Wir helfen Unternehmen in Deutschland
seit 15 Jahren bei der Softwareauswahl

Über SonarQube

Mit SonarQube können Entwicklungsteams jeder Größe Probleme mit der Code-Qualität und -sicherheit in ihren Workflows lösen.

Erfahre mehr über SonarQube

Vorteile:

I like how code duplication, smell code and cognitive complexity are detected.

Nachteile:

If any small mistake happens then no result can be seen. We use traditional sonarqube where we install and integrate rather then plugin in jenkins.

Bewertungen zu SonarQube

Durchschnittliche Bewertung

Benutzerfreundlichkeit
4,3
Kundenservice
4,1
Funktionen
4,4
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
4,4

Weiterempfehlungsquote

8,9/10

SonarQube hat eine Gesamtbewertung von 4,6 von 5 Sternen basierend auf 53 Nutzerbewertungen auf Capterra.

Hast du SonarQube bereits verwendet?

Teile deine Erfahrungen mit anderen Softwareinteressenten.

Nutzerbewertungen filtern (53)

Sachin
Sachin
DevOps Engineer in Indien
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Computer-Software, 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

Code Analysis and ensuing security against threats

5,0 vor 2 Jahren

Kommentare: Overall experience with Sonarqube is pretty wholesome integration came handy with my CI/CD tools such as Azure Devops and Jenkins. Provides insights against vulnerabilities and common threats so that necessary actions can be taken by developers to ensure the security and good coding practices to follow. Features like PR decoration allows to get results in CI/CD tools itself if passed then only commit happens to master branch.

Vorteile:

Feature like Code Analysis and publishing those analysis report to end user. You can use default Quality Gates and Quality Profiles for scanning of your code. In case you want to modify these you can do that and define your own rule. Whenever there's commit in repo you just need to configure the task in your continuous integration pipeline if it passed the parameter only then commit will happens the master/main branch otherwise it will not. With these features you can eliminate the security threats and ensure that developers are following good practices while developing their code. I have integrated it with Azure DevOps.

Nachteile:

Only thing which I can think can be improved is logging of events. Sometime it becomes hard to debug the issues. Other then that, I think over all this fulfills all the requirements.

Verifizierter Rezensent
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 501–1.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

Best Code Quality check Tool

5,0 vor 2 Jahren

Kommentare: We are really taking help of SonarQUbe in maintaining code quality. Doing code scanning on each JIRA story completion. It also helps our developers to improve their code quality. Coding standards are better now. Reports are very useful.

Vorteile:

1. Calculate the quality of code and also helps to improve the quality by providing the solution 2. Highlight the vulnerabilities , repetitive line of code 3. Developer Friendly tool as it provides recommendations on the line of code which needs an improvement. 4. Create Scan reports on demand 5. Option to add exception in code

Nachteile:

1. Report Generation sometime take long time. 2. User Interface should be enhanced. 3. Lack custom rule set 4. As per cost, it is little bit expensive.

Chandramouli
DevSecOps Lead in Indien
Krankenhausversorgung & Gesundheitswesen, 501–1.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

Great tool to drive Coding Quality standards

3,0 vor 3 Jahren

Kommentare: PR analysis and Integration with Bitbucket are most in avoiding the new issues.
The tool needs a lot of improvements
1. Number of rules should be increased.
2. Few rules should have custom exclusions. Ex: Naming conventions => Organisation-specific words will be there which should be in Capital.
3. Generating a lot of false positives
4. Executive reports should generate based on scheduled triggers. We have 20 projects which are assigned to a Portfolio. if you are going to generate a report and send an email for the first portfolio calculation then the rest of the 19 projects info for that day will be missed. Higher management will think that the generated report is the latest but it is not.
5. PR analysis reports should be generated Quickly

Vorteile:

PR analysis and Integration with Bitbucket are most helpful.

Nachteile:

1. Number of rules should be increased. 2. Few rules should have custom exclusions. Ex: Naming conventions => Organisation-specific words will be there which should be in Capital. 3. Generating a lot of false positives 4. Executive reports should generate based on scheduled triggers. We have 20 projects which are assigned to a Portfolio. if you are going to generate a report and send an email for the first portfolio calculation then the rest of the 19 projects info for that day will be missed. Higher management will think that the generated report is the latest but it is not. 5. PR analysis reports should be generated Quickly

Antwort von SonarSource

vor 3 Jahren

Thank you for your review, Chandramouli. We appreciate your feedback, and invite you to join the SonarSource Community Forum. SonarSource Community Forum: https://community.sonarsource.com/ Posting to the Forum will allow there to be transparency to the community, and allow our product managers & users to understand any issues you are facing. To better assist you, please indicate what language(s), and how long the PR analysis is actually taking; as well as, examples of the false positives. Thanks!

Verifizierter Rezensent
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Hochschulbildung, 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

SonarQube is Great for Developers!

5,0 letztes Jahr

Kommentare: We could identify many code related issues that are presented in our code and improve the quality of the application that we are developing. As a overall, SonarQube tool is able to add a value to our applications.

Vorteile:

It is simple for developers to recognize their code smells, unused lines of code, errors, problems with the third-party libraries they are using, etc. information and the precise location of the issue. It also offers answers to those problems. As a result, figuring out the problems and fixing them is simple. This will be a terrific tool for developers. Except that, we can introduce our own rules for checking the code quality. It could identify the code issues that are vulnerable to cyber attacks such as XSS, SQL Injection, etc.

Nachteile:

It was difficult to use the SonarQube on-premise application. Once we pushed a new code section, the server needed to restart in order for the application to work.

Mo
Mo
Lead DevOps Engineer in USA
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Rechtsberatung, 501–1.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

Developer friendly SAST

4,0 letztes Jahr

Vorteile:

We really like the IDE tool called SonarLint which makes it easy for developers to integrate with most IDEs and lint their code even before committing it to the repos. Another advantage was that we were able to self host our own instance on our Kubernetes cluster and keep the versions based on the containers we specify to pull.

Nachteile:

Other engines tend to scan the same code base faster. Not too much of a con since this is all automated.

Flor
Flor
Software Developer in Peru
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Computer-Software, 11–50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

A free tool for source code analysis

5,0 vor 10 Monaten

Kommentare: It helped me to be able to do my job in improving the code, giving me possible solutions and saving me time.

Vorteile:

What I find most useful in this software is the code analysis, which gives detailed reports of the errors found and then suggests possible solutions. This saves time in software development.In addition, their large community helps solve problems that arise along the way.

Nachteile:

Sometimes the reports can give false positives, which requires that the personnel in charge of handling the software carefully review the results to avoid false positives.

Susan
Software Engineer in Australien
Fluggesellschaften/Luftfahrt, 201–500 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

Great product!

5,0 vor 7 Monaten

Vorteile:

This product has actually improved productivity within my team by making sure there’s no duplicate code and by making code easily understandable.

Nachteile:

Code maintenance is actually a difficult part.

Vishvesh
Vishvesh
Quality Assurance Engineer in Kanada
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Computer-Software, 201–500 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

Loved using SonarQube!!!

5,0 vor 2 Jahren

Kommentare: We primarily need to perform some static analyses. Everyone sends a pool request while they're coding. We must guarantee that the code is up to date before committing it to the main branch. That's basically how we work to make sure that whatever rules we've set up, whatever gates we've set up, are followed before we commit the code to the main branch. I had a lot of fun with the powerful tool.

Vorteile:

The way it evaluates all of the code generated and reports on any violations of standard coding help us optimize the written code, ensuring that the smallest number of lines are created to properly cover the functionality. It offers a lovely user interface with distinct groups of infractions ranging from small to large, and it involves fixing the code's needless complexity. It also aids in the removal of duplicate code that has been used several times and the upkeep of method standards.

Nachteile:

Integrating Sonarqube into CI/CD Pipelines takes time, and it may take even longer if the developer is newer. More real-time solutions could be included in the available guide, making it easier to handle issues and complete the integration.

Verifizierter Rezensent
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Computer-Software, 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

Check your developers code quality

4,0 vor 2 Jahren

Kommentare: Great experience I loved it. It will track all the lines in code and gives us the quality report according to rule set.

Vorteile:

Great tool to check the code quality like unit test cases, number of repetitive lines and other checks for coments and other. This helps us to set the rules which should be followed by the developer which maintains the consistency of the software for customers.

Nachteile:

I don't have any much cons on this. But we need little good knowledge to handle this. It is little tricky to manage the application.

Ie
DevOps Engineer in Estland
Computer-Software, 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

Popular tool for code smell search in the organisation's repositories

5,0 vor 7 Monaten

Vorteile:

Easy-to-administer tool, with good functionality to monitor security part of your code (using SAST methodology), with ability to integrate with Jenkins, GitHub and other tools. You are able to fail the build if the code doesn't meet percentage score.

Nachteile:

When new repository is added - there should be pop-up suggestion to create SonarQube project for it, coming from SonarQube. At the moment the user/administrator must watch out for new repositories in the organisation, without a note from the system itself that there is a new repository which you might want to add for scanning.

Verifizierter Rezensent
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, Selbstständig
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

Measure the quality of your software

5,0 letztes Jahr

Vorteile:

I like sonarqube dashboard and the flexibility that quality gates provide to measure your software quality. You can set up you own thresholds for maintenance, reliability, security, code coverage and many other metrics, and allow only versions passing this quality gate to be deployed.

Nachteile:

Unfortunately it lacks an easy way to see trends and go deep into which developers are the best/the worst. Also, it is paid if you need to analyse software in some languages, available only on the cloud.

Sadri
Architecte organique in Kanada
Computer-Software, 201–500 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

SonarQube l'outil a avoir

5,0 letztes Jahr

Kommentare: J'ai utilisé Sonarqube que ce soit avec l'invite de commande de faire une analyse du code avant de le pousser. et aussi la création du pipeline de compilation.

Vorteile:

il s'intègre dans le pipeline de compilation

Nachteile:

L'analyse du code prend du temps et parfois, il y a des recommandations qu'on ne peut pas corriger

Carlos
IT Manager in Spanien
Bankwesen, 51–200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Sonarqube essential code quality analysis tool

4,0 vor 11 Monaten

Kommentare: In short, it is an indispensable tool and should be mandatory in all software development companies.

Vorteile:

The ability to analyze the quality of the code in each deployment or integration, together with the possibility of modifying the rules to allow deployment or not (quantity or criticality of errors or defects), as well as vulnerability analysis allows for better software, always keeping in mind of the developers the quality and security of the code.

Nachteile:

Like everything, the time it takes to leave it well configured and integrated with the rest of the systems, as well as the maintenance and updating of the standards, rules and vulnerabilities depending on the programming language and the news that are published at the level of security.

Verifizierter Rezensent
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

The least you can do for software quality

5,0 letztes Jahr

Vorteile:

Sonarqube allows anyone to run a scan for code smells, bugs or vulnerabilities. There is no reason not to use it or integrate it into your CI/CD pipelines. Even if you do not enforce passing the quality gate, it helps a lot in tracking and highlighting where are your weaknesses. Code duplication and Code coverage are very useful tools to understand the overall quality of your development.

Nachteile:

It is hard to view historic data, and once you run a new analysis you cannot see the previous ones anymore from the same unified dashboard, you have to enter into each metric and check the history link. Please bring back the history dashboard from sonar 5!

Verifizierter Rezensent
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Computer-Software, 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Excellent code assurance tool

3,0 letztes Jahr

Kommentare: It's a great tool and be understood by experienced people more easily.

Vorteile:

Sonarqube helps me find out if there are any repetitive lines in my code. Since the code sometimes get lengthy or at times missed by me to recheck. It is added in continuous integration in jenkins which when runs code smells, coverage and quality will be detected.

Nachteile:

At times we need to precisely set all the settings for the issues to be detected. If any small mistake happens then no result can be seen. We use traditional sonarqube where we install and integrate rather then plugin in jenkins. So the traditional method needs to be more careful in installing and running it.

Daniel
Solution Architect in Dänemark
Immobilien, 201–500 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Review

4,0 vor 3 Jahren

Kommentare: It have been a mixed ride overall. The actualy code analysis is really great, the rest is so so.

Vorteile:

The amount of errors it catches and that developers code look somewhat similar in mindset after using it for some time.

Nachteile:

The setup with CodeCoverage is a nightmare and it seems is not working equallty well all the time. We also have a solution where it doesn't even work.

Antwort von SonarSource

vor 3 Jahren

Hi Daniel. Thank you for your review of SonarQube. We appreciate your feedback! Regarding your code coverage issues, have you checked out our Community Forum? There may be a solution/fix already identified and if not, you can easily start a new thread and provide us with the details around your workflow, language(s), etc. Thanks! Community Forum: https://community.sonarsource.com/

Marcin
Senior Technical Engineer/Senior DevOps Engineer in Polen
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

Staple in the CI/CD pipelined quality gate solutions

4,0 letztes Jahr

Kommentare: It allows our dev teams to keep consistent level of code quality and known issues proof in code and used target platforms so as to provide to end users/customers highest quality products delivered in CI/CD methodology.

Vorteile:

Easily add source code analysis for potential bugs and pitfalls to warrant against developers' errors or just not efficient coding by novices, projects dependencies on vulnerable platforms and potential long-term support issues due to how your code is structured. Simple deployment of binaries needed for scans for major target build environments OSes, plus easy to use APIs, all for the benefit of easy integration into CI/CD pipelines.

Nachteile:

Caps and limits on key server instance component required when obtaining config for project and preset rules, when sending analysis results or getting quality gate results may make the pipelines seem to fail without easier discerning real reasons.

Gaurav
Sr devops engineer in Indien
Automotive, 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

Sonarqube a static code analysis for quality and security of the code

4,0 vor 2 Jahren

Kommentare: We have been using sonarqube in our cicd pipeline for static code analysis and its been very helpful identifying the bugs early in the stages. This tool is best in the market but still missing on some functionalities, mainly in dashboards.

Vorteile:

1. Ensures that only quality, bugfree and vulnerabilities free code goes into production and improves developer’s skills. 2. Supports 24+ languages. 3. Open source version. 4. Developer workflow integration 5. Detect the bugs early in development and send alerts to developers to have a look into suspicious code snippets. 6. The results are faster and can get integrated within pipeline.

Nachteile:

1. Integration with the third party apps could be improved. 2. Dashboards could be better and code security features can be added more. 3. Sometimes false positive results

kiruthiga
DevOps Engineer in USA
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 5.001–10.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

SonarQube Usage review

4,0 vor 3 Jahren

Kommentare: Cheap and good for Code Vulnerability scans.

Vorteile:

The vulnerability scans that it uses encompasses a lot of languages. It also has ability where user can define custom profiles and rules. Dashboards created are easy to use and decipher.

Nachteile:

Technical support is very expensive and need to use their community forums to get support.

Antwort von SonarSource

vor 2 Jahren

Thank you for your review, kiruthiga!

Verifizierter Rezensent
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Great tool to drive Coding Quality standards

5,0 vor 3 Jahren

Kommentare: Driving code quality standards across enterprise and inducing code quality gates in the continuous integration workflow

Vorteile:

Static code analysis, support for Java, .Net, JavaScript, typescript, html, CSS, etc. Helps you set custom quality gates and rules as well

Nachteile:

Community version does not support high availability. You need to pay for this feature, would have preferred it to be free. Tools upgrade process can be improved as we have to take down the tool instance.

Antwort von SonarSource

vor 2 Jahren

Thank you for your review!

Thenappan
Technical Specialist in USA
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 51–200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Keeps ur code intact with less grammar mistake

5,0 vor 2 Jahren

Vorteile:

it allows us to correct the grammatically wrong code , unused imports ,variables etc. It Helps us to optimize the code with the rules specified for that project. Allows us to remove the duplicate code as well.

Nachteile:

Integration with visual studio code and binding with project is tad difficult . Duplicate code block appears only after the build , so we have to wait till the build is completed to view whether any duplicate is present in our code.

Tolgay
DevOps Engineer in Türkei
Telekommunikation, 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

A great tool to improve Code Quality

4,0 vor 2 Jahren

Kommentare: Tool really fulfills our needs on code quality improvements and security perspectives.

Vorteile:

First of all, The tool has a great user interface highlighting all of the errors and bugs. It also shows how much effort is needed to fix those as well. We integrated it with our CI/CD pipelines in GitLab.

Nachteile:

Enterprise licensing cost is a bit expensive. We faced rarely memory issues running the CI/CD pipelines.

Verifizierter Rezensent
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Computer-Software, 51–200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

powerful code quality tool

5,0 letztes Jahr

Vorteile:

SonarQube can integrate with CI/CD tools such as Jenkins, GitLab, and Travis CI, making it easy to automate code analysis as part of the development process. SonarQube allows developers to customize the rules and profiles used for code analysis.SonarQube provides a dashboard and reporting features that allow developers to track the progress of code quality metrics and identify areas that require attention. This feature can help developers stay on top of code quality issues and make data-driven decisions about where to focus their efforts.

Nachteile:

Improving documentation could help users better understand how to use the tool effectively.

Flavio
Flavio
Software Architect in Brasilien
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Telekommunikation, 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

The best bugs exterminator

5,0 vor 2 Jahren

Kommentare: We can't live anymore without Sonarqube. When we started using it 5 years ago, the teams adoption was very fast.

Vorteile:

Code review could be more focused on the new features implementation than trying to identify silly basic faults.

Nachteile:

The Eclipse Sonarqube plugin was not easy to make it work in the same manner was it was setup in the CI/CD machines.

Prateek
Prateek
DevSecOps Engineer in Indien
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Computer-Software, 51–200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

SonarQube: Code Quality and Code Security

5,0 vor 3 Jahren

Kommentare: SonarQube is one of the best open-source tools I have used for SAST testing but I feel there are so many features that are still missing.

Vorteile:

1. Provides a detailed review of the code 2. It highlights suspicious code snippets 3. Strong integration with popular CI pipelines

Nachteile:

1. Installation process should be smooth 2. Reporting is poor 3. Integration with IDE is not available

Antwort von SonarSource

vor 2 Jahren

Thank you for your review, Prateek!