Wir helfen Unternehmen seit 17 Jahren,
bessere Software zu finden
Foothold
Was ist Foothold?
Elektronische Dokumentationssoftware für Anbieter von I/DD und Verhaltensgesundheit. Die Software bietet Fallmanagement, Kundenverfolgung und ein elektronisches Patientendatensystem (EHR) unter einem Dach – mit spezifischer Funktionalität für die Bedürfnisse von I/DD-Agenturen.
AWARDS ist HIPAA-konform, vom Bund als EHR für sinnvolle Nutzung zertifiziert und bietet volle Interoperabilität beim Navigieren durch die neue Landschaft der Pflegekoordination und wertebasierten Pflege.
Wer verwendet Foothold?
Die Software ist ideal für I/DD-Agenturen, insbesondere für solche, die mehrere Programme anbieten, die menschliche Dienstleistungen wie psychische Gesundheit, Störungen des Substanzkonsums, Wohnen und Beschäftigung umfassen.
Du bist nicht sicher, ob Foothold das Richtige ist?
Mit einer beliebten Alternative vergleichen
Foothold
Weitere gute Alternativen zu Foothold
Bewertungen über Foothold
Why Foothold is a great Electronic Health Record!
Kommentare: As I noted above, it is the best EHR we have ever used. It is very easy to use, the programers and staff that answer the tickets are great. Foothold staff actually really listen to their Users, the monthly meeting is well attended and very much appreciated. Also, when they push new things out, they do a great job of having various training materials for users. The trainers are also great and set-up with Foothold staff goes incredibly smoothly. (always have to do a shout out to [sensitive content hidden] they are great!). [sensitive content hidden] are also.
Vorteile:
The ease of making reports, any information that goes into Foothold, you can report out on. The Form Builder and Plan Builder is so easy to use and the scheduling with the Charting Timetable is fantastic. It is a very intuitive EHR.
Nachteile:
Would like that all forms notify the signers that they have something to sign. Really looking forward to a portal for the people supported so guardians can sign there and would just like a tweak to the progress notes so you could check off a goal and then have a textbox directly under it so staff can note how they assisted them and then go on to the next goal. But this is the best EHR we have ever used.
In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:
Just my thoughts?
Kommentare: it has for the most part been a good experience. I love the flexibility to use what we have. I would like to have more flexibility in how we work with consumers.
Vorteile:
flexibility to use the form builders and the reporting. I can create anything I need and get data out of the system easily.
Nachteile:
It does not integrate well with Dr's First and Carasolva, or maybe they don't play well together? Also the product needs a patient portal to push forms to clients collect payments and send appointment reminders.
Knowledge of Implementation Staff for Billing
Kommentare: Not Good. In the less than a year that I have been working with Foothold I have had multiple issues with the billing builder with very little explaination. The trainer I had knew very little about the software. I learned more on my own and with the use of the help section in the software than what I learned from the trainer. Everything in the billing builder is outdated and manual. Not what I expected from a modern EHR/Billing system.
Vorteile:
The multiple reports to choose from for different data points.
Nachteile:
The Billing Builder Setup, so time consuming and outdated.
In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:
Internal Roster
Kommentare: Our experience utilizing Foothold has been satisfactory as Foothold provides the needed capacities for us to do our work with patients and generate required reports.
Vorteile:
AWARDS (Foothold Technology) was our company EHR at some point, but then RMA became our EHR. We use AWARDS for our department to serve as an internal roster system and to provide e-consent values to the Bronx RHIO and Healthix.
Nachteile:
No cons noted using Foothold Techonology.
In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:
RADIUS_Foothold
Kommentare: It has been easy to implement with great guides and support.
Vorteile:
How user friendly and easy to learn it is.
Nachteile:
the white space when creating documents that it takes up and make documents significantly long.
