--- description: Detaillierte Informationen über Trail Blazer Non-Profit Manager zu Benutzerfreundlichkeit, Funktionen, Kosten, Vor- und Nachteilen aus verifizierten Nutzer-Erfahrungen. Lies Ratings & Bewertungen und entdecke ähnliche Tools. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Trail Blazer Non-Profit Manager Erfahrungen, Vor- und Nachteile – Capterra Deutschland 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Startseite](/) > [Fundraising-Software (Spendensoftware)](/directory/20047/fundraising/software) > [Trail Blazer Non-Profit Manager](/software/101648/trail-blazer) # Trail Blazer Non-Profit Manager Canonical: https://www.capterra.com.de/software/101648/trail-blazer Page: 1 / 4\ Weiter: [Next page](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/101648/trail-blazer?page=2) > Trail Blazer bietet leistungsstarke, optimierte und integrierte Spendermanagementlösungen und -tools, mit denen du deine gemeinnützigen Organisationen kultivieren und ausbauen kannst. > > Verdict: Rated **4.4/5** by 71 users. Top-rated for **Weiterempfehlungsquote**. ----- ## Übersicht ### Wer verwendet Trail Blazer Non-Profit Manager? Non-Profit-Organisationen mit weniger als 7 Millionen $ Umsatz. Umfasst religiöse und Gesundheitsverbände, Verbände, die Öffentlichkeitsarbeit betreiben, Bildungsstiftungen, Schul-, Kirchen-, Absolventen- und Berufsverbände, Kunst- und Musikzentren. ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Bewertung | Detail | | **Gesamt** | **4.4/5** | 71 Nutzerbewertungen | | Bedienkomfort | 3.9/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Kundenbetreuung | 4.9/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis | 4.5/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Funktionen | 3.9/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 80% | (8/10 Weiterempfehlungsquote) | ## Über den Anbieter - **Unternehmen**: Trail Blazer Campaign Services - **Region**: Golden Valley, USA - **Founded**: 2001 ## Commercial Context - **Startpreis**: 50,00 $ - **Preismodell**: (Kostenlose Testversion) - **Target Audience**: Selbstständig, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1.000, 1.001–5.000 - **Deployment & Platforms**: Cloud, SaaS, webbasiert, Mac (Desktop), Windows (Desktop), Windows (On-Premise), Linux (On-Premise), Android (mobil), iPhone (mobil), iPad (mobil) - **Unterstützte Sprachen**: Englisch - **Available Countries**: Kanada, Vereinigte Staaten ## Funktionen - Absolventen-Management - Belegmanagement - Berichterstattung und Statistik - Buchhaltung - CRM - E-Mail Marketing - Freiwilligen-Management - Fundraising-Management - Kampagnenmanagement - Kommunikationsmanagement - Kontaktmanagement - Mitglieder-Datenbank - Mitgliedschaft-Management - Mobiles Spenden - Online-Spenden - Pfand-Management - Registrierungs-Management - Social-Media-Integration - Spender-Management - Subventions-Management - Veranstaltungsmanagement - Wiederkehrende Spenden - Zahlungsabwicklung ## Integrations (3 total) - Anedot - PayPal - authorize.net ## Optionen für Kundensupport - E-Mail/Helpdesk - FAQ/Forum - Wissensdatenbank - Telefon-Support - 24/7 Live-Support - Chat ## Category - [Fundraising-Software (Spendensoftware)](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/20047/fundraising/software) ## Ähnliche Kategorien - [Fundraising-Software (Spendensoftware)](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/20047/fundraising/software) - [NPO Software (Non-Profit-Organisationen)](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/30805/nonprofit/software) - [Spendenverwaltung Software](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/30548/donation-management/software) - [CRM-Systeme für Nonprofit-Organisationen](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/31515/nonprofit-crm/software) - [Kampagnen-Software für politische Kampagnen](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/30221/political-campaign/software) ## Alternativen 1. [DonorPerfect](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/2698/donorperfect-fundraising-software) — 4.5/5 (1363 reviews) 2. [Donorbox](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/156860/donorbox) — 4.8/5 (624 reviews) 3. [Bloomerang](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/131207/bloomerang) — 4.7/5 (1286 reviews) 4. [DonorSnap](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/97513/donorsnap) — 4.6/5 (405 reviews) 5. [Neon CRM](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/102088/neoncrm) — 4.3/5 (602 reviews) ## Nutzerbewertungen ### "Trail Blazer is an essential tool for our organization\!" — 5.0/5 > **Betsy** | *26. März 2022* | Bildungsmanagement | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: As a small post-secondary trade school and non-profit we need the critical functionality that Trailblazer provides to track all our constituents and communicate with them regularly through our electronic newsletter. Trailblazer lets us track financial information accurately, communicate with our friends, donors and alums (either collectively or by segment), to review an individual's history with our organization prior to meeting with them, and to create reports to track our progress against fundraising and engagement goals. My two favorite things about this software is that it is easy to get up and running and the product support team is off-the-charts wonderful with immediate and knowledgeable answers. This product support experience is really unique and is the \*key\* reason I recommend this software to anybody who asks. > > **Nachteile**: It's really hard to do drip-marketing campaigns, where we have a sequence of emails to send to particular subsets of individuals. We've found workarounds (thanks to the brilliant support team) but it really is cumbersome. > > This software is a great solution for our smaller-sized organization. It's easy to set up and learn, and the product support team is exceptional. While we yearn for some of the features of MailChimp or SalesForce, the simplicity of using Trail Blazer wins out. To strengthen our online fundraising we are now licensing Classy Software to develop our online campaigns. We still store the resulting data in Trailblazer. ----- ### "Trail Blazer Review" — 4.0/5 > **Agnes** | *29. Dezember 2020* | Religiöse Einrichtungen | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Trail Blazer functions differently than other databases. Once I was used to how to work with it, I like how much I can do with it. I also like the Attribute feature. It allows me to pull out just what group I want to use. > > **Nachteile**: I use Trailblazer for people to sign up for workshops and events. I don't like that I can't add items to the registration page. We would love to be able to ask things like what Parish people belong to, a title line, etc.. We also have Deacons, Priests, Bishops and the Archbishop and their titles are always used. When signing up they will sometimes add it to the first names block. Otherwise, I have to go back and add it for any correspondence. Also - some of the columns that I think should always show up are different on all of the queries I use. For instance, it would be helpful if the Title always showed up. > > Overall experience is good. The Attribute section is very helpful. Also - when I call for support it has always been a very helpful and pleasant experience. ----- ### "Lacking on Donor Mailing Capabilities" — 3.0/5 > **Ykatirina** | *17. Dezember 2020* | Darstellende Künste | Recommendation rating: 4.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: I like that you can customize and edit your own attributes and query views for columns. I love how in columns, you can make attributes updatable, and edit them. I like that you can save queries, though I rarely use the function. > > **Nachteile**: There's a lot that I dislike about the user experience of this database: -When you run a query, I wish you could create an attribute and assign it to all donors in the query -I wish I could update attributes for donors from other search space (e.g. contributions, events, etc) -I don't like that it's only available on PC, and I have to use remote desktop on my Mac laptop. -Mailings are really difficult - households aren't very use-friendly. For example, when I want to mail all of our donors, I have to search the donors in contributions, export them, import them to tag with an attribute as donors, then I honestly can't remember the next steps, if very complicated, and if I am creating multiple lists (e.g. donors, Lybunts, non-donors) I have to deduplicate the lists because there is so much overlap, when I just want the system to reflect who is on what list--it's very complicated and time consuming. -WIth Contributions, the button to "exclude events marked 'non-tax deductible'"to distinguish between sales and donations, is not available in other queries outside the contribution tab. -Reports are not helpful - unclear if it's including all income, vs. just contributions -I need to use summaries and pivot tables for most basic tasks, which is very challenging -Searching and exporting a List of our donors, separated by giving level is very complicated -Importing - duplicate contacts happen often when names \& emails don't merge -Matching funds \& Events is weird \& clunky > > I have learned a lot about how to use this database, however, I am often frustrated at how clunky it is. Yes, it's customizable, but it's very difficult to do some of the most straightforward and necessary functions for our organization. ----- ### "Lots of Search & Record set up options and very good support." — 4.0/5 > **KATHY** | *17. Dezember 2020* | Non-Profit-Organisation Management | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Being able to access by multiple staff/volunteers from different locations. And the ability to pull information Searches by a variety of Attributes, which can be added to. Use of mass email communications is great and easy to use once templates are set up. > > **Nachteile**: The cons list has shortened over the last 4 years as the company has upgraded and added to the system. > > It has been a major upgrade from our one staff only having access on Access on her computer. All kinds of reports can now be pulled for mailing lists, donor specific info for a board member communication, and more. The Support team is very quick to respond and always pleasant to work with. Earlier this year, they even agreed and implemented my suggestion that would benefit all non-profits. ----- ### "Trail Blazer for Member based Nonprofits" — 4.0/5 > **John** | *9. November 2018* | Non-Profit-Organisation Management | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: The software has many features that have worked well for our group which is a membership based nonprofit. Over the few years that we have had it, the company has made substantial improvements on a continuing basis. However, the assumptions underlying the software's design and features must be a close match to your real world operations or you will likely need to adjust how you do some things to make the software work for you. However, the software is very adaptive, it has many features we need and quite a few we have not implemented. Also, and this is critical for us, the software support, training and consulting is worth every penny you pay for the annual license and more\! > > **Nachteile**: There are some issues but these are the nature of the beast with a product with so many features. One is the learning curve (although you can restrict access to certain features on a user by use basis to let them "grow" into the system). Another is that for a membership based system there are design assumptions that we have had to "work around" - but the programmers and tech support have been wonderful to make changes, tweaks and suggest alternative ways to get things done. > > Outstanding. I wish the vendors in other areas that I deal with were this committed to customer support and satisfaction. ----- Page: 1 / 4\ Weiter: [Next page](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/101648/trail-blazer?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/101648/trail-blazer) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Structured Data