Greenhouse

Gute Basis, hat noch Luft nach oben was Usability angeht

Kommentare: Ziemlich umfangreich und kann sicher noch viel mehr als ich gesehen habe als Hiring manager

Vorteile:

Am besten gefällt mir die kollaborativen Ansätze zum gemeinsamen Ausfüllen von Bewertungen vor/nach der Gespräche

Nachteile:

Manchmal kommt man durcheinander wo man welche Notiz mit Tag gelassen hat, weil es einen Funnel gibt und eine gesamte Liste

Happy Greenhouse User

Kommentare: Overall pleased with Greenhouse and think it's a solid ATS.

Vorteile:

I chose to use Greenhouse because it was the tool that made the most sense and aligned closest with the recruiting process I built for Calendly. Their scorecards and stages are similar visual and stage how we approach recruiting perfectly. They have been incredibly innovative recently with their new features and upgrades and I continue to be impressed by the product roadmap.

Nachteile:

I think their reporting is not intuitive and feels clunky. I don't think they have a great visualization into pipeline for non recruiters. So if a hiring manager or executive wants to see how a specific role is progressing I don't think it's easy for them to do or see. There are also a lot of clicks to get somewhere or get back to something.

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen: Lever

Warum Greenhouse gewählt wurde: Hire was not going to a scalable solution and didn't offer the feature set I found critical to successful hiring at Calendly.

Gründe für den Wechsel zu Greenhouse: The approach Greenhouse takes to recruiting process setup is more aligned to the recruiting process I had built for our company.

Amazing tool to simplify recruitment onboarding

Kommentare: Companies that wish to automate their hiring process but don't want to build their own software will find this solution useful. Due to a lack of available workflows and connectors, this is not a good fit for major corporations.

Vorteile:

Greenhouse was utilized for screening applications, taking interview notes, and ranking potential hires. So that we wouldn't repeat ourselves or leave anything out, Greenhouse's fundamental principles were distributed to us in advance and we were tasked with asking about those specific topics during the interviews. The hiring manager then looked over our evaluations that we had submitted.

Nachteile:

Build in a way for interviewees to take notes while using the site, rather than having to do it later. Applying AI to evaluate and rate how well a candidate's resume and cover letter address specific job requirements.

Feature rich ATS with loads of integration options

Vorteile:

I think one of the better ATSs in the market for agencies and recruitment teams, tried several. Greenhouse has one of the most mature tech stack in terms of available integrations. Integrates with sourcing tools like Calendly, HackerRank, HeroHunt.ai and DocuSign.

Nachteile:

What can be improved is the the automation features, it's quite hard to get an automated outreach flow going for instance.

Be prepared to be frustrated

Kommentare: This has been probably my least liked system I've worked with in a long time. I unfortunately cannot recommend it to anyone.

Vorteile:

Being able to schedule emails is probably the only useful thing I've gained from using this system.

Nachteile:

It was extremely difficult for implementation. The support during and after implementation has not been good. It's not set up in a manner where multiple people can be working on the same requisition. It also does not do well with large amount of candidates. Many of the views you have in the system are limited to seeing 10-30 individuals in a list. So if you have more candidates than that, you're adding in many clicks to navigate all your candidates.

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen: Lever

Warum Greenhouse gewählt wurde: Our old system could not do what we needed it to.

Zuvor genutzte Software: BambooHR

Gründe für den Wechsel zu Greenhouse: Past relationships with the owner of Greenhouse.