eClinicalWorks PM

eClinicalWorks PM

von eClinicalWorks

Wer verwendet eClinicalWorks PM?

Das Unternehmen bieten innovative, anpassbare Lösungen für jedes Umfeld, einschließlich Grundversorgungsstellen, ambulanter Chirurgie-Zentren, Gesundheitszentren, Krankenhäusern und mobiler Kliniken sowie mehr als 50 Fachrichtungen.

Was ist eClinicalWorks PM?

eClinicalWorks ist ein führendes Privatunternehmen im Gesundheitswesen, das umfassende elektronische Patientendatensysteme (EHR) und Praxismanagement-(PM-)Lösungen bietet, die von mehr als 850.000 Anbietern in mehr als 20 Ländern eingesetzt werden.

eClinicalWorks PM – Details

eClinicalWorks

http://www.eclinicalworks.com

Gegründet 1999

eClinicalWorks PM – Preisübersicht

eClinicalWorks PM ist verfügbar ab 499,00 $/Monat. eClinicalWorks PM bietet keine Gratisversion und keine kostenlose Testversion. Weitere Preisinformationen für eClinicalWorks PM findest du unten.

Spotlight_media_placeholder

Startpreis

499,00 $/Monat

Kostenlose Version

Nein

Gratis Testen

Nein

Einsatz

Cloud, SaaS, Web

Training

Persönlich

Live Online

Webinare

Dokumentation

Kundenbetreuung

24/7 (Live Vertreter)

eClinicalWorks PM Funktionen

Praxissoftware & Arztsoftware
EMR / EHR (elektronische / medizinische Gesundheitsberichte)
Elektronische Rezepte
HIPAA konform
Inventarverwaltung
Medizinische Terminplanung
Mehrere Büros
Mehrere Ärzte
Patienten-Terminplanung
Patientenabrechnung
Patientenakten
Patientenportal
Patientenregistrierung
Reklamationsabwicklung
Überprüfung der Versicherungsberechtigung

eClinicalWorks PM – Nutzerbewertungen

Zeigt 5 von 291 Nutzerbewertungen

Gesamt
3.4/5
Benutzerfreundlichkeit
3.3/5
Kundenservice
2.9/5
Funktionen
3.4/5
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
3/5
Knott C.
Cardiovascular Research Supervisor
Krankenhausversorgung & Gesundheitswesen, 5.001-10.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
  • Overall Rating
    5/5
  • Benutzerfreundlichkeit
    5/5
  • Eigenschaften & Funktionalitäten
    5/5
  • Kundenbetreuung
    Unrated
  • Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
    Unrated
  • Likelihood to Recommend
    9/10
  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 15.10.2019

"eClinicalWorks is my personal favorite eMR for medical practices"

Kommentare: This is a much less cumbersome software than that used in other offices.

Vorteile: I like the search patient feature - if two patients have the same or similar names, it alerts you. It would be easy to click on the wrong patient in error. All the chart documents are organized intuitively so it is very easy to find a specific document you are looking for. Also, as soon as you pull up the patient, it shows the date of the last visit and date of the next upcoming visit. Also, printing is smooth and no trouble to set up.

Nachteile: The progress notes are semi-prepopulated, which could lead to information getting into the note that you did not intend to.

  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 15.10.2019
Jason A.
Director Business Operations
Gesundheit, Wellness & Fitness, 13-50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
  • Overall Rating
    4/5
  • Benutzerfreundlichkeit
    3/5
  • Eigenschaften & Funktionalitäten
    4/5
  • Kundenbetreuung
    3/5
  • Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
    4/5
  • Likelihood to Recommend
    7/10
  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 4.9.2018

"It gets the job done"

Kommentare: It gets the job done for us and it probably just like most other EMRs they all have issues but at the end of the day they allow you to record your notes and bill the insurance.

Vorteile: ECW can get most of what you want done. I work mainly on the reporting side and staff support. The ability to pull reports is pretty good with their EBO system. We get almost everything we need reporting wise from that system whether it’s financial or encounter data. Their support is pretty responsive usually calling back the same day in most cases. Their billin service is pretty good and is very reasonable. Our company pays about 8% totally cost with ECW which is pretty much the industry standard.

Nachteile: There are sometimes a lot of clicks with ECW. Anytime you do an upgrade something is not going to work which is very frustrating. If you are a CPC practice you will be frustrated as their reporting dashboard took until the middle of 2018 to start working and then we upgraded and now we are waiting on a patch to get the dashboard back up. Don’t expect to speak to anyone that’s first language is English when you call support. We started with ECW in late 2015 and we had to setup everything from scratch which we thought was really strange as they have so many practices you would think there would already be templates for almost everything.

  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 4.9.2018
Morgan K.
Scheduling/Authorization Team Lead
Medizinische Praxis, 501-1.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
  • Overall Rating
    4/5
  • Benutzerfreundlichkeit
    3/5
  • Eigenschaften & Funktionalitäten
    3/5
  • Kundenbetreuung
    3/5
  • Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
    3/5
  • Likelihood to Recommend
    6/10
  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 10.1.2020

"ECW Review"

Vorteile: I Like that this software is web based as well as desktop, so it can be accessed anywhere.

Nachteile: What I like least about the software is that there aren’t a lot of places to keep generalized notes in the patient account.

  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 10.1.2020
Bryan R.
COO
Gesundheit, Wellness & Fitness, 51-200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
  • Overall Rating
    4/5
  • Benutzerfreundlichkeit
    3/5
  • Eigenschaften & Funktionalitäten
    4/5
  • Kundenbetreuung
    3/5
  • Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
    3/5
  • Likelihood to Recommend
    7/10
  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 6.12.2019

"Practical and Cumbersome"

Vorteile: eclinicalworks has stayed ahead of the curve in features and vision on multi-platform EMR. They've stayed adaptable to changing interoperability environment. The clinician for very competitive costs can garnish high access to medical home model and progressive kiosk and outreach modalities.

Nachteile: Lots of clicks, lots of bugs, have to fight to get senior resources to get things corrected. Slow QA turn around for fixes. Lacks patient portal where you can exchange files. Silo development model increasing bug potential, though they finally decades later are looking at Usability so we're hopeful.

  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 6.12.2019
Andrew N.
System Administrator
Krankenhausversorgung & Gesundheitswesen, 13-50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
  • Overall Rating
    3/5
  • Benutzerfreundlichkeit
    1/5
  • Eigenschaften & Funktionalitäten
    3/5
  • Kundenbetreuung
    1/5
  • Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
    4/5
  • Likelihood to Recommend
    3/10
  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 7.10.2019

"Sufficient but lackluster"

Kommentare: After using the product for 10 years our practice had learned to master the inefficient workarounds to where they have become 2nd nature. Unfortunately, recent server stability issues forced us to look for a new solution. Our hosted platform was eventually upgraded/moved to a more stable server farm however it was too late and the process to replace the software had already began. We eventually migrated to a new solution.

Vorteile: The price? As far as bargain EHRs goes, this is probably front runner, but the industry is lacking in innovation and functionality and this product is no different. Where you save money up front you pay for it by having a lack of features and seemless easy to use workflows. We constantly had to create nonsensical workarounds to achieve an acceptable workflow that was less painful for the providers but made it 10 times more difficult for the staff.

Nachteile: As a provider, you grade how easy an EHR is to use based on the number of clicks. As an IT professional you are able to assess a software's efficiency based on numerous other metrics. As the later, I can say by far the worst aspect is the number of clicks. With no redeeming qualities to speak having to drill down 5 or 6 menus to get to a patient's documents or financials and then be forced to back all the way out before checking on a 2nd patient's info is maddening. User's are forced to keep 2 instances open so as to not be forced to close a patient's demos/chart if they have to take a call and open a new patient's chart. This of course is explicitly denounced by eCW as forbidden. We do it anyway ... it's the only way.

  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 7.10.2019