Über Amazon S3

Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3) ist eine Cloud-Objektspeicherplattform für eine sichere und einfache Erfassung, Speicherung und Analyse von Daten.

Erfahre mehr über Amazon S3

Vorteile:

I like the most that they have integrations and documentation for almost every technology availlable, its fast and easy to use, what more could you ask for.

Nachteile:

The only limitation is this can not be used as a block storage and it do not support formatting and can used for object purpose.

Bewertungen zu Amazon S3

Durchschnittliche Bewertung

Benutzerfreundlichkeit
4,2
Kundenservice
4,4
Funktionen
4,6
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
4,5

Weiterempfehlungsquote

8,7/10

Amazon S3 hat eine Gesamtbewertung von 4,7 von 5 Sternen basierend auf 964 Nutzerbewertungen auf Capterra.

Hast du Amazon S3 bereits verwendet?

Teile deine Erfahrungen mit anderen Softwareinteressenten.

Nutzerbewertungen filtern (964)

Abdellatif S.
Abdellatif S.
Freelancer in Frankreich
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Computer-Software, Selbstständig
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Amazon’s best

5,0 vor 2 Monaten Neu

Kommentare: We are chipping away at record chief plan for wellbeing administrations and S3 has been our best pick to get this going. Without S3, we probably won't have had the option to do this. On account of Amazon.

Vorteile:

My most memorable love point is the documentations and simple incorporations. Utilizing the PHP SDK with the hearty documentation had made our venture quick and simple. Besides, the expense... Involving S3 for record capacity is more less expensive than Dropbox. Thirdly: Ability to produce connections and season of expiry is truly perfect. I love this component like cake.

Nachteile:

We are anticipating that S3 should have a streaming component. It ought to be feasible to stream colossal documents straightforwardly without downloading it. Indeed, this element doesn't influence us presently however we will require this later on.

Verifizierter Rezensent
Data Analytics Manager in Philippinen
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Logistik & Lieferkette, 201-500 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

Reliable cloud object storage

4,0 vor 3 Wochen Neu

Kommentare: Overall, we're able to store our datasets reliably and inexpensively thanks to S3.

Vorteile:

I like that S3 is a cost-effective storage solution. We're able to store large datasets reliably at a reasonable price.

Nachteile:

Scaling usage of S3 for a larger team which aren't necessarily devs is quite challenging. Managing many users in AWS in general is a fragmented workflow.

Carmen R.
selfemployed in USA
Animation, Selbstständig
Verwendete die Software für: 1-5 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

amazon s3

3,0 vor 4 Wochen Neu

Kommentare: my overall experience has been betwen mild and good

Vorteile:

what i lke most is that is easy to use an versitile

Nachteile:

what i like least for this product is that it lacks somentime

Adeyeye G.
Adeyeye G.
Founder in Nigeria
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Computer-Software, 2-10 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Kostenlose Testversion
Herkunft der Bewertung

Adeyeye George Review

5,0 vor 3 Monaten

Kommentare: We are working on file manager design for health services and S3 has been our best pick to make this happen. Without S3, we might not have been able to do this. Thanks to Amazon.

Vorteile:

My first love point is the documentations and easy integrations. Using the PHP SDK with the robust documentation had made our project fast and easy. Secondly, the cost... Using S3 for file storage is more cheaper than Dropbox. Thirdly: Ability to generate links and time of expiry is really great. I love this feature like cake.

Nachteile:

We are expecting S3 to have a streaming feature. It should be possible to stream huge files directly without downloading it. Well, this feature does not affect us currently but we will definitely need this in the future.

Verifizierter Rezensent
Director, Technical Product Management in USA
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Marketing & Werbung, 201-500 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

Best global cloud solution provider!

5,0 vor 7 Tagen Neu

Kommentare: My experience with Amazon S3 has been great and my teams feedback is the same. The product line really helps you get a product into production quickly, and the support teams are very knowledgeable with their product line and industry standards to help with custom needs.

Vorteile:

So functions with in Amazon S3 fit any line of business use case, and their custom developed integrations and 3rd party support are the best in the business in helping you deliver great products.

Nachteile:

The only thing that I would say is that the learning curve to support teams developing on AWS is greater than other cloud providers.

Shashank K.
Software Developer in USA
Versicherung, 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Advance hosting provider for videos and visuals

5,0 vor 2 Monaten Neu

Kommentare: All in all Amazon S3 is the most reliable server infrastructure among its alternatives and due to its scalable structure we can base any web and mobile based application's backend on Amazon S3 without experiencing any problem in our services.

Vorteile:

Amazon S3 is by far the most reliable and robust server infrastructure to host the visual materials and videos of any web service. With the advance features of Amazon S3, we can launch video and visuals heavy mobile and web applications without experiencing any serious interruption in our client side.

Nachteile:

Although Amazon S3 works exceptionally in a high performance, I can not state that the support of Amazon Web Services is performing that much perfectly. First of all support teams return time to the email based cases in resolution center is quite slow and we can not get directly support without subscribing to the pro support plan.

Anna P.
Developer in USA
Computer-Software, 1.001-5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Great tool for hosting websites and images

5,0 vor 6 Tagen Neu

Vorteile:

It is easy to upload photos to be able to use the url in applications and other projects.

Nachteile:

Set up and pre-requisites can be a little burdensome. However, enough individuals use this tool that you can easily find a solution by googling.

Saurabh M.
Saurabh M.
Functional Consultant in Indien
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 51-200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

Best Storage Services Offered

5,0 letzten Monat Neu

Vorteile:

Amazon S3 is a premium software in terms of its Security. It helps in Providing the Storage Services. It helps in easy integration with other Platforms as well. Also it has a Permission Matrix that helps in restricting the Rights User Wise. It is accessible worldwide so it becomes an easy medium to Transfer Data from one Location to Another with Great Encryption. Also, using the storage services we can host our Website in order to Use with Maximum Performance

Nachteile:

Permission Assigning could be made more simplified plus the reduction in costing can help alot.

Gouri S.
Gouri S.
Senior Tech Lead in Indien
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Telekommunikation, 501-1.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Amazon S3 for hosting static documents/videos

4,0 letzten Monat Neu

Kommentare: Overall experience using Amazon S3 is very good, we are using this as hosting for our training videos on over website.

Vorteile:

Feature I liked the most about Amazon S3 is it is very easy to host your resources on the cloud and it is having very well documentation.

Nachteile:

The feature or thing which i don't like about Amazon S3 is the pricing is little higher compare to other cloud providers.

Verifizierter Rezensent
Senior Infrastructure Analyst in Paraguay
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Computer-Hardware, 51-200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

S3 buckets are unlimited and versatile

5,0 vor 3 Wochen Neu

Vorteile:

S3 is very easy to use and has enough options to spend weeks tinkering with it. It integrates nicely with every product and architecture inside the AWS ecosystem.

Nachteile:

Security policies could be easier to understand, between ACLs and json policies it can get confusing what does what.

Vikram K.
Vikram K.
Lead - Testing in Indien
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Krankenhausversorgung & Gesundheitswesen, 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Simple and flexible service for Storage Solution

5,0 vor 4 Monaten

Kommentare: S3, at least in terms of distributed storage, has genuinely transformed the world. Calling an API, pushing data to it, and then forgetting about the data center that holds it is an idea that none of us would have believed a few years ago, yet here we are, with massive quantities of businesses relying on S3 and prospering. Since the first introduction of S3, Amazon has constantly developed and released capabilities, each of which is incredibly valuable and complementary to the preceding feature set.
We utilize S3 for a variety of applications, from public UGC buckets for web apps to internal data vaults that store sensitive and confidential information that is protected at rest. S3 is a good fit. I began by utilising S3 as an off-site backup service, then expanded to include additional services. It performs its goal admirably, although it is a touch inconvenient, with several modifications along the process and a rigid business strategy.

Vorteile:

We don't worry about the help since we're on vacation because it's so accessible and repetitious. Use Amazon's SDKs to get basic functionality from a variety of structures, or create your own. There are a plethora of container techniques and security improvements that may be tailored to meet the demands of individual clients. Solid compatibility with the AWS biology system, notably in terms of access permissions. It's so reliable that you can count on it to stay online and available from anywhere in the earth. Its static site facilitating feature is a hidden gem: it provides the least priced, most reliable, and high-performing static web facilitating available in PaaS. In today's world, data is king, thus storing large amounts of data is critical. Amazon's Simple Storage Solution (s3) is the finest and most cheap cloud storage service on the market. On S3, we may store large amounts of data in a variety of formats, including documents, text files, PDFs, audio, video, and more. S3 offers a variety of storage choices, including frequent data and seldom used data that may be saved on AWS Glacier's low-cost storage. The data is stored on AWS S3 and protected with multi-level access protocols such as public, private, and so on.

Nachteile:

AWS environment is riddled with perplexing and incomprehensible configuration options, and S3 is no exception. Fortunately, it's widely used, to the point that you can always find arrangements on sites like StackOverflow. Because S3 defaults to security rather than open access, getting IAM consents to work correctly for Static Website facilitating takes some trial and error. Because AWS S3 is incompatible with system-level applications such as desktops, it has to find a solution that is simple to use. We are unable to store files larger than 5 GB.

Parth P.
Parth P.
DevOps Engineer in USA
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Computer-Software, 501-1.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

Simple Storage Service: Amazon S3

5,0 vor 7 Monaten

Kommentare: Amazon S3 is appropriate for facilitating any kind of item. Energetically suggested assuming previously utilizing with some other AWS administration since combination becomes simpler. It is useful for any association that has a committed IT Department. Not suggested in case the organization doesn't have a group with experience in AWS administrations that screens it since it could wind up being a wreck or costly.

Vorteile:

Exceptionally accessible and repetitive; we don't stress over the assistance having vacation Basic utilization from various structures utilizing Amazon's SDKs, or roll your own An enormous number of container approaches and security changes in accordance with tailor use to client needs Solid reconciliation with the AWS biological system, particularly concerning access consents. It's astoundingly steady you can believe it'll remain on the web and accessible for anyplace on the planet. Its static site facilitating highlight is a secret jewel - it gives maybe the least expensive, generally steady, most high-performing static web facilitating accessible in PaaS.

Nachteile:

The entire AWS environment has a great deal of confounding and unintuitive arrangement choices, and S3 is no special case. Fortunately it's entirely comprehensively utilized, to the point that you can dependably observe arrangements on outside destinations like StackOverflow. Getting IAM consents perfectly for Static Website facilitating require somewhat experimentation since S3 defaults to security rather than open access.

Chirag S.
CITO in USA
Versicherung, 51-200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

Easy data archiving and data governance

5,0 vor 8 Monaten

Kommentare: We use S3 for several things such as archiving unused data from fileserver, storing backups, storing logs and more. I love the storage classes offered by S3. We can store data in standard or save costs by storing it in Glacier automatically using easy-to-configure lifecycle management rules. Some of our database backups get stored in S3 in a write-once-read-many model and can't be removed until a certain date has reached. We also enjoy creating rules to move unused data in S3 to cheap Glacier storage. We also have been replicating S3 data to different regions and accounts for additional data safety.

Vorteile:

The most impactful feature of S3 is its immutability. We can put expiration date on stored data and nobody can delete that until the expiration date has passed. That allows backup data to remain secure.

Nachteile:

Amazon doesn't make a desktop client like FileZilla but specifically for S3. While there are desktop clients available, a product from Amazon would be appreciated by non-technical users.

Manas M.
Senior Software Engineer in USA
Computer-Software, 1.001-5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Highly available distributed storage system with additional features and settings

5,0 vor 2 Jahren

Kommentare: I am having a great experience with Amazon S3, it really dose the things required in a really great way

Vorteile:

This is a core part in most of our use cases , be it big-data computations , databases like redshift, aurora and snowflakes, be it for building a static or redirecting website and what not , it is i think the cheapest cloud distributed storage system and can be integrated with almost everything, integrate it with AWS Athena to analyse on file data, or run copy commands on snowflake or redshift databases to move the data around from or to db etc, or use it on hadoop hive tables by creating the external tables, it supports integration with java, python, or command line interface , so that you can automate the processes without any issues, and the s3 buckets can have security group attached, and lots of settings available in part of security, and can publicly expose some files , can create static web pages & redirecting web pages for both http and https (need some help from cloud front)

Nachteile:

the file naming we is a problem if we have a starting sub string as a file name, example if i had 2 files namely aaabbb and aaa , when i like to select the data of aaa, the data of aaabbb is also selected , because the s3 always treats the file name as filename* and one more thing is the static web support is good and easy to setup for http but for https its difficult need the help of aws cloud-front

Sushank S.
DevOps Engineer in Indien
Immobilien, 501-1.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

A Simple and affordable storage in cloud

4,0 vor 2 Jahren

Kommentare: AWS S3 is Simple Storage Service by AWS which allows you to store data on the cloud at an affordable price.
You can use s3 to store large data like static data, documents, images, videos, etc on cloud and access it anywhere.
We can host static websites on it if you owning a business and want a simple solution to host a static website you can use this option.

Vorteile:

In this growing world, data is the most important so storage of the huge data is very important, Amazon's Simple Storage Service (s3) is the best and affordable cloud storage service available in the market. We can store huge and any kind of data on S3 like Documents, Text Files, PDF, Audio, Video, etc. There are multiple storage options available with S3 like frequent data and infrequently used data can be stored on AWS Glacier low-cost storage. The data is secured on AWS s3 with multi-level access protocols eg public, private, etc

Nachteile:

AWS S3 is not compatible with system-level like desktops, it should have something with which it can use used that will be very easy. We can not store more files more than 5 GB in size

Loiane G.
VP - Business Analysis in Kanada
Finanzdienstleistungen, 5.001-10.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

S3 is still the leader in cloud-based distributed storage

5,0 vor 2 Jahren

Kommentare: S3 has, truly, changed the world at least when it comes to distributed storage. To call an API, push data to it, and then forget about maintaining the datacenter that houses with is a concept none of us would have believed in the recent past but here we are with monumental amounts of businesses depending on S3 and succeeding with it. Amazon has aggressively developed and released features steadily since the initial launch of S3 and each wave of features is impressively useful and complimentary to the previous feature-set. We use S3 for literally dozens of applications ranging from buckets that store public UGC for web apps to internal data vaults that hold sensitive and private information that is encrypted at rest. S3 has fit so many of our needs and saved us countless hours in trivial datacenter maintenance.

Vorteile:

Objects are globally available but can still be geographically "homed" to a specific region. At-rest encryption can be configured for storage of all objects in an S3 bucket. Cost savings can be achieved by selecting the desired storage class that matches the type of data you're storing. Object life-cycles can be configured that will automatically take certain actions on an object when it reaches a certain age. Object versioning in S3 prevents a lot of anxiety around object corruption in multi-user applications. Object attributes can be set through headers that can facilitate intelligent hosting natively through S3 or through CloudFront CDN hosting. Full-featured static websites can be hosted using S3 and CloudFront.

Nachteile:

Presumably due to the number of press pieces on corporations having data compromised from S3 buckets due to their own negligence, Amazon has invested a lot into preventing unwanted public access to S3 buckets. These extra layers can be a bit cumbersome to those of us who "got it" from the beginning and already know how to secure and S3 bucket.

Ridhi D.
IT Specialist in Indien
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 11-50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

A Simple Cloud Object Storage

5,0 vor 3 Jahren

Kommentare: Amazon S3 helps to setup the industry level infrastructure with no big investment and do not require the long term commitment as we can buy the storage space on hourly wages. The different storage classes help us to remain within the budget.

Vorteile:

Amazon S3 is a simple cloud based object storage. The different storage classes are designed to manage the data as per the requirements of the objects. The Intelligent S3 Tiering upgrade or downgrade the storage class based on the access patterns of the object to enhance the availability and durability. The S3 cross region replication helps in replication of the S3 objects in other regions. The multi-factor authentication delete on S3 bucket is really a life saver feature to protect from accidental deletion of objects.

Nachteile:

Amazon S3 is not as simple as its name, the objects locks and versioning features are amazing but not easy as the learning curves sharp. The Storage monitoring provides limited number of notifications under the free tier.

Daniel K.
Daniel K.
Founder in Argentinien
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 2-10 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

Amazon S3 is a solid brand, but not for amateurs

5,0 vor 8 Monaten

Kommentare: I started using S3 as a off-site backup tool, and then I scaled up to use other services. It's serves it purpose rather well, but tends to be a little cumbersome, with many changes along the way and somehow a strict business model.

Vorteile:

Amazon S3 defined the cloud in the begining. It's services were disruptive and much needed. I think that S3 it's a very solid option for backup and file retention.

Nachteile:

However, it's not for the casual user. There are other, new and easy to use services aimed to the small business, wich offers a better way to deploy, are more cost-effective and have a more down-to-earth approach.

Binujaya P.
Software Engineer in Sri Lanka
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 201-500 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Amazon S3 – The best collecting information platform

5,0 vor 3 Jahren

Kommentare: Overall, Amazon S3 is amazing software if you are looking to input a large amount of data in storage and be perfectly secure that your files won’t be used anywhere or by any chance deleted by mistake. The software was tested and there are a lot of satisfied customers that are using Amazon S3. Plus it’s not that expensive to use. Everyone can afford it.

Vorteile:

Amazon S3 is an amazing software tool that provides data storing and keeps the data intact. You can input a lot of data into Amazon S3 without any problem. You can add everything starting from some spreadsheets, pdf, and finishing with some large size images and videos. The data will be one hundred percent safe and no one can ever use it except you. This is a very reliable and inexpensive tool to use. This is the main reason why I like this software. Because of the security settings that they have and a large amount of data than you can enter without any restrictions.

Nachteile:

The one disadvantage that Amazon S3 has it’s the interface. It works very slow and sometimes if you are uploading a bigger amount of files that might take a while. Also, some settings like CLI are a bit complicated to use. One more thing that I dislike is that there is no way to rename a folder in Amazon S3. You will need to copy all of the files and then paste them into a new folder that you will have to make and then delete the old folder. It’s just a waste of time doing all this when you can simply rename the folder, but you have to do it.

Esra K.
Esra K.
Research and Development Director in Türkei
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 51-200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Simple Storage Service for everyone

5,0 vor 3 Jahren

Kommentare: Before S3 we stored our sensitive files on hard drives where also our web application resides. One day it crashed and the files were gone. We started to use S3 and now our application does not depend on where is resides. We don't worry whether our storage is enough. I also use S3 to store my personal files. It is very cheap.

Vorteile:

Amazon S3 (Simple Storage Service) is an object storage service for the cloud. You can store any amount of data and access it anywhere in the world. You may stop depending on hard drives for your web applications and start using Amazon S3 to store your media files, log files etc. It provides 99.999999999% durability which means you may lose just one file in 10,000 years. S3 has versioning option which helps you to prevent accidential deletions. Lifecycle policies help you manage and automate the life of your objects in S3, keeping you from leaving your data unnecessarily available. For example, you can set a lifecycle for your log files to be automatically deleted after 30 days. You can host a static website easily and in a cost effective way without worrying about the underlying hardware.

Nachteile:

S3 has buckets to store objects and these buckets have universal names. So for example, you probably won't be able to open a bucket named "photos". Configuring security is a bit tricky. You have to be careful which buckets will be public and which will be private.

Proinsias M.
Proinsias M.
Owner Manager Digital Specialist in Irland
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Onlinemedien, Selbstständig
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

Difficult to setup, but when you do, you will be delighted

5,0 letztes Jahr

Kommentare: I work on websites with many photographs and useing Amazon S3 has greatly imporoved my page loading speeds. Its has save me money as I do not have to pay extra for Web Service Space. Also Amazon S3 on its own is like a CDN or Content Delivery Network. On one of my projects, I am storing PDF files on S3.

Vorteile:

Great Value for money when it comes to Cloud Storage Great for Photographers to help boost there page speed loading and Google Ranking Reduces costs on te Web Host Server as Pictures, PDF Files and Video are not on the main server

Nachteile:

Difficult to setup and get all your credentials Can be cumbersome if you have a lot of photographs or files. You may need to invest in a plugin to automatically upload the content to S3 automatically.

Robert R.
Email marketing in Rumänien
Einzelhandel, 11-50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

Great software for some businesses

5,0 vor 6 Monaten

Kommentare: Amazon S3 helps us share important video files with clients directly as well as through embedding.
It's great that we have 100% control over what people can view and what they can do with the file.
Streaming speed is good, buffering issues being an exception rather than the norm.
Overall it's a great product to use if you have video courses for example.

Vorteile:

I like the fact that after the initial setup, the day to day usage of the product is easy. The software adapts to the IP you are uploading from to optimize the speed of the process. Rest of steps needed to be done to an uploaded file are processed at great speeds and no time is wasted using this tool.

Nachteile:

I dislike the fact that if you need assistance and you don't have a high tier package, you are left with a forum that is not that helpful nor fast in resolving the issue. Some processes that you have to set up are complex and sometimes their FAQ or Knowledge Book does not contain the entire picture needed to understand how to set up a particular feature if you happen to need a feature that is not in popular demand.

Diego U.
CTO in Spanien
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 11-50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

Amazon is on the right track with this solution

5,0 vor 3 Monaten

Kommentare: I have been working for more than 3 years with cloud solutions, Amazon offers the best on from my point of view and personal opinion.

Vorteile:

Fast and easy setup and deployment. Very comprehensive and intuitive.

Nachteile:

Price, this solution suite is more expensive than the competition, but it’s value justify it.

Vignesh M.
Lead Consultant in USA
Informationsdienst, 2-10 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

Easy and Convinient

4,0 vor 6 Monaten

Kommentare: We use s3 for all our data storage purposes like images, videos and files.

Vorteile:

S3 SDK support is really good. SDK is for all of the programming languages. The community support for s3 is great and is one of the reasons I use it the most.

Nachteile:

Few parts that are difficult to do is directory wise public access or changing permissions of directories.

Ankush K.
Engineer in USA
Computer-Software, 1.001-5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

S3 cloud storage review

5,0 vor 3 Jahren

Kommentare: Overall S3 is economic and reliable cloud storage which I'm using everyday. Introducing some more features like mentioned in Cons above could make it outstanding and it would be a win win over other products.

Vorteile:

- It's fast and probably has cheap options available for you based on your need, like if you just want cloud storage but with less feature you can chose accordingly (Glacier or S3 bucket). - aws cli client/commands are really helpful which makes life easy and fast to list/analyze objects recursively. - you can easily set permissions to your buckets/prefixes/paths using cloud formation templates which is great to grant specific user specific permissions. - easy to set up versioning/auto deletion policies on your data so you don't have to worry about storage cost.

Nachteile:

- The UI is not as helpful as it needed to be sometime. like the filtering/listing of object within your S3 bucket is sometimes weird, it only shows 300 objects per page and you can't control them to list more or less. - you can only visualize an object/file within the UI using sql if it's < 128 MB. If it exceeds 128MB there is no way to visualize this object within the UI and you've to create external table to visualize it or you download it local.