Über testRigor

Accelerate delivery with AI-driven software testing. Seamlessly write no-code tests in plain English for Web, Mobile, and API.

Erfahre mehr über testRigor

Vorteile:

Nicht verfügbar

Nachteile:

Nicht verfügbar

Bewertungen zu testRigor

Durchschnittliche Bewertung

Benutzerfreundlichkeit
4,3
Kundenservice
4,7
Funktionen
4,3
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
4,0

Weiterempfehlungsquote

8,7/10

testRigor hat eine Gesamtbewertung von 4,3 von 5 Sternen basierend auf 3 Nutzerbewertungen auf Capterra.

Nutzerbewertungen filtern (3)

Produktbewertung

Produktbewertung

Nutzung

Sortieren nach

Hast du testRigor bereits verwendet?

Teile deine Erfahrungen mit anderen Softwareinteressenten.

Nutzerbewertungen filtern (3)

Artem D.
Founder / CEO in Kanada
Programmentwicklung, 2-10 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

Ensure maximum test coverage and quality

5 vor 2 Monaten

Kommentare: I don’t think I’ve ever been so impressed by a software testing tool like this, after having worked with so many over the years.

Vorteile:

For any team wanting to cut down on overhead and ensure maximum test coverage and quality, testRigor is definitely the way to go. The team at testRigor has also been great to work with, which is a huge plus. It’s so much better than trying to work with products that don’t provide any assistance or have poor documentation.

Nachteile:

testRigor meets expectations and I can't share anything in particular what I would not like about this tool.

Paul G.
Sr. Automation Engineer in USA
Immobilien, 1.001-5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

testRigor - Plain English Test Automation in the Cloud does not get any easier than this

4 vor 9 Monaten

Kommentare: Test plain English test step design is quick and simple, yet robust to perform a large amount of functionality including mobile testing. 34+ actions words combine with variable capture and reuse to allow a large amount test creation.
Element location is handled transparently to the test developer. Little, if any, effort is required to find elements even when the class changes keeping tests robust.
The platform has a flexible built in CI/CD pipeline that utilizes Twilio to send update alerts to the team about test details.
Development and debug run times essentially have no costs. A flat monthly rate is charged for a minimum of three machines. Once the number tests push the total completion time of the regression suite beyond a reasonable turnaround time, additional virtual machines can be brought on at a modest cost to further reduce execution time by running more tests concurrently.

Vorteile:

Tests written in descriptive plain English. No Java, JavaScript, Python or Ruby to learn. Reduces development time by eliminating xPath or CSS descriptions. Reduces maintenance by automatically locating elements that change class. Implements reusable modular Rules among multiple scenarios for less maintenance Includes before and after full page screen captures in every run. Failures display comparisons to prior pass execution results. Supports BDD style Gherkin "Given" When" Then", but not required. Cross browser testing of Chrome, Edge, Firefox and Safari browsers. Tests run concurrently under Windows, Mac and Linux for reduces run time Tests SMS messaging. Validates dynamic data from email with simple regular expressions No framework developers required to develop or maintain framework.

Nachteile:

While the slideshow screen capture feature is great, a live desktop stream during cloud execution would help identify areas where speed execution can be further optimized.

Martha P.
QA in Brasilien
Fotografie, 11-50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

QA using TestRigor

4 vor 3 Wochen Neu

Kommentare: it is a good software to test the interface functionalities, I have been using it for some time and it is helping to organize and make the tests and make the process more efficient

Vorteile:

The software makes tests easy to implement in a natural language

Nachteile:

the failures in test runs, sometimes a test ran and it failed but the test just passed an hour before and after I run it again it works. I don't know why but sometimes the software fails to run some script.