Wir helfen Unternehmen seit 18 Jahren,
bessere Software zu finden

Deutschland Lokales Produkt

CRISAM Erfahrungen

4,8 (6) Eine Bewertung schreiben Deutschland Lokales Produkt

Über CRISAM

Digitalisiere deine Compliance und nutze bewährte Standards wie ISO 19600 mit CRISAM (Corporate Risk Application Method).

Erfahre mehr über CRISAM

Vorteile:

Nicht verfügbar

Nachteile:

Nicht verfügbar

Bewertungen zu CRISAM

Durchschnittliche Bewertung

Benutzerfreundlichkeit
4,5
Kundenservice
4,8
Funktionen
4,5
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
4,8

Weiterempfehlungsquote

9/ 10

CRISAM hat eine Gesamtbewertung von 4,8 von 5 Sternen basierend auf 6 Nutzerbewertungen auf Capterra.

Nutzerbewertungen filtern (6)

Sortieren nach

Hast du CRISAM bereits verwendet?

Teile deine Erfahrungen mit anderen Softwareinteressenten.

Nutzerbewertungen filtern (6)

Fares
Director of Finance in Deutschland
Staatsverwaltung, 201–500 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

Risikomanagement das Spaß macht!!!

5,0 vor 2 Jahren

Kommentare: Insgesamt machen die Software und der Support hier einen Super-Eindruck

Vorteile:

Die Usability und der Einsatz von Workflows sind hier sehr gut umgesetzt und Entlasten die tägliche Arbeit

Nachteile:

Leider ist die Bereitstellung auf unserem eigenen Server nicht immer ganz Einfach, was aber eher an unseren strengen Sicherheitsvorkehrungen liegt als an der Software.

Michael
Head of Internal Audit and Risk Management in Österreich
Chemikalien, 5.001–10.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

CRISAM and its developing opportunities

5,0 letztes Jahr

Vorteile:

The fact, that Calpana, the company in charge for Crisam in Austria and Germany, understands our needs, reacts fast, and helps achieving the right outcome for a reasonable pricing

Nachteile:

Sure there is a high dependence on the support team behind Crisam, which we are really lucky with, but imagine that this team would not be as good and fast responding, I could imagine this being a problem. But - no issue on our side, we get all the support we need

Sven
Senior Risk Manager in Deutschland
Öl & Energie, 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Crisam used for Bottom up ERM Process

5,0 vor 3 Jahren

Kommentare: We run our ERM Process in Crisma, which is a full-blown bottom up process for the whole company. The software is continuously improved and communication with Calpana is quick and useful.

Vorteile:

- very flexible to meet various requirements - extremely helpful to fulfill legal requirements - fits to different RM standards - very handy for Web-access for users - comfortable and quick aggregation - proactive and dynamic company, always strive to improve functionality and user-friendliness

Nachteile:

- the separation between Explorer and Web-Interface makes it little complicated to provide extensive reports to the user -

Niels
Corporate Risk Manager in Deutschland
Eisenbahnbau, 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

Review of CRISAM

4,0 letztes Jahr

Vorteile:

Web Access is very convenient for users, the user interface is catchy, the process flow for risk assessment provides the necessary guidance, most of the Web Access interfaces can easly be adapted

Nachteile:

A lot of things are possible within dashboards / reports but getting there is not always easy

Dominik
Group Risk Manager in Deutschland
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 5.001–10.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

Highly recommended solution

5,0 vor 2 Jahren

Kommentare: The user-friendly GUI makes it easier to involve risk owners in the assessment process without losing them half way through. Thanks to straightforward accessibility, there are no more reasons for non-participation.

Vorteile:

The software solution is easy to use not only for the risk officer in the headquarters, who compiles the reporting to top management, but also for the local risk owner in the various business units. The processes to identify or assess risks ensures reliable data.

Nachteile:

The powerful reporting engine in place is not easy to use for a non-expert. However, small amendments are no big deal.

Daniel
Enterprise Risk Manager in Deutschland
Öl & Energie, 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Powerful Enterprise Risk Management system

5,0 vor 2 Jahren

Kommentare: My company uses Crisam for its company-wide bottom-up Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) for more than 2 years now with about 200 users. As Enterprise Risk Manager I administrate and use Crisam in my daily routines. Overall, I am quite satisfied with the software and the service provider Calpana. With Crisam we can fulfill our legal and best practice requirements. Next to the ERM, we have integrated several function-specific risk management processes in CRISAM which automatically feed into the ERM, e.g. Tax, IT and some local risk management processes of operating units.

Vorteile:

- Crisam web interface is rather intuitive and guides the user through a risk assessment with customizable helptexts- Crisam can handle several different KPIs to quantitatively and qualitatively evaluate risks and opportunities- Statistical modelling (monte-carlo-simulations) for quantitative risk aggregation is done by the software engine- Generated risk reports from Crisam are customizable to adapt to our own needs- Crisam Dashboard as a powerful feature recently introduced to analyse and visualise recorded risk data.- Data Transfer: We successfully implemented a data transfer from Crisam to Corporater- High-quality customer support with dedicated main contact person

Nachteile:

- Crisam is still set up with two systems: Web Access (user system) + Explorer (admin system)- The risk summary page in Crisam does not work properly in case more than one KPI is evaluated. Users therefore regularly ask for Crisam generated reports to check their input. However, reports from Crisam can only be generated with the admin system. From a process efficiency and userfriendliness point of view, this is a downside. Nevertheless, Calpana recently introduced a 'dashboard' feature which serves as a work-around with room for improvement. - As Calpana is rapidly growing we generally observe a slightly slower customer support than in previous years.