Wir helfen Unternehmen in Deutschland
seit 15 Jahren bei der Softwareauswahl

Über GitLab

Behalte den Überblick über die Fortschritte und Aktivitäten Deiner Projekte. Kodieren, testen und bereitstellen.

Erfahre mehr über GitLab

Vorteile:

GitLab is easy to use and configure the code collaboration is also top notch with every commit being logged to review incase someone messes up the code.

Nachteile:

A bit confusing at the beginning, it's complex and has a steep learning curve. The user interface could do a make over.

Bewertungen zu GitLab

Durchschnittliche Bewertung

Benutzerfreundlichkeit
4,4
Kundenservice
4,2
Funktionen
4,6
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
4,5

Weiterempfehlungsquote

8,8/10

GitLab hat eine Gesamtbewertung von 4,6 von 5 Sternen basierend auf 1.098 Nutzerbewertungen auf Capterra.

Hast du GitLab bereits verwendet?

Teile deine Erfahrungen mit anderen Softwareinteressenten.

Nutzerbewertungen filtern (1.098)

Justin
Justin
Senior DevOps Engineer
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 201–500 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Made DevOps possible for my company

5,0 vor 3 Jahren
Untertitel auf Deutsch sind im Videoplayer verfügbar
Lusia
Softwareentwickler in Deutschland
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 501–1.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

Tool für die tägliche Arbeit

5,0 letztes Jahr

Vorteile:

Wir nutzen GitLab täglich im Scrum Projekt für unsere commits und Versionierung. Diese Funktionen sind super ausgebaut und erfüllen Ihren Zweck selbst in einem Team von 10 Leuten gibt es selten Probleme.

Nachteile:

Integration in unsere tägliche Arbeitsprozesse war kompliziert

Anna Lena
Senior Data Scientist in Deutschland
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 2–10 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

GitLab hat sich bereits etabliert

4,0 vor 6 Monaten

Vorteile:

Kostenlos, einfach, Versionskontrolle möglich, Teams ebenso

Nachteile:

Es ist schwer Gitlab von der Konkurrenz abzugrenzen, zb Github. Gefühlt bietet Github sogar mehr Funktionen…

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen: GitHub

Verifizierter Rezensent
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Architektur & Planung, 51–200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

Gut Lap Bewertung

5,0 vor 9 Monaten

Kommentare: Sehr gut keine Beschwerden

Vorteile:

Die Einfachheit das Preisleistungs Verhältnis .

Nachteile:

Ich finde das dass Programm ein bisschen unübersichtlich ist.

Samuel
Samuel
Founder and CEO in UK
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Internet, 2–10 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

AI Powered Git Repository

5,0 letzte Woche Neu

Vorteile:

Free plan. Collaboration. Ease of setup.

Nachteile:

Have limits in free plan. No much community support like Github.

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen: GitHub

Deepak
IT Architect in USA
Logistik & Lieferkette, 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Best tool for source code repository

5,0 vor 2 Monaten

Vorteile:

Easily manage the versions Able to create ci/cd pipeline

Nachteile:

Na.

Justin
DevOps Engineer in USA
Computer-Software, 201–500 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Beware of GitLab billing issues

1,0 vor 2 Jahren

Kommentare: Not long ago, I ordered some GitLab licenses since more people wanted to use it. I asked to go from 57 to 75 licenses. Instead, GitLab put the order in wrong and added 75 licenses, bringing us to 132 total. About this time, I was pulled to a critically-important project that was way behind schedule and told not to work on anything else. When I got enough breathing room to switch back, [SENSITIVE CONTENT] acted like she couldn't care less. The most I ever got was "I'll be sure to look into it" or "I'm still looking into it". The process dragged on for weeks. I had to nag her over and over again for updates until she finally told me that GitLab's billing department had decided... not to give me a refund because it had been too long. How convenient, especially after dragging out the process for so long. I complained about this, asked for a new account manager, and got what I requested. [SENSITIVE CONTENT] took my concerns to the GitLab crew again... and got told once again that not only would we not receive a refund, GitLab wasn't going to offer us any sort of compensation or credit whatsoever. We're a software company as well, and we would never treat loyal customers this way - especially not our power users. I've built my DevOps career around GitLab and encouraged others to do the same. That GitLab could be so tone-deaf over a problem that was clearly their fault speaks volumes to how the company has changed.

Vorteile:

GitLab does well as an all-in-one software development platform.

Nachteile:

If GitLab makes a billing problem, it may refuse to rectify the problem as they did with us.

Nathan
Mechanical Design Engineer in USA
Automotive, 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

GitLab for Mechanical and Electrical Engineers

5,0 vor 3 Monaten

Kommentare: It's great for small teams! It's hard to get people to use this over a "sharedrive", but it has significantly more features.

Vorteile:

It has all the necessary features for revision control for projects with a few people on it.

Nachteile:

There is not a great way to teach this to people who are coming in from a CAD system like Catia, Solidworks, or Creo. There is not a great way to teach this to PCB designers that are coming from KiCAD or Altium. It would be great to have a GUI for those that aren't using a traditional codebase.

Manish Bhandari
Software developer in Deutschland
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 201–500 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

Review of Gitlab for developers from a developer

5,0 vor 2 Monaten Neu

Kommentare: I experienced streamlined collaboration, seamless version control, and efficient code review processes. With built-in CI/CD pipelines, it helps in automated testing and deployment, enhancing productivity and ensuring high-quality releases. GitLab's user-friendly interface and extensive documentation facilitate smooth onboarding and continuous improvement. Overall, GitLab empowers developers to focus on innovation and delivery, driving success in software development projects.

Vorteile:

Integrated CI/CD, Collaboration Features, Comprehensive Platform

Nachteile:

GitLab can be resource-intensive, particularly for self-hosted instances and GitLab's extensive feature set and customization options can result in a steep learning curve for new users

Carlo
Energy Procurement in Dänemark
Logistik & Lieferkette, 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

DevOps Look no Further

5,0 vor 2 Monaten Neu

Vorteile:

Agile and dynamic ability to build solutions across our complex organization with optimal visibility.

Nachteile:

No cons have been experienced by the organization since using GitLab as our DevOps platform.

XUAN MAI
Product manager in Deutschland
Finanzdienstleistungen, 11–50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

An excellent hub for managing collaborative software projects

5,0 vor 3 Wochen Neu

Vorteile:

what I like most is that Gitlab provides intuitive UI and UX journey for users to fork and merge and the likes

Nachteile:

Overall I don't find anything that is critically bad about Gitlab. Probably if there could be some AI-powered features integrated into GitLab, for example an AI-powered user manual for first-time users, it would be even greater

Álvaro
Álvaro
Fullstack developer in Italien
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 2–10 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

Great managing coding version. Powerfull code review. Struggle with large project.

5,0 vor 2 Monaten Neu

Kommentare: We use every day GitLab for share the projects of our company, documentation, control version code and collaboration features for peer feedback.

Vorteile:

In addition to allowing the management of code repositories, it also provides tools for continuous building, automated testing, issue tracking. Its ability to host both public and private code repositories.

Nachteile:

Its relatively steep learning curve. May require significant hardware and bandwidth resources to run properly.

Jer Lang
Chief Architect in Malaysia
Computer-Software, 201–500 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

A robust tool for project planning and code management

5,0 vor 2 Monaten Neu

Vorteile:

Gitlab allows users to keep track and collaborate in every steps of the project from beginning to the end

Nachteile:

It is slower to load and inherently complex to learn

Verifizierter Rezensent
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 5.001–10.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

Great tool for project management

5,0 letzten Monat Neu

Vorteile:

It’s easy to use and it’s a user friendly program. It’s great for project management. There’s a lot of online documentation which makes it easier to get started.

Nachteile:

Sometimes the interface might be a little slow. Lacking in some features.

Alejandro
Alejandro
CTO & Co-Founder in Argentinien
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Internet, 11–50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

The best opensource tool for software engineering management

4,0 vor 3 Jahren

Kommentare: We're hosting all of our private code repositories on gitlab.com, using the issue tracker, merge requests. We also run our continuos builds and deploy directly to our Google Cloud Kubernetes Engine workloads.

Vorteile:

It's opensource though provides a cloud based solution with a really good free tier. It allows integrating code repositories with issue tracking and continuos integration and continuos deployment

Nachteile:

User experience could be largely improved. Searching and filters are a bit clunky from the UX point of view. Also bulk actions are only allowed at project level.

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen: Jira

Warum GitLab gewählt wurde: We wanted to have issue tracking, code repositories, merge requests and continuos integration/deployment all in the same tool.

Zuvor genutzte Software: Trello und Bitbucket

Gründe für den Wechsel zu GitLab: It was the best alternative for our budget, and it allowed us to use our own Google Cloud Platform account to run Continuos Integration/Deployment jobs

Gábor
Gábor
Senior Programme Manager in UK
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Telekommunikation, 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

High performance at the facilities

4,0 letztes Jahr

Kommentare: Previously, I was looking for an on-premises rather than a cloud-based Git management system, and I found it. Several Linux packages are distributed, installation is easy, and it was good that I could build the environment quickly.

Vorteile:

It is a great largest Git hosting service. Since the system can be deployed in the local on-premises environment, we are operating it experimentally. The CI function can also be evaluated as excellent. This is the best option if local demand exists. It is good not to have large amounts of components and libraries that confuse things.

Nachteile:

When running a large project, the response is usually slow. However, I had no problems with it myself. I am satisfied.

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen: Jenkins

Warum GitLab gewählt wurde: It is an option like a others solutions cloud. The reason is that the secure and free on-premises operation with a concise user interface is a good alternative.

Zuvor genutzte Software: GitHub

Gründe für den Wechsel zu GitLab: You can freely operate on-premises for free. However, if there are no issues with the cloud (such as other products), I wouldn't be as picky about on-premises. Still, the advantages are advantages, and some areas may be essential regarding security standards.

Istvan
Software Engineer in Argentinien
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 11–50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung
Quelle: SoftwareAdvice

Gitlab: A Feature-full alternative to Github

5,0 vor 5 Jahren

Kommentare: We are utilizing gitlab to handle our code versioning and our continous integration and delivery pipeline. This includes our whole workflow from writting code to building it, testing it and deploying it to production.

Vorteile:

- Excellent UI that is easy to understand: many of our developers are migrating for the first time from other software (github, bitbucket) and a constant comment is that the ui is intuitive and easy to understand compared to previous software. The transition is always smooth. - Feature-full product: Gitlab offers a variety of features that I have found to be excellent and of high quality. The code-review process in gitlab is always smooth with the ability to resolve or re-open discussions, address specific comments or the whole of the discussion, the ability to suggest and even apply and commit code from the ui is also a huge plus. The IDE is decent and the file editor is also decent. The CI/CD integration with gitlab runners is smooth, the notification system is great. I get an email whenever a test fails. All from the gitlab ecosystem, i do not need to go to circleCi or some other provider for all of this, which allows the ui and experience to be consistent.

Nachteile:

At this very moment there is no feature or issue that I have found to be detrimental to my experience.

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen: GitHub und Bitbucket

Warum GitLab gewählt wurde: At the moment of the switch, Gitlab offered free private repos. At the moment both Github and Gitlab have this feature; however, I would not switch back to Github due to the ecosystem i've grown accustomed to in gitlab.

Zuvor genutzte Software: GitHub

Gründe für den Wechsel zu GitLab: At the moment, mostly private repositories. Over time, it became a matter of more bang-for-the-buck: more features, a friendlier Ui, more polished software.

Verifizierter Rezensent
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Computer-Software, 501–1.000 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

A must have tool for version controlling and software development process

5,0 vor 2 Jahren

Kommentare: GitLab is my everyday tool which I use for my course project management. I am really happy with its simple and easy-to-use open source support.

Vorteile:

Gitlab has features to set up project wiki, deployment, CI/CD pipeline and managing the project with role management with adequate space for personal projects.

Nachteile:

The documentations are bit confusing and third party plug in integration is bit difficult and confusing.

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen: GitHub und Bitbucket

Warum GitLab gewählt wurde: Open source and easier to use.

Zuvor genutzte Software: GitHub und Bitbucket

Gründe für den Wechsel zu GitLab: Gitlab is easier to use compared to GitHub and BitBucket.

Londou Jacques
Londou Jacques
Web Developer in Togo
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Computer-Software, 2–10 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

GitLab one of the best code versoinnig tools

4,0 letztes Jahr

Kommentare: GitLab has a large and active community of contributors who help maintain and improve the platform

Vorteile:

GitLabprovides a complete end-to-end solution for software development, from source code management and version control to deployment and monitoring. This can be very convenient for teams who want to consolidate their development workflow in a single platform.

Nachteile:

One potential limitation is the complexity of the platform. While GitLab's comprehensive feature set can be a strength, it can also make the platform more challenging to use and configure, especially for smaller teams or organizations.

Verifizierter Rezensent
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 2–10 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

Awesome Git Service

5,0 vor 5 Jahren

Vorteile:

GitLab is a great place to host git repositories - for both private and commercial use. With its pretty and intuitive design, GitLab offers a great experience to work with. Collaboration is managed in a really great way. Their pricing is also amazing: it's mostly free to use. We've had multiple private repos on GitLab for years now and haven't had any reason to upgrade to a paid plan so far.

Nachteile:

GitLab's customer support team is really slow at responding to support requests. However, since I'm on a free plan, that's okay and I think they probably allocate all of their support resources to their paying users - and that's totally fine.

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen: GitHub und Bitbucket

Gründe für den Wechsel zu GitLab: We first hosted all our repos on Bitbucket, but GitLab allowed us to add more users to our repositories for free. It also offered more integrations such as Sentry which was a big selling point for us. GitHub didn't offer free private repos at the time which was the main reason we went for GitLab instead.

Verifizierter Rezensent
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Bürgerliche & soziale Einrichtungen, 11–50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

Great software wit a minimal but efficient design but can definitely use improvements

4,0 vor 6 Jahren

Kommentare: Best way to use it is to keep your gitlab organized is keeping pr's as functional as possible and not mashing 1000 changes into one pr. otherwise gitlab performance go down and so will the interest of the other people who review your merge request!! Setting up gitlab to manage your software projects is child's play, and although the UI is minimal in design it which gets the job done but could definitely use some enhancements and that would make it a top tier no nonsense go-to-software-management-product. Overall it is a great software. I am not aware of the quality of the customer service on the paid tier so can't comment on that. One can manage and maintain gitlab inhouse without needing any paid support. I would recommend it without reservations to any and all software developing companies.

Vorteile:

1. Free of cost 2. Highly efficient, does the job without uncertainty. 3. Never observed any downtime 4. Very frequent and proper updates to the software. 5. easy to maintain 6. can easily integrate with jenkins for Continuous Integration- Continuous Deployment. 7. Easy to setup and use, no support or setup or external teams required. Anybody with minimum computer skills can get this up and running. 8. easy integration with youtrack for issue tracking and merge requesting tracking

Nachteile:

These are not very big cons, but I find them annoying and could definitely use improvement: 1. The edit description on an open merge request also shows up on the history. So If somebody were to make a 10 different changes to the title while keeping the 2. The code formatting in the description box is not too good. It can take several tries before getting it right. 3. There is no way of searching for something based on a line of text. For example if you were looking for a commit or a merge request but you only remember the 4. sometimes very challenging to go back and undo merges which are quite complex. 5. on a given pr, it shows icons of all the participants but doesn't say which participant did what... for example if 5 people have just viewed a pr and done nothing else even then it shows all of them as participants. It would be nice to have a feature which will only show activity by participant on every pr. 6. text based Search via ui is practically no existent. So if you search for something using a text which is part of a commit message, chances are it will not show up 100%.

Arnold
Arnold
SAP External Consultant in Honduras
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

A complete tool to store your projects and configure your CI/CD

5,0 vor 5 Jahren

Kommentare: I have great thoughts about GitLab my experience has been really good. I was really impressed when I started working with it and configured the first project there. I definitely recommend GitLab to anyone that wants to start a new project and doesn't want to use too many tools, GitLab has everything that you need to start.

Vorteile:

I started using GitLab for an external project and I like the following: 1) Easy to work with and auto explanatory. Creating/configuring a new repository is really easy. 2) Great CI/CD implementation. Having the repository with built-in CI/CD is really convenient, you can have everything related to the build and deployment process saved along with your code. I have used bamboo and I really appreciate this feature, it might have its problems but it is really useful. 3) Unlimited private docker registry, you can have your own private registry for free. I cannot express how useful this is. 4) In order to help with the CI/CD process it allows the creation of tokens with access restrictions (read only), so you can use these tokens to download your code or your docker containers without having to provide your personal credentials. 5) It has its own task manager 6) It has free agents that are in charge of executing your builds/deploys so you don't have to provide your own resources.

Nachteile:

1) Configuring build variables is really messy and it is not an ideal implementation. I haven't found a way to set different values for them depending on the branch, so configuring different environments is not too easy 2) Even though having your code with CI/CD is really convenient, it has some drawbacks. If you have an established continuous deployment process that you repeat in many projects and you want to change it (maybe a fix it or improve it) you will have to add that change to all your repositories and all the branches that you want to deploy. So it is a really good feature but it is not too flexible 3) The task manager is messy, and I didn't find a way to have a shared board. 4) It does not have too many software integrations, as I mentioned before I have used bamboo and I really like their integration with other software

Sachith
Software Engineer in Sri Lanka
Bildungsmanagement, 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

The Best DevOps Platform

5,0 vor 5 Jahren

Kommentare: Overall, GitLab is an excellent program for freelancers. It's really simple to use, simple to administrate and offers all that users need for developing. And if users implement it in the correct way it will speed up their development effectively. Adding more to this, it provides excellent ways to manage git repositories on a centralized secure server.

Vorteile:

Project operation: Using GitLab provides the user with complete control over their projects. Users can easily follow up activities assigned to their respective partners. Additionally, the program gives you the advantage to have members across the borders as well, hence it is pretty useful and comes in handy when the work is beyond the borders. Easy to use: GitLab is easy to lean and very easy to use the software as it helps in creating a project by giving instructions from the beginning. The tutorial mode is extremely helpful and because of that no experience or expertise is required to exhaust all the features offered by GitLab.

Nachteile:

Contact Support: Although GitLab provides a good platform for its users, unfortunately, their contact section is poor. Users are unable to recover if they face any problem as the administration is limited. Administration can only be at your service if you own the premium version. Complicated: Although Gitlab is easy to learn when it comes to the menu users tend to feel as if they are lost in some sort of maze. The menu is pretty much clunky because of this some of its users are unable to use GitLab to its full potential. Additionally, the efficiency of users is reduced to a great extent when they wish to search for aspects because it consumes time and energy.

Andrei
Andrei
Lead game developer in Rumänien
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Internet, Selbstständig
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

A great free alternative to GitHub if you need large repos and teams

4,0 vor 4 Jahren

Kommentare: GitLab helped us solve all of our backup and collaboration needs for our large file projects. While we do have on-site physical backups just in case, GitLab is great at keeping the core files safe. On the physical backup we put big assets and on GitLab mostly the code. If it wasn't for GitLab we'd be using GitHub for some projects only as certain files surpass their limit.

Vorteile:

The biggest pro for us at JeFawk Games (me and my freelancing friends, not employees as stated) was the fact that it allowed for 1GB of space for free in private repos! Since we're working on games, we really needed the space and the privacy. This was from before GitHub was acquired by Microsoft and gave away unlimited free repos. Time forwarding a bit and GitHub is giving out free private repos of max 1GB with the option to use the Large File Storage thing, which in GitLab you don't need to bother with as you get it by default. It includes DevOps and a lot of other features that frankly we don't make use of. It's just the much bigger space by default and up to 3 collaborators. GitLab is great! Although it does have some cons....

Nachteile:

One of the biggest problem with GitLab is that their website is a bit laggy. You can wait 1 to 4 seconds for some pages to load. Another issue is that we actually use the GitHub Desktop application to handle GitLab repositories and the setup to connect the application to GitLab is kinda clunky, more like to allow GitLab to be grabbed as URL. Wouldn't wanna go through that again, hopefully they already streamlined it as last time I did it was about 2 years ago.

Arzu
Arzu
Digital Marketing Specialist in Türkei
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Computer-Software, 11–50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Easy to use, comprehensive, open-source tool for project management

5,0 vor 2 Jahren

Kommentare: We have set up and customized GitLab on our own servers in order to manage a project where digital marketing, software, devops, human resources and many teams work together. This really relieved us of a great burden. Everyone's own project management area on GitLab was clear, besides, the issues and projects that they needed to work on were also very clear. We can follow many processes such as product development, project management, task tracking in a sustainable way. It also serves as a great archive for people who join the team later.

Vorteile:

GitLab is an easy to use and versatile project management tool. As a team, we use it not only for software development projects, but also for the follow-up of our other projects. It is really great that it is customizable, you can simplify your interface for your teammates who cannot use complex applications. This offers you a more user-friendly product.

Nachteile:

It's a little harder for people other than engineers to adapt. You shouldn't expect traditional drag-and-drop kanban boards. It's a bit of a technical product. But if we consider that the intended use of the product, this is really normal, not a big minus.

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen: Jira

Zuvor genutzte Software: GitHub

Yurie Katri
Yurie Katri
DevOps Engineer in Spanien
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Telekommunikation, 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

A perfect place for program management

4,0 vor 2 Jahren

Kommentare: Safe to use as SaaS. Easy to build even on-premises, but the SaaS version can be used with peace of mind thanks to strong security measures. Obtaining ISO/IEC 27001: 2013 certification, can be used with greater peace of mind, making it easier to approve the internal introduction request. If you are confident in the security, you can operate free of charge by creating a local server. When creating the request form to send to the internal IT department when submitting the SaaS version, there were some unclear points about security management in GitLab, but GitLab support took the trouble to conduct a remote meeting and was able to resolve all doubts.

Vorteile:

The source code can be managed anywhere as long as you are connected to the Internet. The editor also supports Once editing is finished, you can manage versions by connecting to the Internet and clicking, so you do not need to be connected to the Internet all the time. The source code editing software also supports this, so you can manage it with GUI button operation.

Nachteile:

There is issue management, but there is no task management feature. Therefore, we are forced to handle GitLab + Redmine. If you have a task management feature, you can consolidate with this, and work efficiency will increase.