Wir helfen Unternehmen seit 17 Jahren,
bessere Software zu finden

Über FMS:Workplace

FM: Interact hilft Organisationen, die Verwaltung von Flächen, Auslastung, Vermögen, Bewegungen, Wartung, Mieten und Eigentum zu verbessern.

Erfahre mehr über FMS:Workplace

Vorteile:

The cost of the product fits our business. It is not complicated to use and the technicians like it.

Nachteile:

When running patches, it takes a bit more time due to cutting and pasting data from folders.

Bewertungen zu FMS:Workplace

Durchschnittliche Bewertung

Benutzerfreundlichkeit
4,0
Kundenservice
4,2
Funktionen
4,1
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
4,1

Weiterempfehlungsquote

7,8/10

FMS:Workplace hat eine Gesamtbewertung von 4,1 von 5 Sternen basierend auf 80 Nutzerbewertungen auf Capterra.

Hast du FMS:Workplace bereits verwendet?

Teile deine Erfahrungen mit anderen Softwareinteressenten.

Nutzerbewertungen filtern (80)

Grace
Facilities Admin in Kanada
Hochschulbildung, 501–1.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

FIMS improves my daily work efficiency

5,0 vor 3 Jahren

Vorteile:

FIMS enables us to centralize all Facilities work orders across the university-wide. It absolutely helps improve the efficiency of receiving and processing work requests.

Nachteile:

It doesn't look fancy on both Admin and User interface, but you will get used to it soon. Functionality is more important after all!

Antwort von FM:Systems

vor 3 Jahren

Hi Grace! We are so happy to hear that FM:Systems improves your daily work efficiency by allowing you to centralize your work orders. Thank you for your feedback and the positive review. We are happy to have you as a part of the FM:Systems family!

Lisa
Facility Planner in USA
Hochschulbildung, 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

FMS: Workplace, Space Management

4,0 vor 3 Jahren

Kommentare: Overall our experience with FM has been a positive one. As the administrator, implementation and subsequent upgrades have been frustrating at times; but that happens with all software products. Our end users have been pleased with the ease of use and have been exceedingly happy with the amount of data they are able to glean from the system. The system has been able to quickly provide data for LEAN initiatives, national surveys, state required reports, etc. that in the past has taken weeks to gather and format.

Vorteile:

The most impactful thing about this software for our department, and the university as a whole, is the ability to quickly access floor plans for over 250 buildings, easily color code them according to different data points, and export them.

Nachteile:

As the Administrator and the person who single-handedly set up our system, my continuing frustration has been the lack of documentation regarding the data fields that come with the system out of the box. I have spent hours setting up fields in various tables and connecting them to fields in other tables, only to find out later that those fields were already set up. I felt like I was flying blind without any documentation of the built in table fields and their relationships between tables.

Antwort von FM:Systems

vor 3 Jahren

Hi Lisa, thank you for the feedback! We are happy to hear that FM:Systems has been able to create a more seamless experience in pulling data and accessibility to floor plans. However, we're sorry to hear of your less than satisfactory experience around lack of documentation, and hope you will accept our sincerest apologies. We are committed to providing great customer service and I have shared your feedback with our Customer Success team to hopefully make things right. Please don't hesitate to reach out if you have any additional feedback at info@fmsystems.com.

Betty
Facilities Supervisor in USA
Öl & Energie, 5.001–10.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

FM Systems

3,0 vor 3 Jahren

Kommentare: I really do like the system and all of the options that come with it.

Vorteile:

I like all of the features that the product has.

Nachteile:

The customer service when needing assistance with a request that it not system shutdown critical can take several days to receive help and depending on the request could take even longer.

Antwort von FM:Systems

vor 3 Jahren

Hi Betty, thank you for the feedback! We are happy to hear that you made the switch to FM:Systems have been enjoying the features the product has to offer! However, we are so sorry to hear of your less than satisfactory experience with our support team. We are committed to providing great customer service and I have shared your feedback with our Customer Success team to hopefully make things right. Please don't hesitate to reach out if you have any additional feedback at info@fmsystems.com.

Michael
Senior Space Coordinator in USA
Versicherung, 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

FM:Systems Review - 2021

4,0 vor 3 Jahren

Kommentare: Overall, I have had a good experience with FMS and have very little to be negative about.

Vorteile:

The reporting capabilities are the largest and most critical function I want to comment on. The ability to filter the data you want similar to Excel and then export the exact/specific data you want to Excel in just a few clicks is fantastic. Creating ad hoc reports for a specific request or question is very easy.

Nachteile:

As is norm with any 3rd party vendor / software, the sales team promises the world and says every feature is available and possible. Only to find out that it is in the future roadmap and not yet released. There's also the issue of customizable and configurable - lots of things we want were possible but defined in a way that it would cost money to implement.

Antwort von FM:Systems

vor 3 Jahren

Hi Michael, thank you for the wonderful review and for taking the time to share your feedback with us. We are so happy to hear that you are enjoying FM:Systems' reporting functionality. We have some exciting new releases coming soon in the product roadmap, so I will make sure our team touches base and provides an update on timing!

Keith
Director, Space Management in USA
Hochschulbildung, 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

FM:Interact as a Space Management Facilitator

4,0 vor 3 Jahren

Kommentare: Overall, FM:Interact has been a power player in providing mission-critical space data for the University. It's been a game changer in accuracy and accountability.

Vorteile:

The space management tool is most impact for our organization. It is critical to know the amount of space, the ownership of the space (university, foundations, leased), the responsible stewards of the space (college/school/MBU), and the occupants of the space (employee, student, visitor). The data acquired provides a real-time snapshot of the amount and location of our total facility inventory,

Nachteile:

We we receive a very high volume of revit files, replacing autocad files, as project deliverables. However, to upload and publish revit files in FM:Interact is a challenge at best (often unsuccessful). As more projects are designed in a revit environment, It would be exciting to see FM:Systems to meet this challenge.

Antwort von FM:Systems

vor 3 Jahren

Hi Keith! We are thrilled to have you as part of the FM:Systems family! Thank you for sharing your kind words with us and the positive review. We are so happy that our software has been a game changer for your university around accuracy and accountability. We are also always up to the challenge to continue improving, and therefore I have shared your feedback with our product team. If you have any other product suggestions, please feel free to email us at info@fmsystems.com.

Ronald
Sr. Occupancy Planner in USA
Pharmazeutika, 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

JLL Occupancy Planning

4,0 vor 6 Jahren

Kommentare: Better reporting and graphic views than Archibus

Vorteile:

Web based. Graphic views. Occupancy Zones. Scenario Planning.

Nachteile:

1) Scenario Planning Block & Stack needs to be able to sync (refresh) with live production data of occupied buildings during scenario planning duration. Live space assignments (New hires and departures) are not updated in the scenario, so accurate planning based upon open/occupied seats is not possible without keeping track manually in separate system. Should also be able to ONLY promote moves for actual people, and not have to include Open position seat assignments in the move planner as new hires, when the people do not exist yet? 2) Cannot move people in and out of Occupancy Zones or Locker Asset module using Move Planner Module. I believe move people in and out of Occupancy Zones using Move Planner Module (posted moves) will be coming this year. Would be great if locker assignment (associated with zone assignments) could somehow be connected to Move Planner module as option. 3) Portfolio Summary report should include vacant Occupancy (Mobile) Zone physical desk counts. This way client can get easy accurate total physical occupied and vacant desk counts of vacant (room) desks and vacant desks assigned to an Occupancy zone, without the zone ratio factored in?

Verifizierter Rezensent
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Be Ready to Build, Not Take Off

4,0 vor 6 Jahren

Kommentare: It can function incredibly well, but anticipate an investment period.

Vorteile:

There is the ability to customize and add any fields conceived of. Can connect module upon module to support global data and interfacing.

Nachteile:

If you're expecting an out-of-the-box solution, this won't automatically deliver industry standards. You build and decide what you want, which requires a specialized skillset.

Roy
Office Systems Coordinator III in USA
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

FM:Interact is a pleasure to use

5,0 vor 7 Jahren

Vorteile:

FM:Interact is a solid choice for centralizing and organizing a large portfolio such as ours. Ease of use is key and FM:Interact hits the mark.

Nachteile:

Reporting is lacking. Free solutions like Microsoft PowerBI make it easy and I hope to one day see FM:Systems publish content packs for it that will allow PowerBI to integrate seamlessly with FM:Interact data.

Verifizierter Rezensent
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Internet, 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

Robust software -- Needs a lot of planning

3,0 vor 6 Jahren

Kommentare: We are using the program for Space Managment and Move Management. We will be rolling it out globally and it has taken a long time to get it to this place.

Vorteile:

It is robust and can handle a lot of the basic and custom Workplace tasks including (move management, space managment, ticket management, scenario planning, etc). The new scenario planning tools is great.

Nachteile:

Without extensive planning and configuration, there will be a lot of issues. Not as user friendly as I would like. Also, if the data is hosted by FM, it can be slow.

Jerry
Sr. Facility Engineer in USA
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Very good user interface and excellent sys admin tools. Easy data integrations.

5,0 vor 6 Jahren

Vorteile:

DWF viewer and system admin tools. The ease of installing hot fixes. Integration to SSRS reporting........

Nachteile:

Security roles and groups are too granualar. It is very difficult to manage the access rights across the many groups and role since many came oveer from an FMSpace 7.2 conversion

Bill
CAD/CAFM Administrator in USA
Finanzdienstleistungen, 5.001–10.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Like some of the functions

3,0 vor 6 Jahren

Kommentare: I like that making changes to views is fairly simple. Also we are able to do a fair amount of stuff without the need for a lot of support help.

Vorteile:

The ability to tie Autocad floor plans to a database system..........................................

Nachteile:

I would like to see the markup and measure feature to be more developed. Kind of like how it used to be in FM 7.5. Also would like to see the ability to do department SF info and report on it.

Mark
Facility Management and Security Manager in USA
Rechtsberatung, 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

FM: Interact review

4,0 vor 6 Jahren

Vorteile:

The thing I like most is the ability to include the various modules (asset tracking, service requests, etc.) including uploading documents.

Nachteile:

The thing I like the least is that it sometimes is very slow, gets caught in a buffering cycle, and will freeze. It is also fairly complex to make changes without going to customer service.

Ivan
Head of Security and Technology
, 5.001–10.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung
Quelle: SoftwareAdvice

FM Interact is a great tool to manage Facilities sites, data & moves.

4,0 vor 7 Jahren

Vorteile:

FM Interact is a good Facilities tool to manage Facilities sites globally. Its relatively simple to use. New Report functionality will help performance.

Nachteile:

When running patches, it takes a bit more time due to cutting and pasting data from folders. It would be nice if an automated tool could manage this.

Matt
FM Administrator in USA
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

FM is a great product and I am learning how to do reporting and cant wait to show leadership.

4,0 vor 6 Jahren

Vorteile:

Once everything is set up it manages itself and is easy for most to use. We have techs that are not great with computers and can still use the system affectively

Nachteile:

That it can be hard to fix issues without making phone calls. Always a hassle dealing with internal IT and your techs.

Elizabeth
Process Management Office in USA
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Complicated if you are not familiar with databases, but can provide a lot of data.

3,0 vor 6 Jahren

Vorteile:

Collects a lot of data. I'm excited to use the new report builder and create more graphic reports. Great potential for us, just need to set it up better!

Nachteile:

Complicated to set up, especially since we don't have documentation on the original setup. Our system is slow too.

Rosalie
Facility Planner in USA
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Very very happy

5,0 vor 6 Jahren

Vorteile:

I really like the user interface with the graphics. I like flexibility and ease of use. Very user friendly.

Nachteile:

Working on reporting but it is getting better. Sometime it is not easy to find what I am looking for to change in the system...fields, etc...

Victoria
Facilities Analyst/Database Admin in USA
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

FM: Interact Review

5,0 vor 6 Jahren

Vorteile:

I've been using FM for over a decade and it keeps getting better and better. Love how customizable it can be. This software offers something for every purpose which is good.

Nachteile:

Performance speed is the biggest concern globally.

Verifizierter Rezensent
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Hochschulbildung, 11–50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

Space Management

4,0 vor 6 Jahren

Kommentare: Tracking Department locations, and room data.

Vorteile:

It is easy to navigate and users quickly pick up on navigating through floor plans and views. Tech support is always on top of my issues and resolves things quickly and efficiently.

Nachteile:

A few of the programs features do not align with our company's processes, which turns into a custom build scenario.

Teresa
Space Planning Manager in USA
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Like what it can do but would like to have more interaction with FM to help implement better.

3,0 vor 6 Jahren

Vorteile:

Variety of modules and constant growth and improvement of the tools based on the changing world of facilities and space management.

Nachteile:

Not always as user-friendly for users.

Lynne
Lynne
Systems Administrator in USA
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Krankenhausversorgung & Gesundheitswesen, 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Systems Administrator

4,0 vor 6 Jahren

Kommentare: Good. But needed lots of customization.

Vorteile:

Ease of Use Configurability and Customization

Nachteile:

No mandatory fields in child views Slowness in overall website

Verifizierter Rezensent
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Finanzdienstleistungen, 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

Great idea, but feels more like FM:Might Interact Eventually

4,0 vor 6 Jahren

Kommentare: Mostly using the seating plan information to find where people sit, or to see who sits in a particular area.

Vorteile:

The search and browse facilities and accuracy of the drawing.

Nachteile:

The speed of ... search, fetching drawings ... pretty much everything. It is SO slow and laggy. Comparable web applications that deal with far larger databases work with no apparent latency. The route into the package (which requires many hops) at our firm is rather unnecessary too, though I seem to have managed to overcome that, and achieve SSO with our in house URL shortener.

Dan
Executive Vice President in USA
Verwendete die Software für: Nicht angeboten
Herkunft der Bewertung

FM Success!

5,0 vor 10 Jahren

Kommentare: I have always maintained that what makes FM:Interact so special is primarily three things: Looks Good, Easy to Use, and Highly Configurable. It has its own set of tools to easily add and edit forms, views, and floor plan maps. Also, the product has its own API and is SQL Server based to easily integrate with other systems such as HR as needed.
FM:Systems got it right - they understand that every organization is different, but at the same time, needs to have a core set of FM standards and structure at its core. The company is led by an IFMA Fellow, Mike Schley, who is committed to incorporating industry topics and trends such as BIM, Alternative WorkSpace (AWS) and Hoteling into the product.
This web-based and mobile-ready software stands out by being so flexible and scalable that it helps to ensure that it will grow in the organization. The only mistake you can make is not to leverage it enough - it's a powerful tool to support your facility - highly recommended!

david
manager in USA
Finanzdienstleistungen, 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

review

4,0 vor 6 Jahren

Kommentare: excellent customer service from the entire team.

Vorteile:

i personally like the ease of use of the software

Nachteile:

would like a more modern look. the system is working well but just looks a little outdated.

Sandra
Facility Planning Engineer in USA
Hausmeisterservice, 5.001–10.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

Good product

4,0 vor 3 Jahren

Kommentare: space management

Vorteile:

It is relatively easy to use most of the time.

Nachteile:

Writing reports is difficult -- it's going to take us a while to get there.

Antwort von FM:Systems

vor 3 Jahren

Hi Sandra! We are thrilled to have you as part of the FM:Systems family! Thank you for sharing your kind words with us and the positive review. It means the world to our entire team! We look forward to the continued partnership and collaboration.

sunwoo
Assistant manager in USA
Automotive, 501–1.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 1-5 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

FM system overall testing

5,0 vor 6 Jahren

Vorteile:

it is easy to learn and use. All menus is well organized and very user friendly. I'd like to have deeper experience with this system.

Nachteile:

I have been used it in only test environment but system is very slow one menu to other menu.