Wer nutzt diese Software?

M*Modal Fluency for Transcription is used by physicians to convert their spoken word into high quality electronic records.

Durchschnittliche Bewertung

6 Bewertungen
  • Gesamt 3 / 5
  • Benutzerfreundlichkeit 3.5 / 5
  • Kundenservice 3 / 5
  • Funktionen 3.5 / 5
  • Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis 3.5 / 5

Produktdetails

  • Preisinformationen Contact M*Modal for pricing details.
  • Kostenlose Version Nein
  • Einsatz Cloud, SaaS, Web
    Mobile - Android Native

Angaben zum Hersteller

  • M*Modal
  • http://www.mmodal.com

Über M*Modal Fluency for Transcription

Allows physicians to produce more accurate reports using dictation and speech recognition technology.

M*Modal Fluency for Transcription Funktionen

  • Abkürzungserweiterung
  • Anpassbare Makros
  • Archivierung & Aufbewahrung
  • Audiodatei-Management
  • Audioübertragung
  • Sprach-Erkennung
  • Stimmenerfassung
  • Transkription-Berichterstattung
  • Anpassbare Makros
  • Audioaufnahmen
  • Automatische Transkription
  • Mehrsprachig
  • Sprach-Erkennung
  • Spracherkennungsanalyse
  • Verkettete Sprache (Concatenated Speech)

Die hilfreichsten Reviews für M*Modal Fluency for Transcription

Best Voice Recognition on the Market

Bewertet am 14.8.2016
Bryan K.
Radiologist
Krankenhausversorgung & Gesundheitswesen, 2-10 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Quelle des Nutzers 
5/5
Gesamt
4 / 5
Benutzerfreundlichkeit
5 / 5
Eigenschaften & Funktionalitäten
5 / 5
Kundenbetreuung
5 / 5
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Wahrscheinlichkeit der Weiterempfehlung:
Unwahrscheinlich Äußerst wahrscheinlich

Kommentare: M*Modal is the best voice recognition system I have used, and I have tried most of the major ones. The accuracy is a quantum leap better than any of the other major systems.

Vorteile: Accuracy of recognition very high, for me.

Nachteile: Difficult to make pre-canned reports portable between locations.

MModal Physician User Review

Bewertet am 3.10.2019
Scott B.
Physician
Medizinische Praxis, 51-200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Quelle des Nutzers 
1/5
Gesamt
2 / 5
Benutzerfreundlichkeit
1 / 5
Eigenschaften & Funktionalitäten
1 / 5
Kundenbetreuung
1 / 5
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Wahrscheinlichkeit der Weiterempfehlung:
Unwahrscheinlich Äußerst wahrscheinlich

Vorteile: There is truy noting about this software that I like as compared to Dragon.

Nachteile: I have had this system now for approximately one year having previously used Dragon. Initially it seemed superior to Dragon and that is why I decided to purchase MModal. I can now say that it is horrible and that the first generation of Dragon was better. There are multiple typographical errors averaging 1 out of 10 words. Simple names are misspelled noting I do not have an accent. It does not learn. I look forward to using Dragon when I am at the hospital or at home where fortunately I have kept Dragon. Though I will continue to pay for MModal until end of contract, I am going back to Dragon. Their customer service is abysmal noting that they are slow to respond to issues. The latest software upgrade is even worse. I strongly recommend not purchasing this system.

Very nice program. Very easy to use. Nice standalone program.

Bewertet am 16.4.2018
Verifizierter Rezensent
Medical Scribe/Support Staff
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Quelle des Nutzers 
5/5
Gesamt
5 / 5
Benutzerfreundlichkeit
5 / 5
Eigenschaften & Funktionalitäten
5 / 5
Kundenbetreuung
5 / 5
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Wahrscheinlichkeit der Weiterempfehlung:
Unwahrscheinlich Äußerst wahrscheinlich

Vorteile: The convenience and eaes. This program does not crash and is very user friendly, complete with a word expander program.

Nachteile: There are really no cons. Everything is easy to use and find. Maybe a con would be if it came in different colors to type in, but even that is not a con - that would be fun.

very unsatisfied. it drops too many small words, especially the first word of the sentence.

Bewertet am 12.5.2017
Victor T.
Radiologist
Medizinische Praxis, 13-50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Quelle des Nutzers 
2/5
Gesamt
3 / 5
Benutzerfreundlichkeit
3 / 5
Eigenschaften & Funktionalitäten
1 / 5
Kundenbetreuung
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Wahrscheinlichkeit der Weiterempfehlung:
Unwahrscheinlich Äußerst wahrscheinlich

Vorteile: the templates are very helpful once you set them up, and we did not get adequate support for that.

Nachteile: see above. we have been complaining for months and only get lip service. we have to do many addendums because of errors. It often drops the word "No"! Rarely will it get the word "there" so many sentences start with "Is".

Run from this product

Bewertet am 23.10.2015
James M.
Surgeon
Quelle des Nutzers 
2/5
Gesamt
2 / 5
Benutzerfreundlichkeit
Eigenschaften & Funktionalitäten
2 / 5
Kundenbetreuung
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

Kommentare: I am dictating this without corrections. I have been using immotile now for 6 months. The dictionary is pathetic. It still can not get my name right despite teaching on multiple occasions. It does not have the ability to dictate a single word i.e. name without having to put it into their dictionary and teaching it is pronunciation. When you have names that are pronounced several different ways you can see water problem that would create. Prior to using M*Modal international unit Strachan for over 2-1/2 years. Using M*Modal clearly adds 30-40% more time to my chart completion which means less revenue or less family time. Immotile just cannot of chapter 11. Date of 0 770,000,000 dollars over the next 5 years. They have now teamed up with Athena, our current DHR. I guess to wrong was really do not make a right. As you can see, the system leaves a lot to your imagination when you try to read it's transcription.

Lies weitere Bewertungen