Über Cortex

Dank der proprietären CORTEX-Technologie musst du dich nicht mehr zwischen einem leistungsfähigen und einem nutzbaren System entscheiden.

Erfahre mehr über Cortex

Vorteile:

Nicht verfügbar

Nachteile:

Nicht verfügbar

Bewertungen zu Cortex

Durchschnittliche Bewertung

Benutzerfreundlichkeit
4,3
Kundenservice
4,5
Funktionen
4,5
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
4,5

Weiterempfehlungsquote

8,8/10

Cortex hat eine Gesamtbewertung von 4,8 von 5 Sternen basierend auf 4 Nutzerbewertungen auf Capterra.

Nutzerbewertungen filtern (4)

Produktbewertung

Produktbewertung

Nutzung

Sortieren nach

Hast du Cortex bereits verwendet?

Teile deine Erfahrungen mit anderen Softwareinteressenten.

Nutzerbewertungen filtern (4)

Steve A.
Steve A.
Digital Asset Management Lead in USA
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Gastgewerbe, 1.001-5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Very flexible and scalable system

5,0 letztes Jahr

Kommentare: Cortex has been able to meet the scale and speed demands for how our company works. Without the flexibility of the system and the ability to create multiple API workflows, we would not have been able to be as successful in keeping up with our asset production. The Orange Logic team behind Cortex was always eager to take on our challenges and find workable solutions.

Vorteile:

In our case, we've been able to scale the Cortex to meet our business needs, quickly adjust settings as our workflows change, and use APIs to integrate the system with many of our other production workflow tools. We've achieve both scale and efficiencies thanks to the flexibility of Cortex.

Nachteile:

Along with the flexibility that allowed us to achieve our scale and efficiency, that same flexibility can become complex if it's not planned out properly. It's tempting to do too much too quickly but a more manageable approach is to implement additional functionality in phases that build upon each other.

Verifizierter Rezensent
DAM Specialist in USA
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Freizeit, Reisen & Tourismus, 51-200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

DAM with Cortex

5,0 vor 3 Jahren

Kommentare: Cortex has vastly improved our discovery and branding processes.

Vorteile:

Ease of use is the biggest pro. Many users require little to no training in order to use basic functions within Cortex.

Nachteile:

The support tickets have started to be answered a little slow. Most questions are answered within two weeks, but critical issues still see care rapidly.

Antonio D.
Information Management Officer in USA
internationale Angelegenheiten, 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

UN Photo DAM powered by Orange Logic Cortex

5,0 vor 3 Wochen Neu

Kommentare: It has been overall positive since the launch on production in November 2020.

Vorteile:

SaaS solution, intuitive interface, powerful search and metadata management as well as robust storage and archives management via AWS. Robust cyber security features.

Nachteile:

Constant software upgrades that can be positive for bugs fixing and adding new features, but can disrupt team workflows and add complexity to standards and more work for the team.

Jerome P.
Website Manager | The Store in Australien
Zeitung, 5.001-10.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

Cortex by Orange Logic does a good job of managing many assets on both the backend and frontend

4,0 vor 6 Tagen Neu

Kommentare: Being able to showcase all Assets of different types and make them available to customers easily and quickly for purchase is great. Exactly what you want in a platform like this. It is not our main DAM but rather our gateway for the public to access our Assets for purchase or licensing.

Vorteile:

The platform's asset management system works well. Batch editing for sets of assets is very quick and easy to use and being able to clean out old data is helpful. Calculator while a tad clunky to set up is very robust once running

Nachteile:

The only two things I find as a fault of the platform are when the use case sits slightly outside of its scope and future-proofing. We use the platform for both consumer and professional cases and while this is well suited to professional users, the need for every customer to have a login can be limiting for a consumer user who just wants to come on and purchase one print and will probably not be back again. I realise this use case is not the majority for this type of platform so it shouldn't detract from the overall score but one thing that I still find a little frustrating is the inability to have good quality use on mobile platforms. This might be once again a consumer use case type issue but not being able to simply adapt the site to be mobile and tablet friendly is a little bit of a pain and while it is coming along in most recent releases it is still very far away from where I would expect it to be in 2022. Coming from an e-commerce background and being able to edit sites with CSS to achieve a solid responsive design was what I was expecting when starting work on this platform but it needs to be said that the ability to edit templates outside of specific fixed templates is actually near impossible