Bridgit Field

Wer verwendet Bridgit Field?

Bridgit Field is being used by developer, general contractor, and subcontractor firms across thousands of construction projects in North America.

Was ist Bridgit Field?

Bridgit Field makes construction less complicated from day one with a field-focused solution that simplifies communications and coordination, increases accountability and visibility, and improves quality. Developers, general contractors, and subcontractors across North America use Bridgit Field on over 7,500+ projects to manage and track site inspections, checklists and project milestones, streamline task management and site communication, and unlock real-time data to boost site performance.

Bridgit Field – Details

Bridgit

https://bridgitsolutions.com/

Gegründet 2012

Bridgit Field – Kostenübersicht

Bridgit Field bietet keine Gratisversion und keine kostenlose Testversion.

-thumb
-thumb
-thumb
-thumb

Kostenlose Version

Nein

Gratis Testen

Nein

Einsatz

Cloud, SaaS, Web

Mobile - iOS Native

Mobile - Android Native

Training

Persönlich

Live Online

Webinare

Dokumentation

Kundenbetreuung

Support während der Geschäftszeiten

Online

Bridgit Field Funktionen

  • Bauunternehmer
  • Bestellungen ändern
  • Budgetverfolgung/Auftragskostenrechnung
  • CRM
  • Gerätenachverfolgung
  • Gewerblich
  • Integration in die Buchhaltung
  • Mobiler Zugriff
  • Offline-Zugriff
  • RFI und Vorlagen
  • Schätzung
  • Subunternehmen-Management
  • Vertragsmanagement
  • Vorfall-Berichterstattung
  • Wohngebäude

Siehe die vollständige Bausoftware Liste

  • Barcode-Scanning
  • Berichtsvorlagen
  • Code-Durchführung
  • Kundendatenbank
  • Scanfunktion
  • Subunternehmen-Management
  • Terminverwaltung
  • Tracking fehlgeschlagener Inspektionen
  • Versandmanagement

Siehe die vollständige Inspektionssoftware Liste

  • Aufgabenmanagement
  • Berichten Fotos hinzufügen
  • Dokumentenmanagement
  • Drag-and-Drop
  • Integration von Zeichnungen
  • Kollaboration
  • Kommentare / Notizen
  • Problem-Nachverfolgung
  • Qualitätskontrolle-Checkliste

Siehe die vollständige Mängelprotokoll-Software Liste

Bridgit Field Alternativen

Mehr Alternativen zu Bridgit Field

Bridgit Field – Nutzerbewertungen

Alle Bewertungen lesen

Gesamtbewertung

4,6/5

Durchschnittliche Bewertung

Benutzerfreundlichkeit 4,6
Kundenservice 4,7
Funktionen 4,3
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis 4,2

Software bewerten

Teile deine Erfahrungen mit anderen Softwarekäufern.

Eine Bewertung schreiben
Chantal L.
Bosa Customer Care Concierge
Immobilien, 201-500 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
  • Gesamtbewertung
    5 /5
  • Benutzerfreundlichkeit
    5 /5
  • Eigenschaften & Funktionalitäten
    5 /5
  • Kundenbetreuung
    5 /5
  • Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
    Nicht bewertet
  • Wahrscheinlichkeit der Weiterempfehlung
    10/10
  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 17.6.2019

"Great Punch-List Tool"

Kommentare: Easy to learn and use, the pages are not cluttered and easy to filter through information. Has a reasonable capability to slice and dice data.

Vorteile: Easy to navigate and clean layouts. Can generate reports and send them out anytime.

Nachteile: Can't create CSV reports on the mobile app, but we can on the website. Sometimes too many clicks to go to a location tag.

  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 17.6.2019
Geoff W.
Project Coordinator
Bau, 1.001-5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
  • Gesamtbewertung
    5 /5
  • Benutzerfreundlichkeit
    5 /5
  • Eigenschaften & Funktionalitäten
    4 /5
  • Kundenbetreuung
    5 /5
  • Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
    4 /5
  • Wahrscheinlichkeit der Weiterempfehlung
    9/10
  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 20.6.2017

"It has been a tremendous help, it is very easy to use"

Vorteile: Its quick, its reliable and automated. The learning curve was short and swift for users of all technical abilities. Photos are a big help

Nachteile: You need to establish a clear methodology for use by each project team which can make it complicated. Some items, like paint touch ups, as so frequent that it becomes time consuming to create a new item for each paint mark. If you create one item and list the spots in the description, you cannot close it until all items are complete.
I think there are also some functions that are clunky, like changing users or viewing a list of items in the app. The placement of where you tap to access the lists are not clear to all users, so we have experienced some missed items until they were shown precisely where to tap.
The final downfall, which I think is most important and would take the software to new levels is the adoption of multi-phased deficiencies. Items such as moving a potlight require several users to be informed, yet it would remain "open" on their lists until all parties are finished, OR the first party closes it and the remainder of the trades no longer see it on their lists. Staging it where completion from one trade notifies the next that they need to begin would be a major step forward

Antwort des Softwareanbieters

von Bridgit an 5.7.2017

Hi Geoff,

Thank you for taking the time to review Bridgit Closeout! You've made some great recommendations. Thanks for saying that our product has been a tremendous help on site :)

We've got some good news- we have a solution in the works for our iOS app that will allow you to add a deficiency to multiple locations. There will be some time savings for you with this feature.

As always, if you have any questions about workflows (or Bridgit Closeout in general), your customer coach is always here to help! Feel free to reach out to Danny at dan.mckee@gobridgit.com.

We appreciate you leaving a review!

Thank you,

Daniela

  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 20.6.2017
Paul M.
Manager of Performance Audit and Condo Operations
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
  • Gesamtbewertung
    3 /5
  • Benutzerfreundlichkeit
    2 /5
  • Eigenschaften & Funktionalitäten
    2 /5
  • Kundenbetreuung
    5 /5
  • Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
    3 /5
  • Wahrscheinlichkeit der Weiterempfehlung
    Nicht bewertet
  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 26.6.2017

"For the most part has been OK."

Vorteile: Gathers the PA all in one place.
Easy access.
Good history as it will always be avaliable.
Good customer service. Any questions I have a well answered.

Nachteile: The audits need to coordinated with each other so that the performance audit is in the same numerical order as the Tarion order is in the same numerical order as Closeout.
Need to download the PA pictures to Closeout.
Cannot send messages from underground garages.
Pictures when taken in garages sometimes are not saved.

Antwort des Softwareanbieters

von Bridgit an 4.7.2017

Hi Paul,

Thank you for taking the time to review Bridgit Closeout and mentioning our great customer service! We always want to ensure we are there to help our users.

I'm so sorry to hear that you experienced some difficulties when in low connectivity. Please feel free to reach out to us at support@gobridgit.com if you'd like to speak with someone from our team in person.

Thanks again for leaving a review!

Regards,

Daniela

  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 26.6.2017
Michael L.
Sr. VP, Operations
Bau, 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
  • Gesamtbewertung
    4 /5
  • Benutzerfreundlichkeit
    5 /5
  • Eigenschaften & Funktionalitäten
    5 /5
  • Kundenbetreuung
    4 /5
  • Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
    4 /5
  • Wahrscheinlichkeit der Weiterempfehlung
    8/10
  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 28.8.2020

"Our experience with Bridgit"

Kommentare: Experience has been good. Product has help communicate open QC issues quickly and easily.

Vorteile: More intuitive than PlanGrid for punch.
Roll out support was helpful.

Nachteile: Roll up reporting could be better. Our QC manager spent a lot of time collating information into a monthly report.

  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 28.8.2020
Mike C.
Project Manager
Bau, 501-1.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
  • Gesamtbewertung
    5 /5
  • Benutzerfreundlichkeit
    5 /5
  • Eigenschaften & Funktionalitäten
    4 /5
  • Kundenbetreuung
    Nicht bewertet
  • Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
    Nicht bewertet
  • Wahrscheinlichkeit der Weiterempfehlung
    8/10
  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 31.5.2019

"A very good punch software package"

Vorteile: I have used many other punch management software packages, but none is as straightforward and easy to learn and use. It is intuitive, flexible over multiple platforms, and best of all, Bridget takes care of all the notifications to subs.

Nachteile: There are some functional improvements that can be made to help the ease of use.
1) There needs to be an added approval stage for back punches. After a Sub makes a punch item correction and marks the item "Complete", there needs to be a way for the General Contractor to confirm their acceptance of the correction separate from the Architect/Owner "Approval". This is important because the punch team can be a different person than foreman who is managing the sub's corrections. As a manager, I need to be able to review if a corrected item is acceptable to my team before we conduct the architect's back punch.
2) When using the phone app, there are times when I want to filter by multiple types. For example, if I am walking a sub through a unit, I would like to be able to filter for a specific unit AND for that subcontractor. I can do this on my computer, but not on the mobile app. This needs to be corrected.
3) On the mobile app, a user can copy an item to multiple locations. This feature is not available on the computer version. This should be expanded.
4) When conducting a punch walk in the field, it is best to minimize keystrokes. It would be preferable if the app could be modified so that when a photo is being taken and added to an item that it only take one keystroke and the photo is added. Instead of the current method which requires you press "Take a photo"; then press the photo shutter button; then press "Use photo"; then press "Save" (but I don't want to save).

  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 31.5.2019