Wir helfen Unternehmen seit 17 Jahren,
bessere Software zu finden

Über Net Health

ReDoc powered by xfit ist eine Cloud-basierte Software zur Dokumentation und Planung von medizinischer Rehabilitation und zur Praxisverwaltung.

Erfahre mehr über Net Health

Vorteile:

Being the administrator of Integrated Hospice helps me a lot of lessen my work load especially when we have a new hire staff to educate and train with the software.

Nachteile:

Not too many cons I have run into - few little glitches but they were usually my misunderstanding. The only one I encounter is in scheduling.

Bewertungen zu Net Health

Durchschnittliche Bewertung

Benutzerfreundlichkeit
4,1
Kundenservice
4,0
Funktionen
4,1
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
4,0

Weiterempfehlungsquote

7,8/10

Net Health hat eine Gesamtbewertung von 4,1 von 5 Sternen basierend auf 160 Nutzerbewertungen auf Capterra.

Hast du Net Health bereits verwendet?

Teile deine Erfahrungen mit anderen Softwareinteressenten.

Nutzerbewertungen filtern (160)

Leigh
President/Physical Therapist in USA
Medizinische Praxis, 11–50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Love Net Health and would never consider another product

5,0 vor 2 Jahren

Kommentare: Overall, I've been thrilled with this product. The initial company wasn't responsive to suggestions, but this company is very interested in bettering the product and is committed to making any and all necessary changes.

Vorteile:

Nethealth is the EMR system that I've had since opening my clinic 15 years ago. This piece of software has been part of a few companies, but has grown and developed so much over the years. I love the team, their responsiveness and their commitment to the product. I love the product because it keeps clinicians ultra compliant with documentation and billing. Clinicians can feel confident that what they document and what they bill is what gets sent to the patient's insurance. Practice owners and managers can feel confident that their clinicians notes will be completed quickly if they use the time saving feature of text replacement and templates.

Nachteile:

Net Health needs to do some work in their reporting and analytics space in order to optimize the administrators time and data gathering. However, that's the only immediate need. The team constantly strives to better the product and listens well to feedback!

Joyce
Rehab Coordinator/PTA in USA
Krankenhausversorgung & Gesundheitswesen, 51–200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Great software system for Rehab providers in SNFs that require integration with PCC Nursing

5,0 letztes Jahr

Kommentare: I have had a wonderful experience with Net Health, and it exceeds the needs we have to be integrated with PointClickCare to auto-populate rehab minutes and patient information between the 2 systems, also provide the reports and monthly billing exports that I need to provide to the SNF.

Vorteile:

System meets and exceeds all the rehab needs for our SNF to handle rehab related documentations, certifications, re-certs, progress reports, reports, assessments, projections used for scheduling rehab, daily rehab charges, CPTs, billing exports, time in /out logs, monthly PBJ and labor reports, Clini-SIgn for doctors' eSignatures, Training offered when migrating between Casamata over to Net Health when they merged. Also, great support staff always help resolve any issues quickly!

Nachteile:

Some of my therapists feel the evaluations/certifications are too involved and time consuming due to too many options required to be completed. But once trained well, they understand how to use the system in a more efficient way.

Annika
owner, wound care nurse practitioner in USA
Gesundheit, Wellness & Fitness, 11–50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung
Quelle: SoftwareAdvice

Poor implementation, lack of support and poor features. Tissue analytics does not work well!

1,0 letztes Jahr

Kommentare: No positive words, our journey has been difficult, and we have had to keep our old EMR for the essential functions and this adds to our expense.

Vorteile:

We enjoy the features that allow for easy billing.

Nachteile:

We regret being talked into the purchase of this EMR. We thought we were upgrading. Instead we have no ability to fax documents out of the system, no ability to assign a task to a staff member, where the patient's chart opens up . Tissue analytics is not healful in measuring the wound, every measurement has to be manually corrected. We have reached out to support to the point that they are sick of us. Especially when our providers needed precription abilities, this took 2.5 months. We were advised to write about all of our concerns into the "communities" section and we have done so, but we are still waiting for basic features in even the older and cheaper EMRs that allow us to fax out referrals, e-prescribe with no problems, and use applications that actually work for tissue imaging.

Robert
Verwendete die Software für: Nicht angeboten
Herkunft der Bewertung
Quelle: SoftwareAdvice
5,0 vor 13 Jahren

Kommentare: I have a multi-clinic urgent care/occupational medicine practice in Nashville, TN. Because we handle both urgent care and occupational medicine cases, it was impossible for many years to find a single-solution program for what we do. There are so many differences between those two types of practices in terms of protocol, handling of information, and billing that, if we wanted to do it all well, we had to have multiple systems in place to manage all aspects of patient care - from the front-end procedure, to the provider encounter, retention of records, reporting and billing. We had looked at many different systems through the years with the intent to go to a single system, but each time we looked we felt that they just were not yet up to our standards. We had even looked at the predecessor system for Agility in the past. Then, about 2 years ago we looked at them again. Integritas had developed a system that we felt would meet our needs. We ran our numbers, looking at cost savings from trimming the multiple systems down to a single system. Then the advantage of the federal stimulus reimbursement came along to further help offset the cost of implementation. It suddenly became a no-brainer decision to transition from our existing hodgepodge of systems to a single, unified one that was more cost-effective than our current set-up, and would qualify for reimbursement under the meaningful use definition of the stimulus act. We also wanted to ensure this program was CCHIT-certified. (Fortunately, it is!) So in June of 2010, we implemented Agility. There was training in advance for all our personnel. The training was aimed specifically at the individual groups who would use its different modules. Installation and implementation happened in several phases. As with any new system, you run into a few bumps when you go live. But learning the system was pretty easy for all of our folks. Even our most resistant physician has mastered the program, and uses it without any problems. What we noticed very quickly with this system is how well our documentation improved. All charts became easy to read, review and follow. The built-in coding algorithm, combined with improved documentation, has allowed for an improvement in revenue. I like the fact that the wizards and templates are fully customizable and editable. Every aspect of the patient encounter can be adjusted to the unique needs of the patient. At the same time, being able to automate common and recurring orders and exams with order sets and exam sets speeds things up. The folks at Integritas have been very helpful when we had questions or suggestions for improvements. This is a system that I have no reservations in recommending.

Kristen
Administrator
Krankenhausversorgung & Gesundheitswesen, 11–50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 1-5 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung
Quelle: SoftwareAdvice

Excellent software

5,0 vor 8 Jahren

Kommentare: If you are looking for a user-friendly hospice software, developed by people who understand hospice process and requirements, look no further. Hospicesoft is an excellent program that helps the whole team work together to better fulfill the needs of the patient, eliminating the need for charts full of paper documents,

Vorteile:

The software tracks the many pieces required by multidisciplinary patient care. Excellent dashboards keep administration apprised of what pieces are due, and make finding what you need simple and straight-forward. Finding any piece of the complex patient care puzzle is a breeze. The chart is laid out like any paper chart, and demographics, patient information, every disicipline form, every lab, etc... are all right at your fingertips, only a click or two away. Because it is web-based, there are no requirements for in-house servers, and the information is available from anywhere you have cell or internet access. It can be viewed, or documented, by phone, tablet or computer. There are no specific equipment requirements. Information can be printed, faxed or emailed from within the system (fax requires a very small fee monthly using a service such as RingCentral) to facilities, providers, pharmacies, etc.... Orders for treatments, medications, etc. are easy to update, print, or review. The patient's care plan is a "living" careplan, and revised from within the discipline notes during each visit as the patient's needs changes.

Nachteile:

No interface with a pharmacy benefit manager at this time, so all medications, orders, changes, etc... do have to be entered separately into the pharmacy program. Because the careplan is revised from within the discipline notes, and defaults in from the previous notes all charting has to be done sequentially. For patients with frequent visits, this is sometimes an issue.

Brenda
Director of Rehab in USA
Krankenhausversorgung & Gesundheitswesen, 201–500 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Makes rehab management in SNF much easier

4,0 vor 8 Jahren

Kommentare: I have used several versions of Casamba with different rehab companies. As a manager, the reports saved me time when my customers needed quick information. I have always felt that Casamba has been user friendly to use as a COTA and manager. How to setup and do the evals needs work, but I have always found it easier to use than Rehab Optima. Love the planner!!

Vorteile:

The planner makes planning minutes and tracking ARD's much simpler. The reports aren't difficult to get to and are a quick way to get information for my clients. The alert system aids in making sure all documentation is thoroughly completed before closing and that it is completed in a timely manner within compliance.

Nachteile:

The evaluations aren't as user friendly for the evaluating therapists. They have to choose their goals based on CPT codes and not just on what they want their functional goals to be.

Rich
Director of Corporate Compliance and CQI
Medizinische Praxis, 51–200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung
Quelle: SoftwareAdvice

A lot of really good features and a couple glitches.

4,0 vor 7 Jahren

Kommentare: very good product overall

Vorteile:

ease of use, integrates fairly well with most of our customers' EMR systems, like the updated forms in our 'new' library (version 2.91, I believe)

Nachteile:

the ADR management tool way too time consuming and clunky to use, would like more autonomy to make minor changes (ie. changing items from mandatory elements (red) to optional (blue) or vice versa) without having to go through the cumbersome change request process.

Phil
retired in USA
Krankenhausversorgung & Gesundheitswesen, 5.001–10.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Nethealth Therapy

4,0 vor 2 Jahren

Kommentare: Therapy productivity and efficiency was vastly improved.

Vorteile:

The Nethealth software integrated seamlessly with our underlying EMR system. Great implementation team and quick learning curve for users.

Nachteile:

Continuous upgrades are great but occasionally can cause glitches.

Helen
Speech Language Pathologist in USA
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Grundschul- & Sekundarbildung, 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Makes Documentation Easier

4,0 vor 5 Jahren

Kommentare: Overall, I like the way Casamba is set up to help me complete my documentation requirements. There are plenty of training sessions available for new users.

Vorteile:

As a PRN Speech Language Pathologist, I use this software in my second job at a SNF. I like that it saves me time in my documentation for Evals, daily notes, and weekly progress notes by having templates for each task . It also keeps track of my hours worked and my daily schedule.

Nachteile:

Casamba sometimes has glitches where it is difficult to login and to sync my data before I clock out. Everything must be successfully synced before I can leave work. Sometimes the sync process takes a long time to complete.

Verifizierter Rezensent
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

I am a physical therapy assistant who uses it daily to document

4,0 vor 6 Jahren

Vorteile:

Its easy to use, you can create quick drop downs to ensure your documentation is with in Medicare guidelines.

Nachteile:

The application for the tablet can be confusing and glitches. I have had numerous documents I have completed not sync and needed to be redone

Melani
OTR in USA
Krankenhausversorgung & Gesundheitswesen, 51–200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 1-5 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung
Quelle: SoftwareAdvice

Optima

1,0 vor 2 Jahren

Kommentare: I don’t even know where to start there are sooooo many negatives. My background: 30 years experience, working w therapy programs since late 90’s— and none made me consider quitting my job. Extraordinarily frustrating, tedious, time consuming program with glitches, circular glitches, no saves for a variety of different circumstances, consumes all of my attention to read the 4 or 5 size font lettering and visually screen the page for endless, mandatory boxes to click on, scrolling page right to left and top down — anything missed ( often inconsequential) will force me to go thru pages to find it. Yesterday had to write my saved notes twice bc my computer lost power—8- 10 minutes each note each time, eval takes min of 45 min computer time of 100% focus. I had to leave twice my work bc I wasted so much time in my frustration— to complete the next day. Oh, I’m prn— the fulltime ppl do their paperwork at home and are unpaid—2-3 hrs per night. A horrible, terrible program using technology from the 90’s. It’s counterintuitive. Avoid at all costs— if ur therapists can even read the size 4 font— they will soon need a stronger Rx. My productivity is now 50-60% with my best effort.

Vorteile:

Zero— none— zilch. There is nothing to like— I can’t read previous treatments or evals without endless clicking , no shared med hx between disciplines,

Nachteile:

Any positive reviews I’ve read are 3 or more years old. I seriously doubt those are therapist reviews, probably professional reviewers who are paid.

Kristina
Director Of Rehab in USA
, 51–200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung
Quelle: SoftwareAdvice

Very user friendly

5,0 vor 6 Jahren

Kommentare: Thanks and keep up the good work!

Vorteile:

Everything. I love how user friendly it is. It has a variety of reports that are very helpful in our everyday use. It makes documentation easy. Customer service is the best. If they don't know the answer, they will find someone who does and wait time is always minimal. They always keep up with the changes and provide education for their users.

Nachteile:

I wish that the CPT codes that are billed would be the only ones to show up in the notes section without having to "upgrade" to get this. This can be confusing at times and sometimes leads to documentation mistakes.

Ian
Rehab Director in USA
, 201–500 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung
Quelle: SoftwareAdvice

Easy to use and fantastic customor support!

5,0 vor 6 Jahren

Kommentare: It's the most efficient software I've found for SNF documentation.

Vorteile:

Efficient and easy to use navigation. Makes training therapists who are not familiar with the software very easy. Customer support is fantastic. You can usually get through to a live person quickly and they've always been able to solve our issues efficiently. The numerous reports provide great tracking data for management.

Nachteile:

Can't think of anything. It's always been efficient and the improved loading times over the years have made this software even better.

Elizabeth
OTR/L, DOR in USA
Krankenhausversorgung & Gesundheitswesen, 201–500 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Therapy software review for SNF facilities

5,0 letztes Jahr

Kommentare: It is the best I personally have experienced. We are very satisfied.

Vorteile:

The organization as well as staff support

Nachteile:

I dont have any cons. It truly is a wonderful program.

Jessica
QAPI Coordinator in USA
Medizinische Praxis, 201–500 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung
Quelle: SoftwareAdvice

Mixed experiences

3,0 vor 5 Jahren

Vorteile:

What I like most about this software is it is ascetically pleasing and very user friendly. This software makes it easy for clinicians to document notes and schedules for patients.

Nachteile:

What I like least about this software is the glitches that have been happening ever since the update that happened at the beginning of this year. I wish we could go back to the old system before the update migration was done.

Jessica
QAPI Coordinator in USA
Medizinische Praxis, 51–200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung
Quelle: SoftwareAdvice

User Friendly

5,0 vor 6 Jahren

Vorteile:

This software is very easy to work with from any device. It makes documenting for all of the clinicians easy while saving time.

Nachteile:

I do not like this software since the most recent update that was done in April of 2019. Our company has had a hard time getting issues resolved in a timely manner. It seems as if this update was done prior to figuring out the quirks.

Gina
Director of Therapy/ OTR in USA
, 501–1.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung
Quelle: SoftwareAdvice

I find this product easy to use with good tech support

5,0 vor 6 Jahren

Kommentare: Love having something easy to use that helps with any denials or audits- foolproof

Vorteile:

I think the ease of use. All of my new clinicians comment on how easy it is to learn. Also the updates and reminders for what is due when

Nachteile:

I think goal building for new clinicians is always the hardest. THey build but hit the wrong button and it disappears.

Raymond
Director of Rehabilitation in USA
, 51–200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung
Quelle: SoftwareAdvice

EASE of Access

5,0 vor 6 Jahren

Kommentare: I would recommend this software for EMR.

Vorteile:

Ease of access. You can even do it remotely if you are given access. All you need is in the system to build a note and you can always customize your response too.

Nachteile:

So far I don't have any issues as long as you have good internet. This is a great tool and very user friendly.

Jennifer
Rehab Director in USA
, 2–10 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung
Quelle: SoftwareAdvice

Excellent resource and great tool for SNF therapy

5,0 vor 6 Jahren

Kommentare: Would highly recommend.

Vorteile:

Excellent state of the art documentation system. Easy to use. Customer service is great. And they are right up to date on all therapy changes as well as educating customers through webinars, etc.

Nachteile:

Honestly it meets all of our needs, no cons noted.

Dean
DOR in USA
, 201–500 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung
Quelle: SoftwareAdvice

Lots of configurable features for the SNF therapy environment in an easy to use interface!

4,0 vor 6 Jahren

Vorteile:

Ease of assigning appointments to therapy staff in multiple disciplines. Ability to use on mobile devices, like iPads

Nachteile:

New users can get lost in the number of pre-canned phrases in the drop lists or boxes (learning curve to become efficient with use of the product)

Sonia
PT in USA
Gewerbeimmobilien, 501–1.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung
Quelle: SoftwareAdvice

Helps justify skilled need

4,0 vor 6 Jahren

Vorteile:

Thorough, and cues you on multiple things to help justify skilled needs. Also cues you on anything you might have forgotten to evaluate or to document

Nachteile:

Program is abit lengthy and time-consuming for initial evaluations, and for weekly and monthly notes

Shawna
Billing Manager in USA
Medizinische Praxis, 51–200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung
Quelle: SoftwareAdvice

Medical documentation

4,0 vor 7 Jahren

Vorteile:

I like that each day is broken down per DOS. Very easy to read and understand. Easy to make changes and correct errors.

Nachteile:

I wish we had the ability to click and print multiple documents at one time. Very time consuming to open and print each DOS individually. Also I would like the ability to be able to reprocess the Eval instead of just the DOS. Maybe a multiple button resubmit for incorrect DOI or body parts.

Mark
Director of Rehabilitation in USA
Gewerbeimmobilien, 501–1.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung
Quelle: SoftwareAdvice

Very user friendly for therapist to deliver efficient point of care documentation

5,0 vor 6 Jahren

Vorteile:

The software is easy to navigate. Optima provides user support and education for upcoming industry changes.

Nachteile:

Many changes to the software can be expensive if you would like to customize a certain aspect of your documentation.

Debbie
Manager, Employee Health in USA
Krankenhausversorgung & Gesundheitswesen, 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

Fabulous, the only hold up we have had are with our own I.T. NetHealth has been with us every step

5,0 vor 7 Jahren

Kommentare: EMRs are the now. Agility helps make that process seamless.

Vorteile:

ease in use, easy to teach to new staff. Scan-ability is great as is the ability to have lab, radiology, drug screening, etc. results directly load into Agility.

Nachteile:

i really do not have any dislikes. We had the STIX predecessor which had become antiquated but set us up for an easy transition to Agility software.

Erik
IT Systems Analyst in USA
, 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung
Quelle: SoftwareAdvice

I see room for improvement.

3,0 vor 6 Jahren

Kommentare: Help desk can be slow to respond or not always eager to help the customer.

Vorteile:

Flexibility of platforms; we use both IPads and desktops/laptops however I will comment about the mobile platform next.

Nachteile:

Annoying download when running for the first time on a new/reimaged device, which often times out if there is lower bandwidth. This download also is forced after any update. Our IPads mostly sit idle as the therapists have given up on trying to use them. This is happening at all 40+ of our facilities; it's not an isolated incident. Please take a long, honest look at your mobile product.