--- description: Detaillierte Informationen über invideo zu Benutzerfreundlichkeit, Funktionen, Kosten, Vor- und Nachteilen aus verifizierten Nutzer-Erfahrungen. Lies Ratings & Bewertungen und entdecke ähnliche Tools. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: invideo Erfahrungen, Vor- und Nachteile – Capterra Deutschland 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Startseite](/) > [Videobearbeitungsprogramme](/directory/20022/video-editing/software) > [invideo](/software/180680/invideo) # invideo Canonical: https://www.capterra.com.de/software/180680/invideo Seite: 1 / 18\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/180680/invideo?page=2) > InVideo hilft dir dabei, deine Inhalte in großartige Videos umzuwandeln. > > Bewertung: **4.5/5** von 409 Nutzern. Top bewertet für **Weiterempfehlungsquote**. ----- ## Übersicht ### Wer verwendet invideo? InVideo hilft dir dabei, deine Inhalte in großartige Videos umzuwandeln. Die Anwendung hilft Medienunternehmen, kleinen Unternehmen und Marken dabei, das Engagement des Publikums durch die Einflusskraft von Videoinhalten zu steigern. ## Kurzstatistiken und Ratings | Metrik | Bewertung | Detail | | **Gesamt** | **4.5/5** | 409 Nutzerbewertungen | | Bedienkomfort | 4.5/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Kundenbetreuung | 4.6/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis | 4.5/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Funktionen | 4.5/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Empfehlungsprozentsatz | 90% | (9/10 Weiterempfehlungsquote) | ## Über den Anbieter - **Unternehmen**: invideo - **Region**: San Francisco, USA ## Gewerblicher Kontext - **Startpreis**: 100,00 $ - **Preismodell**: (Kostenlose Version verfügbar) - **Zielgruppe**: Selbstständig, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1.000, 1.001–5.000, 5.001–10.000, 10.000+ - **Bereitstellungen und Plattformen**: Cloud, SaaS, webbasiert, Mac (Desktop), Windows (Desktop) - **Unterstützte Sprachen**: Englisch - **Verfügbare Länder**: Indien, Vereinigte Staaten ## Funktionen - AI Voices - Animation - Animationen und Übergänge - Content Generation - Content-Management - Drag-and-Drop - Inhalt-Bibliothek - KI/Maschinelles Lernen - Kundenspezifisches Branding - Markenüberlagerung - Massen-Upload - Medienbibliothek - Mehrsprachig - Personalization and Recommendation - Prompt Engineering - Teilen in sozialen Medien - Text zu Video - Texteinblendung - Verarbeitung natürlicher Sprache - Video Templates - Video-Erfassung - Video-Management - Videobearbeitung - Videoerstellung - Voice Cloning - Vorlagen - Werkzeuge zur Zusammenarbeit ## Integrationen (1 insgesamt) - Brightcove ## Optionen für Kundensupport - E-Mail/Helpdesk - FAQ/Forum - Wissensdatenbank - 24/7 Live-Support - Chat ## Category - [Videobearbeitungsprogramme](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/20022/video-editing/software) ## Ähnliche Kategorien - [Videobearbeitungsprogramme](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/20022/video-editing/software) - [Video Management Software](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/30754/video-management/software) - [Videoschnittsoftware & Videoproduktion](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/31677/video-making/software) - [KI-Video-Generatoren](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/34376/ai-video-generator/software) - [Text-To-Speech Software](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/33256/text-to-speech/software) ## Alternativen 1. [CreateStudio](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/203897/create-studio) — 4.8/5 (578 reviews) 2. [Synthesia](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/198045/enact) — 4.6/5 (313 reviews) 3. [Movavi Video Editor Plus](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/1011548/movavi-video-editor-plus) — 4.8/5 (1134 reviews) 4. [Fliki](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/1025058/fliki) — 4.7/5 (345 reviews) 5. [Pictory](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/1012384/pictory) — 4.8/5 (163 reviews) ## Nutzerbewertungen ### "Hat bei mir nachweislich nicht funktioniert - Es gibt trotzdem das Geld nicht zurück" — 1.0/5 > **Verifizierter Rezensent** | *17. März 2026* | Unterhaltung | Empfehlungsbewertung: 0.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Aktuell gibt es keine Vorteile da invideo kein Video gerendert hat. In Vergangenen Zeiten hatte ich es geschätzt, da es eine gute Quelle für lizenzierte Stockvideos war. > > **Nachteile**: Dass der Support einen nur hinhalten will und überhaupt nicht auf deine Mails eingeht. Wenn es wie bei mir einen Bug gibt, kriegst du maximal die verloren Credits zurück. Sie weigern sich aber dir dein Geld zurück zu geben. Auch wenn du deinen ganzen Tag mit dem Tool verschwendet hast. > > Ich habe einen ganzen Tag versucht meinen Prompt zu einem Video zu generieren. Das dumme Programm hat ca. 10 Mal jeweils eine halbe Stunde gerendert um dann abzubrechen. Ich hatte es wirklich mit allen verschiedenen Prompts und neuen Anfängen versucht. Jedes Mal das selbe. Der ganze Tag war mit Versuchen verschwendet. Und am Abend musste ich dann auf ein anderes Tool umsteigen, um endlich an meinem Video voran zu kommen. Ich habe das dem Support geschrieben dass ich mein Geld zurück haben möchte. Ich habe schließlich eine Mitgliedschaft und ZusatzCredits gekauft für insgesamt ca. 100 € um das Video generieren zu können. Die haben mir zwar zig Mal zurück geschrieben, sind aber auf meine Antworten überhaupt nicht eingegange. Die haben mir nur geschrieben, dass ich es so oder so oder so noch einmal versuchen soll. Obwohl das Video mittlerweile längst fix und fertig ist und auf Youtube läuft. Ich bin wirklich sauer. Dass hab ich ihnen 5 Mal geschrieben, dass ich kein Video jetzt mehr benötige. Die haben nun mein Ticket geschlossen. Also FAZIT: Funktioniert nicht und es gibt kein Geld zurück\! ----- ### "All IN with InVideo" — 5.0/5 > **Wayne** | *10. August 2025* | Unterhaltung | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: It makes producing YouTube content so easy. I generally drop in my pre-written script and storyboard and it creates the perfect results. > > **Nachteile**: Be nice is I could start the creation process with an audio file. I create podcast for other platforms like Spotify and would then like to take that audio as the baseline and have the video generated from there. > > Very good. I started with very little knowedge - if any, and by using the edit function withint the InVideo platform I have come to understand the structure of video production which has also helped me with other platforms like Meld Studio and CapCut. ----- ### "Invideo review" — 5.0/5 > **Pet** | *18. Oktober 2025* | Animation | Empfehlungsbewertung: 5.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: That you can use the AI Twin feature to clone your voice and have your own voice become all of your voiceovers > > **Nachteile**: That every new feature they add you have to either upgrade your subscription or mostly buy add- ons to use > > It use to be the best most affordable AI product to use that's no longer the case. I only longer love this product ----- ### "Misleading Claims and Unusable Results Despite Additional Costs" — 1.0/5 > **Shawn** | *15. April 2026* | Non-Profit-Organisation Management | Empfehlungsbewertung: 0.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: The concept and marketing are very appealing. The idea of being able to quickly create videos from simple prompts using your own content is exactly what we were looking for as a small nonprofit > > **Nachteile**: The platform did not function as advertised. It failed to reliably use uploaded assets, generated incorrect and mismatched visuals, and required significant editing despite claiming none would be needed. The credit system made it costly to even attempt basic functionality, as credits were consumed without producing usable results. Even after acknowledging these issues, support denied a same-day refund. > > We are a small nonprofit organization and purchased InVideo based on its advertised ability to “create videos without limit” and generate complete videos from simple prompts with “no editing needed.” Within the first couple of hours of using the platform—and during our very first video attempt—it became clear that the product does not deliver on these claims. The system did not reliably use our uploaded assets, did not follow the structure we provided, and generated visuals that were completely mismatched to the content. Scenes included incorrect imagery, blank or incorrect color screens, and unanimated elements where animation was expected. The result was not just slightly off—it was entirely unusable. The platform also claims that videos can be created “just like asking a human editor” and that “no editing is needed.” This was not our experience. The output was nowhere close to usable and would have required significant manual editing, defeating the purpose of the tool. Additionally, the “create videos without limit” claim is misleading. Video generation is heavily restricted by a credit system. While attempting to create a single video, we were prompted to purchase additional credits. We spent over $100 more in good faith, expecting this would resolve the issue. Instead, those credits were consumed without producing a usable result. At that point, the only option presented was to purchase even more credits to try again, despite the fact that the underlying issues were clearly not resolved. This creates a situation where users must continue paying simply to attempt basic functionality. InVideo also advertises a 7-day money-back guarantee. However, in practice, this guarantee is effectively unusable. In our case, simply attempting to generate a video—without downloading or exporting any usable content—consumed credits and made us ineligible for a refund. Since the platform did not produce a usable result, there was no meaningful way to evaluate the service without immediately forfeiting refund eligibility. Importantly, customer support acknowledged that the platform “didn’t perform as expected” and specifically referenced issues such as incorrect visuals, mismatched scenes, and difficulty using uploaded assets—all of which we experienced. Despite this acknowledgment, and despite requesting a refund the same day after only a few hours of use, our refund request was denied based solely on policy. This was not a case of extended use or dissatisfaction over time. It was immediately clear that the platform could not deliver what was advertised, yet no refund was offered or considered. In summary: The platform did not deliver on its core advertised functionality The “no limits” claim is constrained by a costly credit system Additional purchases did not resolve fundamental issues The generated output was not usable without extensive editing The 7-day guarantee is effectively voided by attempting to use the product The company acknowledged these issues but still denied a same-day refund We strongly encourage other organizations—especially nonprofits or small teams with limited budgets—to proceed with caution and fully understand the limitations and costs before committing. This was a costly and disappointing experience for our organization. ----- ### "Avoid Invideo.....Low quality inaccurate videos" — 1.0/5 > **Gary** | *5. Januar 2026* | Bildungsmanagement | Empfehlungsbewertung: 0.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: The concept that they allegedly create good videos caught my attention, but it was a marketing gimmick and not worth wasting your money on this company. > > **Nachteile**: Low quality inaccurate videos with poor customer service. They were provided with a script and subtitles. The subtitles were inaccurate and illegible. > > Avoid Invideo at all costs. They provide low quality unusable videos. I observed mixed reviews before subscribing, but thought I would give it a shot. I typed in a script for a short 10-second video with subtitles. The subtitle wording was inaccurate and illegible. I made a request to edit and correct the video, and they wanted more credits to fix their mistake, so I was left with an unusable video. I then tried to produce a 3-minute video with a full step by step script, and it kept freezing up stating it couldn't complete the request. I reached out within 7 days requesting a refund, and was told since I created a video, even an unusable one, I didn't qualify for a refund. Don't waste your money on this sub-par company. I'll be using Grok moving forward. ----- Seite: 1 / 18\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/180680/invideo?page=2) ## Links - [Auf Capterra anzeigen](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/180680/invideo) ## Diese Seite ist in den folgenden Sprachen verfügbar | Sprache | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## Strukturierte Daten