Wir helfen Unternehmen in Deutschland
seit 15 Jahren bei der Softwareauswahl

Über Amazon RDS

Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) vereinfacht die Einrichtung, den Betrieb und die Skalierung einer Datenbank, einschließlich Aurora, MySQL, PostgreSQL und anderen.

Erfahre mehr über Amazon RDS

Vorteile:

Amazon RDS is easy to use relational database service as it is managed by Amazon.

Nachteile:

The fact that the database will start from a stopped state after 7 days is particularly annoying. This could be remedied by using lambda to shut it down, but that's added work.

Bewertungen zu Amazon RDS

Durchschnittliche Bewertung

Benutzerfreundlichkeit
4,4
Kundenservice
4,4
Funktionen
4,6
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
4,3

Weiterempfehlungsquote

8,8/10

Amazon RDS hat eine Gesamtbewertung von 4,7 von 5 Sternen basierend auf 209 Nutzerbewertungen auf Capterra.

Hast du Amazon RDS bereits verwendet?

Teile deine Erfahrungen mit anderen Softwareinteressenten.

Nutzerbewertungen filtern (209)

Menka
Menka
Software engineer analyst in Indien
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

Amazon RDS review

5,0 vor 4 Wochen Neu

Vorteile:

Amazon RDS is easy to use .It helps to maintain the relational database in the cloud.Also it’s flexible and secure to use.

Nachteile:

It has higher cost compared to other softwares.And also we can only increase the allocated storage in Amazon RDS we can’t reduce it.

Ana
Ana
Security Architecture Discipline leader in Spanien
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Bankwesen, 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

High availability even for database beginners

4,0 vor 2 Jahren

Kommentare: I am using it as a MySQL server. With a managed database server, almost everything can be configured by just operating the configuration screen, so it is recommended that even members with little knowledge of MySQL can create a high availability database infrastructure, such as creating a Master-Slave configuration. It was possible to significantly reduce the man-hours required to install and configure the DB supports in EC2 and the upgrade procedure for maintenance, and dedicate the man-hours to other design and construction work. Including a BD license, it has freed us from license management. In addition, by not needing a physical space, we are freed from the whole flow of purchasing it.

Vorteile:

It is a pay-per-use system where you are only charged for the number of transactions that occur. Still, there is also a subscription system called Reserved Instances (RI), so instances that generate transactions frequently use this system to reduce costs significantly. There are three types to choose from: one-year prepayment, one-year prepayment, monthly payment, and no prepayment, depending on the kind of discount. Pay-per-use is basically cheaper for cases where transactions do not occur frequently, depending on the situation, so you can optimize the charge by using different payment methods depending on the application.

Nachteile:

I would like you to provide a concrete fault test solution. If you do not have a high level of knowledge about RDS, you cannot be relieved that you cannot perform useful failure tests assuming a failure occurs.

Aleksandr
Aleksandr
Principal software engineer in USA
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Computer-Software, 11–50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

Will cost you all yourmoney.

3,0 vor 3 Jahren

Kommentare: Easy to setup. Very expensive. Play great with other AWS services.
The main issue is that metrics collected manually will never meet AWS metrics which are used to bill your stack. And of course AWS point of view will be much costly. Their Enterprise Support can not understand why metrics extracted from DB itself do not meet billing metrics and will endlessly redirect you to yet another expert.

Vorteile:

Requires minimum knowledge or time to set up the database. Everything you need is basically there. Documentation is fantastic. It just works and takes all the burden of infrastructure management from you. A handful of engines, version, and extensions to them are supprted. Integrated seamless to AWS infrastructure.

Nachteile:

Price. It will literally eat 7/8 of your infrastructure budget. Metrics lies. Performance insight simply does not work. Note, this is an opinion of somebody who paid for AWS Enterprise support (sigh, that's me) Backups are not backups per se, this is filesystem rsync. So it is easy to end up with broken DB. Support is very poor.

Muhammad Aamer
Muhammad Aamer
Full stack software developer in Saudi-Arabien
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Immobilien, Selbstständig
Verwendete die Software für: 1-5 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

Ámazon RDS is a great option if you need a remote database

5,0 vor 3 Monaten

Kommentare: My experience with Amazon RDS was great because i could easily establish remote connection to it. It was fast the data retrieval was fast, it is reliable and it is not expansive for what it is providing.

Vorteile:

I like some of the things the most about amazon RDS no 1 obviously the pricing it is amazing you only get charged for your usage and then secondly the remote connection although it is not very easy but when you establish it like for example with your microsoft workbench then there is nothing better than Amazon RDS and then there is more good things for example this is very very secure and fast and reliable

Nachteile:

The only thing i do not like about is it is very very hard if you are not a Database administrator this is probably harder for you maybe you need some extra exclusive study of it

David
David
Head of Engineering in Australien
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Computer-Software, 51–200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

High quality, bulletproof managed database service

4,0 vor 2 Jahren

Kommentare: We use Amazon RDS to manage our key production/transactional databases for our customer-facing applications as well as our development environment, internal ERP, etc. We definitely gain value and efficiency from not having to deal with the management of yet another server - and its operating system, patches, uptime, etc. - it is a real boon to simply have a database-as-a-service that we spin up, connect to, and work with, letting AWS deal with all the management.

Vorteile:

AWS RDS allows us to deploy databases easily and efficiently with great resilience, scalability, and security - but without having to deal with managing a server. RDS makes it easy to spin up a new database, have multi-availability zone replicas, back it up, and do many other things. It's also dead easy to upgrade software versions - simply let AWS look after it.

Nachteile:

Being a managed database service there are restrictions; for instance, with SQL Server you don't have the sysadmin role and you can't set any trace flag you want. You can adjust a number of parameters in the RDS console but only those which AWS have explicitly added support for. There are other caveats and restrictions for other DBMS products too. Another thing I don't like is when you change your instance size it takes a long time - but at least there's no downtime. Also, tooling is restricted. A lot of great tools to dig into performance and query tracing won't work with the AWS caveats so you have to use the AWS RDS console and logs and it can be more tedious to really drill into application performance bottlenecks.

Verifizierter Rezensent
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Verlagswesen, 51–200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Amazon RDS - the backbone of your AWS stack

5,0 vor 2 Jahren

Kommentare: Waaaay back in the day, we owned and managed huge machines on which we ran our database software. It was Oracle for a while, then we moved to mySQL. But the machine and the software were our problem to handle. Most of the time (because these are not new technologies), there were no problems. But when there were problems, there were huge problems. Because like many websites/apps, data is at the core of what we do. No database, and everything goes poof. Since switching to RDS, this has become a thing of the past. We tell RDS what kind of beefy setup we want, and they do the rest. The mySQL patching. The upgrades. If we want to move to a bigger instance, that's pretty straightforward, too. Database hosting at pretty large scale, with just a few clicks. And no machines to worry about. You get decent (but not amazing) visibility into the instance at any time. But, basically, what you really get is peace of mind, not having to worry that your system's most critical layer will flake out on you. That's worth a lot. Also: AWS's Aurora is a very nice port of mySQL. We've had no issues there either.

Vorteile:

Aurora is a great port of mySQL - very compatible and super fast Prices are always going one direction: down Scalable way huge with just a few clicks Automated backups, patching, upgrades You can still do a lot of customization using PL/MYSQL The instances just stay up and running - becomes one less thing to worry about You have options: both mySQL and Postgres

Nachteile:

It's not amazingly easy to update the various variables that enable you to configure your mySQL instance. I wish it was a bit easier to get monitoring that would give you more granular insight into what's causing issues. You don't have quite as much flexibility and control over special packages you might install to do special stuff (calculating the Levenschtein distance between words, for example).

Verifizierter Rezensent
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Computer- & Netzwerksicherheit, 11–50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 1-5 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

Dependable Database management solution

5,0 letztes Jahr

Kommentare: Overall it has amazing control features and i have never experienced any kind of downtime with them, they also have very enhanced security features so data birch is out of the question.

Vorteile:

I is easy to integrate and implement also the customer support is quite good when one is having problems with any of their features.Its also important to note that the backup and recovery are free if you turn on the automation feature

Nachteile:

Auto backup is not automatically turned on so if one forgets to turn it on this might cause challenges in the long run, also i don't think its right even after paying for the solution upfront that one has to leave their financial information on the system

Sonpal Singh
Sonpal Singh
Software Developer in Indien
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Computer-Software, 11–50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

Easy To Setup & Super In Security & Data Management

5,0 vor 8 Monaten

Kommentare: I have a very good experience with AWS RDS system.

Vorteile:

You don't want to care about more configuration setup to run as we did in normal case. A lot of configurable variable available in it to help the system working smooth. You can change maximum setting at runtime . easy to setup replication here, user & permission management is fast & secure.

Nachteile:

No more cons except the price in compare to others only.

Rehan
Software Engineer in Sri Lanka
Computer-Software, 201–500 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

Well performing database

5,0 vor 9 Monaten

Vorteile:

RDS is a highly scalable database and it can scale up or down depending on the resource and workloads it has and it works smoothly even for high data volumes and increased traffic. It automatically backs up data and we can restore our data even if we lost it. This is a highly available db because it automatically stores data in another availability zone and if a failure happens, then the primary database will be replaced with that replica.

Nachteile:

With our application requirement, we have to choose the supported db engine. That db engine running inside RDS has some limitations other than running it in our machine. So that is the drawback I see.

yonas
Project Manager in USA
Programmentwicklung, 11–50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

ARDS review

5,0 vor 2 Monaten Neu

Kommentare: Everything with Amazon RDS is smooth and effortless.

Vorteile:

It is a thorough database management systemd.

Nachteile:

Being new presented several challenges which eventually we were able to receive guidance.

MANAS
Senior Software Engineer in USA
Computer-Software, 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Database Management as a Service is well implemented, which is reliable, secure and efficient

5,0 vor 3 Jahren

Kommentare: RDS is a really good service, I haven't seen any Downtime, the communication between EC2 and RDS is really fast since they are in the same AWS network

Vorteile:

This really reduces the operational time taken to set up a database on a cloud machine, the cost of setting up and managing is really cheep when compared to the native approach of installing mysql or psql on a EC2 and managing it, it exposes us to a verity of options and versions which we wouldn't have been aware of , and setting them up in just clicks without even spending much time in researching on it and figuring out the way to setting it up , The security management is really good, we can set all types of security managements like, subnet, security group, VPC, IAM role etc, which will take a lot of effort if gone manually , Backup restore is really well managed , we can schedule the backup process which dumps the data into the S3, we can restore it when needed , it supports all type of CURD operations including cloning a DB setup, it supports many type of databases, it has a new one called Aurora which is AWS specific which is in 2 flavours (mysql and psql) - can use it for high cost effectiveness, additional features and speed up your bulk query executions, Upgrading DB version or any other edition are easy to make without any data losses, it gives a DNS URL for the DB, we need not manually add its IP into a Rout53, Now we can integrate RDS with AWS secret, using which the application can access the DB with a dynamic password, and this creds gets rotated every day, which really increases the security. Query Execution history and resource utilisation monitoring .

Nachteile:

I know AWS is in a process of developing new hybrid databases like Aurora, i have noticed some trivial issues in it, its slower then RDS for executing stand alone queries , but its faster than RDS while executing Bulk Queries, there may be a way to SSH into the RDS machine or accessing its DB terminal , it would be better it i can do it on the UI, instead of remembering all the commands to connect

Verifizierter Rezensent
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Amazon RDS - All Your Databases at same place

5,0 letztes Jahr

Kommentare: Great!

Vorteile:

Amazon RDS provides the capability to host whichever database server customer wants, providing options like MS SQL , PostgreSQL, and have its own in house Aurora DB.With the Host and user/password simplified model like any other database it allows users who are not familiar with cloud to use it similarly.I have used Amazon RDS with all kind of databases and the way it optimizes costs and provides integration to logs is amazing.

Nachteile:

Log and monitoring on the console could be improved and enhanced heavily

Ashish
Software Engineer in Indien
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Computer-Software, 201–500 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Amazon RDS is cheapest database service i have used so far

5,0 vor 6 Jahren

Kommentare: The benefit we got from using RDS is that we have full control of the RDS instance. Unlike heroku RDS allows me to create any number of databases i want plus it provides 20 GB of PostgresSQL instance in its free tier

Vorteile:

Amazon RDS provides arelational database instance that you can use to create any number to databases. All data are stored in SSD that provides faster read and write compared to conventional magnetic disk. Data can be secured by applying a security group such that the database can get request from within AWS (EC2 servers). RDS provides variety of databases each with their free tier.

Nachteile:

Prices to enable multi availability zones for an instance is just double to their singe availability zone. It is too costly. For beginner the set up of RDS is quite confusing. Sometimes It doesn't display the estimated price of while setting up resources of an instance.

Verifizierter Rezensent
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Computer-Software, 201–500 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Great Database option for the cloud if you want fine-grained instance management

4,0 vor 4 Jahren

Kommentare: Overall Amazon RDS has been a very good solution in our switch to the cloud. Other options have come out that may be better for most people, such as Amazon Aurora, but it's great for fine-grained control over instances.

Vorteile:

Amazon RDS has worked really well for us for our cloud DB solution. It's pretty intuitive and easy to use, and you can choose exactly what instances sizes, storage sizes, etc. you want.

Nachteile:

Amazon RDS has a strange method for determining how many IOPS you get (Input/Output Operations per Second): it's based mostly on your db storage size. So if you have a smaller database that is hit a lot, you can get throttled with the IOPS. But if you have a large database that isn't hit as often, you end up having a lot of unused IOPS.

Verifizierter Rezensent
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Computer-Software, Selbstständig
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Forget about management!

5,0 vor 5 Jahren

Kommentare: As most AWS services, it is super useful when your business is in a phase where you need more services and less time to manage them. If you can pay for the maintenance maybe you prefer to optimize your setup managing it by yourself.

Vorteile:

You can set it up with a few clicks only, and you get a fully managed database instance: forget about backups, OS updates, etc. It even sets up High Availability for you if needed, creating multiple nodes. You can choose the resources of the system (CPU, Hard Disk, memory) and other configurations (DBMS parameters, extra read nodes…)

Nachteile:

You can only scale resources by using a bigger instance type (it means more CPU and more RAM) or replica nodes. Eg. you cannot set up a Raid disk configuration to improve I/O.

Fırat
CEO in Türkei
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 51–200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

Best quality ever!!!

5,0 letztes Jahr

Kommentare: I don't want to give too much detail, but I have to say that it is the best database software I have used in my life. You get a smooth service from general quality to customer service and it is very cheap compared to similar applications.

Vorteile:

Amazon continues to achieve the best in this field as always. I think it is good that it dominates the database market because it is a good example and competitive environment for other similar applications.

Nachteile:

I have not had a bad experience, I am extremely pleased. Using amazon credits jointly on all services is an impressive feature. I did not have any compatibility problems and I was very satisfied with the overall quality.

Sushank
DevOps Engineer in Indien
Immobilien, 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Amazon RDS : High uptime and faster processing in-cloud database management

4,0 vor 3 Jahren

Kommentare: Amazon RDS is very reliable and easy to use it support various types of databases including widely used MySQL and others like Postgres, aurora without worrying the infrastructure.
IT is very easy to migrate from existing or new database also it has helped us to avoid downtime with Multi-AZ setup.

Vorteile:

1. RDS is very fast and feasible to fetch and manage the data. 2. Version are dynamic and can be chosen/changed through simple steps. 3. Restriction can be easily managed through subnets and security groups. 4. It has high uptime overcoming downtime and can be scaled easily.

Nachteile:

1. Some time for the beginners it is not easy to setup or manage. 2. Pricing is bit high if you are creating a small instance DB. 3. Integrations with 3rd party is quite a bit complex. 4. No fully admin controls are given to manage the DB.

Benjamin
CEO in Kanada
Computer-Software, Selbstständig
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

Works well

5,0 vor 4 Jahren

Kommentare: It's worked well for me.

Vorteile:

Backed by AWS - corporate level product for an affordable price.

Nachteile:

No support included. Need to figure out your issues on your own or pay (extensively) for support.

Christopher
Founder in USA
Computer-Software, 2–10 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

Enterprise database without the hardware

5,0 vor 3 Jahren

Kommentare: Overall my experience with RDS has been a good one. It's great for a small business looking to scale in the future.

Vorteile:

What I like about RDS is the variety of database options from both a hardware and software standpoint. In addition, it's easy to have a database stood up within 10 to 15 minutes.

Nachteile:

The fact that the database will start from a stopped state after 7 days is particularly annoying. This could be remedied by using lambda to shut it down, but that's added work. A simple email reminding you that the database is still stopped would suffice. Even if the reasoning is to run updates, would it not make sense to start, update, and then shut it back down if it was down previously?

Mehak
Software Engineer in Indien
Computer-Software, 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

Amazon RDS all database services and no management worries.

5,0 vor 4 Jahren

Kommentare: Used Amazon RDS on multiple applications the scalability of the RDS really helped in load intensive tasks and the easy backup provided by the tool helped in many cases when data was corrupted due to human errors.

Vorteile:

It is one of the most simple and lightweight solutions available in the market with amazing scalability as per the usage, its disaster recovery is great. The read replica structure helps to manage a huge load. Supports various DB services such as Oracle, MySQL, Postgres and SQL Server.

Nachteile:

The management of the RDS parameters becomes a difficult task if you are not familiar with the UI. The price might be on the higher side for small projects with large data storage.

Jamie
Software Engineer in Südafrika
Computer-Software, 51–200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Managing a lot of database things you don't want to do yourself

5,0 vor 6 Jahren

Vorteile:

Gold standard in SaaS/IaaS database services. Handles many tasks and configuration options for you. Amazon Aurora is a great, fast and reliable database service available in RDS. Integrates well with other AWS services.

Nachteile:

Ties one in to the AWS platform, particularly if you start using some of the best features like Aurora. The AWS console is not user-friendly. Can get quite expensive, but probably still cheaper than hiring highly-skilled people to manage your databases for you.

Verifizierter Rezensent
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Computer-Software, 11–50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Fantastic Managed Databases

5,0 vor 5 Jahren

Kommentare: Using RDS has been great. Before we rolled our own MySQL servers and actually was bottlenecked by them in a big release. RDS opened the pipes and helped us support a lot of connections. It’s also 10x easier to manage.

Vorteile:

RDS makes deploying a MySQL or Postgres cluster a breeze. Their Aurora fork of MySQL allows for even more performance boosts. Auto scaling is made easy. Back ups are made easy. RDS makes everything easy.

Nachteile:

Pricing can be a bit steep if you need their r3 server series.

Priyansh
Database Manager in Indien
Computer-Software, 11–50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Database Over Cloud

5,0 vor 5 Jahren

Vorteile:

With Amazon RDS, you longer need to install, set up and manage your database system. Just Choose suitable Database system, choose suitable instance type, configure a few things, and you database will be ready. You do not need to install or set up anything, amazon will take care of these things. You can straight away starting your database.

Nachteile:

You will be charged a hefty amount for its services by Amazon.

Nitin
Nitin
Junior Dev in Indien
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Finanzdienstleistungen, 501–1.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

Amazon RDS

5,0 vor 3 Jahren

Kommentare: We have created MySQL instance in RDS and have been using it for 2 years via My SQL, and it had been a smooth and amazing experience in terms of data backup and the service provided by RDS.

Vorteile:

Amazon RDS allows creating DB instances in a very few clicks with full customization like engine type, size of class required, connectivity, availability, and durability. Also, all monitoring, eventing, and logs are very handy and displayed on the pictorial representation dashboard.

Nachteile:

Honestly, Amazon RDS fulfills all the use cases for me and I haven't spotted any disadvantage in it.

Verifizierter Rezensent
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Computer-Software, 11–50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Simple, stable SQL DB hosting

5,0 vor 4 Jahren

Kommentare: We have a fleet of managed DB instances and we don't have to worry or set up replicas manually.

Vorteile:

The managed nature of the hosting takes a lot of workload off of my team, letting us focus on more important things. It's definitely worth it.

Nachteile:

Making changes is always a bit scary, especially with respect to reboots. They also take a long time with no clear progress indication.