Wir helfen Unternehmen in Deutschland
seit 15 Jahren bei der Softwareauswahl

Was ist ModMed?

EMA von Modernizing Medicine ist ein fachspezifisches EHR-System für Dermatologie, Augenheilkunde, Orthopädie, HNO-Heilkunde, plastische Chirurgie, Schmerztherapie und Urologie und eignet sich für eine beliebige Anzahl von Anbieter*innen und Mitarbeiter*innen. Zu den wichtigsten Funktionen gehören: von praktizierenden Ärzt*innen entwickelt, native iPad-Anwendungen, cloudbasiertes adaptives Lernen, automatisierte Notizen und Rechnungen, MIPS- und MACRA-Funktionalität und vieles mehr. Eine vollständige Suite integrierter Lösungen ist ebenfalls verfügbar.

Wer verwendet ModMed?

Praxen für Dermatologie, Augenheilkunde, Orthopädie, plastische Chirurgie, HNO-Heilkunde, Urologie und Schmerztherapie.

ModMed Software - 1
ModMed Software - 2
ModMed Software - 3
ModMed Software - 4
ModMed Software - 5

Du bist nicht sicher, ob ModMed das Richtige ist? Mit einer beliebten Alternative vergleichen

ModMed

ModMed

4,3 (165)
Keine Preise gefunden
Kostenlose Version
Kostenlose Testversion
83
Keine Integrationen gefunden
4,2 (165)
3,7 (165)
4,1 (165)
VS.
Startpreis
Preisoptionen
Funktionen
Integrationen
Benutzerfreundlichkeit
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Kundenservice
149,00 $
Monat
Kostenlose Version
Kostenlose Testversion
71
1
3,9 (422)
3,8 (422)
3,2 (422)

Weitere gute Alternativen zu ModMed

Practice Fusion
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Diagramm-Erstellung
Elektronische Rezepte
HIPAA konform
Allscripts Professional EHR
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Compliance-Verfolgung
Diagramm-Erstellung
Terminplanung
myCare Integrity
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Für dieses Produkt wurden noch keine Funktionen durch Nutzer bewertet.
NextGen Office
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Abrechnung & Rechnungsstellung
Reklamationsabwicklung
Verwaltung von Patientenakten
myCare iMedicWare
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Diagramm-Erstellung
Dokumentenmanagement
HIPAA konform
Nextech EHR & PM
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
HIPAA konform
Patienten-Terminplanung
Verwaltung von Patientenakten
Tebra
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
HIPAA konform
Terminplanung
Verwaltung von Patientenakten
Intergy
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Code- & Gebühreneintrag
Schadensprüfung
Verwaltung von Patientenakten
Prime Suite
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Diagramm-Erstellung
Verwaltung von Patientenakten
Übungs-Management

Bewertungen über ModMed

Durchschnittliche Bewertung

Gesamt
4,3
Benutzerfreundlichkeit
4,2
Kundenservice
4,1
Funktionen
4,1
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
3,7

Nutzerbewertungen nach Unternehmensgröße (Angestellte)

  • <50
  • 51-200
  • 201-1.000
  • >1.001

Bewertungen nach Punktzahl finden

5
56%
4
24%
3
10%
2
3%
1
7%
Tom
Tom
CEO in USA
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

An EMR that puts the physician and patient first

5,0 vor 6 Jahren

Vorteile:

Specialty-specific EMR built that is easy to use and intuitive. Assists with proper ICD-10 coding and use of modifiers. Additional modules for Pathology, Practice Management/Billing, Telemedicine, and MIPS reporting are available as integrated features. A proactive and responsive company that takes provider issues and input seriously.

Nachteile:

The system is designed around an optimal workflow. As with any EMR, office workflows will need to be updated in order to align with the system's capabilities.

Antwort von Modernizing Medicine

vor 6 Jahren

Tom, thank you for taking the time to share your review and for your continued support! -Alex B., Marketing

Trent
Practice Administrator in USA
Medizinische Praxis, 51–200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

EMA saves time and makes money

5,0 vor 2 Monaten Neu

Vorteile:

The intuitiveness of documentation for providers allows them to not spend as much time on the burdensome of documentation. This allows providers to focus on patient-care instead of administrative work.

Nachteile:

Sometimes, the rigidness of ModMed requires us to change our workflows instead of changing ModMed to integrate into our workflows.

Antwort von Modernizing Medicine

vor 2 Monaten

We value your feedback, Trent! Thank you for taking the time to leave us a review.

Thu
Ophthalmologist in USA
Medizinische Praxis, 11–50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

The most inefficient EMR I have used in 15 years

1,0 vor 5 Monaten

Kommentare: I spend hours every night/weekend charting because of the inefficiency of the program. The support is horrible/nonexistent. Lots of bugs, unannounced updates. It ruins my quality of life.

Vorteile:

It’s easy on the eyes, looks pretty. It’s easy to use for staff who are not tech savvy.

Nachteile:

So so inefficient. Constant scrolling, switching between screens. Unable to upload prescription details. Doesn’t update history automatically. Frequently crashes.

Antwort von Modernizing Medicine

vor 5 Monaten

Thank you for bringing this to our attention. We're sorry to learn about your experience. We are always looking to improve our product experience and your feedback is helpful.

Bracken
Practice Manager in USA
Krankenhausversorgung & Gesundheitswesen, 11–50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 1-5 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung
Quelle: SoftwareAdvice

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

Support completely falls off a cliff after implementation

5,0 vor 4 Monaten

Kommentare: Implementation was overall smooth and painless with one exception. They did not ask or understand the Nevada can't prescribe controlled substances on paper and thus didn't do anything for e-prescribing of controls until I brought it up a couple weeks before go live that I didn't see access for our provider. Had great trainers that showed us how to use the software and answered our questions. For clinical questions I haven't had any issues. We have several contacts and they respond to us quickly for support. If it has anything to do with billing or coding, it is an absolute nightmare to get support from someone on a phone or email. They did not setup our virtual card payment drive and we are still waiting for them to give us a folder for this. I was told this was done 07/07/23 and it still has not been completed. I have never had any issues with getting help on basic coding and payment issues until moving to BOOST (billing service). We will be taking a hard look at renewal time if we want to keep this service. I'm sure ModMed is going to reply to this post, so if you want to keep earning our business, you need to step it up.

Vorteile:

Great features. Intuitive system. Great clinical support (several contacts to get immediate help). Learns from previous encounters.

Nachteile:

BOOST support (billing service). You cannot get someone on the phone or email to answer basic billing questions or setup basic admin billing access for your account.

Antwort von Modernizing Medicine

vor 4 Monaten

We always aim to deliver a great experience and are sorry to hear in this situation we missed the mark. Thank you for taking the time to bring this to our attention.

Theressa
Theressa
Practice Administrator in USA
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Gesundheit, Wellness & Fitness, 11–50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 1-5 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung
Quelle: GetApp

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

Great product but tricked us into paying $28K extra

5,0 vor 8 Monaten

Kommentare: I am having to pay $28K out of my pocket as a result of their verbiage "billing commencement date 120 days from contract date". They are so busy adding new clients on they don't have time to push your training so the long/ short is you have to start paying before they implement. I see no reason why we would be charged for software, patient reminders, efax, coding assistance, prescription writing capabilities, or patient surveys when we literally had zero access to it. I can understand charging a fee for the "sandbox" but we still had no access to the actual software functionality.

Vorteile:

We love the actual product. Cloud based services are great when you're coming from a local server/ remote situation.

Nachteile:

Software support has been great but it took somewhere around 6 weeks to get a response from the billing team (handles billing us, the client). The initial contract did not show any of the ancillary items that we very specifically asked about except efax. They also do not include tax on the contract so when budgeting/ making financial decisions to switch this is a bit misleading. We were lead to believe that everything that we could possibly be charged for was included. This was not the case.