Wir helfen Unternehmen in Deutschland
seit 15 Jahren bei der Softwareauswahl

Cerner Ambulatory EHR Erfahrungen

Über Cerner Ambulatory EHR

Cerner Ambulatory unterstützt mehr als 55 Fachrichtungen, indem integrierte klinische und finanzielle Lösungen und Dienstleistungen bereitgestellt werden.

Erfahre mehr über Cerner Ambulatory EHR

Vorteile:

I like that PowerChart is easy to navigate and customize depending on the user. The customer support is always a phone call away if you need them.

Nachteile:

I find that this software is not oriented towards the physical therapist, and it is very tough to integrate information between departments in the hospital.

Bewertungen zu Cerner Ambulatory EHR

Durchschnittliche Bewertung

Benutzerfreundlichkeit
3,5
Kundenservice
3,6
Funktionen
3,6
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
3,4

Weiterempfehlungsquote

6,4/10

Cerner Ambulatory EHR hat eine Gesamtbewertung von 3,8 von 5 Sternen basierend auf 159 Nutzerbewertungen auf Capterra.

Hast du Cerner Ambulatory EHR bereits verwendet?

Teile deine Erfahrungen mit anderen Softwareinteressenten.

Nutzerbewertungen filtern (159)

KRENCISWEL
KRENCISWEL
Medical Laboratory Scientist in Katar
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Krankenhausversorgung & Gesundheitswesen, 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Excellent

5,0 vor 6 Jahren

Kommentare: Less paperwork, less patient waiting time, efficient and accurate management of samples through the use of barcode system within the software.

Vorteile:

I have been working with cerner powerchart since 2016 and it has been very helpful with managing patient orders specially with regards to clinical laboratory test orders. It is very organized and all clinical orders are separated by classification. It has decreased the patient waiting time and processing time for the lab where I am working. Overall its very helpful to medical professionals like me.

Nachteile:

There is really no cons for this software. Occassional downtime, updates and server problems but those were just minor technical difficulties. And are always adressed by the support team efficiently.

Verifizierter Rezensent
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Gesundheit, Wellness & Fitness, 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 1-5 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

Makes things easy

5,0 vor 5 Jahren

Kommentare: It is a great place to compile all records and look up patient information when needed. It has helped me stay on track with clinic notes.

Vorteile:

I like that Cerner is transparent enough so that nothing is too hard to figure out. I am able to find patients easily, write clinic notes easily, and view past records easily.

Nachteile:

You can only see up to 500 records before things start to disappear. I do not like this. Additionally, it can be hard to find certain records, perhaps a search bar within the records would make things easier.

lang
Physician in USA
Medizinische Praxis, 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung
Quelle: SoftwareAdvice

Cerner just living off old software and the name

1,0 vor 7 Monaten

Kommentare: Horrible, their IT will blame and make excuses of why the product fails to live up to its reputation. They hire kids that have no right being in IT/system analyst, coders, etc. They all use this a way into the field and no nothing about coding even for the most basic things required in documentation i.e. Fishbone labs, smart templates(all show not aligned, no data, etc.) The problems are so signifcant that they can't possibly be overcome.

Vorteile:

Nothing not one single good thing that I can say about Cerner products or the corporation. It seems that there are a lot of reviews from people who have never actually used the product or are required to use the product daily. I feel like these review are useless because they allow a clerk to front desk person to comment and that comment holds just as much weight as the provider/physian responsible for documenting, ordering, etc. that actually has a license on the line.

Nachteile:

Everything: The power chart templates are useless, the labs are horrible on interoperability(getting outside labs to pull into results review), workflows lack vision on what is needed and how to view it in a timely manner, the powerforms/powernotes are just as useless. The system is lightyears behind less expensive products. Our current system is has been updated 3 times and still doesn't even have ICD 10 codes correctly entered making my job 10 times harder, ICD 10 codes went into affect >5 years ago and we are still dealing with extensive problems. Its just horrible that Cerner doesnt have one actual physician on staff to guide them in what is needed in daily charting on a patient. The orders fall off after 1 yr from the MAR to where pharmacy can't bill requiring providers to have to cancel and reorder every 6 months to prevent reimbursement problems. This becomes a safety issue and if anyone was actually regulating these EMR's they would be shut down immediately for concerns of patient safety.

Christine
Unit Clerk in USA
Krankenhausversorgung & Gesundheitswesen, 501–1.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Cerner EMR

4,0 vor 4 Monaten

Kommentare: Overall experience was great! The training is very straight forward for each specific use making it easy to use and easy to train new employees.

Vorteile:

Ease of use. Very easy program to use and navigate.

Nachteile:

Not having the ability to override some actions. When scheduling emergency C-section surgery would be easier if there was a way to override directly to surgery scheduling.

Ethan
Pharmacist in USA
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Krankenhausversorgung & Gesundheitswesen, 5.001–10.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

Cerner PowerChart Review

4,0 vor 5 Jahren

Kommentare: Overal Cerner PowerChart satisfies electronic medical record needs well with a few areas of improvement. I am not involved with EMR purchasing decisions but from what I understand, Cerner PowerChart is a good product for the money.

Vorteile:

Cerner PowerChart provides a comprehensive location for all medical information. Information display can be customized to fit user needs and provides quick access to pertinent info with continued use. Home screens are customized for each particular practitioners credentials and needs making many commonly used tasks always right at hand. Accessing information from other visits is also easily performed regardless of which encounter the patient was initially pulled up. One of my favorites is the results callback functionality that allows easy review of discharged patients culture results.

Nachteile:

While Cerner is not difficulty to use, not all features are entirely intuitive. Many functions require repeated use and lots of clicking to access and perform relatively simple tasks. While there is a quick link for Meds Manager access for pharmacists, the link does not pull up the current patient profile opened, necessitating re-entering of the patient encounter number which is a bit tedious. Additionally, the disjunction between FirstNet and PowerChart is inconvenient and would be nice if charts opened through FirstNet opened PowerChart rather than a separate entity of FirstNet given the difference in functionality between the two programs.

Lauren
Physical therapist in USA
Krankenhausversorgung & Gesundheitswesen, 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

Tough to use for physical therapists

3,0 vor 3 Jahren

Kommentare: The software is an electronic medical record software that leaves a little bit to be desired especially compared to some of the other EMR choices out there. It is clunky, and a bit disconnected especially between departments which leaves communication gaps which can be dangerous in the hospital situation.

Vorteile:

I understand where everything is located, and the multi-patient task list makes things easy to find in the course of my day.

Nachteile:

I find that this software is not oriented towards the physical therapist, and it is very tough to integrate information between departments in the hospital. I do not like that my patients will "fall off" My list if they are off the unit or floor, which makes it very easy to miss people. I do not like that you can't see the orders for the patient right away and you need to click on each chart to get more detail which makes it cumbersome to schedule. I wish that you were able to use smart phrases similarly to Epic In order to make documenting more efficient. I also dislike the amount of clicks and grids that a physical therapy note requires. It takes a lot of time to document.

Adam
Adam
RN in USA
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Krankenhausversorgung & Gesundheitswesen, 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Organized, but repetitive.

4,0 vor 5 Jahren

Kommentare: Overall it wasn't a hassle and made each day better with it's ease of use. Some days you feel like there's just so much to be done through it and you wish it didn't exist but that's part of what you sign up for in nursing!

Vorteile:

I liked the ease of use and how it allowed for enough tabs for all my patient's charts during any shift. IT allows for most of the required charting to be done just with clicks via the mouse and not too much typing which saves time. It would help generate scores for certain diagnostics which also aids time management.

Nachteile:

A lot of it was repetitive and sometimes the options for a certain part of an assessment didn't quite exactly meet what was assessed. It also times out after a while, which was unfortunate for those days when charting seems to take forever and you leave your desk by a patient or coworker and if not promptly resumed you lose what you were working on, had it not been saved. Makes you really want to get friendly with the save button.

Verifizierter Rezensent
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Krankenhausversorgung & Gesundheitswesen, 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

Improvement from previous system

3,0 vor 3 Monaten

Kommentare: having used multiple EMR/EHR in the last 10+ years. Cerner is an improvement from the previous military EHR which was ancient. However there is still many features missing and requires so many clicks to get to the section or place you want versus other EHR systems.

Vorteile:

Interface capability with inpatient setting and how you can access a patient record from the hospitalization within same system. Patient portal access

Nachteile:

Not as smooth of transition from one “flowsheet” to the next and requires lots of upfront learning. D

Darpan
Darpan
tech lead in USA
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

I would always prefer epic

4,0 vor 3 Jahren

Vorteile:

Legacy tool. Useful in small practices.

Nachteile:

Compatibility with 3rd party tool. All round utilization for every clinical functionality

Latha
RGN in UK
Krankenhausversorgung & Gesundheitswesen, 51–200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

My cerner

5,0 vor 3 Monaten

Vorteile:

Secured , easy to use and retrieve for future reference

Nachteile:

None, everything was covered by the software

Nathaniel
Nurse in USA
Krankenhausversorgung & Gesundheitswesen, 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Cerner Powerchart Review

5,0 vor 6 Jahren

Kommentare: Overall experience was good. I was initially trained on Cerner Powerchart. There are better EMR systems out there as far as flow, successful add-ons, and auto saving features. However, I must say that the ease of charting on systems and pages within the original body of Powerchart software flows very well. I love the short cuts that I am able to use so that my charting time is much faster than veterans using the system. The customization of pages for each department makes it very friendly for the user. And best of all that customized organization you are used to having follows you in case you float to another unit.

Vorteile:

The Pro's about this software include that it can be customized to make changes throughout every department within the hospital system that uses it. This makes the software versatile. I have seldom had a tired day without running through the routine of charting on patients but Cerner allows for the quick access lists of options in my charting that can be expanded when I need it to jog my memory for the descriptor needed in my charting. Unlike other charting systems I have used in the past, a default collapsed list of charting options in Cerner is very helpful. Additionally, Cerner has a lot of built in quick access options for charting that my fellow coworkers asked me to teach them. The ability to chart without the use of a mouse makes everything fly by. This is especially important when the mouse at a charting station doesn't work well. The best part of the customized organization on any specific hospital unit is that this organization of information follows you when you float to other units. This means that if you need to help your buddy unit out the charting time will not slow down due to being in a foreign environment. Very Very Very helpful!

Nachteile:

There is not a built in auto save feature in the charting. The ability to alter charting during my shift is important but there should be a time limit or window within which change to the charting can be counted as initial documentation. If you currently save every so often to ensure your work is not lost and realize information documented was inaccurate then there is a flag on whatever information you change showing that a mistake has been made. This is an unfortunate drawback which points to the lack of autosave features. One other big con to the system is that when outside information is integrated, such as education material from a subscription database online, the patient chart only reflects information documented when added through specific links within Cerner. As an example if you add documentation that you printed off a handout for the patient you cannot link the handout to the patient chart after the fact. This means that prior to printing anything you HAVE to enter the database from a specific designated page in Cerner and attach it to the chart. Only one way in and one way out. Poor organization in the add-ons in Cerner.

Tara
RN in USA
Medizinische Praxis, 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Easiness compared to other products

5,0 vor 5 Jahren

Vorteile:

Compared to other medical management systems, I believe this one is the most simple ones. Less tabs, information populates accurately, and little to no system errors.

Nachteile:

Some functions like the time frame. When a specimen is drawn and collected, results will collect at the time frame the lab was sent out and not the time the lab results were actually populated. Also, it would be nice if certain document notes when created would populate as a New notification.

Javier
Operations Officer in USA
Krankenhausversorgung & Gesundheitswesen, 51–200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

365 Medical EMR

5,0 vor 7 Jahren

Kommentare: Must customizable EMR solution I've had the pleasure of working with. Customer support is just a phone call away and they always answer in 5min or less. Powercharts allows providers to customize macros and auto text in order to streamline their daily workflows. Solutions also provides voice recognition and is compatible with Microsoft and Apple computer. Front desk Sheduling system allows offices to configure call protocols, auto verifies insurances and makes registration paperless. System does seem overwhelming at first, but like everything else if the user is willing to learn and puts their part in customizing their favorites the system simplifies their workday.

Vorteile:

Very customizable to any practice specialty.

Nachteile:

When there are parts of the software that can be improved an enhancement needs to be submitted. These enhancements take a long time to take effect.

Antonice
Nurse in USA
Krankenhausversorgung & Gesundheitswesen, 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Cerner review

4,0 vor 5 Jahren

Kommentare: Well, my overall experience my be a little more significant than others. This program is ONLY used by those in healthcare settings so I get a little more experience and time with it than most.

Vorteile:

I like that it’s now easier to chart. We’re able to chart vitals, admitting notes, doctors and nursing notes, ADL’s and vitals in one swoop. Things aren’t really hard to find either. Once you’re directed where to go and with some practice( which in a hospital of clinic setting you HAVE to use this everyday) it becomes just like texting. Easy and smooth

Nachteile:

There IS a lot of clicking. You basically click maybe twice to get to different options but that is overlooked pretty easily.

David
PACS Assistant in USA
Medizinische Praxis, 5.001–10.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 1-5 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

Easiest way to find patient information and keep it organized

5,0 vor 6 Jahren

Kommentare: As someone who speaks with patients on the phone constantly, I find it useful to be able to open multiple Powerchart files at once. This keeps me focused on the task at hand and after a phone call I can return to the previous patient I was working on. All in all this program has been a life saver.

Vorteile:

The amount of information that is able to be found on this software and organized is truly amazing. This program makes it simple to find patient information in seconds and utilizes the ability to open multiple patients at the same time when things get frantic. I really enjoy the layout of the tabs and subsections within them, as they make it easy to find certain aspects of a patients file without digging through everything and wasting time. As long as staff members upload the information and keep it current there are no problems keeping track of a patients medical record and information.

Nachteile:

I dislike that the software is not always intuitive. Some times there is information that I would like to find, but until I am trained on where to find the information in Powerchart I cannot locate it quickly. With that said, I believe there is simply a large learning curve for so much information and it will just take time - not really a fault in the service itself.

David
AR and Billing Specialist in USA
Krankenhausversorgung & Gesundheitswesen, 501–1.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

There when you need it

4,0 vor 5 Jahren

Kommentare: I work with this on a daily basis and it is a godsend, I pull records on a daily basis filing appeals and what not. I could not be any happier with the software, it is rarely down and when it is, It has been fixed rather quickly.

Vorteile:

I like the ability to look for records by "doctor" it makes it so much easier and fast to get the records you need without searching the entire account and visits.

Nachteile:

I really have too many bad things to say about the software system, it has always been there for me when I need it, I have yet to run into any problems when finding records. Finding older records can sometime be a little tricky but again it works great for me.

Amelia
Patient Benefits in USA
Krankenhausversorgung & Gesundheitswesen, 201–500 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

If a bit clunky, still a valuable product

4,0 vor 3 Jahren

Kommentare: PowerChart is an invaluable tool for our practice. The software allows easy communication, document upload, and provider note taking.

Vorteile:

The product is easy to navigate and organize. Maneuvering between patients is easy and there are few chances at making HIPAA errors due to software.

Nachteile:

Learning to manually alter settings takes some time and user know-how. Getting settings to stay over time can be difficult.

Anna
Surgical/medical assistant in USA
Medizinische Praxis, 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Charting for the better

4,0 vor 2 Jahren

Vorteile:

The software is really nice in the fact that it stores a lot of data and is very specific as to how it stores it. For example medical records being linked together so you can gather a whole medical history without calling a million other doctors.

Nachteile:

It’s very busy and can be hard to navigate.

Kelli
Counselor in USA
Psychische Gesundheitsfürsorge, 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Cerner Feedback

3,0 vor 5 Jahren

Vorteile:

I liked that information carried over from Master Treatment Plans and intakes.

Nachteile:

I didn't like that when a new encounter was created because they stepped down to IOP level of care, that everything in their chart got erased and needed to start over.

Kelsey
Chemo Coordinator in USA
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Powerchart is valuable to have because many different healthcare entities use this software.

4,0 vor 6 Jahren

Vorteile:

It is easy to access and locate lab results. I like that you can see the results of certain diagnostic tests, as well as other tests even if they were not ordered by your physician.

Nachteile:

It is easy to choose the incorrect encounter for a patient to make it hard to locate results. The software is not self-explanatory.

Mallory
IT applications analyst in USA
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Cerner is by far the easiest, most user friendly EMR available.

5,0 vor 6 Jahren

Vorteile:

The maintenance on the software is minimal. It's stable and Cerner helps maintain a lot of it. We use all of the applications available and have been so pleased.

Nachteile:

It's a whole system, so downtime includes taking everything down. You can't do it piece by piece. This causes downtime for the entire organization.

Don
Owner in USA
, 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung
Quelle: SoftwareAdvice

Functional

4,0 vor 6 Jahren

Vorteile:

I was happy with the training we received as users. The Cerner educators were very friendly and knowledgeable about the products.

Nachteile:

The thing I most disliked was the seemingly ever updating changes that we endured. It seemed as if the program was always being updated, requiring more training.

Jessica
Genetic Counselor in USA
Krankenhausversorgung & Gesundheitswesen, 5.001–10.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

Not as user-friendly as EPIC

4,0 vor 2 Jahren

Kommentare: I prefer EPIC over Cerner.

Vorteile:

Cerner is a good EMR program with the basic features of patient appointments, documentation, outside records, lab results, etc.

Nachteile:

Cerner is not as user-friendly as EPIC's EMR. It takes about a month of daily use to get the hang of where different files and information are located in the patient chart. I wish its search feature could search more in-depth within the patient chart like EPIC does.

Ashley
Ashley
Pharmacy tech in USA
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Worked with this software daily for over 7 years.

5,0 vor 7 Jahren

Vorteile:

I liked how user friendly this software was. At the time i worked with people who ranged from all ages and everyone seemed to be able to work this fairly easy.

Nachteile:

At times it could be pretty glitchy. And the updates drove us kind of crazy in the pharmacy. But that comes with the territory.

Christopher
MD in USA
Krankenhausversorgung & Gesundheitswesen, 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Cerner or not to Cerner

4,0 vor 6 Jahren

Vorteile:

Ease of learning Relatively intuitive Integration with voice dictation Straightforward

Nachteile:

Power notes can be convoluted Preferences could be better organized. Occasional hiccup with dictation needing a restart/logout No compatibility easily with other EHR