Wir helfen Unternehmen seit 18 Jahren,
bessere Software zu finden

LoadMaster Load Balancer

LoadMaster Load Balancer

Was ist LoadMaster Load Balancer?

KEMP bietet seinen Kunden eine automatisierte, elastische und skalierbare Anwendungsbereitstellung, die ein besseres Benutzererlebnis mit größerer Flexibilität ermöglicht. Mit mehr als 40.000 Bereitstellungen weltweit ist KEMP ein Branchenführer bei den fortschrittlichen Layer-4/7 Application Delivery Controllern. LoadMaster ist virtuell, als Hardware, Bare Metal und als Cloud-Anwendung (AWS und Azure) verfügbar.

Wer verwendet LoadMaster Load Balancer?

Kunden reichen von Fortune 50-Unternehmen bis hin zu kleinen und mittleren Unternehmen, Zweigstellen, Managed-Services-Anbietern und Kunden aus dem Bildungs- und öffentlichen Sektor.

LoadMaster Load Balancer Software - 1
LoadMaster Load Balancer Software - 2
LoadMaster Load Balancer Software - 3
LoadMaster Load Balancer Software - 4
LoadMaster Load Balancer Software - 5

Du bist nicht sicher, ob LoadMaster Load Balancer das Richtige ist? Mit einer beliebten Alternative vergleichen

LoadMaster Load Balancer

LoadMaster Load Balancer

4,7 (72)
2.500,00 $
einmalig
Kostenlose Version
Kostenlose Testversion
20
1
4,5 (72)
4,5 (72)
4,7 (72)
VS.
Startpreis
Preisoptionen
Funktionen
Integrationen
Benutzerfreundlichkeit
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Kundenservice
95,00 $
Monat
Kostenlose Version
Kostenlose Testversion
42
1
4,5 (42)
4,7 (42)
4,9 (42)
Die grünen Bewertungsbalken geben an, welches Produkt gemessen an der Durchschnittsbewertung und der Zahl der Bewertungen am besten abschneidet.

Weitere gute Alternativen zu LoadMaster Load Balancer

Load Balancer Enterprise ADC
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Alarmfunktion / Benachrichtigungen
Server-Überwachung
Vordefinierte Protokolle
Citrix ADC
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Alarmfunktion / Benachrichtigungen
Authentifizierung
Remote-Monitoring und -Management
Barracuda Email Security Gateway
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Bedrohungsschutz
E-Mail-Filterung
Spam Quarantine
Edgenexus Load Balancer/ADC
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Für dieses Produkt wurden noch keine Funktionen durch Nutzer bewertet.
Traefik
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Aktivitäts-Dashboard
Bevollmächtigung revidieren
Inhalt-Weiterleitung
Cloud Load Balancer
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Für dieses Produkt wurden noch keine Funktionen durch Nutzer bewertet.
Varnish Enterprise
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Lastverteilung
Speichern der Inhalte im Cache
Website Delivery
ManageEngine OpManager
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Alarmfunktion / Benachrichtigungen
Real-Time Monitoring
Server-Überwachung
Checkmk
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Real-Time Monitoring
Real-Time Notifications
Server-Überwachung

Bewertungen über LoadMaster Load Balancer

Durchschnittliche Bewertung

Gesamt
4,7
Benutzerfreundlichkeit
4,5
Kundenservice
4,7
Funktionen
4,4
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
4,5

Nutzerbewertungen nach Unternehmensgröße (Angestellte)

  • <50
  • 51-200
  • 201-1.000
  • >1.001

Bewertungen nach Punktzahl finden

5
69%
4
28%
3
3%
Giuseppe
Microsoft System Engineer in Schweiz
Industrieautomation, 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

In meinen Augen der Leader im Bereich Load-Balancing

5,0 vor 5 Jahren

Vorteile:

Die Software ist sehr übersichtlich und einfach. Die Templates auf der KEMP-Seite helfen sehr bei der Konfiguration der Regeln. Abgesehen von dem ist auch mit ESP sehr vieles abgedeckt.

Nachteile:

Ich konnte leider für meine Bedürfnisse keine Nachteile finden bis jetzt.

Antwort von Progress Software

vor 5 Jahren

Giuseppe, thank you very much for your review!

Nathan
Nathan
Network Analyst in USA
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Anwaltskanzlei, 201–500 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Great load balancers for the cost. Watch out for potential sudden steep price changes, though.

5,0 vor 7 Jahren

Kommentare: Great load balancers for our Microsoft Exchange mail systems at an affordable cost.

Vorteile:

Very flexible and affordable load balancers. They work great, with very little hands-on maintenance required to keep them running smooth.

Nachteile:

Kemp unexpectedly raised the prices on their maintenance plans, and they now cost double what they did a few years ago. This was quite a shock to us since we had not received any sort of warning that their maintenance prices were going to be increased, and they had no flexibility on this price change. We had already budgeted for the maintenance renewal based on a budgetary quote they gave us a few months before the price change, and as a result we had to go severely over budget in order to keep our equipment covered.

Eljakim
Eljakim
CEO in Niederlande
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 11–50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Reasonably pricey, but customer support is excellent

5,0 vor 5 Jahren

Kommentare: Our high load solutions are very scalable; enabling HTTP/2 was literally checking a single checkbox.

Vorteile:

The KEMP load balancers just work. For our purpose where we have about 25.000 concurrent users working on various web applications, it's a simple and easy solution that makes the entire application much more scalable.

Nachteile:

The KEMP has a built in feature to do caching. I would like to be able to specify exactly which file types I want to specify; KEMP has it the other way around where you can specify certain things NOT to cache. Also, the way to temporarily disable real servers is a bit weird; you can disable a real server, but the system will keep sending existing users to that server, yet it won't show in the statistics how much traffic is going to the server.

Christine
head of core i.t. in USA
Bankwesen, 201–500 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Loadmaster - An economical investment

3,0 vor 6 Jahren

Kommentare: This is an affordable alternative to F5 and some of the more expensive load balancers on the market.

Vorteile:

Kemp's pricing makes this product much more affordable than other options on the markete.

Nachteile:

Lack of some advanced features other competitors have

Peter
IT MAnager in USA
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 51–200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

Great Product for all SLB needs

5,0 vor 5 Jahren

Kommentare: Great support from pre-sales to Post sales to pro services. Everyone I've interacted with knows their core competencies extremely well.

Vorteile:

Easy to deploy in all situations. Varying license types to accommodate most users.

Nachteile:

It's not terribly intuitive when you come from another competing Vendor.

Antwort von Progress Software

vor 5 Jahren

Thank you for taking the time to leave us a review Peter! I'll be sure to pass on your kind words to our support team.

Ken
IT Manager in USA
Maritime Wirtschaft, 201–500 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 1-5 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

Best value and support that I have seen in a long time!

5,0 vor 5 Jahren

Kommentare: Took only a few hours to set up and now it just runs and we forget about it!

Vorteile:

The virtual load balancer was inexpensive and very easy to install and create/use but the technical support is excellent! I emailed a setup question in for the free trial load balancer and received a answer within an hour! I was then asked to do a remote session so they could check what I had done so far and also offered the help finish the setup! I elected to finish on my own to learn the software and the support tech would email me asking for updates and if I needed any additional help all the way through the trial and licensing of the complete software! This level of support has not been seen in years, please keep it up!

Nachteile:

So far have not been able to find a single con.

Verifizierter Rezensent
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
, 51–200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Good product, needs to be setup properly and will work as expected

4,0 vor 7 Jahren

Kommentare: We improved outlook performance and stability for the end users, during daily business but also reduce service interruptions during maintenance windows. The load master is built as a virtual appliance and we set it up in a cluster, so that it is fully redundant. We are looking into using it also to balance other applications, which Kemp can do as well.

Vorteile:

KEMP have a partnership with Microsoft in order to load balance Exchange which was a great plus for us while selecting the right product since we wanted mainly to loadbalance Exchange for the Outlook client in order to minimize interruptions during maintenance windows or simply to balance connections. The great thing is also that the virtual appliance allows you to load balance your application but without the need of adding hardware to your datacenter. this is a great approach and the technology has proven to work as expected without issues.

Nachteile:

There is a well written administration guide which needs to read extensively before setting up services. This is not a product where complexity is taking away from the administrator. Lots of options, sometimes a matter of try and retry before all works. UI could be improved.

Dalibor
Dalibor
IT System Engineer in Kroatien
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 201–500 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

Load balancer with great features

5,0 vor 6 Jahren

Kommentare: Ever since it run in our production, LoadMaster virtual load balancer is serving us really good and without any hustle. The product is stable, easy to setup and maintain, and is doing it’s job amazingly well.

Vorteile:

Virtual load balancer with great set of features, supports many protocols, stable, intuitive, not too complicated to setup and maintain, competitive price

Nachteile:

Haven’t had any trouble since first day, there are no disadvantages that I am aware of

Antwort von Progress Software

vor 6 Jahren

Thank you Dalibor, we're delighted that LoadMaster is meeting your requirements and that you've had a problem free deployment!

Arpad
Arpad
Team Lead of System Administration team in UK
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 501–1.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

Some experiences

5,0 vor 6 Jahren

Kommentare: We replaced the SLB servers of Cisco hardware with LoadMaster.
This product is better because check not only layer-4, but layer-7.

Vorteile:

I can setup it very easily, but it knows very complicated check too. I'm very satisfied the Support Team, they always helped very quickly and helpfully.

Nachteile:

I can't tell any bad for it, but I have been using it since the end of last year. Till that time we setup simple virtual services.

Antwort von Progress Software

vor 6 Jahren

Thank you very much for your review, Arpad - we're delighted to see that you were able to set it up easily and that it supports your more complex needs too. And thank you for the shout-out to our support team - they'll be thrilled too!

Kent
Owner in USA
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

Had the VLM200 up and running production work in about 30 minutes.

5,0 vor 7 Jahren

Kommentare: Easy to use and affordable loadbalancer with ongoing development and support.

Vorteile:

Very easy to use. Configuration options follow a logical flow. Monitoring options provide useful information.

Nachteile:

Would be nice to have options to sort or search the information on the statistics menu. Was difficult to come up with something I could say is an issue...

Lazaro
Lazaro
Systems Engineer III in USA
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

Loadmaster is a great product. Definitely a pleasure to work with. Very low maintenance.

5,0 vor 7 Jahren

Vorteile:

Cost. Best bang for your buck. Definitely easy to use. Hardware agnostic. Support is very knowledgeable and helpful.

Nachteile:

Lack of features. Product is too locked down. Not a fan of the switch requirements for high availability.

Verifizierter Rezensent
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 11–50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Great product

5,0 vor 6 Jahren

Vorteile:

The LoadMaster is easy to setup, it is almost impossible to make a mistake. And when we have questions we usually get a response within a couple of hours. Very good support.

Nachteile:

They need to work a bit more on the user interface when you have many SSL certificates. The list is unclear, and that bit of the GUI just doesn't work too well. I understand most use cases have only one or two certificates, we have over 30 per virtual host. But they should be able to work on that.

Verifizierter Rezensent
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Telekommunikation, 201–500 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Excellent product and value for money

5,0 vor 6 Jahren

Vorteile:

The user interface is very straight forward and does not need any special knowledge to configure. Also it is very flexible and there are a lot of customization you can do to address most of our needs. In addition the support is immediate and to the point so I consider KEMP as very reliable. I have been using KEMP from 2012 and had no issues whatsoever and all services were 99.99999% up.

Nachteile:

Transparency to the connection is a bit complex to achieve.

Verifizierter Rezensent
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Konsumgüter, 501–1.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

Great load balancer

5,0 vor 6 Jahren

Kommentare: I started using the LoadMaster to replace a Microsoft WAP solution that was publishing Exchange OWA and Lync to the Internet clients. Soon it was replacing other load balancer solutions we were using internally. We also have a lot of network devices using static IP configuration and when we changed our domain controllers, we had to re-configure them all manually, one by one. With LoadMaster, the solution was as simple as creating new virtual DNS services pointing to the new DCs.

Vorteile:

The software is quite easy to setup and configure, thanks to the large number of available templates to download. For more complex situations, Kemp Support Team is there and they're really fast and good at what they do. The free version runs almost all the features of the product and it can be used permanently in a test environment or even in production if there is no need for a large bandwidth. It's also possible to have several interfaces in different networks, so one box can be used in different network segments, keeping the traffic isolated. Working with the LoadMaster is pretty much set it and forget it: once configured, it just runs with no problems.

Nachteile:

It doesn't run well in Hyper-V or at least it didn't when I bought it last year. I really don't like the way logs are presented in the software. A lot of the information in the logs is only meaningful to Kemp Support Team.

Verifizierter Rezensent
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Öl & Energie, 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Does what it needs to do without too many features

4,0 vor 7 Jahren

Kommentare: Cost effective load balancing for clustered applications.

Vorteile:

Reliable. Stable code. Doesn't require much thought once it has been configured. Relatively easy to setup compared to competitors

Nachteile:

Lacking features. Limited logging options. Support is hit and miss. Lags behind competitors features.

Verifizierter Rezensent
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Öffentliche Ordnung, 501–1.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Stable loadmaster

4,0 vor 6 Jahren

Vorteile:

Fast and pretty clear interface. Software is stable as well.

Nachteile:

Some options need a little more explanation and more options and customization on the alerts would be helpful. Like don't send an alert for specific machines or only if it's down for a certain amount of time.

Kent
Business Solutions Programmer in USA
Halbleiter, 51–200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

KEMP is an excellent partner for a first time implementer of a load balancer

5,0 vor 5 Jahren

Kommentare: 2019 was the first time setting up and administrating a load balance for a SharePoint farm. Kemp's professional services, training and assistance made the setup easy. We even had to troubleshoot a connectivity error early in the setup due to us having purchased the wrong type cable and Kemp kept involved until it was correct to our and there standard. License support for 2020 was easy and straight forward which is a pleasant surprise compared to some other companies I have worked with.

Vorteile:

Ease of use of the software and instructions provided are excellent. Kemp's professional service is recommended to download and setup your first template. Also the re license for 2020 was made easy with simple instructions sent out by license renewal team.

Nachteile:

The graphs of analytic data for your load balance data could have more options. It would be nice to be able to add more data types in the graphs and expand the time range.

Antwort von Progress Software

vor 5 Jahren

Thanks so much for your kind review Kent, we're so glad Kemp products are working well for you.

Verifizierter Rezensent
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Halbleiter, 201–500 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

Good product and support

5,0 vor 5 Jahren

Kommentare: The LM-X15 did a good job to balance the traffic to our SharePoint front end servers.

Vorteile:

The pricing of the load balancer and support subscription is affordable for a small-sized company. The LM-X15 meets our need to balance the SharePoint front end servers, and their support rep is knowledgeable.

Nachteile:

The LoadMaster portal is great to use and contains the useful information about our front end servers, but the UI could be improved a little.

Antwort von Progress Software

vor 5 Jahren

Thank you for taking the time to leave us a review, we're delighted the LM-X15 meeting your needs.

Verifizierter Rezensent
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 201–500 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Kemp LoadMaster : best loadblancer for Exchange

5,0 vor 6 Jahren

Kommentare: We used it with Exchange Server since Exchange Server 2007.
A must to have in your Exchange Architecture

Vorteile:

All : easy, efficient Pricing is very low compare to other competitor

Nachteile:

Because I need to fill in this section I just said nothing cons

Lewis
Infrastructure Engineer in UK
Finanzdienstleistungen, 201–500 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

LoadMaster

5,0 vor 6 Jahren

Kommentare: My overall experience has been excellent, our company has been able to move away from Microsoft NLB pretty seamlessly and the support engineers have worked with us to help implement our solution which is less than basic. A functional yet affordable product and also great staff.

Vorteile:

The LoadMaster is easy to implement in a resilient virtual environment. The documentation knowledge base online is very helpful even for advanced deployments. But overall I am most impressed with the level of support, I am always speaking to a knowledgeable engineer who knows how to resolve any issues I encounter. And even if they don't they will continue working with me until we reach a solution together.

Nachteile:

The web UI can be slightly clunky, sometimes you have to manually refresh and even reboot the device specifically when using HA. But if you stick to Chrome the experience it's generally a lot better than other browsers.

Ayssam
Ayssam
Software Engineer in USA
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

best customer support, good online documentation, nice features

5,0 vor 7 Jahren

Vorteile:

- nice features. Kemp supports a lot of protocols. - good online documentation - customer support is awesome

Nachteile:

I think that logging needs to be improved. Now, all logs go to one file. when it is too big, it is hard to use it. There is no log rotation or archiving

Charlie
Systems Administrator in USA
Bildungsmanagement, 501–1.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

LoadMaster VLM - Fantastic Virtual Web Load Balancer

5,0 vor 4 Jahren

Kommentare: We are using it to load balance one of our mission critical apps.

Vorteile:

The ease of use and setup. It's a virtual appliance that you import into VMWare and it installs and works quickly and easily. The setup is simple and once you have it running, it just works.

Nachteile:

The support Web site they have set up for downloading updates is a little janky, and finding and updating the software for the VLM isn't the easiest. Plus the virtual appliance Web management interface doesn't have a log out option.

Verifizierter Rezensent
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Telekommunikation, 11–50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

Kemp has been a great asset to our company and has simplified the load balancing we do.

5,0 vor 7 Jahren

Vorteile:

The best part of the software is that it is intuitive and easy to use. I really enjoy the interface.

Nachteile:

There's really not much I dislike about the product. I have found that all aspects have been very useful.

Verifizierter Rezensent
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Luft- & Raumfahrt, 11–50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

A simple and cost effective load balancer

5,0 vor 6 Jahren

Vorteile:

Kemp Loadmasters are easy to deploy and extremely cost effective, when compared to the bigger players. Purchased the virtual appliances and had them up and running in the environment in a very short amount of time.

Nachteile:

Lacks some of the features of the bigger players, but you expect that for the price.

Antwort von Progress Software

vor 6 Jahren

Thank you very much for the review, we really appreciate your feedback and we are pleased that you found it easy to deploy.

John
System Administrator II in USA
Versicherung, 51–200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Have always had good luck with both Kemp VLMs and KEMP Physical Load Balancers

5,0 vor 7 Jahren

Kommentare: Easy of use, used with exchange server farm to provide continuous service even if a server needs to be taken down for maintenance.

Vorteile:

Easy to set up , secure, and very affordable. With the Kemp templates., workloads can be deployed in very short amounts of time.

Nachteile:

I can't think of any major cons for the Kemp. The only catch would be it would be nice to have integrating with LDAP for Admin users on the box.