Wir helfen Unternehmen in Deutschland
seit 15 Jahren bei der Softwareauswahl

Über ALM/Quality Center

Eine einheitliche Softwareplattform zur Beschleunigung der Bereitstellung sicherer, zuverlässiger und moderner Anwendungen.

Erfahre mehr über ALM/Quality Center

Vorteile:

This tool will allow your team to run testing process in a very easy manor, once everything is ready for them in matter of STD.

Nachteile:

I really dislike how it is only supported on internet explorer.

Bewertungen zu ALM/Quality Center

Durchschnittliche Bewertung

Benutzerfreundlichkeit
4,4
Kundenservice
3,9
Funktionen
4,5
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
3,9

Weiterempfehlungsquote

7,5/10

ALM/Quality Center hat eine Gesamtbewertung von 4,4 von 5 Sternen basierend auf 22 Nutzerbewertungen auf Capterra.

Hast du ALM/Quality Center bereits verwendet?

Teile deine Erfahrungen mit anderen Softwareinteressenten.

Nutzerbewertungen filtern (22)

Naveen
Naveen
senior consultant in USA
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Computer-Software, 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Better Application Lifecycle Management tool in the market

5,0 vor 3 Jahren

Vorteile:

It is a fairly easy to use application management tool available in the market which has features to track the status of a defect.

Nachteile:

It would be better if we have an ability to create diagrams especially when we are dealing with complex defect created by Tester.

Antwort von OpenText

vor 3 Jahren

Thanks for giving ALM/Quality Center a very positive rating and pointing out it is easy to use. Regarding your comment on the ability to create diagrams, we are not sure what you are referring to. Could you share more details and which version you are using? You may check the online help: https://admhelp.microfocus.com/alm to see whether the latest version supports the feature you need, and if applicable submit an enhancement idea at https://community.microfocus.com/adtd/sws-qc/i/alm_qc_idea_exchange. Ying Lei Product Marketing Manager, Micro Focus ALM/Quality Center

Per
ALM Expert in Schweden
Pharmazeutika, 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

Quality center is still going strong

5,0 vor 2 Jahren

Kommentare: Implemented it in 3 major organization, easy to learn is my major experience. An introduction to new users just take 20 min and then they are fully self going.
Worked some other systems where filter seems to be very complicated to implement in an easy way, non filters as good as QC. Compared to JAMA ....

Vorteile:

-All features other ALM tool manufacturers claim is actually working better in QC -Simplicity of using , you know where you are what you filter how you find thing through traces -More advanced testplanning than all other tool (maybe except codebeamer) - Easy adminstration - easy to search and present during audits. - remarkable possibilities with risk management IF some people just let their confusing ideas start from 0 again

Nachteile:

Interface on Explorer Not entirely web based Feelgood appearance (Looks old)

Judith
Lead Test Engineer in USA
Computer-Software, 201–500 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

ALM doesn't have the bang for the buck.

3,0 vor 2 Jahren

Vorteile:

This software is great for tracking requirements and tests. It also tracks issues found, and when they are corrected. However, the reporting is clunky and not easy to work with.

Nachteile:

Higher level review to give management insite into the project.

Nitin
Test Manager in USA
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

Test Management tool ALM

5,0 vor 4 Jahren

Kommentare: I am using ALM from more than 10 years , have seen many enhancements. I love this tool for test Management and highly recommend to other if you can manage the cost.
It’s an easy web based tool for requirements management, test planning, execution and defect reporting.

Vorteile:

1. One solution for all Test Management (Test planning, execution and defect management) 2. Fast and reliable 3. Support end to end traceability 4. Integration with UFT automation tool. 5. Support upload using existing Excel test cases 6. Access management for various type of users 7. Web based tool 8. API available for automation

Nachteile:

1. Sometime it failed to download components while opening in browser due to access level issue 2. Unfortunately, no support to major automation tool selenium 3. Can’t export attachments with test cases 4. High cost per user 5. If ALM is closed and if you reopen the same test it shows object locked 6. No support to update defect from excel. Except automation API

Antwort von OpenText

vor 4 Jahren

Thanks for the review & high rating. It provided helpful insights. You had cons I'd like to address #1: If by access level you mean admin permissions, the ALM Client Launcher solved this: https://marketplace.microfocus.com/appdelivery/content/alm-client-launcher #2: The Jenkins plugin enables you to run most types of tests, inc. Selenium & results are reflected in ALM: https://plugins.jenkins.io/hp-application-automation-tools-plugin/ #3: This is known & we'll address soon #4: Depends on what you want to achieve. Our product has rich ALM functionality built in & high scalability, plus several editions to fit usage needs #5: Contact customer support with this & provide details #6: With Connect you can do so without using API. It includes a connector between Excel & ALM that allows you to map fields between the two: https://marketplace.microfocus.com/appdelivery/content/micro-focus-connect-core & https://marketplace.microfocus.com/appdelivery/content/micro-focus-connect-connectors

Senthilkumar
Tools consultant in USA
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

Best software life cycle management tool, worth to use

5,0 vor 5 Jahren

Kommentare: Holding large number of business users who use software systems to track their deliverables which is really challenging one. We designed and create folder structures in ALM modules and customized different workflow models to accommodate the business process, automation and performance testing. Synchronized company users along with ALM LDAP mechanism. Satisfying all business roles like business analysts, developers, Quality assurance and performance teams along with this single tool. Upgrading new version comes with new features and easy to upgrade the data without spending additional cost on application and database servers.

Vorteile:

Below are salient features that makes life easy for any software professional -Traceability matrix, end to end traceability, integration with other market tools like JIRA, REST API to develop excel macro utilities, UFT integration, cross project customization, defect management process, Business excel addin to load the entities, risk based planning and execution, Corporate LDAP user management based on single sign on options, business process testing, Auto-pass license server configuration

Nachteile:

Apart from high license cost, I see all the features are beneficial. Pointing a one feature that still not comfortable is version management - check out / check in entity.

Antwort von OpenText

vor 5 Jahren

Hi Senthilkumar, I reached out to Ying Lei, the product marketing manager for Micro Focus ALM. She wrote, in response: Thank you for taking the time to write a valuable review of our product, where you pointed out its many strengths. Your review indicates that your organization has upgraded to the latest version. I am glad to know that and appreciate your feedback. It not only lets us know how you feel about using the product, but also provides good information for organizations who are evaluating ALM tools. Thank you also for your feedback on the versioning feature. We will include it in future release planning. Best regards David Shephard Program Manager, Customer Engagement at Micro Focus

Joseph
QA Team Leader in Israel
Medienproduktion, 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

Does this tool keep up with the pace?

4,0 vor 4 Jahren

Kommentare: as a tool for managing STD and bugs - great.
when you need web access and control over the entire process - less

Vorteile:

This tool will allow your team to run testing process in a very easy manor, once everything is ready for them in matter of STD.

Nachteile:

the ability to monitor bugs and process is less than other options. not competitive enough in matter of web page support for everywhere access

Antwort von OpenText

vor 4 Jahren

Thanks for reviewing Micro Focus ALM/Quality Center, and making very positive comments on its Test Management aspect. Regarding your feedback on its Web interface, we're making process to address it. Web Runner is an ALM/QC web client introduced last year, and we are expanding its functionality step by step. Soon there will be a major release and by then Web Runner will have the following capabilities: Manual and automated test execution, Defect Management and ALM/QC dashboard access (read-only). We look forward to your upgrade to the latest version to maximize your gain from current investment. Ying Lei, Product Marketing Manager, Micro Focus

Verifizierter Rezensent
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Computer-Software, 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

A Quality tool that lost its edge for Agile Development

4,0 vor 3 Jahren

Kommentare: Overall good, for non-agile products especially. It is a quality product that doesn't run into problems or issues - very enterprise-grade.

Vorteile:

The way that the functionality is organized (requirements - plans - test - runs - reports) makes a lot of sense. The traceability across the phases of the release works really well.

Nachteile:

It is just difficult to transpose the way this tool is organized to Agile sprints and releases. It requires substantial effort to make it work in an Agile environment.

Antwort von OpenText

vor 3 Jahren

Thanks for giving our product a very positive rating and pointing out it's enterprise-grade and has more robust functionality. You mentioned you need Agile functionality - you have the choice to use Micro Focus ALM Octane (see: https://www.microfocus.com/products/alm-octane/overview), or ALM/Quality Center with Jira integration (see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4kleONygrbc&list=PLlUdEXI83_XpO-noDZHe0NtfaQ3lu_OG5&index=3). ALM Octane has not only full-fledged Agile and DevOps functionalities, but also test and quality management capabilities like ALM/Quality Center.

Menaka
Lead QA & software tester in USA
Bankwesen, 5.001–10.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

Good project management tool

4,0 vor 4 Jahren

Kommentare: ALM Quality center was the first project management tool I ever used and was pretty impressed at first. We can use it right from requirement gathering to defect tracking for every single step.

Vorteile:

I like that it was user friendly and was able to have all the details of every release of my project in one place. It was easy to access the test cases and execute testing on daily basis. Defect tracking was much efficient too.

Nachteile:

I have faced some frequent outage and application was slow sometimes when there was too much load. Also, licensing issues and cost

Antwort von OpenText

vor 4 Jahren

Posted on behalf of Ying Lei, Product Marketing Manager for ALM/Quality Center: "Thanks for choosing ALM/Quality Center as your first project management tool, and for writing this review. You mentioned outage and performance issues encountered. I suggest you report this to customer support: https://www.microfocus.com/en-us/support/Quality%20Center%20Enterprise%20(QC)%20On%20Premises, so that they can help analyze what might be the cause. You may also do an analysis by yourself using the online ALM Adivsior tool at https://almadvisor.saas.microfocus.com/. I hope these issues will be solved soon and you will enjoy more with the product."

Ricky
Technology lead in USA
Computer-Software, 5.001–10.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

Good software for test management

5,0 vor 3 Jahren

Kommentare: Overall good experience with project life cycle and defect Management.

Vorteile:

Easy to use and very organized portal for defect and quality management for a project. Variety of Reporting options available.

Nachteile:

Overall good software but looks bit heavy while loading and UI could be more user friendly and faster would have more helpful.

Antwort von OpenText

vor 3 Jahren

Thanks for giving ALM/Quality Center a high rating. Regarding the UI, we now have some new types of clients more friendly and lightweight. ALM Client Launcher (see: https://marketplace.microfocus.com/appdelivery/content/alm-client-launcher) is a Windows-based client that can completely replace the traditional ALM client and is much easier to maintain. The Web Runner (see: https://admhelp.microfocus.com/alm/en/15.5-15.5.1/online_help/Content/Web_Runner/main_menu.htm) is a pure web-based UI that you can use regardless of the browser and OS you use (Windows, MacOS and Linux all work). We're continuing adding more capabilities to the Web Runner, please stay tuned.

Charan Raj
Charan Raj
QA Automation Engineer in Indien
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Most used Project management tool in IT industry

4,0 vor 2 Jahren

Kommentare: I strongly recommend for Large scale projects
It is very useful for time management, tasks , tracking, reporting everything is good

Vorteile:

In ALM , I like features and integration with other softwares like HP UFT, Tosca and Loadrunner softwares Easy to track project tasks Backlogs Log defects Can schedule to run automation scripts

Nachteile:

It's little expensive compared to other tools

Mallikarjuna
Lead consultant in USA
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

Review on ALM quality center

4,0 vor 4 Jahren

Kommentare: It’s playing very vital role in software life cycle

Vorteile:

Application life cycle management is very leading tool in software deployment program as its playing a vital role in capture the metrics on each and every story and make a track in Testing process and we can capture bug in development and assigned to respective peers

Nachteile:

It’s easy traceable to development process and identify the issues and trace them through ALM

Antwort von OpenText

vor 4 Jahren

Hello Mallikarjuna. We appreciate your product review as it relates to Micro Focus ALM/Quality Center, thanks for taking the time. Also, thanks for pointing out that ALM/QC plays a vital role in your software development lifecycle. Your pros, including your cons as you described them in your review, both look pretty positive. When you get a chance, could you please help us understand why you gave us a 2/10 for "Likelihood to Recommend?" Our goal is to assure the highest quality products and solutions for our customers. Thanks again! Best regards, Ying Lei

Ana
Software Analyst in Kanada
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

Good tool to have a centralized place for your application lifecycle

4,0 vor 5 Jahren

Kommentare: I find it a tool that is very useful and powerful when properly set up but is not as user-friendly as other similar tools out there.

Vorteile:

ALM has a lot of features that allow teams to build better software, it has a lot of different options for reports: Dashboards, Excell reports, Word Reports, Graphs, KPI Analysis, Progress Status, etc. Integrating ALM with Performance Center tools enables the tool to produce a complete overview of the progress in testing with minimum effort required to create the reports.

Nachteile:

The customization of the tool is not straightforward, you do need to do a lot of trial and error and there are a lot of options that cannot be changed from the default values. The guides and documentation is not as clear as it could be. The customer support when dealing with technical issues takes time to reply and it takes a long time to get issues fixed.

Ganesh
IT Analyst in USA
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

Efficient project management tool

4,0 vor 4 Jahren

Kommentare: I like that I can upload my test cases in excel to Quality center so I could upload my previous files and I can access all my test cases, requirements and defects in one place.

Vorteile:

I like the ease of use with QC and it has end to end traceability. It is fast and reliable. Access management for various types of user is possible. Defect management works pretty well too.

Nachteile:

It’s high cost and no support to major automation tool like selenium

Antwort von OpenText

vor 4 Jahren

Thanks for your review and your positive feedback on many of the functionalities of ALM/Quality Center. Regarding Selenium, it is supported through the Jenkins plugin "Micro Focus Application Automation Tools" - https://plugins.jenkins.io/hp-application-automation-tools-plugin/. This Jenkins plugin enables you to use most types of test tools, including Selenium. The test results are reflected in ALM/QC. Ying Lei, Product Marketing Manager, Micro Focus

Ramesh
Director in USA
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 2–10 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

ALM for Lifecycle , Test , Defect , Requirements , Release Management

5,0 vor 2 Jahren

Kommentare: My Experience With ALM has been good, I have used this product since Mercury days for almost 25 years now

Vorteile:

ALM has evolved over the Years and has almost all the features that anyone would need. Has very good Integration Capability

Nachteile:

Pricing of the Product is on the higher side discourages lot of customers shy away from it especially when there are other Low cost options available

Verifizierter Rezensent
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Bankwesen, 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

ALM Software

3,0 vor 5 Jahren

Kommentare: In our company we use test case for run and defect.

Vorteile:

A multi-functional application that we use in our software testing processes. In our company we use test case for run and defect.

Nachteile:

It is not very practical to use because the application is multifunctional

Antwort von OpenText

vor 5 Jahren

I wanted to say thank you for your feedback regarding Micro Focus ALM. Your comments are a little vague, but when we hear feedback like yours it often points to either the solution being more than required or there is a need for training. I'd really appreciate hearing more so that we can improve your experience with Micro Focus. You can email me or contact your local Micro Focus representation; and you'll find some information on ALM training here: https://marketplace.microfocus.com/education We look forward working with you.

Sivasubramaniyan
Test Engineer in USA
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Useful tool for project management

5,0 vor 2 Jahren

Kommentare: This is our one stop place which is used for the entire complex project status with the day to day activity. We have the entire project life cycle, starting from requirement to Test plan to Test cases (on Test lab) to the defects. Multiple teams are onboarded and it is easy to use and track everything.

Vorteile:

The ease of use with the tracking and the inbuild functionality of generating the reports

Nachteile:

Mapping all the way from Requirement to Test plan to Test lab and finally the defects

Adnan
Admin
Einzelhandel, 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung
Quelle: SoftwareAdvice

A long time users review

5,0 vor 7 Jahren

Kommentare: This tool is an industry standard in the SDLC

Vorteile:

The linking of defects to test runs is excellent. Any changes in mandatory fields or status of the defect triggers an e-mail and sent automatically to the user that the defect is assigned to. Also, ALM is considered to be an excellent auditing tool.

Nachteile:

It's an awesome tool but it has one small issue: it takes a long while in the initialization process and a delay is noticeable when an incorrect password is entered during signin process.

Saranya
ETL Test Lead in Indien
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Defect tracking tool ALM

5,0 vor 4 Jahren

Kommentare: Time saving while creating test report.

Vorteile:

1. Defect tracking, test case execution status, requirement mapping all can been seen at one place. 2 Fast retrieval of data 3 Helps in daily defect management call. 4 Requirement matrix can be done easily. 5 Macros can be used. Easily automated.

Nachteile:

1. Moving from AlM to excel option needs more improvement.

Mingmo
Mingmo
Software QA Engineer II in USA
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
, 51–200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

A great tool to use for reporting QA metrics to the business.

5,0 vor 6 Jahren

Kommentare: Reporting metrics, organized structure, testing tool.

Vorteile:

This software makes it easy to create a test set in an organized tree structure. Afterwards, you can grab metrics into any type of graph you would like.

Nachteile:

I really dislike how it is only supported on internet explorer. It would be nice if it were supported on other platforms that is least buggy.

Shwethashri
Software quality assurance tester in USA
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

ALM review

4,0 vor 4 Jahren

Vorteile:

1. Easy Maintenance of test cases, test plan and test lab w 2. Integration of QTP with BPT framework with alm was smooth.

Nachteile:

1. BPT components loading and unloading was taking more time. So Test execution of BPT flows from alm was time consuming

Verifizierter Rezensent
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Unternehmensberatung, 501–1.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Software per analisi qualità

4,0 letztes Jahr

Vorteile:

Un'applicativo validissimo che permettere di gestire in maniera consona dei progetti con realizzazione di cartelle per Test Case e per la loro tracciabilità

Nachteile:

Nessun aspetto da valutare in maniera negativa

Verifizierter Rezensent
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Versicherung, 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Effective test management tool

4,0 vor 4 Jahren

Kommentare: I am very pleased with the tool. It is robust and feature rich; providing many configuration options. Perhaps too many which can become confusing and cumbersome.

Vorteile:

It allows for efficient and effective test script, execution and defect management; all within one tool. I've been using the defect management tool for more than a decade.

Nachteile:

Like most things, it requires knowledge of the tool in advance and planning to properly configure it for its most effective use.