von ARES Project Management

4 / 5 10 Bewertungen

Wer nutzt diese Software?

ARES PRISM is a project lifecycle management solution designed for companies across all industries who need to bring in their projects on time and within budget.

Durchschnittliche Bewertung

10 Bewertungen
  • Gesamt 4 / 5
  • Benutzerfreundlichkeit 4 / 5
  • Kundenservice 4.5 / 5
  • Funktionen 4 / 5
  • Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis 4.5 / 5


  • Kostenlose Version Nein
  • Kostenlose Testversion Ja
  • Einsatz Installiert - Windows
  • Training Persönlich
    Live Online
  • Kundenbetreuung Support währen der Geschäftszeiten

Angaben zum Hersteller

  • ARES Project Management
  • Gegründet 1992


ARES PRISM is an enterprise project lifecycle management software solution that supports the planning, execution, and completion of capital projects for dependable forecasts, cost control, and performance measurement. Integrate and standardize management processes with PRISM modules for Estimating, Cost Management, Engineering Management, Procurement, Contracts, Field Management, and Dashboards.

ARES PRISM Funktionen

  • Angebote / Schätzungen
  • Arbeitsauftragsverwaltung
  • Bestell-Management
  • Bestellungen ändern
  • Kostenplanung und Prognosen
  • Material-Rechnung
  • Produktionskosten-Nachverfolgung
  • Rechnungsmanagement
  • Verfolgung der Kosten bis zur Fertigstellung
  • Verfolgung des Prozentsatzes bis zur Fertigstellung
  • Zeitverfolgung
  • Überschuss-Berichterstattung
  • Agile Methodiken
  • Anpassbare Vorlagen
  • Budgetmanagement
  • Gantt-Diagramme
  • Ideenmanagement
  • Kanban-Tafel
  • Kundenportal
  • Meilensteinverfolgung
  • Portfoliomanagement
  • Ressourcenmanagement
  • Traditionelle Methodiken
  • Verfolgung der Kosten bis zur Fertigstellung
  • Zeit & Kosten Verfolgung

Die hilfreichsten Reviews für ARES PRISM

Great cost control software with instant budget and schedule integration

Mit Google übersetzen Bewertet am 29.9.2017
Brian C.
Sr. Staff Project Services Analyst
Öl & Energie, 5.001-10.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Quelle des Nutzers 
4 / 5
4 / 5
Eigenschaften & Funktionalitäten
4 / 5
5 / 5
Wahrscheinlichkeit der Weiterempfehlung:
Unwahrscheinlich Äußerst wahrscheinlich

Kommentare: There are many benefits to using the software. I like the enterprise reporting capability where multiple cost engineers can be managing projects in the system and that data can be combined at the program level. As a cost engineer, financial analyst, or project manager, there are few tools that can match G2 out of the box. There are definitely some competitors who offer products that can be tailored more to a specific business, but the amount of time and money that is required for the customization is very expensive. G2 is great for anyone who is converting from spreadsheets to a more structured platform.

Vorteile: The things I like most about G2 is that it is ready to go out of the box. G2 provides enough structure for you to start using it immediately, but also offers the ability to customize to many different business needs. G2 can be used at a project or program level to manage projects from a few million to several billion dollars. Some other benefits are that you can quickly setup the software to integrate with SAP, load actuals, and see your EAC quickly in both tabular and graphical form. You can select your physical progress method to obtain both calculated and independent EAC's. Integrating the software with Primavera is also very easy by creating a cross-reference utilizing G2's built in utilities. The same can be done to map your estimate to control accounts so that you have a common element at the level which the project is managed. There are a good amount of standard reports are available and the system also has a report writer available. When starting a new project, I immediately go to G2. I like the fact that reporting periods are locked down once closed out and forecasts can be obtained easily. The system also allows you to process accruals in a couple of different ways and allows the tracking of both actuals and incurred. Great software that I will continue to use for many years!

Nachteile: There are a good amount of standard reports available, but if using the report writer, some time is required to learn.

I have had experience with the PRISM software products since 1996, my level is expert.

Mit Google übersetzen Bewertet am 26.9.2017
Chris D.
Vice President
Bau, 51-200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Quelle des Nutzers 
4 / 5
5 / 5
Eigenschaften & Funktionalitäten
4 / 5
5 / 5
Wahrscheinlichkeit der Weiterempfehlung:
Unwahrscheinlich Äußerst wahrscheinlich

Kommentare: Reduced effort in managing the monthly reporting process, reduced duplicate work, reduced effort spent finding mistakes in the multiple systems we used. ROI was realized quickly. Baseline can be established quickly allowing the monthly reporting and trending processes to begin sooner in the project cycle. Ability to establish a baseline while the other systems (schedule & estimate) are being fine tuned. The change management features save time on the project and allow changes to be incorporated very quickly!

Vorteile: It's ready to go on Day 1, you can actually load data and start configuration immediately and develop a PMB very quickly. I've used on Mining, O&G, Energy, Land Development, Rail, Airports, Government EVMS required projects, and even IT projects and PRISM has always met my program' / projects' needs. If there is a gap, the ARES team works to understand the requirement and close the gap. The ROI was quick as the implementation and training cost were fare less than other tools on the market. The system has many reports to analyze a programs performance if tracking unit rates, quantities or just contract and subcontract values. It's easy to get data into and out of the system and doesn't require complex work flows.

Nachteile: The on-screen analytics can be improved. All analytics run through reports or from the Dashboard system. It has taken us a long time to get service packs to fix technical issues in the past. It's seems to be getting better. Most issues were addressed with simple work-a-rounds luckily.

Lies weitere Bewertungen