Wir helfen Unternehmen in Deutschland
seit 15 Jahren bei der Softwareauswahl

Über SpiraTest

Webbasierte Software, die dir hilft, bessere Anforderungen zu schreiben, deine Testfälle zu verwalten und Fehler zu verfolgen.

Erfahre mehr über SpiraTest

Vorteile:

The support team has been excellent. I really appreciate their prompt, courteous responses.

Nachteile:

If you don't use the software the way they expect, it can be difficult to work around it.

Bewertungen zu SpiraTest

Durchschnittliche Bewertung

Benutzerfreundlichkeit
3,9
Kundenservice
4,5
Funktionen
3,8
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
4,4

Weiterempfehlungsquote

7,7/10

SpiraTest hat eine Gesamtbewertung von 4,0 von 5 Sternen basierend auf 104 Nutzerbewertungen auf Capterra.

Hast du SpiraTest bereits verwendet?

Teile deine Erfahrungen mit anderen Softwareinteressenten.

Nutzerbewertungen filtern (104)

Segundo
Segundo
Google IT Support Specialist in Ecuador
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Bildungsmanagement, 2–10 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

Spiratest Review

5,0 vor 3 Jahren

Kommentare: Well besides the cost, the over all experience is great!!! The interface has nothing to be complained about.

Vorteile:

Excellent product!!! So easy to organize and manage your team. Creating requirements is quite simple . We can create software requirements and insert child features in an instant. Managing the priorities for your teams testing is a breeze with color coded priorities. Observing and handling your teams test steps is made easier to handle with the color coded labeling.

Nachteile:

The only thing that I can say is that it is expensive costing over $9k per year!! Also, you have to lie $40 a month for each concurrent user.

Antwort von Inflectra

vor 3 Jahren

Thanks for the response, we're glad you like the product and features. On the pricing side, we are one of the few tools to price by concurrent user and we try and keep our prices to be one of the more affordable in the industry. Also the price per concurrent user decreases the more users you purchase.

Verifizierter Rezensent
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Übersetzung und Lokalisierung, 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

SpiraTest, a one stop shop for Quality Management

4,0 vor 2 Jahren

Kommentare: As the company's SpiraTest administrator, I have been able to present the highlights to new users in 30 minute sessions, and that's how easy it is to get new users started on using the suite. The software is easy to use, but its only limitation is its lack of third-[arty integration to some popular software packages such as RemedyForce.

Vorteile:

SpiraTest is a little-known Quality Management suite, but it packs a lot under the hood. It is readily customizable, has an easily navigable UI, and its main modules are Planning )Requirements, Planning Board, Releases, Documents), Testing (Test Cases, Test Sets, Test Runs, Automation Hosts, and Configurations), Developing (Source Code, Commits, and Pull Requests) and Tracking (Incidents, Risks, Tasks, and Resources). The reports and graphs are intuitive and can be exported to a variety of formats for sharing and dissemination.

Nachteile:

The one glaring feature lacking in this software package is the limited of third-party integration it supports. Currently SpiraTest doesn't have a plug-in for Remedy Integration, although there is one for SalesForce.

Antwort von Inflectra

letztes Jahr

Thanks for the review. Appreciate the feedback on 'Remedy' will pass that on.

Begonia
Senior Software QA, team lead in USA
Medizinische Geräte, 51–200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Love version 4 but we are unable to work with version 5

2,0 vor 7 Jahren

Kommentare: My rating above is for Spiratest version 5. We have used and loved Spiratest for the last three years but we are considering stop using after seeing version 5 features. We upgraded to version 5 months ago and we have to downgrade it because we found it unusable. I was hoping something has gone wrong with the upgrade and we started a trial version hosted by Inflecta so we could create a brand new project and work with any problems and issues with tech support. It turns out the original upgrade was working fine and what we thought were bugs turned out to be features. We can't work with projects that force our test cases to be ordered alphabetically. To upgrade to version 5 will cause us to spend a lot of time creating custom fields and assigning numbers so we can see the test cases in the order we like. In addition, we will need to write code so we can have a report that doesn't list the test cases in alphabetical order. It doesn't make sense to us to spend time and resources trying to make the new version work like the previous version. I am not opposed to software changes and I am always happy to see improvements in new versions but this is a showstopper for us. We are in the process of deciding whether we need to keep to paying our annual fee if we are not going to continue upgrading the software. Sorry, we loved your software but you lost us here.

Vorteile:

The colors

Nachteile:

See my previous comments

Antwort von Inflectra

vor 7 Jahren

Hi Begonia Sorry that you didn't like the changes in v5.0. Unfortunately for every user that liked the way the old folders and test cases worked, a much larger number really didn't like them and found them cumbersome and confusing. That's why we did the redesign in v5.0 and most of our users are much happier. But as the old saying goes, you cannot please everyone! If you really need it to work the old way, then probably staying on v4.0 makes the most sense.

Verifizierter Rezensent
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Non-Profit-Organisation Management, 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

Test Management Service for Modern Ways of Working

4,0 vor 3 Jahren

Kommentare: It's a well-developed testing solution with a price model that beats many other product hands down. If you have testers who walk on to cover a project, then go back to their day jobs between testing cycles, give SpiraTest another look.

Vorteile:

I like the fact that a cloud-hosted version of the software is available.

Nachteile:

It can be a bit too rigid in the way it expects testing to be performed, which can be a barrier to getting things done. If you don't use the software the way they expect, it can be difficult to work around it.

Tejaswi
Test Engineer in Schweden
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Computer-Software, 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung
Quelle: GetApp

Probably the best test management software available!

4,0 vor 6 Jahren

Vorteile:

Creating and and reusing test case is very simple. It helps teams communicate regarding test cases while performing QA duties. Integration are great and also you can undo deleting.

Nachteile:

UI can be imporved. The customization is not that great. Tracking modules can be improved, all these can be improved to make this good tool a great tool.

Alejandra
Quality Assurance Lead in
Verwendete die Software für: Nicht angeboten
Herkunft der Bewertung

Spira Test Version v2.1 has many functionalities of a Robust Testing Tool.

3,0 vor 15 Jahren

Kommentare: Spira Test Version v2.1 has many functionalities of a Robust Testing Tool, it is complex and has what a project needs to start testing, but it is difficult to implement and I can see project monitoring a little bit weak if the test execution was not correctly followed from the start. It would be good to see a few more features and clean up the UI to be able to have a better feeling of the projects you are currently working on. A concern is the security when using Jira integration, I don't think we need to personalize and configure every bit of the tool specially in installation files adding sensitive information should be left optional (like in other project settings). New features in the configuration management would also help to identify the items we are working on. Thanks for all your continuous support. Alejandra Gonzalez

Vorteile:

- Defects will open new ticket in Jira ( with new ID ) email notification will be set to Spira Test ID - Integration with documents from MS Office available in HTML, XML, Word and Excel formats. - Integrated with third party software: Available Jira Integration - Available to Import test cases from excel with provided SpiraTestImporterTemplate.xls - Highlights changes to requirements and test cases in History - Changes can trigger e-mail alerts or notification of users set up. - Updates are available for download in the website. - Monitor Environment and Resource Usage: Available in Application event logs from server to administrator - Can add attachments to requirements and test cases, but need to click on it to open it and the description is an alt tag to the name of file. - DB Backup options available to db administrator. - Tool support resources: Comprehensive on-line help, email, and examples supplied in demo trial.

Nachteile:

- Would like the User interface to be a little more friendly and easy to use. - Spira Test implementation needs to configure too many sensitive user information in the configuration file, would like to see another version that does not need this - Was not clear if the history of execution status is saved after many executions just saw some saved. - Email sent from Incidents created from Spira test makes tracking difficult, the subject of project. is not in the title of email, only the id, that is the next ID available for all projects. - Server performance issues, Spira Test requires too many resources. - Record and play not available in this Software version. - Need to update installation files (*.config) for each user that is using the tool. User setup and access process is too long.

Verifizierter Rezensent
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Personalwesen, 501–1.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 1-5 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

Very simple tool that works well within our organisation

4,0 vor 6 Jahren

Kommentare: The major benefit was the introduction of formalised test management processes that inherently increase the capability maturity of our organisation.

Vorteile:

Very easy to use and setup. The requirement management is suitable and integrates well with test management and incident management (defects). By far the best part of the software is that we get all this are a very reasonable price.

Nachteile:

Some inconsistencies with editing such as placing of 'save' button and the wording for those buttons that are moderately unintuitive. Custom Reporting would be nice and the reports in general need work; as does the exporting of graphs (which are all black).

Antwort von Inflectra

vor 6 Jahren

Hello, Thank you for reviewing SpiraTest. We wanted you to know that we have released a new version of SpiraTest which includes a new Custom Graphing feature. We hope you will find it useful for your reporting needs.

Verifizierter Rezensent
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Verwendete die Software für: Nicht angeboten
Herkunft der Bewertung

SpiraTest for effective Test Management

4,0 vor 6 Jahren

Vorteile:

Our team reviewed the free trial of SpiraTest as a test management tool for our organization. It was very easy to use and setup. Now, we are looking at purchasing it. It integrates easily with Jira as a project management tool and it is a cheaper option to other test management tools .

Nachteile:

I realize that once a user is created there is no way of deleting them, you can only disable the user. Some things like the auto-mail content and workflow names are not customizable.

Xavier
Quality and Test Architect Lead in Spanien
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Staatsverwaltung, 201–500 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 1-5 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung
Quelle: GetApp

You don't need to spend a lot of money in a Test Management Tool - Use SpiraTest

5,0 vor 5 Jahren

Vorteile:

Great usability. It has a lot of features, easy to configure and customize. We need to migrate our projects from HP QC/ALM to SpiraTest and it has a great tool to migrate everything (releases, traceability, requirements, test cases, executions, ...). We've tested in some projects and works great.

Nachteile:

It needs only more BI or reporting customization, but I think is enough now for most projects. Some other integrations will be great, like some tools for exploratory or acceptance testing (Microfocus Sprinter, ...).

Liberal
Liberal
Testing analyst in Tarjeta Naranja in
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
, 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Nicht angeboten
Herkunft der Bewertung
Quelle: GetApp

Very good test tool and the support is excellent

5,0 vor 9 Jahren

Kommentare: We have testing our health systems with trial Spira Test and Spira Team amd tjese `products meet all our nees, and We found will be a very good balance of cost and functionality and the support team of Inflectra Sales is excelent.They replied all my questions and issues with the Spira Team instalation.

Vorteile:

Spira Team is flexible and ease to use in destop or web system, in dot net technologies and IIS 7.5 We hope my companies will buy these producs The customers support is very good. The cost is very low alongside other products and very good benefits

Nachteile:

Have not found any yet

Guy
Senior QA Analyst in UK
Computer-Software, Selbstständig
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

Varied feature set yet unintuitive to use

3,0 vor 5 Jahren

Kommentare: Finding a suitable test management system isn't an easy thing to do and various of the features offered by SpiraTest in theory come off sounding like a good thing, in practice however it feels more like a battle when it comes to using it on a regular basis and sometimes leaves the user desiring simpler solutions, which may not offer this almost object-oriented like approach to reusable content, but are at least easier to learn and use.

Vorteile:

Can share and re-use test content Can create instances of a test that allow for snapshots relevant to the time of execution

Nachteile:

Tricky to learn / Not intuitive Interface doesn't make the re-use of test content as straight forward as it could be Attachment system can result in a messy collection of files stored within repository (and can then make selecting attachments tricky too)

Antwort von Inflectra

vor 5 Jahren

I'm sorry that you found it harder to use SpiraTest than anticipated. We put significant effort into the UX to make it work for teams and projects of different sizes, and we will certainly listen to your feedback to see how we can do even better.

Jeremy
Software QA Analyst in USA
Computer-Software, 501–1.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

Great tool to help organize your testing needs

4,0 vor 7 Jahren

Kommentare: A few years ago we worked with this product on a trial basis. Everyone liked the fact that it helped keep our test cases organized and consistent regardless of who wrote them. We were able to bring the product on full time. When I left the company moved to another one, SPIRA was one of the first software applications that I pushed for to have and I continue to do so.

Ben
Support/Test in
Verwendete die Software für: Nicht angeboten
Herkunft der Bewertung

Spiratest Review

2,0 vor 10 Jahren

Kommentare: We have found that some of the things we want to be able to do, which we believe most software companies would like to do are not available. When we discuss this with support, they are very responsive, but don't seem to understand what we are trying to achieve, so we work with them for 3-4 days and then they say ' Oh you can't do that'. An example, is as follows:- We now need to test our software running on Windows 2012R2. Through the software there is a way to see what has been tested on 2012, but it is impossible to get a report of a view of things that have not been run against 2012. We think this is quite fundamental. The good things about Spiratest is that support is very responsive.

Antwort von Inflectra

vor 10 Jahren

We have consistently tried to explain to them the difference between Test Runs and Test Cases and how the reports work, but I think they have some specific reporting needs that do not come out of the box. For the stated example, the Test Case and Test Set Summary reports show what needs to be executed and the Test Run report shows what has been executed. There is an ability to create custom reports in the latest version, but I think they didn't want to go down this route for some reason.

Torsten
Software Test Manager in
Verwendete die Software für: Nicht angeboten
Herkunft der Bewertung

Not for everyone

3,0 vor 11 Jahren

Kommentare: Spiratest has a lot of features but is very annoying to work with. If you have a very rigid development process it might be a product for you but if you are into more agile processes and/or get annoyed by bad UX this is not a product for you.

Vorteile:

Very feature rich

Nachteile:

Slow Extremely lousy inline editing of test cases UX needs major improvements You loose edits of test steps if pressing save before update Workflow is very waterfall or V-model centric.

Antwort von Inflectra

vor 11 Jahren

We're sorry to hear that Torsten didn't find SpiraTest appropriate for his organization. The version he's using is not the most recent one and many of his items of feedback have already been addressed, and the others are addressed in the upcoming v4.0 release. Specifically the feedback around Agile is interesting since SpiraTest provides built-in support for user stories, sprints (iterations), unit test integration and acceptance tests mapped to user stories. The UI has been completely updated in our v4.0 release which addresses the UX issues.

Vino Kumar
UI / UX Designer in Indien
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

Prefect Monitoring Solution for Testing

5,0 vor 6 Jahren

Vorteile:

The User Interface and Test Case structure is amazing. ST got folder structure so that users can setup the modules per folder per release. I can execute same test case for each release.

Nachteile:

The lack of branching and versioning of test cases. Need to improve in requirements for test steps. SpiraTest requires too many resources

Arie
Mr. in
Verwendete die Software für: Nicht angeboten
Herkunft der Bewertung

Spiratests is for us qualified to support our testorganisation and even improve our organisation.

4,0 vor 15 Jahren

Kommentare: Spiratests is for us qualified to support our testorganisation and even improve our organisation. We just installed it and used it. All users are surprised with the results.

Vorteile:

Easy tu use and to implement. Even with relative small knowledge of testing organisation. Our testeam is very enthousiastic of the results. We are testing a major upgrade and we are using this project to test Spiratest. We have a clear overview now of the the testresults. Because of the furtures of the software we also learn to improve our testorganisation.

Nachteile:

Difficult to install on a pc as a common user. However. For system administrators the installation software makes it easy for people with their skills.

Ivar
Consultant in
Verwendete die Software für: Nicht angeboten
Herkunft der Bewertung

OK - but misses functionality in integration interface

3,0 vor 13 Jahren

Kommentare: neutral as per now.

Vorteile:

I have only checked out the integration with other systems - Jira on my part. Nice setup for mapping the fields and parameters in integration with JIRA.

Nachteile:

I find the user interface very messy and 'undelicate'. The main reason for us to consider SpiraTeam is to have one 'own' system for the QA team. Everything else is in Jira. However - the mapping from Jira to SpiraTeam misses requirements. The only thing that can be sync'ed are Incidents. And we are not happy to call a use case or feature enhancement in Jira an incident in SpiraTeam. I have logged this with support.

Bryan
General Manager Products and Services in
Verwendete die Software für: Nicht angeboten
Herkunft der Bewertung

I would recommend SpiraTest without any reservations to large and small companies.

5,0 vor 15 Jahren

Kommentare: I would recommend SpiraTest without any reservations to large and small companies who want to take testing seriously.

Vorteile:

SpiraTest is a lightweight and affordable but full featured testing tool. We use it extensively to manage requirements and test conditions with a full integration with our JIRA issue tracking implementation. I must compliment Inflectra/SpiraTest on their incredible support services. They respond quickly to issues on the few times I have needed to use them and have provided answers extemely quickly and with minimal fuss.

Nachteile:

Only works on Microsoft SQL and Windows at the moment.

Jaime
Sr. Manager in
Verwendete die Software für: Nicht angeboten
Herkunft der Bewertung

The product is evolving and getting more useful. A tutorial for testers and for managers will.

4,0 vor 16 Jahren

Kommentare: The product is evolving and getting more useful.
A tutorial for testers and for managers will be very useful. Specially for some of the testers, they need to get use to work with a testing software and it might be a big change in their work habit.

Vorteile:

The product has most of the features we need. Quick, effective an friendly support.

Nachteile:

Missing printer friendly capability for graphics/histograms Missing capability to export a graph/figure The test report doesn't export to Excel the test steps, only tabular information. After a refresh, the page comes back to the top, in stead of remembering the current scroll position

Bilge
Software Developer in Test in Türkei
Verwendete die Software für: Nicht angeboten
Herkunft der Bewertung

SpiraTest

5,0 vor 9 Jahren

Kommentare: In our company we began using SpiraTest to run our automated tests and also getting the test run results both for manual and automated tests. It's quite powerful. Short time ago I had some difficulties on integrating selenium webdriver tests to SpiraTest. I wrote emails directly to Inflectra and in a very short time they answered with some advices. It didn't work at first sight, so I wrote back and they replied quite quickly. Customer Service is great, they don't stop till giving you the right answer. I advise everybody to use SpiraTest.

Ashish
Asst Mgr -QA in
Verwendete die Software für: Nicht angeboten
Herkunft der Bewertung

Low Priced tool, value for money.

4,0 vor 11 Jahren

Kommentare: In all, the tool is almost there on top, but need some UI revamp which we are hoping in V4.0.
Let me know if 4.0 beta version is available for demo view

Vorteile:

Good and simple UI, Rich features

Nachteile:

Should have good reporting capabilities- Graphical reporting - (pie charts, bar graphs) Test case management is not very intuitive- Cut, copy and paste, move test cases across the test case folders, test sets is not easy Incident Management - multiple tabs are not too user friendly

Becky
PMO Manager in USA
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

IT Organizational Improvement in Testing

4,0 vor 7 Jahren

Kommentare: Our first two projects are utilizing the Spira tool. This was not an easy effort for us to use something new as spreadsheets were our testing tool. We have had significant improvement in our testing process. We are very satisfied with the tool from both a processing perspective and the ease of use for the testers.

Vorteile:

Ease of user for the testers

Nachteile:

The administrative set for a nontechnical users was challenging but manageable

Alex
Software QA Manager in
Verwendete die Software für: Nicht angeboten
Herkunft der Bewertung

Excellent customer support.

4,0 vor 16 Jahren

Kommentare: Still early, but based on my experience with this tool and with Test Director, I believe that this tool would be the way to go. Especially from an ROI perspective. For a QA Test Management solution, it seems like it will be excellent.

Vorteile:

Excellent customer support. If you have a question, they answer it quickly and with complete straight forward answers. Excellent cost. This makes it accessible to every company with QA and Test Management needs. Pretty straight forward.

Nachteile:

None encountered yet.

Amanda
QA Team Lead in
Verwendete die Software für: Nicht angeboten
Herkunft der Bewertung

The product is quick and easy to use right out of the box.

4,0 vor 15 Jahren

Kommentare: The product is quick and easy to use right out of the box. It is a great answer to our QA Management needs, especially for a smaller company like ours.

Vorteile:

The support team has been excellent. I really appreciate their prompt, courteous responses! Very affordable.

Nachteile:

My only compaint is the lack of integration with Axosoft Ontime. Although it is my understanding that is coming very soon.

Antwort von Inflectra

vor 14 Jahren

We have released integration with AxoSoft OnTime since this review was written.

John
John
QA Manager in
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Internet, 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung
Quelle: GetApp
5,0 vor 9 Jahren