Wir helfen Unternehmen in Deutschland
seit 15 Jahren bei der Softwareauswahl

Über BrowserStack

Ein browserübergreifendes Testwerkzeug zum Testen des reaktiven Designs.

Erfahre mehr über BrowserStack

Vorteile:

Easy to create test cases to perform automated testing across devices/browsers. Selenium integration via which we can run automated testing.

Nachteile:

I don't like that it can get quite a bit costly very quickly. Also if you want to be able to test faster, it's going to get expensive fast.

Bewertungen zu BrowserStack

Durchschnittliche Bewertung

Benutzerfreundlichkeit
4,5
Kundenservice
4,4
Funktionen
4,4
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
4,0

Weiterempfehlungsquote

8,4/10

BrowserStack hat eine Gesamtbewertung von 4,5 von 5 Sternen basierend auf 166 Nutzerbewertungen auf Capterra.

Hast du BrowserStack bereits verwendet?

Teile deine Erfahrungen mit anderen Softwareinteressenten.

Nutzerbewertungen filtern (166)

Mike
Mike
Evangelist
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Internet, 11–50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Good Multiple Device Testing

5,0 vor 3 Jahren
Untertitel auf Deutsch sind im Videoplayer verfügbar
Aris
Aris
Web Developer in Griechenland
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Verbraucherdienste, 2–10 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

The full web testing suite

5,0 vor 3 Jahren

Kommentare: We are testing our website projects against all browsers - operating systems and devices to fix errors, bugs and behavior. Without BrowserStack, testing on all those devices and browsers would be impossible to afford and maintain.

Vorteile:

We are using BrowserStack to test our web applications on every platform there is and fix all bugs, design glitches, gestures etc. Having all those different devices, operating systems and browsers available is impossible. Thanks to BrowserStack not only we can test our websites on different browsers-platforms but we can document and verify everything using screenshots. The GeoLocation testing is very cool because we can test our websites which are available only in our country and need to know for sure if the website restricts user functionality for the rest of the world.

Nachteile:

The plans that include Selenium which is of interest to us, are very pricey and it's difficult to afford if a company has low-budget websites on its list. For big companies that handle big projects with thousands of users these plans are affordable and a must-have especially for Single Page Applications and high-traffic websites.

Daniel
Software Engineer in USA
Unterhaltung, 51–200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

Danny Finkelstein - BrowserStack Review

4,0 vor 2 Jahren

Kommentare: Overall I've been using this product at 3 different companies for the past 8 years and I've been satisfied with my experience. Theres always going to be things that I would love to see more of (but that goes to say with any SASS product I utilize). BrowserStack looking at ways to optimize the network tunneling and latency between the VMs and the local tunnel would be even more key as I see a lot of customers looking towards alternatives sometimes like Docker Compose for running more performant tests (at least for chrome).

Vorteile:

BrowserStack is easy to get up and going. The documentation is fairly simple to use and the community support allows me to find answers promptly. The incremental improvements to the dashboard for reviewing automated tests have been helpful.

Nachteile:

I would have to say that BrowserStack is just not ahead of the game when it comes to beta versions of new iOS upgrades or chromedriver and sometimes in the past (although I've seen this improve) were late in providing the newest iOS version for automation.

Nazif
QA and Observability Engineer in Niederlande
Einzelhandel, 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

ultimate tool for visual browser and app testing

5,0 letzten Monat Neu

Kommentare: Great tool put into use during corona time when everyone had to work from home where we no longer had mobile devices in our hands.

Vorteile:

we use this tool for visual testing with mobile and desktop browsers for our website. Almostly about 100 users are using it with 25 scrum teams on weekly. We don't use real devices any more.

Nachteile:

Good tool but the licence model is user based. due to complex internal architecture in an enterprise environment, local testing is not allowed to use and has been disabled.

Timothy
Timothy
Co-Founder in Südkorea
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Computer-Software, 2–10 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

An essential tool for front-end devs (when it works)

3,0 vor 5 Jahren

Kommentare: Cross checking responsiveness is a MUST for web design, but using this tool is close to a nightmare. It typically takes me 15-20 minutes just to get it working correctly, and I can't explain why sometimes it works and other times it doesn't. Their chrome plugin and the desktop app seem to work in connection to each other, but how or why they work sometimes and not others is a complete mystery. Testing Localhost sites especially will give you a headache as the tech just isn't well designed for a good user experience.

Vorteile:

- Uses actual devices and not emulators - A wide range of devices and sizes are available

Nachteile:

- The Chrome extension works about one out of five times you try it - Lots of bugs in getting it to work, and often kicks you off the device for unknown reasons - The connection is slow, but to be expected with remote connection to a live device - Sometimes bugs still do not show on BrowserStack which I can see on my own device of the same type - Checking localhost sites is especially difficult to get working

Kristin
Principal Engineer III- Software Testing in USA
Personalwesen, 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

A great way to test your mobile app on lots of devices

5,0 vor 2 Jahren

Kommentare: BrowserStack gives us the ability to perform manual and automated testing on a huge variety of mobile devices, ensuring better test coverage and freeing us from the work of maintaining a device library.

Vorteile:

Having access to such a variety of devices and operating systems means that we get a ton of test coverage. I also appreciate that BrowserStack maintains all of the devices themselves, saving our company from the burden of device management. It's also worth mentioning that customer support is PHENOMENAL. I can send our BrowserStack team a question and get an answer in minutes.

Nachteile:

I'd like to be able to customize what I see when I first navigate to the app so that I don't have to click to the function I use most (App Live testing with an uploaded app).

Mitchell
Senior Quality Assurance Manager in USA
Finanzdienstleistungen, 5.001–10.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

A Powerful Tool for Cross Browser Testing and Great Customer Service

5,0 vor 3 Jahren

Kommentare: The Browserstack team has been great. They worked one on one with our engineers to get up and running. They have listened to problems we are trying to solve and have come up with solutions that meet our needs.

Vorteile:

Browserstack is easy to use and covers almost any OS/Browser combination you could possibly need for testing. The live version can be picked up and used by anyone on day one. My automation team was able to easily convert our Selenium scripts. If you need to test on real devices they offer that as well.

Nachteile:

One user cannot be on multiple license types. We have automate pro and automate mobile licenses. For a user to move between them, you have to remove them from one license and add them to the other. Not a huge issue. We have mitigated this by separating duties, but for a smaller shop it could be an issue if you have more than one type of license.

Tim
Application Architect in Belgien
Bankwesen, 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

BrowserStack to automate our mobile app tests

4,0 vor 3 Jahren

Vorteile:

We leverage BrowserStack to automate our mobile app tests. It prevents us from having to manage our own on-premise device farm.

Nachteile:

We have some problems integrating BrowserStack local inside a Docker container. GitHub issue already exists but has been open for a while without activity.

Verifizierter Rezensent
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

Easy to use and integrate, cross-browser and device test, parallel execution - Go with BrowserStack

5,0 vor 2 Jahren

Kommentare: Overall experience is good until now. We are happy with the parallel execution, easy configuration and integration features.

Vorteile:

BrowserStack is very easy to use product. It was very easy to configure the tool with existing and new projects. We bought the license along with parallel execution which really helped in reducing the execution time.

Nachteile:

There is nothing as such that we like least. We are supposed to used all the features that BrowserStack is providing.

Paulo
Founder in Italien
Computer- & Netzwerksicherheit, 2–10 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Kostenlose Testversion
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

Does the job, but costs a little more

4,0 letztes Jahr

Kommentare: Browserstack do the job. It works well and the multiple OSes and devices *are* there. The experience is something about 8.5/10 in my scenario (real-time and bug testing). A good product.But with competition asking half of the price to provide an experience as fast as Browserstack or even faster, it may not be the final choice for some customers.

Vorteile:

Being able to test multiple browsers on multiple OSes and devices is *the* feature.

Nachteile:

In my opinion, the price is a little higher than the best competitor (Lambdatest) as well as the time to boot the VM and browser.Perhaps this difference is due to the fact that I used a free trial, but it is precisely in the free trial that the company has the opportunity to show its best.

Sonali
Senior Process associate in Indien
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

BrowserStack

5,0 vor 7 Monaten

Kommentare: Overall it's useful device to use and work with and I found it user friendly compared to other such as lambda test.

Vorteile:

It's similar to real devices and gives same results as you can get in real device. You can get all the solutions easily and with no time if you report them.

Nachteile:

After few hours it might be slow as part of performance and your work can get delayed due to that.

Piotr
QA Automation Engineer in Irland
Computer-Software, 51–200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

Effortless cross browser testing with benefits.

5,0 vor 2 Jahren

Kommentare: To sum up, BrowserStack is an amazing tool with a lot of features and possibilities. The documentation is vast, and customer support is helpful. I was using it for about a year and a half, and it significantly improved cross-browser and cross-device testing coverage with a slight increase in workload. However, all those advantages are connected with a quite high price. If a company can afford this tool - it will be a great added value. On the other hand, there are a couple of cheaper competitors on the market, so it is not necessarily the best choice. Everything depends on company needs.

Vorteile:

First of all, BrowserStack is extremely easy to use! To start LiveApp testing it is enough just to use one small program, enter the BS website and the user is ready to go with his local tests, so there is no need to move your tests to an external server to run them. Users can select the browser and its version and all is immediately ready to be tested. Secondly, automation and parallelism are natively supported in BrowserStack, even if a framework is not supporting this kind of execution. Similar to a LiveApp mode, the user can select Browsers that need to be covered, as well as their versions and after a short configuration, tests can be executed. Reports are automatically generated after execution is completed, and they can be also fully customized depending on user needs. Documentation is extensive and contains a lot of examples and details regarding configuration, setup, and the product itself. Also, customer service is friendly and willing to help if any obstacles appear. BrowserStack has a lot of features, that are not obvious but can simplify the work. E.g. geolocation testing was important in my industry and this tool allowed me to check it effortlessly. I was surprised by the number of browsers, devices, and versions that can be selected. Users can find almost every configuration - Device + OS version + Browser version - he wants and e.g. easily reproduce specific, edge-case bug.

Nachteile:

Unfortunately, BrowserStack is quite pricey, and not every company will be ready to pay for it. It comes with a lot of features, but it is more expensive than its main market competitors. Sometimes slowdowns and lags are noticeable - as it is an external tool, some delays must be taken into account.

Tim
Senior iOS Developer in Österreich
Finanzdienstleistungen, 11–50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Provides a variety of browsers that may be difficult to cover in a regular test environment

5,0 vor 2 Jahren

Kommentare: We found BrowserStack to be great for some devices that we didn't have physical access to for budget or difficulty acquiring. This was particularly useful for some older iPhones.

Vorteile:

Browserstack's focus is to provide a large amount of unique browsers (and device environments for Android and iOS) to allow for large scale testing on web apps to ensure they work reliably in all situations. We found this to be very useful for ensuring the rarer (but still very important) devices were covered during our testing of web apps (particularly on older iPhones). Its website and API provide easy ways to access these devices and with an automated setup this becomes very powerful.

Nachteile:

Some latency testing could be unreliable in certain configurations on mobile apps. Although this feels like it was more of a problem with how our software was originally designed. We eventually solved most of these issues but it added confusion.

ilysse
Project Manager in USA
Marketing & Werbung, 11–50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

A Real Game Changer in Website Development

5,0 vor 3 Jahren

Kommentare: We've used BrowserStack for several years while building websites. Our clients trust that we are going to be able to test their website before it launches because of BrowserStack.

Vorteile:

BrowserStack is a life saver in website development, so our team can test across all browsers for desktop, tablets, and all mobile devices. It also helps us to be able to replicate issues that clients may see, even if we don't have their device.

Nachteile:

We can currently only have one user logged into BrowserStack at a time. There may be an upgraded plan for more users.

jayathi
Engineer in Sri Lanka
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

Get done your executions with 'less effort' and 'higher efficiency'

5,0 vor 6 Jahren

Vorteile:

In past two years this is my primary cross browser testing tool.User friendly UI and easy to understand. It's easier to work with this tool and it provides various features to fulfil your testing purposes. If your looking for to get done your executions with less effort and higher efficiency, This tool is the best solution. They provides more than thousand devices to deploy your executions. This is very stable and reliable application. Highly recommended for anyone.

Nachteile:

You need a better network connection to get more efficient results. Other than that there are no any cons to mentions. It's very perfect tool. Cheers !

Ilya
QA Manager in Russland
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Now you can forget about lots of Virtul Machines with different browsers

5,0 vor 6 Jahren

Kommentare: You don't need to waste time on configuring virtual machines, thinking about licenses and extra devices.

Vorteile:

Allows you to use real devices, different os and browsers You can easily start to work without any guidance (UX is very good) You can use developers tools on iOS - it allows you to find errors more quickly.

Nachteile:

Prices are high and rising fast. Customer support is slow, sometimes you should wait. Very rarerly you can find out that necessery device is not available

Verifizierter Rezensent
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 11–50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Great multi browser/os tool

5,0 vor 4 Jahren

Kommentare: Great solution if you dont want to spend tons of money on a test farm.

Vorteile:

I can easily check new features on my website with browserstack. (android, iphone, desktop) different os/browser versions.

Nachteile:

Sometimes can be really slow. Sometimes behave differently from a native device despite they say they are using native devices.

Verifizierter Rezensent
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Computer-Software, 11–50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

Full featured testing on both mobile and desktop

5,0 vor 5 Jahren

Vorteile:

Originally, the killer feature was that you could develop in a localhost environment but still use browserstack to test on various devices. Then they added IP spoofing and geo-location testing which elevated the usefulness that much more since we were looking for solutions that would easily allow us to test and confirm issue that we were getting from international clients and now it's all in one place.

Nachteile:

There's an optional download that aims to speed up usage of browserstack. While this is nice, it'd be good to somehow work this into the main application. This is because although the speed up is beneficial, it would be hard to install on end-user devices of nontechnical internal testers who are the ones who most often complain about the speed.

Verifizierter Rezensent
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
, 11–50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

If you do any kind of web development, you need this.

5,0 vor 6 Jahren

Vorteile:

I've been making websites for over 20 years now and I wish I had this tool years ago! It's a solid, fast, complete product that will basically pay for itself because it will save you hours in development and debugging work.

Kobi
QA Manager in Israel
Finanzdienstleistungen, 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Payoneer review

5,0 vor 2 Jahren

Vorteile:

Easy to use and adapt to our needs, A variety of devices and debug and inquiry options.

Nachteile:

Not thinking of anything in particular right now. When I see or hear something I will update

Vinothkumar
Sr. Automation Engineer in USA
Krankenhausversorgung & Gesundheitswesen, 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

Product feedback

4,0 vor 3 Jahren

Vorteile:

Customer Support, integration, logs and other details, video screenshots and so on are good.

Nachteile:

Some of the features like cross platform support within the same session switching between the apps and iOS related performance features like battery usage, CPU usage, memory usage and so on, would be nice to have.

Verifizierter Rezensent
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Computer-Software, 501–1.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

browserStack life saver

5,0 vor 3 Jahren

Vorteile:

the features and UI are easy to use and understand.

Nachteile:

installing the apps on should be made little easy.

Chinmay
SDET III in Indien
Finanzdienstleistungen, 201–500 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

The best testing tool for devs

5,0 vor 3 Jahren

Vorteile:

The most important features that BrowserStack provides are detailed logs, choice of extensive devices and of course the best customer support

Nachteile:

The pricing for AppAutomatio could be better. Also, BrowserStack should allow custom plans.

Verifizierter Rezensent
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
, 11–50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

A must for cross-platform browser testing.

5,0 vor 6 Jahren

Kommentare: Ensuring our web experiences lived up to our developers expectations on all devices all without having to maintain our own device lab.

Vorteile:

There is no better way to test your web applications on a variety of browsers, operating systems, and devices. It's incredibly easy to use and works VERY well when testing content on your local machine. For our web developers, there is simply no alternative.

Nachteile:

It's not cheap when you have team members who aren't frequent users. That really is my only complaint.

Taylor
Interim QA Manager in USA
Hausmeisterservice, 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

BrowserStack Review by Taylor Morgan

5,0 vor 3 Jahren

Vorteile:

The value of using real devices with the integrations that are available within a reasonable price. Also, the interactions with the company are positive, and the responses are very quick/helpful.

Nachteile:

The thread has to be run/managed from a local machine or VM on the consumer side rather than the thread being run from Browserstack.

Verifizierter Rezensent
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
, 51–200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Amazing software to test your applications without having all the mobile devices available

4,0 vor 6 Jahren

Vorteile:

This is an amazing software to test our application look and feel in all the mobile devices and check for possible issues with them. The full option of the product is amazing and also allows to install them on the "virtual" phone.

Nachteile:

Sometimes the response of the application is not fantastic we had some response issues of the application when trying to test some important developments.