Über Phabricator

Software development platform that facilitates managing projects, reviewing codes, debugging, hosting repository, and more.

Erfahre mehr über Phabricator

Vorteile:

I loved that I was able to escalate issues with local geographic issues to a global team.

Nachteile:

It's understandable but could be a downer for potential users. The community behind it is not as active as other solutions, so finding a solution to your problem could take time and effort.

Bewertungen zu Phabricator

Durchschnittliche Bewertung

Benutzerfreundlichkeit
4,0
Kundenservice
3,2
Funktionen
3,8
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
4,3

Weiterempfehlungsquote

7,6/10

Phabricator hat eine Gesamtbewertung von 4,1 von 5 Sternen basierend auf 15 Nutzerbewertungen auf Capterra.

Nutzerbewertungen filtern (15)

Sortieren nach

Hast du Phabricator bereits verwendet?

Teile deine Erfahrungen mit anderen Softwareinteressenten.

Nutzerbewertungen filtern (15)

Brian B.
Brian B.
Streamer in USA
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Computerspiele, 2-10 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

best tool to use for Tech stacks

5 letztes Jahr

Vorteile:

Phabricator has such a large array of tools for coding I can test everything inside their suite.

Nachteile:

I haven't had any major issues using phabricator to work with my code and the fact that is free and open-sourced means fewer updates on the program itself.

Mark D.
Mark D.
Principal Architect in Kanada
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 2-10 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

Phabricator is the best hands down

5 vor 2 Jahren

Kommentare: Super useful software, that's really well built with the option to make it more serious or leave little developer quips in.

Vorteile:

Phabricator makes it really easy for you to move from setup to creating tasks and projects. It's secure, open source, multi-functional and honestly just amazing.

Nachteile:

Not all the features are available right away, so it does require a little configuration to ensure it works the way you want it to.

Verifizierter Rezensent
Line Producer & Sysops Admin in Kanada
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Computerspiele, 11-50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

A powerful tool that needs fine tuning

3 vor 3 Jahren

Kommentare: I'm happy with the solution, but I sometime feel frustrated not being able to address/find proper solutions to what seems to be simple/common situations for this kind of tool

Vorteile:

Phabricator is an easy to implement and free tool, that can be used as a task/bug manager/tracker. It's pretty versatile and offers various pre-installed tools/plugins, with a lot of possible parameters to play with in order to create Projects, related tasks and link this to your repository solution (we are using Git). It offers the possibility to work with lists or board (kan-ban style), it has a free sprint plug-in that allows to Phabricator to be used as a scrum tool. Being free and stand-alone, it allows integrators/developers to come up with their own scripts and/or plugins.

Nachteile:

It's a bit confusing at first, since the information can be presented in different style, at different places and, therefore, can be interpreted in different ways. The development is slow and a lot of features requested by paying customers as much as free users seem to take a long time before being addressed. It's understandable but could be a downer for potential users. The community behind it is not as active as other solutions, so finding a solution to your problem could take time and effort.

Rijn B.
Software Engineer in USA
Computer-Software, 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Must have if use monorepo

5 vor 4 Monaten

Vorteile:

Phabricator is a great tool for medium to large company. It provides everything need for a large group of engineers and is perfect for monorepo.

Nachteile:

It doesn't have a good per-repo permission control or customization.

Earlie R.
Dayforce Support Analyst III in USA
Personalwesen, 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

Better than Github

5 letztes Jahr

Kommentare: Definitely a great experience. I would recommend Phabricator to all my friends who work in different industries.

Vorteile:

I really like the interface of Phabricator. It's definitely user friendly.

Nachteile:

The search engine can be improved when searching for this.

Verifizierter Rezensent
Software Engineer in USA
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Computer-Software, 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Phabricator - Full featured Diff Reviews

4 letztes Jahr

Vorteile:

Its not just the diff being reviewed, its wrapped between all the contextual info as well. - Phabricator does a great job surfacing all the information like passing/failing tests - Your git stack is avaialble as part of the diff review, lets you see how the feature is evolving As close to pair programming as it gets at a distance.

Nachteile:

The setup can be a bit complicated given you want to host your codebase on the web. To take full advantage of a CI features, you'll wire up the unit tests and deployment machines to test each diff and how it affects the big picture.

Pranav A.
Software engineer in USA
Computer-Software, 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Simple and efficient

4 vor 2 Jahren

Kommentare: It's been good. Has most things in one tool (tasks, project management, code review, code explorer, paste bin etc).

Vorteile:

It's simple. Things work well within the system. You can refer objects by just their ids. Code review is easy. Task and project management is simple Very good command line support

Nachteile:

I love it. The only thing that others may not like is that it's not as full featured as JIRA. But that may be a feature

Ahmad A.
Ahmad A.
Associate QA Engineer in USA
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Computer-Software, 201-500 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

No live update make this tool frustrating

3 vor 4 Jahren

Vorteile:

Works very smooth and has little to no issues performance wise

Nachteile:

UI is meh, no auto refreshes or auto updates on boards make it frustrating. I have to manually refresh the page in order to see comments on tickets

Verifizierter Rezensent
Controller in USA
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Immobilien, 51-200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

For Engineers

3 vor 2 Jahren

Kommentare: I avoided having to use it if at all possible and am glad we moved to Trello

Vorteile:

We used this software to help our company get organized with ordering supplies and keeping up with employee needs.

Nachteile:

It was not easy to use. The engineers found it very useful for their flow, but regular employees had a hard time navigating and understanding how to make requests using the system

Rodrigo ernesto P.
Q&A Test Manager in
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Versicherung, 51-200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Nicht angeboten
Herkunft der Bewertung
Quelle: GetApp
4 vor 3 Jahren
Justin S.
DevOps Engineer in USA
Computer-Software, 201-500 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Maximal pain for minimal gain

2 letztes Jahr

Kommentare: For a free service, Phabricator is okay, but realize that Phacility, its parent company, is largely a one-man show. I wouldn't entrust my company's productivity to something with that sort of "bus factor." Be aware that if you *are* using Phabricator because it's free, Phacility doesn't respond to any feedback from you. Which I suppose is fair, given that it has to make money somehow. I have trouble thinking of reasons to use Phabricator over integrated platforms like GitLab (and even GitHub) that offer a more comprehensive, more thoroughly documented, more robustly backed experience.

Vorteile:

Phabricator is entirely open source, so there's no need to worry about licensing fees. It supports multiple version control systems, which may be helpful in mixed environments. Its rule engine for notifications, Herald, allows us to set up complex notification schemes based on specific criteria.

Nachteile:

I have fundamental problems with the way that Phabricator is designed. First, Phabricator is deployed as a Git repository and extensive amounts of manual setup. No easy deployment and upgrades for you! GitLab, which is a significantly bigger project, can be deployed as a single Linux package. This wouldn't be so painful if Phabricator's documentation was up to snuff, but it isn't. There are many aspects of Phabricator that are entirely undocumented. Phabricator relies on users using Arcanist, a PHP-based client-side tool that wraps around version control commands. PHP? And no packages? Really? While ostensibly designed to make code review easier, it basically just ends up complicating everything because nobody who comes in has ever worked with it. Phabricator's interface is incredibly confusing. It tries to be cute by assigning creative names to different services, but they're so confusingly named that new hires often have no idea what a service is actually for. Because it isn't an integrated platform like GitHub or GitLab, it doesn't provide the same sort of experience as these services.

Ravi B.
Software Engineer in USA
Computer-Software, 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

My favourite code review too

5 vor 2 Jahren

Kommentare: Overall, I have enjoyed phabricator more than any of the alternatives I have used — it makes code review feel intuitive and lightweight; and integrate it in my daily workflow.

Vorteile:

The ability to view code side-by-side; intelligent diff calculation; macros make reviewing fun; simple, intuitive and easy to understand state machine for the commit

Nachteile:

Features outside of code review and browsing code are quite rudimentary, and as a result I end up using other tools for task management, etc.

Verifizierter Rezensent
Expert in USA
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Telekommunikation, 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

A fantastic way to improve product and process areas.

5 letztes Jahr

Vorteile:

I loved that I was able to escalate issues with local geographic issues to a global team.

Nachteile:

The CX is not the best if you're outside of a software engineering position. But it helped improve processes in a global company for me.

Verifizierter Rezensent
Manager II, Growth Marketing in USA
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Internet, 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

go-to change management tool

4 letztes Jahr

Vorteile:

easy to use great open source option for code submission and review tool for code changes and approval processes

Nachteile:

github has a free trial for sampling the software and has beeter infrastructure automation offerings

Jonathan W.
IT Consultant in USA
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, Selbstständig
Verwendete die Software für: 1-5 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

Engineers

4 vor 2 Jahren

Kommentare: It's a good product to have all of the bug reports in one place.

Vorteile:

Good tool for users to contact and work with Engineers. Since Engineers might be staring at lines of code for hours, they will be slow to respond to emails. This is a good tool to contact them.

Nachteile:

It looks very dated. It can be very hard to maneuver around if you are not familiar with the interface.