Wir helfen Unternehmen in Deutschland
seit 15 Jahren bei der Softwareauswahl

Deutschland Lokales Produkt

Über aqua

aqua vereint das Management von Anforderungen, Defekten und Testfällen in einer Plattform und bleibt einfach und intuitiv zu bedienen.

Erfahre mehr über aqua

Vorteile:

A seamless integration environment with a set of test tools helps to do it. The tests can be run efficiently with different test data, thanks to possible sets of variables.

Nachteile:

The usability of some functions is a bit tricky.

Bewertungen zu aqua

Durchschnittliche Bewertung

Benutzerfreundlichkeit
4,4
Kundenservice
4,9
Funktionen
4,6
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
4,7

Weiterempfehlungsquote

9,2/10

aqua hat eine Gesamtbewertung von 4,7 von 5 Sternen basierend auf 25 Nutzerbewertungen auf Capterra.

Nutzerbewertungen filtern (25)

Sortieren nach

Hast du aqua bereits verwendet?

Teile deine Erfahrungen mit anderen Softwareinteressenten.

Nutzerbewertungen filtern (25)

Erdmute
Produktmanagement in Deutschland
Computer-Software, 11–50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 1-5 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

Hilfreiche Software mit Entwicklungspotential

4,0 vor 2 Jahren

Kommentare: Das Erstellen und wiederverwenden von Testspezifikationen ist mit ein wenig Übung wesentlich einfacher, übersichtlicher und schneller als mit Excellisten oder Worddokumenten. Die Testfälle lassen sich einfach in logische Reihenfolgen bringen, die dem Tester bei der Durchführung deutlich Zeit sparen.

Vorteile:

Die Funktionen "Verwaltung der Anforderungen", "Verwaltung der Testfälle", "Verwaltung der Testszenarien" und "Verwaltung der Bugs" bauen logisch aufeinander auf und sind mit kurzer Einweisung gut zu benutzen. Die automatische Erstellung von Testfallvarianten aufgrund von Wertetabellen finde ich grandios. Das Durchführen der Testszenarios lässt bisher keine Wünsche offen.

Nachteile:

Die Benuzterführung in der Weboberfläche ist nicht ganz einheitlich gestaltet und manchmal etwas umständlich, z.B. bei der Sortierung von Testfällen in den Testszenarien. Ich hoffe, dass in zukünftigen Versionen daran noch gefeilt wird.

Dhimitri
Dhimitri
Senior Consultant in Spanien
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 51–200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 1-5 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

Very good experience with a very good testing tool

5,0 vor 4 Jahren

Kommentare: The experience with Aqua ALM was overall very positive. This tool, pretty much, exceeded our expectations since it's very complete and easy to use. Even with some limitations due to the trial version, the customer service was excellent and very fast to answer every doubt or request that we had and this was very much appreciated.

Vorteile:

-Friendly interface and easy to use. -A complete tool for testing. You can do pretty much any testing-related tasks. -Automatic testing. -Great customer service. -Fair prices.

Nachteile:

-At the beginning, maybe not 100% intuitive. -Limited trial version. It would be nice to have the experience of a user management system even during the trial period.

Marko
Softwaretester in Deutschland
Computer-Software, 201–500 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

Super program for test management and perfect connection to other tools

4,0 letztes Jahr

Kommentare: Our Experience are very good. We have build in 2,5 years a teststructure with more then 1000 Testcases.

Vorteile:

This tool offers an own system structure, also you have a perfect individual overview. You can integrate a lot of tools with the free api.

Nachteile:

The Performance can be fastersome little things can be better but these aren't test relevant things

Jennifer
Senior Associate Quality Assurance ERP in Niederlande
Pharmazeutika, 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

Personal assessment of Aqua

4,0 vor 4 Wochen Neu

Vorteile:

Clear structure and handling for a test documentation.

Nachteile:

I find the manual very complex. There are probably many other functions you could use Aqua for - but filtering them out takes a lot of time.

Josephine
IT Test Manager in Deutschland
Biotechnologie, 5.001–10.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

Intuitive Sofware

5,0 vor 4 Jahren

Kommentare: Our users are glad to work with aqua!

Vorteile:

Aqua is very easy to learn. It enables the management of manual and automated tests. The user and roles management as well as project configuration ensure an exact information management at projects. Additionally Andagon offers a great product support.

Nachteile:

The documentation of SSO wasn't up to date, which caused us some issues. But Andagon helped out within a conference call.

Roland
Senior Consultant in Deutschland
Unternehmensberatung, 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Kostenlose Testversion
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

Complete Test Management Tool out of the SaaS Box

5,0 vor 4 Jahren

Kommentare: We looked for a test management tool without excessive infrastructure set up but with all features which are needed for every days testing. Crowd testing is also an option since aqua ALM can be made accessible for externals as well.
Selenium integration is also possible within the web client, windows must be underlaying for this, because powershell scripts control the interface to it.

Vorteile:

Intuitive operating without excessive training if you know such tools like HP-ALM. If training is needed e.g. for testers there are enough documents available for that.

Nachteile:

Building test scenarios (=test sets) for a dedicated release is a bit tricky. You have to enter the target release in the requirements, set a filter to that target release and then display the related test cases and build a test scenario out of that.

Sergio
Software Developer in Schweiz
Computer-Software, 2–10 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 1-5 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

Great product: really easy to use and great support

5,0 vor 4 Jahren

Kommentare: We are using the testcases with teststeps and the testscenarios. That allowes us to give a great feedback about errors that occure.

Vorteile:

It is really intuitive, has a great look and shows the results very visual. It is as well very easy to personalize with own fields and selections. And the support is very quick and helpful!

Nachteile:

There is nothing bad I can say about this product, except that I still need to do the testing myself :-D

Solomia
Product designer in Ukraine
Bankwesen, 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

This tool helps us to keep our tasks organized

5,0 letztes Jahr

Kommentare: We use aqua for requirements engineering, communication with developers and testers and bug reporting. I would definitely recommend this product to any company looking to improve their communication process or find a better way of reporting bugs.

Vorteile:

aqua is the best tool I've ever used for requirements and test case management. It's very easy to use, and has a convenient Google Chrome app that allows us to track bugs easily and create reports Automatically. The new beta AI features also save our time by allowing us to create test cases from requirements automatically and requiring only minor editing by our testers.

Nachteile:

It would be nice if there were more videos during onboarding

Verifizierter Rezensent
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Internet, 501–1.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

We tried different tools and aqua is the best for test management

5,0 letztes Jahr

Kommentare: Aqua is an important tool in our team. It helps us to collect all the necessary information about requirements, test cases and bugs. We keep all the communication regarding that in aqua

Vorteile:

I think we got a fair price for a solid mix of issue tracking, reporting, and even some agile functionality. Customer support is always answering very quickly and the product is often updated. Recently they added AI features in test case creation and it already saves us a lot of time.

Nachteile:

I don’t know, I have nothing in mind

Elena
Testmanager in Deutschland
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 501–1.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

working with aqua is fun and easy

5,0 vor 4 Jahren

Vorteile:

I learned aqua intuitively, it was as if I had always known aqua! It is very easy to create complex data constellations for the test cases, for example in Excel and import them into aqua. When carrying out the test, you have the right conditions, the right data for every test step and the expected results for every test scenario! Reports and dashboards are easy to configure and you always get the data in real time, very useful to act quickly.

Nachteile:

If you don't find something, refresh the view or delete the filters ;-)

Jossmely
Jossmely
Especialista de Redes y Plataforma Tecnológica in Venezuela
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

So complete and mature tool for the management of tests in the market,

4,0 vor 6 Jahren

Kommentare: So complete and mature tool for the management of tests in the market, We had success impressive visibility over the whole QA.

Vorteile:

aqua can be operated intuitively, administration is easily understandable. The reporting is conclusive and provides a good basis for decision making. After having used aqua, employees value the speed. Automating manual test cases is easier. A seamless integration environment with a set of test tools helps to do it. The tests can be run efficiently with different test data, thanks to possible sets of variables.

Nachteile:

In my experience I have not had dissatisfaction with the application. the implementation of modules, generate report, was practical and simple.

Jan
Robot Creator in Deutschland
Industrieautomation, 11–50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

Aqua

5,0 vor 4 Jahren

Kommentare: In general, we are happy with aqua and are increasing our usage.

Vorteile:

The product is very easy to use, it comes with an office like UI and we were able to get started within hours. Aqua offers a number of options to optimize or filter certain aspects and hide a lot of complexity. Thus being easy to use for multiple people. We liked the reporting functionality and the comment functions to help improve our requirements and test process.

Nachteile:

We ran into some minor issues which were mostly solved by the support team. We still have some issues with exporting to excel, since rtf export were not human readable.

Kostiantyn
DevOps in Rumänien
Informationsdienst, 2–10 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

Best option on the market

5,0 letztes Jahr

Kommentare: We moved all our manual and automated QA effort to aqua. It was a pleasant surprise that the reporting functionality is much deeper yet intuitive than my experience with the free trial suggested.

Vorteile:

Aqua gives us a great overview over all our testing activity, including test cases and test scenarios.

Nachteile:

Views would sometimes get stuck and show no tickets, but that doesn't happen anymore.

Arthur
Frontend Developer in Ukraine
Computer-Software, 51–200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

aqua helped optimize our process

5,0 letztes Jahr

Kommentare: aqua is a great support to make switching to automated testing easier

Vorteile:

aqua helps to gather all the data from automated and manual testing in one place. The integrations work really good, it saves us a lot of time

Nachteile:

There is no test automation inside the tool, so we have to use test automation tools as integrations

Daniel
General Manager in Deutschland
Automotive, 11–50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

Easy to use tool for requirements engineering

5,0 vor 4 Jahren

Vorteile:

We use aqua primarily for requirements engineering and it works very good for us. Before we started with aqua we used text files for describing the requirements of our products. Especially the change-tracking was very complicated. With aqua it is now very easy to collect requirements from different sources and managed them.

Nachteile:

The installation of new aqua-releases could be simplified and some pre-definied reports would be helpful.

Verifizierter Rezensent
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Computer-Software, 51–200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

Excellent help with test case management and bug tracking

5,0 letztes Jahr

Kommentare: Our team's work became more effective after we started using aqua. Visibility of test cases has increased since now not only QA can see the test cases, Dev team also can see the test cases covered for a given bug and see which test case has failed for the given bug.

Vorteile:

It's a great tool that integrates seamlessly with Jira and simplifies communication between developers and testers in our team

Nachteile:

Nothing special. We implemented it pretty quick in our company

Zoheil
QA Engineer in UK
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 11–50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Kostenlose Testversion
Herkunft der Bewertung

Fantastic Test Management Tool

5,0 vor 4 Jahren

Vorteile:

Very comprehensive tool that covers Test Management from A-Z. Sales/Customer Support was amazing. The option to add free users to work on Defect Management only is perfect for smaller teams and companies that work with externals. At the same time, the more expensive options give clients that can afford it all the extras they could need.

Nachteile:

The layout/look is a little traditional (which some companies actually may prefer) and the lack of an agile/scrum board for Defect Management for free Users was an issue for us (but it's a free version so can't really complain)

Clemens
Qualitymanager in Deutschland
Outsourcing/Offshoring, 5.001–10.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Kostenlose Testversion
Herkunft der Bewertung

Multifarious tool, with a lot of helpful functions for the test

5,0 vor 4 Jahren

Vorteile:

- modern and clean surface - supports all phases of the fundamental test process -> helpful functions for the test planning -> promotes the control of the tests (transparent inspection trough the active test analysis and execution -> structured test design -> easy documentation of the test execution -> detailed reporting - individual and adaptable reports - helpful wiki

Nachteile:

- the abundance of functions is not only a blessing, it's also a curse -> at the beginning it's not easy to understand all the different Buttons, functions, tabs and so on

Oliver
Quality assurance in Deutschland
Internet, 11–50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 1-5 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

Fits perfectly to our needs

5,0 vor 4 Jahren

Kommentare: Super friendly staff, good on boarding and fast access

Vorteile:

- Desktop application / Web application - Functionality - Pricing - License management

Nachteile:

More possibilities in the Jira Sync plugin

Jan
Product Manager in Deutschland
Forschung, 51–200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Kostenlose Testversion
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

aqua tests

4,0 vor 4 Jahren

Vorteile:

usability & functionality & GUI & setting-up multiple users

Nachteile:

UML for relation settings & some minor bugs

Volker
Testkoordinator in Deutschland
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Kostenlose Testversion
Herkunft der Bewertung

Review Aqua

4,0 vor 4 Jahren

Vorteile:

The Product is easy to use. The Product is extensive

Nachteile:

I Dont missing features. Integration Confluence. Testautomation is not so easy to implemated

Steffen
Project Manager in Deutschland
Immobilien, 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 1-5 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

Good product

4,0 vor 4 Jahren

Vorteile:

Easy to use, intuitive approach from testcase to bugs an solutions

Nachteile:

Difference between Desktop and WebClient in administrator mode

Johannes
Fachbereichsleiter in Deutschland
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 11–50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

Aqua ALM is a modern and easy to use Application Lifecycle Management Tool

5,0 vor 2 Jahren

Vorteile:

Modern, sleek look and easy to use and great interface to use with other tools

Nachteile:

More interfaces for different tools would be great

Florian
Applikationsmanager in Deutschland
Öl & Energie, 51–200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Kostenlose Testversion
Herkunft der Bewertung

Good Balance between costs and benefit

5,0 vor 4 Jahren

Vorteile:

It is a complete ALM-tool with all functions which you need for testmanagement.

Nachteile:

The usability of some functions is a bit tricky. But I didn´t know a tool which is easier to handle.

Kevin
Solutions Quality Administrator in USA
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Kostenlose Testversion
Herkunft der Bewertung

Robust test management software

4,0 vor 4 Jahren

Vorteile:

The ease of use for setting up test cases, tracking defects, and robust reporting.

Nachteile:

Lack of out-of-box reporting available with the lower tier pricing options