical: https://www.capterra.com.de/software/146625/fluxx-software-for-grantmakers Seite: 1 / 5\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/146625/fluxx-software-for-grantmakers?page=2) > Fluxx Grantmaker vereinfacht die Arbeit und die Berichterstattung über Auswirkungen. Fordere eine Demo an. > > Bewertung: **4.3/5** von 96 Nutzern. Top bewertet für **Weiterempfehlungsquote**. ----- ## Übersicht ### Wer verwendet Fluxx Grantmaker? Führende Software für die Fördermittelvermittlung, die sich für Organisationen eignet, die mehrere Programme verwalten und jährlich mehrere Zuschüsse vergeben, die Effizienz fördern und ihrer Kundschaft eine gute Erfahrung bieten möchten. ## Kurzstatistiken und Ratings | Metrik | Bewertung | Detail | | **Gesamt** | **4.3/5** | 96 Nutzerbewertungen | | Bedienkomfort | 3.9/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Kundenbetreuung | 4.0/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis | 4.1/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Funktionen | 4.2/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Empfehlungsprozentsatz | 80% | (8/10 Weiterempfehlungsquote) | ## Über den Anbieter - **Unternehmen**: Fluxx - **Region**: San Francisco, USA - **Gegründet**: 2010 ## Gewerblicher Kontext - **Zielgruppe**: 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1.000, 1.001–5.000, 5.001–10.000, 10.000+ - **Bereitstellungen und Plattformen**: Cloud, SaaS, webbasiert, Mac (Desktop), Windows (Desktop), Android (mobil), iPhone (mobil), iPad (mobil) - **Unterstützte Sprachen**: Englisch - **Verfügbare Länder**: Australien, Deutschland, Frankreich, Irland, Kanada, Neuseeland, Niederlande, Singapur, Südafrika, Vereinigte Staaten, Vereinigtes Königreich ## Funktionen - Berichterstattung und Statistik - Buchhaltung - CRM - Dokumentenprüfung - Erinnerungen - Finanzberichterstattung - Formularverwaltung - Förderungssuche - Kommunikationsmanagement - Mitglieder-Datenbank - Vertrags-/Lizenz-Management - Werkzeuge zur Zusammenarbeit - Zahlung-Nachverfolgung ## Integrationen (19 insgesamt) - Candid - Docusign - Google Contacts - Google Docs - Google Drive - Google Maps - GuideSTAR - Mailchimp - Microsoft 365 - Microsoft Excel - Microsoft Outlook - Microsoft Word - NetSuite - QuickBooks Online - QuickBooks Online Advanced ... und 4 weitere Integrationen ## Optionen für Kundensupport - E-Mail/Helpdesk - FAQ/Forum - Wissensdatenbank - Telefon-Support - Chat ## Category - [Fördermittelverwaltung Software](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/30567/grant-management/software) ## Ähnliche Kategorien - [Fördermittelverwaltung Software](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/30567/grant-management/software) - [NPO Software (Non-Profit-Organisationen)](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/30805/nonprofit/software) ## Alternativen 1. [Good Grants](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/206672/good-grants) — 4.8/5 (21 reviews) 2. [Submittable](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/158382/submittable) — 4.8/5 (398 reviews) 3. [MonkeyPod](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/203848/monkeypod) — 4.8/5 (101 reviews) 4. [Sage Intacct](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/76/intacct) — 4.3/5 (716 reviews) 5. [Grant Lifecycle Manager](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/122147/grant-lifecycle-manager) — 4.9/5 (52 reviews) ## Nutzerbewertungen ### "Super Flexible Grantmaking System" — 4.0/5 > **Stephen** | *5. Mai 2022* | Philanthropie | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: The positive experience started from the beginning: the onboarding process. The onboarding team helped guide us through organising all the exported data from our old system and mapping it into the new structure. I learned that there is no "default" setup - everything was set up from scratch to match our desired workflow and existing data. As we have grown and needed to make changes to our grants programmes, we have customised Fluxx more and more to our particular needs. The majority of this we have been able to do ourselves or with the help of the active and helpful Fluxx community from around the world. There is a huge amount of knowledge and goodwill on the Fluxx community forum, there are local user groups, and an annual Fluxxcon conference. The Fluxx community is well supported by the company (dedicated member of staff) and by far the quickest way to get help when needed. Fluxx's Advanced Services team are available to take on bigger customisation projects, but we have not needed to use them (yet). Another stand-out for me about the product is that you can modify the system using (limited) lower-level coding in a reporting language called Liquid HTML, and its underlying language Ruby. This opens up possibilities for incredible customisation of reporting, workflow, external data access, and processing. > > **Nachteile**: From the beginning I realised "there is no manual". Yes, there is documentation within the help-desk system and this is growing over time, but it tends to be task-based rather than actually describing the interface and what everything does. Support is sketchy at times. There is often better information and help from the rest of the global community than from the Helpdesk; over time, too many of my bug reports have gotten stuck at "With Engineering" and not resolved. Offsetting the support issues is the way that Fluxx provides levels of certification for users and admins, though online courses. These appear to be valuable conduits for product knowledge and good practice. Recently, Fluxx has locked down some of the things that we used to be allowed to do with Ruby programming within the system. Thankfully, they listened to users' voices and have allowed some more flexibility than they were planning, but the net effect has been that it takes some more time and effort to learn the programming environment and to implement features using it. The cost is quite considerable, about 1.5% of our granting budget. This could be prohibitive for grant-makers smaller than we are. We feel we get good value for this. > > We have been able to streamline our operations considerably with Fluxx, so that our standard workflow can be operated by one person, and the quality of the generated reports taken to our Board is exceptional. The flexibility is so great that it can be a challenge to know when to stop refining processes\! Having got to this stage, however, it means we can concentrate more on higher-level concerns like outcome reporting, equity issues, and community engagement. ----- ### "Very satisfied long time Fluxx admin" — 5.0/5 > **Dan** | *5. März 2025* | Philanthropie | Empfehlungsbewertung: 9.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: -Great functionality out of the box, but with a high degree of customization available to clients -Fluxx as a company is constantly evolving and improving the platform and responding to client needs for features and functionality -Big market share = big customer base = big user community -Active user community, with excellent "Community" website with many channels and robust contributions from users across the spectrum of clients -Long and growing list of third party integrations, including middleware -Excellent user conference (just wish it was every year\!) -Fluxx company shares my values and those of my employer - this is important for the work we do > > **Nachteile**: -Fluxx is not a CRM, and although they have gotten better thanks to Fluxx's efforts and those of the robust user community and implementation partners, CRM-like functions aren't naturally built in. -Client learning and training is not a "one stop" experience; learning (especially as an admin) is cobbled together from documentation, training modules, webinars, user community, consultants/implementation partners, user conference, etc. -Document management is a pain and could really use a major overhaul -Expensive (although probably similar to close competitors) > > Very satisfied with the GMS and would genuinely recommend it to any grantmaker. ----- ### "CFSEM Fluxx Review" — 3.0/5 > **Ryan** | *29. April 2022* | Non-Profit-Organisation Management | Empfehlungsbewertung: 0.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: That it's cloud based, and helped our organization modernize. > > **Nachteile**: The service, hands down. It takes days and weeks sometimes for tickets to be responded to. We've had tickets open for years that impact the usability and administration of the system. Tickets sent to engineering get lost in the void so much that its a common jest among the Fluxx user communities. I often have to reach a point of frustration where I am emailing our Fluxx representative before movement is made. And still, most often the response is that 'its with engineering'. > > The experience with iNet when we implemented in 2019 was less than ideal. After handing over the reigns to us, and we learned the administrative backend on our own, we quickly realized that the initial build of Fluxx was already unsustainable in the way it was structure. The documentation that was provided was less than ideal and was very little help. The training was also miserably lacking, as our whole staff would likely agree on. Fluxx was a step forward for us, as we have been using a legacy system may decades old, but the longer we used it, the more issues cropped up. The more I learned in the admin panel, the more I realized that the current setup was unsustainable and would eventually require a complete rebuild if we were to remain. We got very little help with that issue (about unsustainability) and little to no advice from Fluxx on how to proceed. We are getting by today, but as we add more programming we continue to struggle to fit things in our current setup. Not only is the setup an issue, the persistent issues with existing functionality, the bugs that arise and take a year to get fixed. Its been frustrating to say the least. ----- ### "We've adopted the product and some of the staff\!" — 4.0/5 > **Jovoni** | *15. April 2025* | Non-Profit-Organisation Management | Empfehlungsbewertung: 7.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: The customization of platform is a highlight and the willingness of the team to provide a product that best fit our needs. There was a team effort to onboard our staff. Each person was knowledgeable about their particular area and was incredibly helpful. > > **Nachteile**: There are some quirks about the platform like, when printing a pdf the text in the blue box is black and difficult to read and the font color for a signal message is very light on the grantee dashboard side. > > At onset the pacing of the onboarding process was set well, and the team was very accommodating. The staff building the product frequently answering questions and willing to 'tinker' to service the need of our organization and the uniquities of having our membership agencies as grantees. During the initial testing process, we felt like we could have benefited from more guided instructions (we don't know what we don't know) and perceived that we needed more time during refinement as we had a different perspective/ understanding of how the system worked and needed to make the necessary adjustments. However, our team felt rushed by project management at times to complete the project ahead of schedule - but during meetings expectations/priorities were clearly discussed and interim meetings were held (in-between standing meetings) to ensure the quality of the product. ----- ### "Overall a great platform" — 5.0/5 > **Tara** | *25. April 2025* | Gastgewerbe | Empfehlungsbewertung: 8.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Fluxx is extremely adaptable to our program's unique needs. Our grantees and grant reviewers have both shared that they find the platform to be extremely intuitive and user friendly. Fluxx's implementation team takes the time to learn each organization's program, and doesn't stop until it's right. > > **Nachteile**: For the administrator, Fluxx has a steeper learning curve. Making changes to the site or a grant application sometimes involves liquid code and can be cumbersome and lead to errors. ----- Seite: 1 / 5\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/146625/fluxx-software-for-grantmakers?page=2) ## Links - [Auf Capterra anzeigen](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/146625/fluxx-software-for-grantmakers) ## Diese Seite ist in den folgenden Sprachen verfügbar | Sprache | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Strukturierte Daten