Wir helfen Unternehmen in Deutschland
seit 15 Jahren bei der Softwareauswahl

Aircraft Maintenance Systems Erfahrungen

Über Aircraft Maintenance Systems

AMS‘ Feature-reiche Software-Suite bietet Kunden-bewährte Wartung- und Inventar-Management-Lösungen für Luftfahrt-Kunden weltweit.

Erfahre mehr über Aircraft Maintenance Systems

Vorteile:

Easy to use and very helpfull in our operation.

Nachteile:

No automatic disconnection and impossible to work if a person is connected.

Bewertungen zu Aircraft Maintenance Systems

Durchschnittliche Bewertung

Benutzerfreundlichkeit
3,6
Kundenservice
3,5
Funktionen
3,3
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
3,5

Weiterempfehlungsquote

6,6/10

Aircraft Maintenance Systems hat eine Gesamtbewertung von 3,9 von 5 Sternen basierend auf 21 Nutzerbewertungen auf Capterra.

Nutzerbewertungen filtern (21)

Produktbewertung

Produktbewertung

Nutzung

Sortieren nach

Hast du Aircraft Maintenance Systems bereits verwendet?

Teile deine Erfahrungen mit anderen Softwareinteressenten.

Nutzerbewertungen filtern (21)

Jeff
DOM in Kanada
Luft- & Raumfahrt, 11–50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

AMS software for Seneca

5,0 vor 4 Jahren

Kommentare: We went from a home built system to AMS.

Vorteile:

It is fairly easy to use. Very robust, no issues that have stopped us from releasing aircraft. Like that it isn't in the cloud so if internet down we can still have access.

Nachteile:

Make it easier to customize. Could look more modern Mobile access through an app or even just on my phone at work. Need a dispatch module.

Jason
Quality Assurance in Kanada
Fluggesellschaften/Luftfahrt, 11–50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

AMS Implementation

4,0 vor 4 Jahren

Kommentare: The AMS team helped to streamline the aircraft documentation process. It became easier for one person to manage the workload.

Vorteile:

During the implementation process the staff were very helpful to bring us up to speed to incorporate this software in our company

Nachteile:

Certain aspects of formatting were challenging to get used to.

Sandra
Director of Sales and Marketing in USA
Verteidigung & Raumfahrt, 2–10 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Simple Aircraft Maintenance and Scheduling Software

3,0 vor 4 Jahren

Kommentare: We have been using AMM since 2012 and have seen it improve over time. It would be great if AMS would develop a simplified quarantine / inventory module that would allow users to better track hours and cycles when a component or assembly is not installed.

Vorteile:

The AMM software is simple to use and has a fair selection of available reporting functionality. It also has enough versatility that it can be used to comply with varied company processes and procedures. Finally the software can be used as an on-site or remote installation solution.

Nachteile:

The Inventory Manager module does not offer the functionality we need. Specifically the inventory transfer from base to base. We also have had several releases that break existing functionality on the AMM module.

DJ
Fleet Support Manager in Kanada
Fluggesellschaften/Luftfahrt, 201–500 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

AMS

4,0 vor 4 Jahren

Vorteile:

Has the features we need to operate our aircraft

Nachteile:

Issues and bugs take a long time to get addressed, if ever

Shaune
aircraft maintenance in Kanada
Luft- & Raumfahrt, 11–50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

My review

5,0 vor 4 Jahren

Vorteile:

Easy to use. Ties maintenance and inventory very nicely together. Product support is very good, with the availability of online assistance.

Nachteile:

There needs to be a status bar or wheel when making selections. Currently you make a selection and then you wait but new users are confused whether their selection was enabled....no status wheel or bar to identify that the selection was made and now the program is "thinking". Just a blank screen.

Nicholas
Crew Chief in Kanada
Fluggesellschaften/Luftfahrt, 51–200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

N. Carbery review

3,0 vor 4 Jahren

Kommentare: Frustrating.

Vorteile:

At its base level the software makes it possible to create an E-Log book and add entries saving time and effort when it is functioning properly.

Nachteile:

Very slow to go into and out of individual planes to make entries. Component, task, and AD tracking is almost entirely done manually. Little to no customization. Constant freezing, crashing, and downed servers. Little to no support. Countless minor bugs (lists starting at #2, defect sync adding defects in an inverted order, etc.) When the system crashes it locks the user in the aircraft they were using requiring us to wait for the system to reboot to continue working rather then allowing another user to continue working at another computer while the first one resets. Inventory manager requiring very specific searches while looking through inventory items as opposed to generic searches like those used by google, yahoo, or many other commonly used search engines. Only allowing one user to access an aircraft at a time.

Agata
Aircraft Technical Records Administrator in Kanada
Luft- & Raumfahrt, 51–200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Great Software for Large or Small Companies

3,0 vor 4 Jahren

Kommentare: Use it daily to track aircraft components on our fleet as well as for our inventory of parts. Customer service for both sides has been satisfactory and AMS has always helped us solve issues when we have them.

Vorteile:

AMS has the capacity to retain a seemingly endless amount of detail and hours down to the smallest components. It can easily be customized for each user to allow or deny the appropriate permissions, and be integrated with the flight and inventory modules to maintain accurate maintenance records.

Nachteile:

The interface is quite dated, and hopefully AMS works to make it more user-friendly in the future. "Drag and Drop" would be useful in many cases, or the ability to link components to inspections, or for inspections to be linked to certain components would be beneficial.

Myron
Director of Maintenance in USA
Fluggesellschaften/Luftfahrt, 51–200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

AMs Reveiw

4,0 vor 4 Jahren

Vorteile:

It is easy to read reports and was easy to teach all mechanincs how to use it.

Nachteile:

Wish there was an easier way to set valves for forecast list. ie if aircraft flys 850 hours, 500 cycles, and 700 landings put those numbers in and show what would come due in the next year

CHRISTOPHER
DOM in Kanada
Fluggesellschaften/Luftfahrt, 11–50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

AMS

4,0 vor 4 Jahren

Vorteile:

reports are clear, access to different sections is fairly straight forward.

Nachteile:

Weight and Balance report not very user friendly for the helicopter operator, frequent bugs spuratically apear in system , that means we need a full time emplyee to cross check data imput.

Alain
Maintenance Director in Kanada
Fluggesellschaften/Luftfahrt, 51–200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Good software but need more option at a good price

4,0 vor 4 Jahren

Vorteile:

Easy to use and very helpfull in our operation.

Nachteile:

Support is almost absent and softaware have stay the same for the last 4 year now almost Support contract and option expensive wich prevent me to add some new feature

LAURETTE
Adjointe à la maintenance in Kanada
Fluggesellschaften/Luftfahrt, 11–50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Maintenance aéronef

4,0 vor 4 Jahren

Kommentare: Système efficace dans la planification et le suivi de la maintenance des aéronefs.

Vorteile:

Logiciel facile a utilisé et qui facilite la planification de la maintenance.

Nachteile:

Les fonctionnalités du programme qu'on désire ajouter sont souvent non inclus dans le prix de base.

Adam
Maintenance Production Manager in Kanada
Luft- & Raumfahrt, 51–200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

AMS - New look built on old software.

2,0 vor 4 Jahren

Kommentare: Overall the software is limited and the customer service is poor.

Vorteile:

Great price point. Work report interface is ok.

Nachteile:

Customer service is slow and very hard to communicate with. The software has so many inherent limitations that they are not able to/unwilling to implement any changes that are brought up by customers. Inventory and maintenance tracking are completely separate. Tracking an assembly with sub assemblies is impossible. You must manually adjust each sub part. Reports can not be customized and often do not show you any of what you want. The program runs very slowly even with a newly upgraded company server/computers etc. There is no way to amend work report content and AMS refuses to add that feature. If we enter something in error that error will be fixed on paper but not in the data base.

Eric
PRM in Kanada
Luft- & Raumfahrt, 11–50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

No changes..... only excuses.....

3,0 vor 4 Jahren

Kommentare: we used tu have the sofware version 13. .... we the payed to up grade to the latest versions.... since then... nothing but problems....

Vorteile:

was a smll familly company before..... how things have changed.

Nachteile:

W & B that has not been updated in the last 12 years.... techs constantly saying that problems will be resolved at next up date...... never the case.... feel like ams is concentrating more on "big" companies and less and less taking care of small companies....

Torbjorn
Maintenance Manager in Dänemark
Fluggesellschaften/Luftfahrt, 11–50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Good but still need improvement.

3,0 vor 4 Jahren

Kommentare: It's good but competitors seem to have incorporated what's missing.

Vorteile:

Inventory and especially Document Manager and it's connection from parts receiving all the way to component manager. No longer need paper component cards.

Nachteile:

User manual inadequate. Document print in EU format A4 still extremely bad despite complaints. (after 10 years use....). Installation and updates need to be performed by AMS support staff, not just download and install like most modern programs.

Eric
Quality assurance in Kanada
Luft- & Raumfahrt, 51–200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Inventory manager

4,0 vor 4 Jahren

Vorteile:

All features are easy to use. The option document manager save a lot of time .

Nachteile:

No problem with the software but the technical support need to be reviewed.

Maurizio
Accountable Manager in Italien
Professionelles Training & Coaching, 2–10 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

A good friend at work

5,0 vor 4 Jahren

Vorteile:

Comprehensive task management, the ability to manage parts directly on the WR

Nachteile:

The calculation of 100th maintenance times instead of sexesitimal

Claudio
Maintenance Director in St. Pierre und Miquelon
Luft- & Raumfahrt, 11–50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

accessible system but not always reliable and complex to use

3,0 vor 4 Jahren

Vorteile:

Aircraft forcast list data extraction and analysis

Nachteile:

no automatic disconnection and impossible to work if a person is connected

Leonel
Quality Manager in Kanada
Verwendete die Software für: Nicht angeboten
Herkunft der Bewertung

Helipark and AMS: a partnership which has yielded and will yield good results!

5,0 vor 9 Jahren

Kommentare: For us, one of the highpoints of AMS is to have been developed by and for the Maintenance Organization. Our relationship has been very professional over the last years, and the AMS team was ever attentive to our needs all the time. Despite the geographical distance, Helipark is very pleased with the level and quality of support from AMS. Today, we feel Helipark had a great evolution in terms of customer satisfaction that before using AMS software. We truly believe that AMS is on the right path to success.

Harold
Quality Assurance in
Verwendete die Software für: Nicht angeboten
Herkunft der Bewertung

AMS Maintenance Manager

5,0 vor 14 Jahren

Kommentare: Would highly recommend this product. Customer support has been outstanding.

Vorteile:

Does everything we need in an easy to follow format. Very nice integration with Inventory Manager.

Nachteile:

Would like spell check embedded in the program.

Bonnie
Maint. Technical Support in Kanada
Verwendete die Software für: Nicht angeboten
Herkunft der Bewertung

Good Customer Service

4,0 vor 9 Jahren

Kommentare: Pros : Good Customer Service
Overall : Easy to use

Philippe
Quality Manager in
Verwendete die Software für: Nicht angeboten
Herkunft der Bewertung

Satisfied

4,0 vor 14 Jahren

Kommentare: Would recommend 100 % to any operator.

Vorteile:

Easy to use, Awesome support..

Nachteile:

Update and special request take time..