Durchschnittliche Bewertung

  • Gesamt
    4,2/5
  • Benutzerfreundlichkeit
    4,4/5
  • Kundenservice
    4,8/5

Über Endtest

Codefreies automatisches Testen. Angetrieben durch maschinelles Lernen.

Erfahre mehr über Endtest

Zeigt 40 Bewertungen

Craig C.
Senior Technology Analyst
Computer-Software, 13-50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
  • Gesamtbewertung
    5/5
  • Benutzerfreundlichkeit
    4/5
  • Eigenschaften & Funktionalitäten
    4/5
  • Kundenbetreuung
    5/5
  • Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
    5/5
  • Wahrscheinlichkeit der Weiterempfehlung
    10/10
  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 9.11.2018

"Excellent customer service and an evolving app"

Kommentare: Overall, I've been extremely pleased with my Endtest experience. While the software may not be as mature as say, Quality Center, it's easy to use and customer support is outstanding. I've not found any issues that the product could handle.

Vorteile: Biggest plus with Endtest is customer support, Support team is wonderful to work with, team is super responsive and always has a solution for my issues. As far as the product goes, it's very easy to pick up and create a automated test. The team at Endtest continues to evolve the software, adding new features and increasing the capabilities of the software.

Nachteile: Need some additional features to make navigating around the UI a little easier on the user. Would like to see additional DB's available (like Mongo). Would like a more formal method of letting customers know when new features are available and some documentation on how the feature work.

  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 9.11.2018
Lavanya G.
QA Engineer
Finanzdienstleistungen, 51-200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 1-5 Monate
  • Gesamtbewertung
    4/5
  • Benutzerfreundlichkeit
    5/5
  • Eigenschaften & Funktionalitäten
    3/5
  • Kundenbetreuung
    5/5
  • Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
    4/5
  • Wahrscheinlichkeit der Weiterempfehlung
    7/10
  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 4.11.2019

"Endtest as an Automation tool "

Vorteile: > No scripting skill required
> Easy to use
>Support is amazing
> Parallel execution of tests & test suites in different browsers & devices
> Executes test on the cloud real browser /devices
> Test script support is amazing
> On error navigates back to the test step with error ( this is my favorite as no need to debug much)

Nachteile: > Execution time is high compared to other tools in the market
> Mobile Apps testing needs Browser Stack subscription

  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 4.11.2019
Marko V.
QA Lead
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 13-50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
  • Gesamtbewertung
    4/5
  • Benutzerfreundlichkeit
    5/5
  • Eigenschaften & Funktionalitäten
    4/5
  • Kundenbetreuung
    5/5
  • Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
    5/5
  • Wahrscheinlichkeit der Weiterempfehlung
    10/10
  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 30.3.2020

"EndTest is a really professional tool"

Kommentare: They have the best support team in the world, and in general EndTest is really good software which can easily become crucial part of your continuous delivery process. Easy to learn and easy to handle and it is possible to utilize junior team members for automation.

Vorteile: Easy of use, we quickly managed to integrate this software in our continuous delivery process. Also, team members that didn't have enough knowledge about automation, quickly learned how to work in EndTest so we could integrate more resources that our team is possessing.

Nachteile: It is connected to browserstack and it would be awesome that there is possibility to connect to a local device or that EndTes has his own farm of devices. Personally i would rather pay extra money to connect to local devices rather than browserstack license. The biggest problem is that sometimes browserstack has issues and it is not possible to run test correctly.

  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 30.3.2020
Glen C.
Associate QA Engineer
Gastgewerbe, 1.001-5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 1-5 Monate
  • Gesamtbewertung
    3/5
  • Benutzerfreundlichkeit
    3/5
  • Eigenschaften & Funktionalitäten
    3/5
  • Kundenbetreuung
    Nicht bewertet
  • Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
    Nicht bewertet
  • Wahrscheinlichkeit der Weiterempfehlung
    6/10
  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 9.11.2018

"Decent Option for Cross-Browser/Device Testing"

Kommentare: One division of our company does use this for testing of our public-facing website. My team and I mostly work on internal tools for the company's finance team. I was unable to see a compelling reason to use this over GhostInspector or Mabl, both of which seem better suited for functional testing. The wide variety of device/browser compatibility is impressive, but not strictly necessary for our particular business needs. I think if EndTest had action recording, that would be a different story.

Vorteile: Navigation is intuitive and the page loads quickly to ensure a good work pace. Broad support for different browsers and devices. If statement support and database connection/querying is also nice.

Nachteile: Lack of in-browser action recording features, no option to export/import to/from Selenium or other popular frameworks. No option for global or suite-level variables, and test-level variables are not displayed in an easy to view UI.

  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 9.11.2018
Ramya R.
QA Engineer
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 201-500 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
  • Gesamtbewertung
    4/5
  • Benutzerfreundlichkeit
    5/5
  • Eigenschaften & Funktionalitäten
    4/5
  • Kundenbetreuung
    Nicht bewertet
  • Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
    Nicht bewertet
  • Wahrscheinlichkeit der Weiterempfehlung
    10/10
  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 30.4.2020

"Good tool for automation."

Vorteile: It supports for all the browsers. We can copy/move test cases in another test suite. Its easy for use and supports if statement.

Nachteile: While running lots of testcases sometimes tests fails randomly and Execution time is high. No option for copy/move test suites and add new step in between the test steps. Test case results are not stable. No option to move test suites.

  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 30.4.2020
Maarten P.
Product Owner
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 13-50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
  • Gesamtbewertung
    4/5
  • Benutzerfreundlichkeit
    5/5
  • Eigenschaften & Funktionalitäten
    4/5
  • Kundenbetreuung
    5/5
  • Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
    5/5
  • Wahrscheinlichkeit der Weiterempfehlung
    9/10
  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 29.10.2019

"Feature-packed - Easy to use and setup"

Kommentare: We ensure proper operation of new releases for our customers. Better quality, happier customers!

Vorteile: It took less than half a day to get acquainted and up to speed with Endtest. We quickly had the first test cases set up. The ability to schedule test runs and invoke the tests through a URL are really helpful.

Nachteile: Endtest offers support for the most popular and recent browser versions. Would be great if older versions and less popular browsers can be tested in the same way.

  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 29.10.2019
Abhijeet S.
Quality Assurance Engineer
Krankenhausversorgung & Gesundheitswesen, 13-50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
  • Gesamtbewertung
    4/5
  • Benutzerfreundlichkeit
    4/5
  • Eigenschaften & Funktionalitäten
    4/5
  • Kundenbetreuung
    5/5
  • Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
    4/5
  • Wahrscheinlichkeit der Weiterempfehlung
    9/10
  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 25.10.2019

"Great tool for automation. "

Kommentare: I was working on appium studio for mobile automation, when I found this one. Then I switched to website automation. I havent tried automating mobile here but website automation is working just fine. It made my work easier and efficient because I could cover more test cases on a daily basis. I took a lot of help from our rep. He is a wonderful and very to-the-point person. Since I was a beginner, he had to help me alot. He does a pretty good job.

Vorteile: - Interactable and simple UI
- Maintaining test suites
- Scheduler
- Well documented
- Continuous progress to enhance the customer experience
- Using machine learning helps solve a lot of problems
- Video recording, etc. etc..

Nachteile: The way the result is shown, Failed test cases should be little more elaborative.

  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 25.10.2019
Jacob Z.
QA Specialist
Einzelhandel, 13-50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
  • Gesamtbewertung
    5/5
  • Benutzerfreundlichkeit
    5/5
  • Eigenschaften & Funktionalitäten
    5/5
  • Kundenbetreuung
    5/5
  • Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
    5/5
  • Wahrscheinlichkeit der Weiterempfehlung
    10/10
  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 6.11.2018

"A great tool for your QA team"

Kommentare: We've mainly been using EndTest for basic tests to ensure high-value pages and features are working on our site after code deploys. The video recordings of tests have been super helpful in locating where errors may be occurring if a test fails. Besides the features, the customer support is always top notch and personal.

Vorteile: We've mainly been using EndTest for basic tests to ensure high-value pages and features are working on our site after code deploys. The video recordings of tests have been super helpful in locating where errors may be occurring if a test fails. It's very helpful having access to multiple types of VMs so that our QA team can make sure everything works on all devices and browsers. The test cases in EndTest are easy to set-up and do not require advanced coding knowledge.

Nachteile: Not much I can think of at the moment...

  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 6.11.2018
Steven N.
Manager Software Engineering
Computer-Software, 1.001-5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
  • Gesamtbewertung
    4/5
  • Benutzerfreundlichkeit
    4/5
  • Eigenschaften & Funktionalitäten
    5/5
  • Kundenbetreuung
    5/5
  • Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
    4/5
  • Wahrscheinlichkeit der Weiterempfehlung
    9/10
  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 29.10.2019

"Really great tool"

Kommentare: Great tool, very good and personal support. Price is not too high.
Tests are as fast as you might wish for. Unfortunately, front end tests are slow by nature I'm afraid...

Vorteile: The ease of use is incredible. We have put a student (1st year bachelor computer science) on it and the first day, he was already able to write high quality tests for us.
EndTest uses selenium in the backend, but don't even try to write it yourself in selenium, because the issues you will face are massive, and are almost all solved by using the EndTest tool.
You can also integrate EndTest with your Jenkins build server.
Also, the new features that they add during the year are really impressive. I would recommend this tool to everyone who takes front-end regression testing seriously.

Nachteile: Sometimes, tests tend to fail randomly. We have set up a retry system to prevent false positives. We have the same issue when using selenium, and there it's even worse.

  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 29.10.2019
Craig C.
Senior Technology Analyst
Computer-Software, 13-50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
  • Gesamtbewertung
    5/5
  • Benutzerfreundlichkeit
    4/5
  • Eigenschaften & Funktionalitäten
    4/5
  • Kundenbetreuung
    5/5
  • Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
    5/5
  • Wahrscheinlichkeit der Weiterempfehlung
    10/10
  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 28.10.2019

"Solid software with exceptional Customer Service"

Kommentare: Overall our experience has been exceptional. We started using this software product at it's infancy, so while we've had to go thru some growing pains with them, the customer service is so exceptional that any issues have far outwieghted the growing pains. They continue to make improvements and add new features and are always open to suggestions from me on what can be done to improve the product.

Vorteile: - Easy to get started running automated test
- Exceptional customer service
- New features added on a regular basis

Nachteile: - Some features can be a bit complicated to figure out
- More features to make navigating around the UI are needed

  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 28.10.2019
Manak C.
Principal QA (Automation)
Computer-Software, 51-200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
  • Gesamtbewertung
    4/5
  • Benutzerfreundlichkeit
    4/5
  • Eigenschaften & Funktionalitäten
    4/5
  • Kundenbetreuung
    4/5
  • Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
    4/5
  • Wahrscheinlichkeit der Weiterempfehlung
    8/10
  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 5.11.2019

"EndTest Evaluation"

Kommentare: This tool is good option for small project. We can manage our tests automation easily if number of test case count is less. But as test automation count increases, it becomes difficult to manage it.

Vorteile: EndTest is easy to use tool. We can start using it in very less time. Help documentation was very good.

Nachteile: It is not suitable for large project having lot of test cases.

  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 5.11.2019
Verifizierter Rezensent
Automated Testing Engineer
Finanzdienstleistungen, 13-50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
  • Gesamtbewertung
    5/5
  • Benutzerfreundlichkeit
    5/5
  • Eigenschaften & Funktionalitäten
    5/5
  • Kundenbetreuung
    5/5
  • Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
    5/5
  • Wahrscheinlichkeit der Weiterempfehlung
    9/10
  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 11.11.2018

"Amazing Customer Service"

Kommentare: It's so helpful to have a fast, easy-to-use, reliable program to run our tests on.

Vorteile: The ease of use is the best feature of EndTest, but the customer service is absolutely stellar. Any questions I had (even if they were about automated testing in general and not specifically about EndTest) were quickly answered in great detail.

Nachteile: The only part of EndTest that is a bit difficult for us is the long wait times and the inability to predict the length of a test. However, I believe this is a general issue for automated testing.

  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 11.11.2018
Steven N.
Manager software engineering
Computer-Software, 1.001-5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
  • Gesamtbewertung
    4/5
  • Benutzerfreundlichkeit
    5/5
  • Eigenschaften & Funktionalitäten
    4/5
  • Kundenbetreuung
    5/5
  • Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
    5/5
  • Wahrscheinlichkeit der Weiterempfehlung
    10/10
  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 9.11.2018

"Enfocus"

Kommentare: Very positive. We have implemented EndTest for almost a year now, and it already helped us quite a lot in preventing bugs to be released. Some developers were very reluctant to use the tool, but after a while, they clearly see the benefits. The tool proved its worth.

Vorteile: The fact that you don't need to be a developer to write tests and the ease of creating tests

Nachteile: no versioning on the tests and no conditionals.

  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 9.11.2018
Andrew S.
Quality Assurance Analyst
Non-Profit-Organisation Management, 1.001-5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 1-5 Monate
  • Gesamtbewertung
    4/5
  • Benutzerfreundlichkeit
    4/5
  • Eigenschaften & Funktionalitäten
    4/5
  • Kundenbetreuung
    5/5
  • Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
    5/5
  • Wahrscheinlichkeit der Weiterempfehlung
    7/10
  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 26.11.2018

"Easy to use, needs time to mature"

Kommentare: Overall I love Endtest and will continue to work with them and provide my feedback regarding its feature set. Keep up the great work!

Vorteile: I love that I can create and easily maintain a set of tests without any coding knowledge. The team at Endtest is also very quick to respond to queries and is also very helpful when confronted with complicated testing scenarios that cant be easily converted into simple test steps.

Nachteile: Being relatively new application there are a few tweaks that still need to be made to allow for easy maintenance. As an example, moving and creating new test steps and test cases can be cumbersome due to the "move" feature being a bit clunky.

  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 26.11.2018
Verifizierter Rezensent
Technical Support Specialist
Bildungsmanagement, 2-10 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Kostenlose Testversion
  • Gesamtbewertung
    4/5
  • Benutzerfreundlichkeit
    4/5
  • Eigenschaften & Funktionalitäten
    4/5
  • Kundenbetreuung
    Nicht bewertet
  • Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
    3/5
  • Wahrscheinlichkeit der Weiterempfehlung
    7/10
  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 22.8.2019

"Gets the job done maybe, but we went with another"

Vorteile: Great multi-browser automated testing that boasts it's "powered by machine learning". Definitely less repetitive to write tests than in something like Selenium

Nachteile: UI and overall value led to us buying something else. Customer support wasn't as effective as other product we were trialing.

  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 22.8.2019
Verifizierter Rezensent
VIP Account Manager
Unterhaltung, 1.001-5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
  • Gesamtbewertung
    5/5
  • Benutzerfreundlichkeit
    5/5
  • Eigenschaften & Funktionalitäten
    5/5
  • Kundenbetreuung
    5/5
  • Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
    5/5
  • Wahrscheinlichkeit der Weiterempfehlung
    10/10
  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 14.11.2018

"Amazing!"

Vorteile: Easy to use, no setup needed as everything is done through their cloud infrastructure, literally no coding skills needed.
Easy test maintenance, fast, experienced and reliable support.

Nachteile: I could not find any cons for it, at all.

  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 14.11.2018
Verifizierter Rezensent
Software Developer
Essen & Trinken, 1.001-5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
  • Gesamtbewertung
    4/5
  • Benutzerfreundlichkeit
    4/5
  • Eigenschaften & Funktionalitäten
    4/5
  • Kundenbetreuung
    5/5
  • Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
    5/5
  • Wahrscheinlichkeit der Weiterempfehlung
    8/10
  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 13.11.2018

"Satisfied"

Kommentare: We were able to get someone that was not technical to create end to end test for one of in house apps. Provided lots of reassurance

Vorteile: You do not need a developer to code selenium scripts

Nachteile: Very tedious work. Maybe a desktop tool or a recording software to make this easier for the non dev

  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 13.11.2018
Akash S.
Developer Test Automation Coop
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 10.001+ Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 1-5 Monate
  • Gesamtbewertung
    5/5
  • Benutzerfreundlichkeit
    5/5
  • Eigenschaften & Funktionalitäten
    4/5
  • Kundenbetreuung
    5/5
  • Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
    4/5
  • Wahrscheinlichkeit der Weiterempfehlung
    8/10
  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 8.11.2018

"Ease of Use and Functionality"

Kommentare: So far so good, if you could better scheduler with proper result viewing option, it would be the best.

Vorteile: Different in-built functionalities which are available makes life easier for tester to create automation script. Any one with basic knowledge can create test-scripts.

Nachteile: Scheduler Functionality and Server time, It should sync with User's Local time so user can schedule his/her test according to local time so it saves time.
Even as a pro users, sometime we ran out of resources so if you can scale it up it would be great.

  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 8.11.2018
Nicolas gabriel R.
QA Test Manager
Internet, 51-200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 1-5 Monate
  • Gesamtbewertung
    4/5
  • Benutzerfreundlichkeit
    4/5
  • Eigenschaften & Funktionalitäten
    4/5
  • Kundenbetreuung
    5/5
  • Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
    4/5
  • Wahrscheinlichkeit der Weiterempfehlung
    8/10
  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 14.2.2019

"Keyword based automation tests"

Kommentare: I've been using it for almost 2 months. You'll learn quick and you'll have a automation test suite in a few days.
Support is great, they answer and solve problems very quick.
You can export your test cases to python or executable files.

Vorteile: Very easy to use, you can create execute schedule and backup you test suites.
Support is very good and new features are release from time to time
Is not expensive, and totally worth it.
Web based, no need to install any app or soft.

Nachteile: Some minor issues in the platform, but they are working on it.

  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 14.2.2019
Gurjeet S.
Front End Web Developer
Einzelhandel, 51-200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
  • Gesamtbewertung
    4/5
  • Benutzerfreundlichkeit
    4/5
  • Eigenschaften & Funktionalitäten
    4/5
  • Kundenbetreuung
    5/5
  • Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
    4/5
  • Wahrscheinlichkeit der Weiterempfehlung
    8/10
  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 14.11.2018

"Simple easy way to get into testing"

Kommentare: We used EndTest to allow (non technical) people from various departments to be able to set up tests on areas of the website that matter to them which can then be set to run on an automated basis.

Vorteile: Easy enough for non-developers to set up and run a test. This allows people in various roles to set up tests to automate the testing of features on the website that matter to them.

Nachteile: Can be difficult to debug when setting up tests when compared to running something like headless Chrome locally.

  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 14.11.2018
Ryan C.
Senior Software Engineer
Darstellende Künste, 13-50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
  • Gesamtbewertung
    4/5
  • Benutzerfreundlichkeit
    4/5
  • Eigenschaften & Funktionalitäten
    5/5
  • Kundenbetreuung
    5/5
  • Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
    5/5
  • Wahrscheinlichkeit der Weiterempfehlung
    8/10
  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 23.11.2018

"Endtest Review"

Kommentare: Automated testing with testers that have limited programming experience. API endpoints are essential to being able to operate.

Vorteile: Automated features, low-code interface, extensive features. Very quick responses.

Nachteile: Long time to load sometimes. A little lackluster UI. I should be able to see more, but a lot of it is whitespace. Dragging elements around can be okay but if I have a long list of items it's really cumbersome.

  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 23.11.2018
Manu S.
Senior Integrations Consultant
Marktforschung, 201-500 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
  • Gesamtbewertung
    5/5
  • Benutzerfreundlichkeit
    5/5
  • Eigenschaften & Funktionalitäten
    5/5
  • Kundenbetreuung
    5/5
  • Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
    5/5
  • Wahrscheinlichkeit der Weiterempfehlung
    10/10
  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 22.10.2019

"Endtest 101 Review"

Kommentare: Great Great Great. As I sad in the above fact, it is super easy to use, does not require any knowledge of coding, the chrome extension helped me a lot when setting up tests, and the customer service is great.

Vorteile: I love how easy it is to use, it is also super easy to communicate feedback. The tool was easy to onboard my team onto and explain how the solution actually works. We do a lot of automated testing for a UI we built for a client, that we used to do manually.

Nachteile: Really nothing to say here. I am currently waiting for SSO integration, but that's really not a deal-breaker at the moment for us.

  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 22.10.2019
Tanel T.
Software tester
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 51-200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 1-5 Monate
  • Gesamtbewertung
    5/5
  • Benutzerfreundlichkeit
    5/5
  • Eigenschaften & Funktionalitäten
    4/5
  • Kundenbetreuung
    5/5
  • Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
    5/5
  • Wahrscheinlichkeit der Weiterempfehlung
    10/10
  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 16.11.2018

"Great soft for (manual)TESTERS whose code skill is modest"

Kommentare: As a manual tester, it was the first straightforward soft which is handy and not frustrating (vs Katalon Studio for example). Customer support is awesome - never left alone so far.

Vorteile: Ease of use, great and simple UI. Runs great with different browsers.

Nachteile: Somehow impossible element identification in Drupal 8 (dropdown-selection menus).

  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 16.11.2018
Alagu R.
Test Analyst
Medienproduktion, 10.001+ Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
  • Gesamtbewertung
    4/5
  • Benutzerfreundlichkeit
    3/5
  • Eigenschaften & Funktionalitäten
    4/5
  • Kundenbetreuung
    5/5
  • Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
    4/5
  • Wahrscheinlichkeit der Weiterempfehlung
    7/10
  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 6.11.2018

"easy tool for testing with lot of functional complication"

Kommentare: Good Tool with contunous improvements needed on Performance.

Vorteile: Easy to use
User-friendly
Easy to learn

Nachteile: Slowness when you run the test - Results page
More messages for the user in results page about the current test run ( I always refresh it - don't know why)
Scheduling on daily basis will cause issues

  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 6.11.2018
Paul M.
Senior Tester
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 13-50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 1-5 Monate
  • Gesamtbewertung
    4/5
  • Benutzerfreundlichkeit
    4/5
  • Eigenschaften & Funktionalitäten
    4/5
  • Kundenbetreuung
    5/5
  • Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
    Nicht bewertet
  • Wahrscheinlichkeit der Weiterempfehlung
    9/10
  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 18.3.2019

"Easy and Quick setup for automatic testing"

Kommentare: It's an easy way to setup test automation for testing websites and you don't need to all the coding that goes behind it all

Vorteile: In general it's quite easy to understand how it works, making the challenge of test automation simpler a lot

Nachteile: It takes quite some clicking forward/backward to get things done

  • Quelle des Nutzers 
  • Bewertet am 18.3.2019