Wir helfen Unternehmen in Deutschland
seit 15 Jahren bei der Softwareauswahl

Was ist Trakstar Learn?

Wer braucht ein Klassenzimmer, wenn die Ausbildung überall stattfinden kann? Die cloudbasierte E-Learning-Plattform von Mindflash bietet eine einfache, intuitive Schulungslösung für Angestellte, die von zu Hause aus, im Büro oder im Außendienst arbeiten. Die Software erleichtert Führungskräften, Kunden, Auftragnehmern, ihren Angestellten und anderen wichtigen Erfolgspartnern durch dynamische Schulungen, die online verfügbar sind, die Arbeit.

Wer verwendet Trakstar Learn?

Mindflash ist eine hervorragende Lösung für die Schulung von Kunden, Partnern, Wiederverkäufern oder Angestellten. Über 1.000 Unternehmen, darunter Apple, Microsoft, Uber, Dyson und PBS, vertrauen auf Mindflash.

Trakstar Learn Software - 1
Trakstar Learn Software - 2
Trakstar Learn Software - 3
Trakstar Learn Software - 4
Trakstar Learn Software - 5

Du bist nicht sicher, ob Trakstar Learn das Richtige ist? Mit einer beliebten Alternative vergleichen

Trakstar Learn

Trakstar Learn

4,2 (105)
4.599,00 $
Jahr
Kostenlose Version
Kostenlose Testversion
46
12
4,2 (105)
4,0 (105)
4,4 (105)
VS.
Startpreis
Preisoptionen
Funktionen
Integrationen
Benutzerfreundlichkeit
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Kundenservice
Keine Preise gefunden
Kostenlose Version
Kostenlose Testversion
123
30
4,5 (241)
4,4 (241)
4,5 (241)
Die grünen Bewertungsbalken geben an, welches Produkt gemessen an der Durchschnittsbewertung und der Zahl der Bewertungen am besten abschneidet.

Weitere gute Alternativen zu Trakstar Learn

Absorb LMS
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Kursverwaltung
Lernmanagement
Portal für Lernende
SkyPrep
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Kursverwaltung
Lernmanagement
Portal für Lernende
LearnWorlds
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Berichterstattung / Analyse
Beurteilung-Management
Lernpfade/-verläufe
Eurekos
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Kurs-Tracking
Kursverwaltung
Portal für Lernende
Tovuti
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Gemischtes Lernen
Kurs-Tracking
Kursverwaltung
Teachlr Organizations
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Kursverwaltung
Portal für Lernende
Tests/Bewertungen
LearnUpon
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Kursverwaltung
Portal für Lernende
Tests/Bewertungen
Thought Industries
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Asynchrones Lernen
Kursverwaltung
Portal für Lernende
Intellum Platform
Am besten bewertete Funktionen
Asynchrones Lernen
Kurs-Tracking
Kursverwaltung

Bewertungen über Trakstar Learn

Durchschnittliche Bewertung

Gesamt
4,2
Benutzerfreundlichkeit
4,2
Kundenservice
4,4
Funktionen
3,7
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
4,0

Nutzerbewertungen nach Unternehmensgröße (Angestellte)

  • <50
  • 51-200
  • 201-1.000
  • >1.001

Bewertungen nach Punktzahl finden

5
46%
4
40%
3
9%
2
3%
1
3%
Ken
Ken
Education Specialist in
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Internet, 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung
Quelle: GetApp

Great LMS and Customer Support

5,0 vor 8 Jahren

Kommentare: We've been using Mindflash for over a year now and their product and support is top-notch. Improvements are made seamlessly and when there is a problem, customer support is prompt in responding. The interface is easy to use and intuitive. We've been able to launch and grow our eLearning product over the past year with ease and our customers are happy with the functionality and ability to access our courses from anywhere. I'm looking for more improvement on the reporting side and managing users is getting better. I like the ability to create a quiz and an evaluation within the product.

Vorteile:

Ease of use. Great Customer Support. Intuitive for users. Easy to create a course, series and catalog as well as upload content. Great flexibility and choice when it comes to creating a quiz and an evaluation. I like that you can integrate with Shopify for monetizing class offerings.

Nachteile:

Advanced reports could be better. I would like to see more ability and ease of creating customer fields. Would like to see a live environment to produce and conduct virtual learning.

Ron
Dir Channel Support Programs in USA
Maschinenbau oder Wirtschaftsingenieurwesen, 11–50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung
Quelle: SoftwareAdvice

Mindflash is a Solid but Basic LMS Performer

4,0 vor 6 Jahren

Kommentare: Even with the cons, I’d rate Mindflash a solid performer. You can quickly provide trainees a personalized dashboard. The content and user management interfaces are easy to use. The quiz options beat most of the platforms we’ve looked at. The platform provides basic LMS features at a very reasonable price. We’ve not had any showstoppers and our content library continues to grow. I’d recommend Mindflash as a solid but basic LMS for learners and administrators.

Vorteile:

Before I review this product, it’s important to note that there is a new version of the product available. We’re currently waiting in line to be converted. However, I don’t think many of these items I’m about to mention will change for us. I’ll mention it where it matters. Mindflash is an easy to use LMS. We brought up a partner training program within a few months. It’s a snap to bring up a trainee dashboard. Just add a little custom text, upload a graphic, and your good to go. The testing features are very good; true/false, multiple choice, multiple correct, label picture areas, label matching, and ordering of steps. The testing features will be even better in the new release. You can easily upload most content types and rearrange the sequence as needed. You can record audio right in the platform. There is reasonable Salesforce integration capability so, invitations and basic reporting can be done right in Salesforce. Administrators can easily flip back and forth between the admin and trainee views. The platform supports courses, series, and catalogs. There is a good set of options when building filters for viewing users or content. You can easily copy and modify course profiles and content. The in-platform reporting in our version of the LMS is abysmal. However, from what I’ve seen in the new version, reporting has some very big improvements.

Nachteile:

Mindflash is best for large enterprises where you can take advantage of higher level subscription plans that have all the features. Since they segment their levels by feature (and not number of seats), we’re missing what I would consider to be basic functionality. We are currently on a legacy plan named Advanced. We can’t modify existing text in invite and reminder emails, we can only add text. We can’t remove the large Mindflash logo from the emails. We can’t customize the certificates for completion of courses and the quality of the existing certificate options is poor. If you need to automate the reminder emails, there is only three interval options, three days, seven days, and fourteen days (you pick one). While it’s easy to launch a trainee dashboard, the layout is not what I’d call a rich UI experience. It’s basic. The mobile options are limited. This is an app for tablets but nothing for phones. You can’t provide a fully public link to a course. The trainee must set up an account to view the content. If you use the public course feature, the system will not synchronize with the Salesforce objects for that trainee. To force the synchronization, you must send an invite to the trainee from Salesforce after they have already started or taken the course, which can cause confusion.

Nicole
Training Coordinator in USA
Philanthropie, 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung
Quelle: SoftwareAdvice

Okay system, but lacks in many areas where other LMS are ahead of the game.

3,0 vor 5 Jahren

Vorteile:

I liked uploading my excel spreadsheets to the system and having mass invites and reminders sent to users.

Nachteile:

There were several things I did not enjoy about this system. The reporting was off when we would run reports on the same things on different days. I also did not like the lack of drop-down options for our users, which made reporting demographics difficult. Above all, it was not a user-friendly system for our users. Many were confused and had difficulties logging in and completing the training. This was the ultimate deal-breaker after being with Mindflash as an organization for just over 3 years.

Megan
Megan
Director of Programs in
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Non-Profit-Organisation Management, 11–50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung
Quelle: GetApp

Online Training for Nonprofit Employees and Volunteers

4,0 vor 8 Jahren

Kommentare: Annually Sierra Service Project trains over 200 adult volunteers and 45 young adult staff members through Mindflash. We use Mindflash for two months a year intensively.

Vorteile:

Very easy to upload videos, PDF and Power Point files. Very easy to rearrange content, add quizzes, surveys and course/series requirements.

Nachteile:

No spell check in quiz sections. Content can be slow to load for users with not excellent internet connection. Wish there was a better method for keeping an account instead of deleting and recreating each year without paying a monthly rate. Ability to make account "inactive" but not accessible for in between time.

Jason
Jason
Training Manager in
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Versicherung, 501–1.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung
Quelle: GetApp

Mindflash LMS

4,0 vor 8 Jahren

Kommentare: Our business relies on a national network of damage appraisers. Remote training is difficult and costly at times, therefore we were needing a way to successfully train close to 1000 people at the same time, spread across the entire U.S. Mindflash has given us the flexibility to train them all without pulling them off the road during the day for live webinars.

Vorteile:

Mindflash helps to keep the training more focused. With the ability to assign training to individuals, or entire regions with a few clicks of a mouse is great. The Mindflash reporting capabilities are very good and easy to use.

Nachteile:

The tiered pricing structure is frustrating at times. We sometimes need to add more users, but we don't need more features. We end up paying for additional features that we never use. If we need to add one more person above our current tier limit, we have to go to a completely new level and price structure rather than just pay to add a user.