Wir helfen Unternehmen in Deutschland
seit 15 Jahren bei der Softwareauswahl

Über SpiraTeam

Ein integriertes Application-Lifecycle-Management (ALM) -System, das deine Projektanforderungen, -Freigaben, -Testfälle und Probleme verwaltet

Erfahre mehr über SpiraTeam

Vorteile:

Pricing is clear and upfront, unlike some of the smoke and mirrors sales tactics used by other vendors who shall remain nameless but here are some hints.

Nachteile:

However we miss some specific functions. Therefore we need workarounds or specific implementations.

Bewertungen zu SpiraTeam

Durchschnittliche Bewertung

Benutzerfreundlichkeit
4,0
Kundenservice
4,6
Funktionen
4,4
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
4,6

Weiterempfehlungsquote

8,6/10

SpiraTeam hat eine Gesamtbewertung von 4,1 von 5 Sternen basierend auf 97 Nutzerbewertungen auf Capterra.

Hast du SpiraTeam bereits verwendet?

Teile deine Erfahrungen mit anderen Softwareinteressenten.

Nutzerbewertungen filtern (97)

Erin
Erin
Senior QA Analyst in
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 51–200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung
Quelle: GetApp

Great Tool For The Entire Project Life Cycle

5,0 vor 8 Jahren

Kommentare: We have been using SpiraTeam within our organization for quite a few years. SpiraTeam is very easy to use, and is a great way to help track, maintain and troubleshoot an entire project, from the planning stages, to implementation, to enhancement requests and software bug and defect resolution. I would recommend SpiraTeam to any organization looking for a straightforward, easy to use tool.

Vorteile:

Pros: Easy to use Versatile Tracks multiple project points

Nachteile:

Cons: Cannot easily move artifacts from one project to another.

Dusan
Test manager in Serbien
Bankwesen, 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Spira test manager review

5,0 vor 3 Monaten

Kommentare: Great help for test management, bug management, reporting.

Vorteile:

ISTQB theory is implemented in Spira. Easy to use in different categories. A lot of opportunities for project management.

Nachteile:

There are no big problems but I have to mention better connection with Jira, full range of services to be implemented in both directions.

Daniel
Daniel
Architect IT in Spanien
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, Selbstständig
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

A complete vision of the projects

3,0 vor 7 Jahren

Kommentare: I was used SpiraTeam in some projects. Our work with the application was right, but our experience with it, is like a fixed application with a strongest modulation of the project process. The UI, is not very friendly with a complex form to work on it.
Is true, that you can add any document, requirement, task or other in each moment, but you cannot change the flow of the project. In action it is maddening because you has not clarity of the steps to do with the different parts of the project.
But, if you have a big project with many people that need to interact (for example, you need to follow the status of the tasks and the test cases by developer) it is your project application.

Vorteile:

The application can modify to adapt the workflow to your needs (based on a complex workflow). The document management is very good. You can change a part of UI (colors, logos, etc.). You can do a personal dashboard with your heat points. This could help you to focus your most important points.

Nachteile:

In my personal opinion, the application needs a guidance or a screen that can show the flow process to make more easy the entry of the project elements.

Antwort von Inflectra

vor 7 Jahren

Thanks for the feedback. We are adding a new user onboarding wizard into SpiraTeam to guide a new user through the project management process that is enabled in SpiraTeam. We're not sure which version Daniel used, but v5.0 has a completely overhauled user interface which our users are loving.

Juan
Test Engineer in Südafrika
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Capitec Bank Feedback

5,0 vor 5 Jahren

Kommentare: Most excellent, brings our Business and testing together in understanding the req.

Vorteile:

The Software made Automation easier. Integration easy, total revolutionary product. Very powerful tool if used as designed.

Nachteile:

Users. Misunderstanding the designed use compared to their personal opinion.

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen: TestRail

Gründe für den Wechsel zu SpiraTeam: Brings all the elements of Testing together. One time shoe shine.

Owen
Owen
Analyst in Finance and Accounting in USA
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Essen & Trinken, 5.001–10.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung
Quelle: GetApp

A system with virtues and aspects to improve

4,0 vor 3 Jahren

Kommentare: The most necessary changes that Inflectra SpiraTeam can develop in new improvements are the following: the grids can be very restrictive and do not offer the possibilities of quickly ordering the launches, in the requirements module it is where they must make more changes to increase the speed and for last I would like to see in a new version a better way to create custom reports.

Vorteile:

Inflectra SpiraTeam is a product that works satisfactorily with multiple browsers such as Chome, Opera and Firefox without presenting compatibility problems, it is very easy to manage and maintain and another positive aspect is the robust integration with AxoSoft OnTime. My recommendation is to work day by day with Inflectra SpiraTeam and request technical assistance if necessary. Also, I recommend asking Inflectra to add more features in a new release. SpiraTeam has a lot to improve, but it is on the right track.

Nachteile:

There are many improvements that the Inflectra SpiraTeam team can implement in a new update, for example, the grids, custom reports and the requirements module. SpiraTeam should implement and add more custom reporting options, improve testing functionality, and increase the speed of the requirement module.

Kristin
Director of QA in USA
Verwendete die Software für: Nicht angeboten
Herkunft der Bewertung

SpiraTeam Review

3,0 vor 9 Jahren

Kommentare: Overall, the product is a great value. There are definitely things that can be improved though.
* Make reporting easier to use and more flexible. One of our number 1 complaints from Managers that use the system including myself is that we can't easily get data out of the system.
* Make it easier to create custom reports.
* The testing functionality is still cumbersome. We have seen our testing times increase fairly significantly since we started using the product. While some of that was expected, the tool is slow and not very efficient in some cases. For example instead of allowing multiple modules to be added at one time, the testers have to search for each one separately.
* The requirements module is slow.
* Performance of the product overall could be improved.
* Grids are restrictive. I have gotten lots of feedback with people wanting the ability to do things like double sort the grids or multiselecting certain fields like release.
* The customer service is fantastic but the reason I didn't give it an outstanding score is because I wish we had more say with enhancements. I wish we could pay you for an enhancement that was really important to us or for you to create a report for us.

Antwort von Inflectra

vor 9 Jahren

We appreciate the feedback. Reporting is one of those areas where we have added significant new capabilities but users always want to slice and dice things in different ways. The custom reporting added in v4.1 has helped by allowing users to create their own reports and we shall be adding more custom graphs in future version. For enhancements we have 5000+ customers so sadly we do have to make decisions about priority, which is one challenge with a tool that is designed to be used by large numbers of customers that have their own processes...

Aaron
Aaron
Internal Business Improvement Consultant (Senior Business Analyst) in USA
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Versicherung, 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 1-5 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

SpiraTeam gives visibility to the work getting done!

4,0 vor 5 Jahren

Kommentare: My company purchase this and said "here, figure out how to use this for your project". It took be a couple of hours to put all the pieces together. It is rather intuitive and user friendly. I was able to guide the team into how we intend to use the tool to develop our software product. It was easy to get the team engaged in using SpiraTeam.

Vorteile:

I like that we can see the work move across the Planning (Kanban) Board so it gives great visibility to the entire team of the work that is being done. It is great for agile approach to software development. It provides great integration from Requirement to Development to Testing to Completed.

Nachteile:

The toughest part of using this new tool was to determine at what level to put the requirements into the system. As we were transitioning to agile at the same time we determined to put features into the tool as requirements and write user stories for each feature. It worked well. My team experienced some clunkiness, but I believe it was the way we had the tool configured as opposed to the tool itself. We changed the permissions on a couple of roles (BA, Developer) and it worked much better. We also changed some of the default workflows to make it work better.

Dieter
Software Engineer in Deutschland
Industrieautomation, 201–500 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

You get more than you pay for SPIRATeam - easy to use - get better from update to update

3,0 vor 7 Jahren

Kommentare: - Great overview over the project progress
- Easy administration effort

Vorteile:

- easy administration - traceability over the whole development process - good test integration - integrated dokument versioning - good and fast support

Nachteile:

- external test tool integration arn´t freeware anymore - text editor for inputs arn´t so good like in other tools

Brian
Brian
Quality Assurance Specialist in
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Papier & forstwirtschaftliche Erzeugnisse, 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Nicht angeboten
Herkunft der Bewertung
Quelle: GetApp

Great affordable Project Lifecycle Management tool!

4,0 vor 9 Jahren

Kommentare: My team and I have been using SpiraTeam for over a year now. We continue to be impressed by how customizable the product is. The ability to create custom workflows for Requirements and Incidents really allows us to make this product conform to our companies methodology. We aren't forced to follow a rigid methodology (Pure waterfall or Scrum). We can configure the application to follow our specific needs.

Vorteile:

-Hosted solution, no infrastructure to worry about, Inflectra handles the backups, upgrades, servers, etc -Customizable workflows -Easy to learn UI -Plug-in for integration with our Automated Testing tool -Plug-in for Visual Studio

Nachteile:

-At times it can be a little slow when loading new pages, not huge lag but enough to be annoying -The out of the box reports aren't the best and creating custom reports is challenging

iain
iain
Development Manager in
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
, 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Nicht angeboten
Herkunft der Bewertung
Quelle: GetApp

I'm a big fan of the application

5,0 vor 9 Jahren

Kommentare: I'm a big fan of the application. I manage the testing team for an IS department and was unhappy with the existing tools we had, so I evaluated a number of tools to replace what we used. The outcome put SpiraTest in the top 5. After using the free trial for a few weeks I was sold.

Vorteile:

+ Excellent price: + Mature tool: + Good integration: + Good support:

Nachteile:

SLA support for hosting: As I work for a big company , there’s a demand for 24hour support and clear SLAs. Inflectra don’t provide that level of cover. That said, I’ve not had any problems in the 9 months I have used the tool.

Lawrence
Testing Manager in
Verwendete die Software für: Nicht angeboten
Herkunft der Bewertung

Great feature set at any price - yet at the best price!

5,0 vor 14 Jahren

Kommentare: SpiraTeam from Inflectra was inexpensive enough for us to use when our QA efforts were first launching as well as feature rich enough now that we have dozens of testers, analysts, and developers involved. We plan to bring on a test automation tool next year (QuickTest Pro, SmarteScript, or TestComplete) and SpiraTeam came with the hooks built in. In fact, SpiraTeam has a number of extra features built in that may make it even more useful to us over time; such as Project & Requirements Management. Their sales and support team have been invaluable in helping us understand how to use their software and even how to best test our software as well. They are flexible and very fast to respond (even after we bought) Their pricing model makes sense for the initial purchase and the annual maintenance. Simply put, Im sold. Its too tough to justify a competing product, no matter how popular, at tens of thousands of dollars more.

Vorteile:

SpiraTeam is an incredible value. Its feature set rivals competitors that are literally 10 times the cost. It has provided all the test case management that we need & the sales/support team has been immediately responsive to every question we've had.

Nachteile:

The only challenge we've had with SpiraTeam is the "team" part. It isn't quite as graceful as we'd like for using a team of testers to execute tests. They came up with a solution so it's not a show stopper but I hope it improves with the next release.

Shibu
QA - Automation in
Verwendete die Software für: Nicht angeboten
Herkunft der Bewertung

Technical support

4,0 vor 13 Jahren

Kommentare: For the value of money it is worth to use ,but those who look at this as an alternative for QC the comfort of use is surely going to loose.

Vorteile:

Remarkable technical support, for this I would really like to appreciate the Inflectra Support team especially to Adam who understood my issues and fixed it.

Nachteile:

1. Very sad to know that an appropriate load testing certification is not yet done or not published yet. 2. Single database for all the projects for big firm like us who keeps huge date will be concern , suggestion is to keep seperate db for each project.

Antwort von Inflectra

vor 13 Jahren

- Unlike QC we chose to use a single database because many potential customers disliked the admin burden of QC and the inability to do cross-project reporting. - Load testing results for v3.1 in the process of being formatted for external consumption - The system has a different user interface than QC, some people like SpiraTeam's more than QC, some prefer QC, it depends what you are used to :-)

Pascal
project manager in
Verwendete die Software für: Nicht angeboten
Herkunft der Bewertung

Good mid range ALM-software for a good price

4,0 vor 14 Jahren

Kommentare: good software covering a lot of functions for a good price

Vorteile:

Very quick und friendly support with honest and competent answers. Interesting price. Important ALM-function are covered

Nachteile:

However we miss some specific functions. Therefore we need workarounds or specific implementations: Cross-project associations or copy function for custom properties Render different attachments format (without coping them as image in the description field) in a HTML report Ability to change or add custom report Copying configuration between different installations Data migration from (other than the 4 supported tools) third party software with attachments Disabling not always used mandatory fields (planed effort) in the different asp pages

Subramanya
Manager QA in
Verwendete die Software für: Nicht angeboten
Herkunft der Bewertung

Highly cost effective solution for test management

4,0 vor 14 Jahren

Kommentare: Great and simple tool, a cost effective solution.

Vorteile:

1) Features available 2) Cost per feature 3) Integration with TestComplete & NUnit 4) Great Sales person; Adam helping end user better understanding of functionality, providing workaround and more importantly promptness in response.

Nachteile:

1) Inflexibility in reports, though this could be overcome by customized xml reports, this customization could have been made simpler. 2) Dashboard is functional but not appealing 3) Testing tasks other than testcase execution could not be created 4) OS Env could not be mentioned for a test planning & execution

Antwort von Inflectra

vor 14 Jahren

For item (4) you just need to add OS/Env custom properties on the Test Runs and then you can specify such factors during testing.

Paras
Head - IT Operations in
Verwendete die Software für: Nicht angeboten
Herkunft der Bewertung

SpiraTeam Review

4,0 vor 10 Jahren

Kommentare: Basis our current usage, we have found Spira to be a good SDLC tool till the testing stage. This has helped us tracking/recording and monitoring our test cases and test results. The workflow in which we are able to track the requirement from the initial requirement gathering stage to the release stage, including testing very effectively. It has also helped in keeping a tab on the release calender and hence effective Project Management. There is scope of improvement in the overall upload functionality, specially post appending our data. Creation of new workflow, still remains a challenge, which hopefully spira team is working towards addressing.
It would be helpful, if we complete SDLC cycle, including post release management workflows as well.

Kelly Jo
IS Business Analyst in
Verwendete die Software für: Nicht angeboten
Herkunft der Bewertung

Review

4,0 vor 11 Jahren

Kommentare: I would definitely recommend this product to companies for test case writing and execution. The product is easy to use. The testing progression can be viewed quickly for management of the timeline. We do not use the product for the business requirements though.

Vorteile:

Able to use test spreadsheet to write test cases and it is very simple to import into product. Test case execution is user friendly. Discrepancies can be tied to the test case. Discrepancies can be distributed amongst team members with ease for development and re-testing.

Nachteile:

Large quantity of test cases in the import spreadsheet can cause it to lock up.

Amanda
Director in Neuseeland
Verwendete die Software für: Nicht angeboten
Herkunft der Bewertung

Excellent product

4,0 vor 9 Jahren

Kommentare: Overall SpiraTeam is an excellent product, very easy to use and testers love the set up. I have been setting it up onsite for a major client and showing their test team how to use the product. As well as the set up, I am also hooking it up to Rapise to get automated testing in place for a continuous deployment solution. There have been one or two issues, however, the Inflectra support team are very, very quick to help and resolve any problems, and they also readily implement change suggestions if you come up with something that would be useful. Note: Make sure you take a full back up before updating to newer versions if running on a local server.

Bill
CRM Manager in
Verwendete die Software für: Nicht angeboten
Herkunft der Bewertung

I would reccomend this product to anyone who needs to manage a project with test cases.

4,0 vor 15 Jahren

Kommentare: I would reccomend this product to anyone who needs to manage a project with test cases and requirements.

Vorteile:

The product does an outstanding job on collecting the information needed to manage projects both large and small. The application has a good road map for future enhancements and helps me manage my projects without the normal amount of effort.

Nachteile:

The screens could use some user inferface enhancements to make it easier to navigate. The filters, although useful, can confuse you as to what you are seeing. Many time I think I'm missing data to only find that the system ha me in a filter.

David
David
Test Manager in
Verwendete die Software für: Nicht angeboten
Herkunft der Bewertung

Top Marks

5,0 vor 13 Jahren

Kommentare: I've looked at several applications in this segment and this comes out tops so far no doubt about it. If you've never had an ALM before or even a test management tool then you just can't lose. I'm expecting an ROI in man hours the first year of ownership not to mention the lift it will give to our working process along with job satisfaction for all our users.

Vorteile:

Total value for money, a customer service second to none, this is a vendor with the customer in focus. The application is very intuitive and meets all our current needs with plenty of room for growing.

Nachteile:

None so far

Rahul
Senior Test Consultant in
Verwendete die Software für: Nicht angeboten
Herkunft der Bewertung

Excellent Value for Money, replacement for QC

5,0 vor 15 Jahren

Kommentare: It can still improve with additional features such as mutiple copy paste, more stable build for IE 8 users. But an excellent buy for this price. Reliable and well priced tool.

Vorteile:

We have used this tool for organisation of 50 users and it has worked perfectly. It has got all the features which a Test and Defect management tools should have.

Nachteile:

Its not very stable on new IE 8. Need to have some more basic feature to improve usability and speed of writing, designing Test Scripts.

Antwort von Inflectra

vor 14 Jahren

The mentioned issue with IE8 was addressed many versions ago (v2.2+).

Dawn
Quality Control Specialist in
Verwendete die Software für: Nicht angeboten
Herkunft der Bewertung

SpiraTeam is great. You get much more than you pay for. I would definitely recommend this software

4,0 vor 15 Jahren

Kommentare: SpiraTeam is great. You get much more than you pay for. I would definitely recommend this software to others.

Vorteile:

You're customer service is wonderful. Everytime I have presented a question I receive a very quick email back from Adam. Other than our own customer service I have never received such good service from a software vendor.

Nachteile:

With the new 2.2 upgrade I have lost the ability to tab when creating a new test script. This is causing me to take twice as long to enter my steps.

Namita
Manager, Business Analysis in
Verwendete die Software für: Nicht angeboten
Herkunft der Bewertung

Vendor Selection / Scoring

3,0 vor 12 Jahren

Kommentare: Like what I saw today but would like to trial it out to get some hands on experience.

Vorteile:

Today was the first time we had a overview of the tool. Based on the initial meeting, it seems to be a tool that covers most of our requirements and seems fairly easy to use.

Nachteile:

Need to know more about the integration with Microsoft Project Server and the upcoming release on requirements and test in March of 2012.

Joe
Director of Quality Assurance in
Verwendete die Software für: Nicht angeboten
Herkunft der Bewertung

SpiraTeam

4,0 vor 14 Jahren

Kommentare: Recommended highly.

Vorteile:

The thing we like most about SpiraTeam is its flexibility. We are able to configure it to our processes and integrate it with MS TFS. The customer support is outstanding.

Nachteile:

There are a few things we wish it had, but they are very open to enhancement suggestions and most of the things we suggest are already planned for an upcoming release.

Nancy
Programmer/Analyst in
Verwendete die Software für: Nicht angeboten
Herkunft der Bewertung

We are mostly using this package as documentation for our testing processes.

4,0 vor 15 Jahren

Kommentare: We are mostly using this package as documentation for our testing processes.
We can keep track by release as to what has been tested. Very satisfied with product.

Vorteile:

Support for the product has been fantastic! Whe have gone thu 2 upgrades and had questions. The support personnel ( Adam ) was extremely helpful and we were able to complete the upgrades.

Nachteile:

None at present.

Alejandro
PMO Manager in
Verwendete die Software für: Nicht angeboten
Herkunft der Bewertung

Sage Spain Spira Team Review

4,0 vor 11 Jahren

Kommentare: We need the TFS Sync with the requirents synchronization.
The rest of the features are OK, and works quite well.
The Customer Service is excellent.

Antwort von Inflectra

vor 11 Jahren

The TFS 2012 data-sync that includes the requirements data synchronization is under development right now. Should be released in mid-August.