Wir helfen Unternehmen in Deutschland
seit 15 Jahren bei der Softwareauswahl

Was ist CARET Legal?

Erfahre, warum Zola eine schnell wachsende Praxisverwaltungssoftware ist. Integriertes CRM, E-Mail und robuste Treuhand- und Geschäftsbuchhaltung. Zola Suite bietet führende Case-Management-Funktionen, ausgefeilte Massenabrechnung, Dokumentenmanagement, Aufgabenmanagement und vieles mehr über eine moderne und intuitive Nutzeroberfläche. Zola ist cloudbasiert und über jeden Browser sowie über native iOS- und Android-Apps zugänglich. Zu den Integrationen gehören LawPay, QuickBooks und Dropbox.

Wer verwendet CARET Legal?

Zola wurde entwickelt, um die Bedürfnisse moderner Kanzleien zu erfüllen. Die integrierte Lösung eignet sich gut für Unternehmen jeder Größe, die eine Vielzahl von Bereichen abdecken.

CARET Legal Software - 1
CARET Legal Software - 2
CARET Legal Software - 3
CARET Legal Software - 4
CARET Legal Software - 5

Du bist nicht sicher, ob CARET Legal das Richtige ist? Mit einer beliebten Alternative vergleichen

CARET Legal

CARET Legal

4,5 (129)
89,00 $
Monat
Kostenlose Version
Kostenlose Testversion
122
16
4,5 (129)
4,4 (129)
4,6 (129)
VS.
Startpreis
Preisoptionen
Funktionen
Integrationen
Benutzerfreundlichkeit
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Kundenservice
39,00 $
Monat
Kostenlose Version
Kostenlose Testversion
109
15
4,6 (1.591)
4,6 (1.591)
4,7 (1.591)
Die grünen Bewertungsbalken geben an, welches Produkt gemessen an der Durchschnittsbewertung und der Zahl der Bewertungen am besten abschneidet.

Weitere gute Alternativen zu CARET Legal

Clio
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Abrechnung & Rechnungsstellung
Rechtsfall-Management
Zeitverfolgung
Amicus Attorney
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Dokumentenmanagement
Rechtsfall-Management
Zeitverfolgung
TimeSolv Legal Billing
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Abrechnung & Rechnungsstellung
Kostenverfolgung
Zeitverfolgung
FreshBooks
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Abrechnung & Rechnungsstellung
Online-Abrechnung
Rechnungserstellung
Cleo Integration Cloud
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
AS2-Protokoll
Elektronischer Datenaustausch
Mehrfache Format-Unterstützung
LeanLaw
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Buchhaltung
Kundenportal
Zeit & Kosten Verfolgung
Sage Timeslips
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Abrechnung & Rechnungsstellung
Rechnungshistorie
Zeitverfolgung
Filevine
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Dokumentenmanagement
Fall-Aufzeichnungen
Kundenmanagement
PracticePanther Legal Software
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Abrechnung & Rechnungsstellung
Für Juristen
Zeitverfolgung

Bewertungen über CARET Legal

Durchschnittliche Bewertung

Gesamt
4,5
Benutzerfreundlichkeit
4,5
Kundenservice
4,6
Funktionen
4,3
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
4,4

Nutzerbewertungen nach Unternehmensgröße (Angestellte)

  • <50
  • 51-200
  • 201-1.000
  • >1.001

Bewertungen nach Punktzahl finden

5
73%
4
16%
3
5%
2
5%
1
2%
Michael
Michael
Managing Partner in USA
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Anwaltskanzlei, 11–50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 1-5 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

Significant upgrade from our last billing software

5,0 vor 3 Jahren

Kommentare: Zola Suite is significantly improving the efficiency of our timekeeping and billing processes. We are spending less time to get bills out, and they are going out faster. I am very happy we made the switch.

Vorteile:

First and foremost, being able to access the software via a web-based login is extremely useful, especially when so many of us are working from home. Time entry is straightforward and easy. I do feel like it is helping us capture a higher percentage of our billable work than we did in the past. Most of the reporting functionality is really great. Customer support has been extremely responsive and helpful. Integration with Quickbooks Online is really nice.

Nachteile:

The transition from our old software to the new (e.g., data migration) was tough. To be fair, we expected it to be tough: we used the old software for almost 15 years so it had a lot of data and we were heavily reliant on it and very used to the way it worked. The Zola customer service folks worked with us tirelessly to make it happen and that was great, but even though we expected the transition to be difficult, it was slightly more difficult than we expected. Access to historical data (data imported from our old software) is more limited than I was hoping for. The default user types are a little too limited (there's no middle ground between "has all access and all rights" and "doesn't have sufficient access to do essential tasks") but the customer support team very quickly found a custom solution for us, which was great.

Antwort von CARET

vor 3 Jahren

Hi Michael. Thank you for your feedback. We're happy to hear that Zola has significantly improved the efficiency of your timekeeping and billing processes. We're sorry to hear that your migration expectations were not met. With an advanced migration, our team will migrate contacts, calendar events, matters, tasks, unbilled time entries, trust balances and more. While most legal practice management providers will not migrate historical financial data, we're committed to pushing the envelope and our dedicated data operations team is developing tools that will allow us to increase the volume of data we're able to efficiently and accurately migrate for clients. More on that to come soon! With respect to your feedback around user profiles, as an EnterprisePlus user, we can create custom user types for your account. A member of our support team will be in touch to help ensure that everything is configured correctly.

Kit
Kit
Managing Partner in USA
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Rechtsberatung, 2–10 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 1-5 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

Best overall in case management software, but has minor UI annoyances

5,0 vor 4 Jahren

Kommentare: After using Clio, MyCase, and PracticePanther at various points in my career (and testing CosmoLex and RocketMatters most recently when opening a new firm), none of the CMS programs on the market have come close to ZolaSuite's comprehensive functionality. Having the ability to do not just case management and billing, but complete firm accounting/reconciliation is a godsend. The integrated CRM in the Enterprise Plus tier is fantastic - no need to have an outside CRM that may or may not fully integrate with your CMS. The email feature is the clencher - having an actual, FULL email inbox that syncs with Gsuite email makes keeping case-related correspondence a snap.

Vorteile:

Robust program that covers everything from case management to client lead intake to comprehensive firm accounting. Easy to use and navigate for the most part. Integrated CRM and FULL accounting of all operating and trust accounts with triple reconciliation keeps the entire process streamlined and accessible without having to utilize a dozen different programs and hoping nothing falls through the cracks.

Nachteile:

Has minor UI issues that can be annoying, particularly the inability to active a full subscription without going through a multi-step process involving both the sales department and support team at Zola. This should be a "click here, pick your plan, enter your payment method" process with no need to have it "activated" by the company before being able to use it. That being said, there are some additional features that I would love to see Zola add/integrate/improve ASAP (which I am sending to Zola as suggestions for future improvements). If these features were incorporated, ZolaSuite would certainly be a category killer and rapidly take over the entire market, but they are not "dealbreaker" items as far as I'm concerned for overall ratings.

Gary
Lawyer in USA
Anwaltskanzlei, 11–50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung
Quelle: SoftwareAdvice

Caret should not be in this space

3,0 vor 2 Monaten Neu

Kommentare: Over the years, the software utility has declined.

Vorteile:

It was a good product when there was customer support. They no longer offer decent customer support. Taking 5 days to add a new employee is inexcusable. It impedes my buisness

Nachteile:

Customer support has been outsourced to offshore. They also started using a VoIP solution, but a cheap one making it very difficult to hear and understand that tech on the line. Moreover, they make it difficult to even reach a tech person and when you do, they are lazy and sometimes, just plain defiant. For example, I asked them to add a new employee recently, and was directed to watch videos. I replied that if I could have done it myself, I would have. They should not be in this space and I dont plan to stay with them after this.

Antwort von CARET

vor 2 Monaten

Hi Gary, we're very sorry to hear that your experience with CARET Legal is not living up to your expectations. We will be sure to pass along this feedback to our team and use it to continuously improve our customer experience.

Ulrich
Ulrich
Doctor in Benin
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Medizinische Praxis, 2–10 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 1-5 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

Great CARET Legal!

5,0 vor 3 Monaten

Kommentare: My experience with Caret Legal has been incredible. I've gained in promotion and efficiency thanks to all the features it offers. I manage my files efficiently, organize my documents and track my time. Everything is perfect with Caret Legal!

Vorteile:

This software is just incredible. With Caret Legal, I manage my legal files brilliantly. Accounting, generating basic reports and time management are just some of the advantages this software offers me.

Nachteile:

So far, I don't have much to complain about with Caret Legal.

Antwort von CARET

vor 3 Monaten

Hi, Ulrich. Thank you for taking the time to share your experience working with CARET Legal. We love hearing from happy customers like you!

Christian
Partner in USA
Anwaltskanzlei, 2–10 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

Cloud-based practice management

5,0 vor 2 Jahren

Vorteile:

Built-in accounting was important and Zola's accounting features are excellent, though we'd occasionally like to be able to customize reports. Even so, we can get the info we need. Time entry is easy and set up to facilitate completeness. The automatic time entry windows help us not to lose time. Matters management is simple and flexible. Document upload and management is good, with features to avoid duplication, track versions, view documents easily, automatic OCR, integration with Word. Email handling and the ability to associate emails with matters is good. but the change from server-based management comes with

Nachteile:

Some of the issues are simply the result of being a web-based program, so navigating and using requires people to change habits, and some features of local server-based management are not available. OCR is not always consistent - some documents that OCR in a local pdf editing app do not seem to OCR on Zola. Wish list: a plug-in to permit creation of a spreadsheet in Excel and direct upload to Zola like the Word plug-in; Outlook shared calendar integration so the entire firm calendar would synch with the shared Microsoft Exchange Outlook calendar; an invite mechanism like Outlook; the ability to save all email attachments at once to a matter folder; the ability to move documents from a matter to another matter subfolder; the ability to change the document menu from white lettering on grey to black lettering on white; the ability to import V-cards; icon notification of email receipt; document searching by date created/modified

Antwort von CARET

vor 2 Jahren

Christian, thank you for taking the time to share your experience with Zola Suite as well as your wish list. We always welcome feature requests and enhancements that will greatly improve our platform. We're working on some enhancements to OCR and we're discussing the ability to customize reports with our product team. Stay tuned!