Wir helfen Unternehmen in Deutschland
seit 15 Jahren bei der Softwareauswahl

Veeva QualityOne EQMS Erfahrungen

Über Veeva QualityOne EQMS

Top-SaaS-Online-Suite von Anwendungen für Qualitätsmanagement, Dokumentenkontrolle und Schulungsmanagement.

Erfahre mehr über Veeva QualityOne EQMS

Vorteile:

One of the thing that i love with Veeva is, it can handle my complex document easily and the interface of the software is very easy to navigate with.

Nachteile:

Sometimes the relationships between objects is not automatically created. For example you can relate a finding to an audit, but then you must go into the audit and relate it back to the finding.

Bewertungen zu Veeva QualityOne EQMS

Durchschnittliche Bewertung

Benutzerfreundlichkeit
4,3
Kundenservice
4,6
Funktionen
4,3
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
4,3

Weiterempfehlungsquote

8,8/10

Veeva QualityOne EQMS hat eine Gesamtbewertung von 4,7 von 5 Sternen basierend auf 12 Nutzerbewertungen auf Capterra.

Nutzerbewertungen filtern (12)

Sortieren nach

Hast du Veeva QualityOne EQMS bereits verwendet?

Teile deine Erfahrungen mit anderen Softwareinteressenten.

Nutzerbewertungen filtern (12)

Verifizierter Rezensent
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Medizinische Geräte, 11–50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

Veeva QualityOne

5,0 vor 6 Jahren

Kommentare: We use QualityOne as an electronic quality management systems.

Vorteile:

Best in class document and record management and pretty good quality event management to boot. UI is great, document handling is above par, and while quality events can sometimes feel like an add on, the UI is still great and customization / configuration is a breeze. Additional selling points for us were the full API and excellent and responsive troubleshooting / support.

Nachteile:

Quality event management utilizes a slightly different format than document management, and it's not as robust as the document management, but the value is still excellent and configuration options allow more flexibility than other solutions we've seen in the price range.

Adam
Senior Quality Engineer in UK
Medizinische Geräte, 51–200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

Veeva Vault Documentation and Quality Management

5,0 vor 4 Jahren

Kommentare: Implementing QualityOne has provided the company with a single solution for its document control requirements and automating various processes involved in its Quality Management System. This means that users, management and auditors are able to quickly access data with the knowledge that they are viewing the latest version in a secure manner.

Vorteile:

We chose this software initially for our document management system with the intention of expanding its use to encompass all of our quality management system. The features that our end-users particularly like are the ease of use of the application, people found that it was very intuitive and with a little familiarity were able to accomplish tasks in a quick and efficient manner. People also liked the fact that they could view and compare documents without having to go to the trouble of always downloading the record to their PC simply to see it's contents.

Nachteile:

The rendition of documents held is limited and could be expanded to cover other formats

Jerome
Core IT Manufacturing and R&D Domain Leader in Frankreich
Kosmetik, 5.001–10.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 1-5 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

L'Occitane review (IT point of view)

4,0 vor 4 Jahren

Vorteile:

- OOB tool - Online solution : first time ever we saw an app (draft version) the day after the Kick Off ! - Friendly and easy to use for end users - Implementation teams share their other customers experiences ans best business practices, this is a HUGE project accelerator

Nachteile:

For today the object versionning is not a natively integrated feature. TOO EXPENSIVE !

Mike
IT Regulatory Quality Manager in USA
Pharmazeutika, 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

QualityOne - One stop for EASY Quality Management

5,0 vor 6 Jahren

Vorteile:

The ease of use is second to none. I have a lot of users who need access to the system who themselves have never worked in a Quality Management System before, let alone in the Pharma industry before. If I had to give them access to other systems (like Master Control, Trackwise, Documentum) I'd be extremely worried about their ability to utilize the system in an efficient manner. QualityOne makes every task (like approving docs, adding a CAPA, etc) simple. To date, I have not had one user ever report the system was hard to use. Many users have already become super users just by using the system on a day by day basis.

Nachteile:

The initial configurations sometimes do not push through correctly to the production system, and these arent checked before go-live. But these issues are easily remediated and typically, in our case, have not caused any downtime.

Thomas
Electrical Engineer in USA
Konsumgüter, 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

Simple to Use

5,0 vor 6 Jahren

Kommentare: We have increased quality compliance with our documentation while eliminating over 2 peoples worth of effort across our site. We have been able to move from several document management solutions to 1 because it is meeting all of our needs.

Vorteile:

Easy to navigate and understand user interface. Users at my site are consistently able to use the product with zero formal training.

Nachteile:

Currently difficult to print documents, many steps are required.

Danny
Quality Development Director in Irland
Biotechnologie, 201–500 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

QualityOne as an automated QMS tool

4,0 vor 4 Jahren

Kommentare: Overall we are very pleased with QualityOne as our automated QMS solution

Vorteile:

Flexibility - the tool can be adapted to suit changing business requirements. Implementation team - The Veeva team which assisted us in configuring the system and going live were excellent.

Nachteile:

One or two features are not intuitive and reassigning tasks could be made easier.

Hasbullah
Hasbullah
Sales And Marketing Specialist in Malaysia
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Telekommunikation, 5.001–10.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

High quality product

4,0 vor 3 Jahren

Vorteile:

One of the thing that i love with Veeva is, it can handle my complex document easily and the interface of the software is very easy to navigate with.

Nachteile:

The pricing scheme is quite steep and expensive.

ENRQUE
QUALITY MANAGER in Brasilien
Kosmetik, 5.001–10.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 1-5 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

GREAT CHOICE

5,0 vor 4 Jahren

Vorteile:

BEST IN CLASS, USER FRIENDLY, STANDARD SOLUTION BUT COMPLETELY CUSTOMIZABLE

Nachteile:

PRICE VALUE FOR MONEY FEE PER LICENCE SEARCH ENGINE NOT AS POWERFUL AS GOOGLE/AMAZON. EX, accents

Maarten
Ehs officer in Niederlande
Pharmazeutika, 501–1.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

Secure management, and archiving to store your document

5,0 letztes Jahr

Vorteile:

User friendly for trained personnel. Reliable and hold many options to find background information yourself. To prevent easily invalid version of docs are used.

Nachteile:

Quality systems tend to be less forgiving when mistakes are made. Having said this, it's al part of quality and reliability. Make sure to use the more restricted way of working only when it is really needed.

Verifizierter Rezensent
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Baumaterial, 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

Replacing existing system

5,0 vor 6 Jahren

Kommentare: We were looking for a solution that did not require a lot of IT time once the product was up and running as well as giving our suppliers access to their quality data. QualityOne will accomplish both.

Vorteile:

The ability to configure the software is great and the main reason we selected QualityOne to replace our internally build software. The Veeva team has been exceptional in working to understand our processes and guiding us on how to best translate it into QualityOne. The software is definitely working for us vs. us working for the software.

Nachteile:

Sometimes the relationships between objects is not automatically created. For example you can relate a finding to an audit, but then you must go into the audit and relate it back to the finding. It should make that relationship both ways automatically.

Matias
Validation Manager in Argentinien
Pharmazeutika, 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

Veeva, como gestion de documentacion de procesos

4,0 vor 7 Monaten

Kommentare: Trabajando en la migracion, puedo decir que la experiencia vivida es de que es flexible y adaptable, pero se necesitan recursos que comprendan el funcionamiento, olisticamente. Muy buena experiencia si se tienen recursos para adaptarlo

Vorteile:

es versatil, buena interfaz de usuario, dinamico y interactivo.

Nachteile:

Lleva bastantes recursos, para amoldarlo a la necesidad.

Andy
Vice President of Quality in USA
Medizinische Geräte, 501–1.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

Web Industries QualityOne Review

5,0 vor 4 Jahren

Kommentare: Simply, under my leadership I'm advocating Web Industries to use QualityOne not because of system capabilities but rather Veeva's strong partnership capabilities. Those partnership capabilities include but not limited to: listening to customers, subject matter expertise, and building meaningful relationships.

Vorteile:

1.) Great commercial off the shelf (COTS) functionality 2.) Easy point-and-click configuration 3.) Visual, dynamic reporting

Nachteile:

1.) Minimal embedment of LEAN/6sigma tools in processes 2.) Cost of Poor Quality (CoPQ) roll metric and report would be valuable