--- description: Detaillierte Informationen über Load Balancer Enterprise ADC zu Benutzerfreundlichkeit, Funktionen, Kosten, Vor- und Nachteilen aus verifizierten Nutzer-Erfahrungen. Lies Ratings & Bewertungen und entdecke ähnliche Tools. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Load Balancer Enterprise ADC Erfahrungen, Vor- und Nachteile – Capterra Deutschland 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Startseite](/) > [Lastverteilungsplan Software](/directory/30813/load-balancing/software) > [Load Balancer Enterprise ADC](/software/140396/loadbalancer-org) # Load Balancer Enterprise ADC Canonical: https://www.capterra.com.de/software/140396/loadbalancer-org Seite: 1 / 4\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/140396/loadbalancer-org?page=2) > Eine funktionsreiche, hochleistungsfähige Lastausgleichslösung, die auf der Plattform deiner Wahl ausgeführt werden kann. > > Bewertung: **4.8/5** von 68 Nutzern. Top bewertet für **Weiterempfehlungsquote**. ----- ## Übersicht ### Wer verwendet Load Balancer Enterprise ADC? Loadbalancer.orgs vielfältige Kundenbasis reicht von Fortune-50-Unternehmen bis hin zu kleinen und mittleren Unternehmen. Kernsektoren sind E-Commerce, Regierung, Bildung, Gesundheit, Finanzen und Telekommunikation. ## Kurzstatistiken und Ratings | Metrik | Bewertung | Detail | | **Gesamt** | **4.8/5** | 68 Nutzerbewertungen | | Bedienkomfort | 4.6/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Kundenbetreuung | 4.9/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis | 4.7/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Funktionen | 4.6/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Empfehlungsprozentsatz | 90% | (9/10 Weiterempfehlungsquote) | ## Über den Anbieter - **Unternehmen**: Loadbalancer.org - **Region**: Wilmington, DE, USA - **Gegründet**: 2003 ## Gewerblicher Kontext - **Startpreis**: 150,00 $ - **Preismodell**: (Kostenlose Testversion) - **Zielgruppe**: Selbstständig, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1.000, 1.001–5.000, 5.001–10.000, 10.000+ - **Bereitstellungen und Plattformen**: Cloud, SaaS, webbasiert, Mac (Desktop), Windows (Desktop), Linux (Desktop), Windows (On-Premise), Linux (On-Premise), Chromebook (Desktop) - **Unterstützte Sprachen**: Englisch - **Verfügbare Länder**: Afghanistan, Albanien, Algerien, Amerikanisch-Samoa, Amerikanische Jungferninseln, Andorra, Angola, Anguilla, Antigua und Barbuda, Argentinien, Armenien, Aruba, Aserbaidschan, Australien, Bahamas, Bahrain, Bangladesch, Barbados, Belarus, Belgien und 210 weitere ## Funktionen - Authentifizierung - Gesundheitsüberwachung - Load Distribution ## Integrationen (1 insgesamt) - Microsoft Azure ## Optionen für Kundensupport - E-Mail/Helpdesk - FAQ/Forum - Telefon-Support - 24/7 Live-Support - Chat ## Category - [Lastverteilungsplan Software](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/30813/load-balancing/software) ## Alternativen 1. [ManageEngine OpManager](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/168854/manageengine-opmanager) — 4.6/5 (343 reviews) 2. [N-central](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/13803/n-central) — 4.2/5 (253 reviews) 3. [NinjaOne](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/165889/ninjaone) — 4.7/5 (298 reviews) 4. [Remote Monitoring and Management](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/144309/atera) — 4.5/5 (461 reviews) 5. [NGINX](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/1016181/nginx-plus) — 4.5/5 (20 reviews) ## Nutzerbewertungen ### "A reliable product." — 5.0/5 > **Holger** | *5. Juni 2025* | Informationsdienst | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: The system is designed to be user-friendly and straightforward to configure, even for those with limited technical experience. It features a well-designed, intuitive web-based user interface (WebUI) that allows for efficient navigation and management of settings. Upgrading to newer versions is a seamless process, requiring minimal downtime and ensuring compatibility with existing configurations. > > **Nachteile**: The Web-based user interface (WebUI) does not currently provide an option to configure or adjust the time interval between individual monitoring checks, requiring manual modification through backend settings or configuration files instead. > > A robust and trustworthy product that users can count on for consistent performance and minimal downtime. ----- ### "Worth every penny" — 5.0/5 > **Ed** | *11. September 2026* | Gesundheit, Wellness & Fitness | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Reliability. They just work, they stay up, the updates are no problem. Support is first class - always helpful. > > **Nachteile**: I can't think of anything to put here. There have been no downsides whenever I've worked with these devices. > > Extremely positive. The machines are absolutely solid, brilliant uptimes. Contacting support is easy and they're response quick. ----- ### "Great product by a great company\!" — 5.0/5 > **Ed** | *5. Februar 2026* | Informationsdienst | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: The appliance provides a huge amount of configuration options, with a lot of granular control to suit most hosting environments. We use it for balancing between web servers to provide failover capabilities and it does the job without complaining. No performance impact. The support is what really sets Loadbalancer.org aside from similar products. Very responsive and knowledgeable engineers, no need to deal with 1st line gatekeepers. Every time I've dealt with support, I've only been met with friendly, approachble people who know their stuff. > > **Nachteile**: It can be a steep learning curve for anyone new to this. If you've come with existing experience with HAProxy or other Apache-based reverse-proxy platforms, you may find it easier to get started. However, the onboarding process and support has been really helpful. > > Great company to deal with. Solid product with plenty of features. Doesn't need constant tinkering or maintenance once up and running (except for patching). Pricing is good for top tier product, and offers good value for money. ----- ### "Easy to use" — 5.0/5 > **Carolyn** | *30. Juli 2026* | Krankenhausversorgung & Gesundheitswesen | Empfehlungsbewertung: 9.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Easy to configure and use - simplified and easy to navigate UI Responsive customer support, if it's urgent they jump on almost immediately to assist, they're also incredibly kind and patient > > **Nachteile**: having to re-add the same servers into multiple pools can be frustrating if you have a lot of servers - there's no pick list to choose from, if you have 10+ servers you have to manually add the same servers into each pool > > Coming from an f5 environment, it was refreshing to have something that's pared down to just the basics that we need for load-balancing - our team isn't having to navigate through unnecessary screens for the limited feature set we use ----- ### "Loadbalancer Support for Enterprise" — 5.0/5 > **Ritesh** | *6. Juli 2026* | Luft- & Raumfahrt | Empfehlungsbewertung: 5.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Stability and Post Deployement Support on the highlight issue. The problem was correctly identified with the root cause and resolved > > **Nachteile**: As far as being the day to day user of LB, the product is very good for enterprises. It would be great if a online sinulator available for New User to experiment on the tool. > > Fantastic, Great and Timely Support, Stable and Enterprise friendly. Easy UI and Best Suitable for Aviation Industries ----- Seite: 1 / 4\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/140396/loadbalancer-org?page=2) ## Links - [Auf Capterra anzeigen](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/140396/loadbalancer-org) ## Diese Seite ist in den folgenden Sprachen verfügbar | Sprache | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | | tr | | ----- ## Strukturierte Daten