Über QuickReviewer

QuickReviewer ist eine Online-Proofing-Software für Teams, die durch schnelleres Feedback einen schnelleren Designgenehmigungsprozess erreichen möchten.

Erfahre mehr über QuickReviewer

Vorteile:

Ease of use and quick understanding of anyone who switched from Dropbox.

Nachteile:

Which makes it difficult to scrub through a video.

Bewertungen zu QuickReviewer

Durchschnittliche Bewertung

Benutzerfreundlichkeit
4,4
Kundenservice
4,8
Funktionen
4,3
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
4,7

Weiterempfehlungsquote

8,9/10

QuickReviewer hat eine Gesamtbewertung von 4,6 von 5 Sternen basierend auf 30 Nutzerbewertungen auf Capterra.

Nutzerbewertungen filtern (30)

Sortieren nach

Hast du QuickReviewer bereits verwendet?

Teile deine Erfahrungen mit anderen Softwareinteressenten.

Nutzerbewertungen filtern (30)

Bruce K.
Bruce K.
Postdoc in UK
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Hochschulbildung, 1.001-5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 1-5 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

Great

5,0 vor 2 Jahren

Vorteile:

I particularly like the weblink feature that you can deploy using a simple plugin on your Wordpress site. The whole website is loaded so you can review multiple pages and is easy to navigate, comment on, and review. The other media types (pdf, images, etc.) work seamlessly also and support has been quick and concise when it comes to getting back to me. The white label options are also useful to have.

Nachteile:

The only con right now is the file size for uploads, but I know this is only temporary and will be increased soon.

Sunil B.
Sunil B.
VP in Indien
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 11-50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 1-5 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

Easy to use, flexible with amazing support

5,0 vor 2 Jahren

Kommentare: Our review process, getting feedback, tracking versions... its all become easier instead of using email and Google Drive. We were up and running within a day. The full team took literally 2 hours to understand the complete software.

Vorteile:

Firstly the support team is amazing. As a software its very easy to get set up and use. Workspaces makes it great for the complete design team to collaborate.

Nachteile:

Integration of Adobe CC is missing in the power plan, but is in the roadmap

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen: Approval Studio und Ziflow

Warum QuickReviewer gewählt wurde: Google Drive is great for documents and excel. But working with design reviews, proofing, feedback is something that is amazing in QuickReviewer. Technically we're using both.

Zuvor genutzte Software: Google Drive

Gründe für den Wechsel zu QuickReviewer: Easier to use, better pricing, more flexible, quick response, great service.

Prateek G.
Prateek G.
Associate in Indien
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Gesundheit, Wellness & Fitness, 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

Proofing for multiple clients

5,0 vor 2 Monaten Neu

Kommentare: Speak with your clients on how this will make things easier for everyone so they adopt the tool because it really helps.

Vorteile:

I manage a creative team. A lot of files are sent to me for review, so I need to quickly manage and view all the proofs, identify the status of each file and follow up on files that have not been acted on. QuickReviewer gives me a clean view on each of these aspects which makes life way easier.

Nachteile:

Comment responses should be sent to reviewers without having to @ mention them.

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen: Frame.io

Gründe für den Wechsel zu QuickReviewer: Instead of getting comments from different channels like chat, text messages, email and phone, we are able to get everything now in one spot. This really improves clarity and reduces rework.

Michael R.
Technology Officer in USA
Strafverfolgung, 1.001-5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 1-5 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

Needs work on document types, technical help, speed, clarity of what is happening to the document.

3,0 vor 2 Jahren

Kommentare: frustrating waiting for documents that have been added to be available within a reasonable time for review, now it takes until the next day before they are available.

Vorteile:

It can review documents and images and websites and video.

Nachteile:

poor clarity in how website links are used and employment of plug-ins, crashes when trying to load in video, only takes .pdf documents, only provides one method of commenting on documents and the icon is so small it is barely visible, comments in the column are barely visible due to contrast and brightness, other annotations are not featured out enough (lines, boxes, arrows), they are too small.

Jyoti R.
Jyoti R.
Quality Analyst in Indien
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 201-500 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

QuickReviewer is an excellent tool to bring your creative team together and get design evaluations.

5,0 vor 3 Monaten

Kommentare: QuickReviewer has made the full review process way easier to track. It has brought our design on a single platform to add and see feedback.

Vorteile:

The QuickReviewer user interface is one of my favorites. Setting up a proof and sharing it for review is simple. The proofing interface is also one of my favorites. Comments are simple to add and intuitive.

Nachteile:

The status should be linked to a workflow. It should be like setting up a new stage based on which I can trigger an action so that the next user is automatically notified of the task they have been assigned.

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen: Ziflow

Zuvor genutzte Software: Frame.io

Michal S.
Graphic designer in Tschechien
Verlagswesen, 11-50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 1-5 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

Found this when searching for alternative for Dropbox PDF reviews

4,0 vor 2 Jahren

Kommentare: Quick, nice and I'll be probably comming more often.

Vorteile:

- Speed - Ease of use and quick understanding of anyone who switched from Dropbox - Dark mode - The developers seem to really care about the product

Nachteile:

- Inability to see all the historical comments, once a new version of document is uploaded. That's what I miss most. But I have been on back-and-forth communication about this possibility with the dev team.

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen: ReviewStudio, GoVisually und Filestage

Warum QuickReviewer gewählt wurde: Dropbox had some bugs and was starting to be unbearably slow

Zuvor genutzte Software: Dropbox Business

Gründe für den Wechsel zu QuickReviewer: price/performance ratio (sadly, boardgame publishing is somewhat poor industry and I came from somewhat poor country, so the price for using is an important factor in our decision)

Rahul G.
Rahul G.
Digital marketing expert in Indien
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Grundschul- & Sekundarbildung, 11-50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

The best proofing system i came across. it's just super easy

5,0 letztes Jahr

Kommentare: Awesome !. I am using this tool as a DAM (Digital asset management) tool and have to work with numerous vendors and numerous formats. The proofing is just super easy.
Oh yeah ! and integration with adobe apps, dropbox just icing on the cake.

Vorteile:

In digital marketing we constantly work with vendors and QuickReviewer has been a blessing. I was looking for a tool and found this one. Logged in with just 1 click using my gmail. Super easy to use with the Google drive style interface. Now i just use this tool for the proofing the files. I can send links easily , review versions and much more. The tools just helps me get my work done super fast. i started using the tool for free and then upgraded as the demand increased.

Nachteile:

Need to work on visibility. had a hard time looking for it.

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen: Ziflow

Gründe für den Wechsel zu QuickReviewer: Ziflow is expensive and made for many other features which are not required.

Niraj M.
Niraj M.
Senior Accounts Manager in Indien
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Marketing & Werbung, 11-50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

Great tool for Review and Proofing docs

5,0 letztes Jahr

Vorteile:

The interface is just supereasy to use and the Our vendors can even access it on their smartphones.

Nachteile:

nothing as such. we have been using it for some time now and works great .

Akarsh S.
Akarsh S.
Solution Architect in Indien
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 201-500 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

If you do a lot of proofing and have multiple approval cycles, QuickReviewer is the way to go!

5,0 vor 2 Monaten Neu

Vorteile:

QuickReviewer stays true to its name and lets our clients and team review quickly and easily. We use a production workflow where our design heads must proof and approve each bit that goes out to a client for review. The same cycle continues when we're going live, with new versions being uploaded hourly!

Nachteile:

Some of our clients prefer to use an app instead of a web browser. However, with the number of options that QuickReviewer offers, it is not a dealbreaker.

Srishty P.
Srishty P.
HR in Indien
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 11-50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Kostenlose Testversion
Herkunft der Bewertung

"Excellent online proofing!"

4,0 vor 4 Monaten

Vorteile:

QuickReviewer is really simple to use and distribute with individuals who need to evaluate our pdfs. Easy comments and responses without sending multiple emails. I appreciate that they can mark up and rotate the pdf proof in QuickReviewer (which for us was a big feature), and the comments rotate with the proof.

Nachteile:

I haven't found a means to save old pdfs so that we can refer to them. An archiving option would be good to have.

Alberto G.
Video Marketing in USA
Marketing & Werbung, Selbstständig
Verwendete die Software für: 1-5 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

Time Saver! A Must for Creative Services

5,0 vor 2 Jahren

Kommentare: I really love that we can set restrictions for team members by creating workspaces.
The video review part is the best and i will continue to use it.

Vorteile:

I really love the video editing feature of QuickReviewer! It makes it easier to communicate and get the revisions done for clients.

Nachteile:

1. I don't like that I can not review my videos directly from Google Drive. 2. I wish there was a way to disable download until it is approved by both parties. That way they won't be able to download if there is a pending invoice. 3. If there was an option to leave voice memos also on the video timestamps that would help out a lot. 4. If there was a way to draw and add shapes to make commenting a bit easier. 5. Not being able to link it to FCPX 6. Being able to place Watermark if downloaded before it is approved by both parties

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen: Frame.io

Warum QuickReviewer gewählt wurde: This is easier to make comments and place stamps on the video

Zuvor genutzte Software: Google Drive

Gründe für den Wechsel zu QuickReviewer: price

Vivek P.
digital marketing manager in USA
Marketing & Werbung, 2-10 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Kostenlose Testversion
Herkunft der Bewertung

Saves a Lot a time with the reviewing and approval process

5,0 vor 8 Monaten

Vorteile:

I had started my own business and handeling all the marketing material review took up most of my time. I came to know about quickreviewer through an online ad. Tried it. Super easy to use. I have since been using this software for handeling all the work that i get done with the freelancer graphic designers and with some of the companies as well. The best thing is that I can also check the updates on my phone through the links and login on though the browser. This software has helped me streamline the process of review and approval and helped make the most of the time i have and which i now use in improving the effieciency and quality of my services rather than chasing long list of emails.

Nachteile:

Use it for review and approval of the marketing material and other designing work which I am outsourcing for my business.

Paula D.
Marketing Campaign Manager in USA
Marketing & Werbung, 2-10 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 1-5 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

Almost there!

4,0 vor 2 Jahren

Vorteile:

1. Your customer service is amazing! Speedy and thorough 2. On of our designers has used it and loves it! 3. The video that I can share with clients to teach them how to use it.

Nachteile:

1. In Proof HQ, they number the comments, not count them, but number them. It helps when you're on a call with a client and can say "look at edit #45" 2. Websites are still buggy. A. The plugin doesn't work with Elementor B. The scaling option is cool, but you can't see the whole site at the largest size, it requires a horizontal scroll C. When I click on a comment to see where the pin drop is, the pin drops are jumpy and I can't always see exactly where they're meant to be bc they move around.

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen: PageProof

Gründe für den Wechsel zu QuickReviewer: 1. you do websites 2. the deal on AppSumo

Randy B.
Creative Solutions Director in USA
Grafikdesign, Selbstständig
Verwendete die Software für: 1-5 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

A must have for graphic designers...

5,0 vor 2 Jahren

Kommentare: I needed a smooth and reliable way to engage my client(s) and get their edit requests in a more collaborative way with their other approvers, which in turn allows me to gain faster approvals. QuickReviewer has brought that ability to my most important projects and clients and it has sped up the production of several jobs in just the couple of months I've been using it.

Vorteile:

I really like it’s clean interface and simplicity of getting markups and approvals from clients.

Nachteile:

It needs some minor refinements to make it more user friendly from the client on-boarding perspective.

Stacy V.
EveryJob in USA
Unterhaltung, 2-10 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 1-5 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

1:1 Square Format Needed

5,0 vor 2 Jahren

Kommentare: Good

Vorteile:

Ease of use, cost, avalible to edit without signing in

Nachteile:

It really needs to be able to accept 1:1 square format so my clients can review square format videos. Everytime I have a client that uses 1:1 formats, I have to use Vimeo editor so they can review it!

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen: Vimeo Pro

Gründe für den Wechsel zu QuickReviewer: Cheaper

Tanjeem T.
Junior Researcher in Kanada
Forschung, 5.001-10.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 1-5 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

Great tool for collaborative reviews!

4,0 vor 2 Jahren

Kommentare: So far it has been a really easy-to-use product that hasn't taken a lot of training for me and my co-workers. It's definitely made reviewing documents much easier because of the collaborative feature.

Vorteile:

My team and I really enjoy the collaborative feature of this product. It's great to be able to leave comments and have quick interaction and reviewing of our papers. The tracking and reviewing features makes keep track of changes so much better. It's so hard to keep track of all the changes reviewers make on documents and I've had times where I might miss a necessary change because there's a lot of documents to sort through. This is not the case with this product because you have all reviews and change requests in a single file or location. It's really great for when you need reviews from a small team.

Nachteile:

The one con I would say is that the file size could be expanded further for bigger uploads. Often times when working with manuscripts, the file size can be pretty large. To benefit from the reviewing features of this product, being able to upload without barriers would be great.

Rahul V.
Marketing Manager in Indien
Marketing & Werbung, 1.001-5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

Really handy for design collaboration

4,0 vor 2 Jahren

Kommentare: It's a very straight-forward tool that doesn't require training and product-walkthroughs.

Vorteile:

Video and live website really is great! Also we exchange .PSD very often between marketing and design teams - so now marketing don't need to have Photoshop to view and review the file. Overall, it's a cost-saver and very handy. Saves us from a lot of WhatsApp back and forth with client.

Nachteile:

Opening each files takes to a new browser tab, it would be great if the tabs can be created within the web app to avoid too many tabs.

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen: GoProof und Ziflow

Jed K.
President in USA
Animation, 2-10 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 1-5 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

Our team loves QuickReviewer

5,0 vor 2 Jahren

Kommentare: We used other reviewers that worked fine but the price was steep. This does what we need without going overboard. IT is easier to organize than other systems too.

Vorteile:

The software works great and new features are being added regularly. The team really listens to your suggestions. They have actually implemented some of my requests

Nachteile:

The play bar is very small. which makes it difficult to scrub through a video.

Charlene B.
Full-Stack Web Developer in USA
Design, 2-10 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

The Possibilities Are Great

4,0 vor 2 Jahren

Kommentare: This has been one of the cleanest project review software I've worked with and look forward to seeing the innovations to come!

Vorteile:

What I like most includes: • The ease to upload images to share with clients for review, • The ability for clients to comment directly on their projects, • Ability to Approve or Reject projects.

Nachteile:

What could be improved includes: • Easier way to share project folders with clients, so they don't have to "sign-in", • Better way to respond while not logging on.

Erik B.
Filmmaker in Niederlande
Medienproduktion, Selbstständig
Verwendete die Software für: 1-5 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

Great for video review

4,0 vor 2 Jahren

Vorteile:

Easy to use. Did improve my post production process a lot. The support (by email) is great.

Nachteile:

The amount of integrations. But they just started and did put out a roadmap on their site.

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen: Frame.io und Vimeo Pro

Gründe für den Wechsel zu QuickReviewer: Special lifetime offer. Custom branding like CNAME, logo & colours. Coming up features like Google Drive & FCPX integration.

Tanuj singh R.
Tanuj singh R.
Programmer in Indien
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 1-5 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

Excellent online proofing for all assets

5,0 vor 4 Monaten

Kommentare: We were figuring out how to communicate better across multiple teams, from designers to project management to quality assurance and marketing. We’ve reduced the number of emails that are sent and received, and we don't get lost in email interpretation anymore. We know exactly where a change is required. All of the commenting tools are fantastic. I also like the pdf export with comments options.

Vorteile:

I like the user interface because it's simple to use and share with coworkers, especially those who aren't as tech savvy. They can comment and respond to one other without having to send multiple emails. I really enjoy the feature of downloading comments. We need to keep track of everything we do, so we chose QuickReviewer.

Nachteile:

There is nothing I dislike so far, it's such a great product. You could add a feature for choosing who to send reminders to.

Verifizierter Rezensent
Sr Marketing Manager in USA
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Immobilien, 501-1.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

The best solution for proofing content

5,0 vor 2 Jahren

Vorteile:

The ability to virtually pass around a document for reviews with easy tools for comments is perfected by QuickReviewer.

Nachteile:

The only thing I wish was a feature was for the bounding box of the comment to be highlighted when you either click/hover over a comment so you can see exactly what it's referring too (not just the page)

Kathleen C.
Creative Director in Australien
Marketing & Werbung, 2-10 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 1-5 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

Quick Review of QuickReviewer

5,0 vor 2 Jahren

Kommentare: So far so awesome!

Vorteile:

It is free for people like me who need to keep my overheads down, work remotely to my clientele, and need to provide a professional and easy interface for the clients to give logical feedback in a timely and easy way.

Nachteile:

I would just like to see toggle arrows on the view screen so that clients can easily get to the next design to review without having to go back to the thumbnail screen and click ... that would make the UX virtually seemless.

Marcus M.
Founder in USA
Medienproduktion, 2-10 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

I love the Weblink Feature

5,0 vor 2 Jahren

Vorteile:

The Weblink alone is worth it! I can easily make changes to client websites without logging in and out and the constant back and forth with client web changes.

Nachteile:

Weblinks are limited. I feel you should get more for the price point.

Saurav P.
Sr. Sales Manager in Indien
Computer-Software, 11-50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 1-5 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

Great tool for online reviewing of creatives

5,0 vor 11 Monaten

Kommentare: I was facing the problem of reviewing & approving of the Creatives for ads with my Marketing team. Quickreviewer has solved this problem by realtime sharing & reviewing of the creatives with my team.

Vorteile:

Its ease of use. Real time commenting & feedback on any changes in Images as well as Videos. Workspace Feature for Collaborating with Team members or your Marketing team is quite handy. Mails are automatically send to the other members whenever any changes or comments are made on the creatives.

Nachteile:

Should have integration with youtube also. Otherwise its quite a good tool.