Wir helfen Unternehmen in Deutschland
seit 15 Jahren bei der Softwareauswahl

Über Codemagic

Fortlaufende Integration und Bereitstellung für Android-, iOS-, Cordova-, Ionic-, React-Native- und Flutter-Projekte.

Erfahre mehr über Codemagic

Vorteile:

I love the automation from a git push to the deployment of the app to the customer. The software is very intuitive to setup and has a thorough documentation to get things working quickly.

Nachteile:

Missing the possibility to post release_notes with iOS builds. Missing the possibility to add additional info to the release_notes message (e.g. integration testing results to the Slack message).

Bewertungen zu Codemagic

Durchschnittliche Bewertung

Benutzerfreundlichkeit
4,6
Kundenservice
4,6
Funktionen
4,6
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
4,6

Weiterempfehlungsquote

9,0/10

Codemagic hat eine Gesamtbewertung von 4,7 von 5 Sternen basierend auf 121 Nutzerbewertungen auf Capterra.

Hast du Codemagic bereits verwendet?

Teile deine Erfahrungen mit anderen Softwareinteressenten.

Nutzerbewertungen filtern (121)

Ivo
Ivo
Software Engineer in Deutschland
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Finanzdienstleistungen, 11–50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

Overall Good CI/CD for Flutter

5,0 vor 3 Jahren

Kommentare: We needed a CI to build and publish a Flutter app for Android and iOS to both stores as well as Firebase App Distribution. Bitbucket Pipelines doesn't offer Mac machines so we chose something Flutter-specific to not have to worry about Flutter setup in CI.
The good pre-configuration of the build machines as well as publishing tools saved us a lot of time in setting up the CI.

Vorteile:

Good integration with Bitbucket, easy to use UI to set up CI jobs. Mac machines with everything preinstalled to do Flutter testing, build and releases. Allows auto-cancelling of previous builds if new commits are pushed. Especially App Store Connect helpers were very welcome since we didn't have much experience with publishing iOS apps. Newer Yaml configuration option also works well and can of course be versioned with the rest of the app.

Nachteile:

Lately webhook events are sometimes processed out of order when you have multiple coming in (for example you push to a branch with an open PR, which triggers a hook for both the push and the P{R update). That can lead to the wrong builds being auto-cancelled and a bit of confusion as to whats happening. Sometime issues with retrieving build logs. Dark mode could use more contrast. Linux machines still lack cache support. All in all only minor issues though.

James
James
Founder in USA
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Computer-Software, 11–50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

A truly wonderful, modern CI

5,0 vor 3 Jahren

Vorteile:

The first thing that struck me about Codemagic is that it looks and feels like a modern tool. Many of the competing softwares in the space have a terrible user experience, which makes you immediately shiver when you first open them. Codemagic is quite the opposite. The user interface is clean and the platform is very configurable considering. I've found builds to be fairly quick and the platform stable. They do a great job of rolling out updates consistently.

Nachteile:

While the interface is great, I think there could be some improvement in terms of how projects are laid out. Overall, very minor.

Mahendra
react native intern in Indien
Übersetzung und Lokalisierung, 2–10 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Kostenlose Testversion
Herkunft der Bewertung

Mobile app hardware limitation

3,0 vor 3 Jahren

Kommentare: i Had made atleast 250+ build request and no doubt for time management this is unbeatable you do not need to wait in queue for long even you have free tier . Codemagic gives default installations of jq like tools which help us to save time in installing it every time plus cache service for add more option in default tools.

Vorteile:

The service of auto code signing and build triggers upon the commits with conditional triggers

Nachteile:

IOs code signing and slack support. the codemagic have very poor documentation for code signing they should given more example and help in code signing process . like i use gaming laptop i dont have ios and now i need ios app ipa file not to upload on appstore but for me to check max size before deliver. i should not need developer account for this . i can do it with xcode and so i can do it with mac cli rather then doing changes every time i can automate it but no help for that while there is appcircle ci/cd which provide their code.

Enes
Enes
DevOps in Türkei
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Computerspiele, 51–200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

Unity CI/CD

5,0 vor 2 Jahren

Kommentare: We have faster build times. It is more secure than Jenkins. Very easy to setup for developers and other team members.

Vorteile:

We were having a hard time building our games on Jenkins and codemagic came to the rescue. We can take concurrent builds at the same time for iOS, since it's a SaaS we don't have to manage the platform. It's very easy to use and set up. Pretty cheap when you compare it with the other platforms.

Nachteile:

You can store your codemagic.yaml file on the website so you always have to have it on your repository.

David
David
CTO in Spanien
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Gesundheit, Wellness & Fitness, 2–10 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

Best CI for Flutter

5,0 vor 3 Jahren

Kommentare: Excellent. Not only from a tech, value proposition point of view, but only from a customer service. The slack channel the use for that is an excellent idea.

Vorteile:

It's a CI specific for flutter ecosystem, so you have every option you need for that platform and stack, and no option you don't need.

Nachteile:

The (extremely rare) ocasional instability of a company starting up. Nothing to worry about.

meghana
Software Development Engineer in Indien
Computer-Software, 51–200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Kostenlose Testversion
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

codemagic - A magically quick way to ci-cd!

5,0 vor 3 Jahren

Kommentare: My overall experience is great. Helps one bring their ci-cd dream to reality so fast - its so relieving and fun to achieve that!

Vorteile:

Constant, quick, great support by the team, especially from [SENSITIVE CONTENT] in bringing the ci-cd to life for our product.

Nachteile:

1. Not so obvious things like - encrypting the jks file. 2. Obscure and scattered information in the doc on certain parts of integration information like android-signing info being very distantly placed from the actual content. 3. No clear - complete example on certain customised implementations like environment specific release.

Sanni
Flutter Developer in Indien
Computer-Software, 51–200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

Code magic saves my time from dev to production to maintenance stages of the products that we build

5,0 vor 3 Jahren

Kommentare: It saves a lot of time.
Also removes the whole worry about building and internal test builds and also production release builds.

Vorteile:

The ease of setting up multiple pipelines. The ease of navigating and setting up signing the iOS and Android apps

Nachteile:

That there are only 500 free minutes per month. Having 700 minutes can help me survive for my projects. (I am grateful for the current free tier)

William
Principal Consultant in USA
Computer-Software, 2–10 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

For Flutter CI/CD, it's awesome!

5,0 vor 3 Jahren

Kommentare: I recommend Codemagic to anyone looking for an easy to use, easy to understand, free CICD solution for Flutter apps.

Vorteile:

All options in the UI for build configuration, have a help icon that takes you to their documentation. Their documentation quality is accurate, up to date and always helpful.

Nachteile:

I did experience wildly varying build times for ios/xcode. When you are paying out of pocket and the build times aren't consistent it makes you wonder. This has seemed to have gotten better, more consistent lately.

Antwort von Nevercode

vor 3 Jahren

Thank you so much for your kind words! Feedback like this keeps us going. At times, builds times are dependent on the Apple side as they have their own app processing time management which results in timeouts most of the time. However, we have just released a new feature about Introducing App Store Connect Build Post Processing. Please do join our Community Slack (https://slack.codemagic.io/) to learn more about this. If you face some other issues, please let us know specifically by providing build links, so that we can look into them.

Verifizierter Rezensent
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Marketing & Werbung, 201–500 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

Competent platform for iOS

5,0 vor 3 Jahren

Vorteile:

We had an ready transition from our last tool. In the past, changing platforms has been an ordeal.

Nachteile:

Many features are Flutter centric. Sometimes the docs aren't clear that something is specifically for flutter builds, and other platforms feel second class.

Ryan
Ryan
Sr. Software Engineer in USA
Verifizierter Nutzer auf LinkedIn
Computer-Software, 51–200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

A great CI/CD tool

4,0 vor 3 Jahren

Kommentare: Overall, there is no better combination of price and developer experience. Tools like GitHub Actions are powerful but require more configuration and are probably better suited for larger teams.

Vorteile:

Ease of use - essentially low maintenance once it is set up. Developer experience Great customer support Competitive pricing

Nachteile:

Currently no static analysis or support for code coverage. Reporting on failed tests could also be better. In the past I have had issues with Apple Dev Console authentication. Mac Mini instances can also be slow at times.

Dmitry
USA
, 2–10 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 1-5 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

Great tool for ionic builds

5,0 vor 8 Jahren

Kommentare: I tried to setup CI for ionic builds on Jenkins and it was a disaster. Android builds are possible but iOS builds is a complete magic, there are only few providers of Macs on cloud, the process is very unclear. Apple is notoriously known for making devs lives over complicated even with Apple tools, not to mention Jenkins and other third-party products. NeverCode was just what I was looking for, a CI cloud based platform to build ionic apps on android and ios. And they keep their promise: you need only few clicks for a simple app. In my case I had to put much more into it, mostly due to the mess in packages.json and other config files. That was the tech debt you should pay before good CI automation anyway. Comparing to Travis Nevercode pricing is very reasonable (not to mention that you barely can build ionic on Travis).

Vorteile:

* Cloud based -- no need to maintain servers * Specific, knows about ionic / cordova -- only few settings to get things up and running * Great customer support -- fast and professional, it feels they are on early stage when devs handle support requests and closely watch for issues * Easy to learn and use * Good documentation -- easy to read and understand

Nachteile:

It feels that product is pretty new and many things are missing. Obviously they will be added * The documentation is too brief sometimes. Apple certs are crazy so Nevercode could elaborate more on how to use them * No direct support for Google Play publishing, though you can plug a hook and do it easily * No automation to increase build numbers though it is pretty trivial to do on your own, just be aware you need to write some scripts here * Lack of security consideration. You shall give permissions to all your repos on github, not to a particular one. No 2FA if register with login/password. No protection for signing certs. (On Travis you cannot really access encrypted keys directly) * No way to cache node_modules and folders alike between the builds

Kris
CTO in Australien
Computer-Software, 2–10 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

Ultimate Flutter Mobile App Deployment Time Saver

5,0 vor 3 Jahren

Kommentare: Codemagic has taken away the most unpleasant tasks our app development studio had, and saved us thousands of dollars in staff costs in our first year of using it.

Vorteile:

The little details of deployment to the app stores, with Google Play and especially Apple changing things every few months, meant that releasing a new version of an app always had an overhead of adjusting things, maybe changing versions of things in the local environment, to get the build and the upload and the publish steps to work. Codemagic takes care of 99% of this overhead for us. It has all but removed completely one of our most unenjoyable tasks as mobile app developers.

Nachteile:

The cost is a little higher than I would love - and by that I mean, had they figured out their costing before we signed up, we might not have chosen it. Having said that - and this is so important - it is EXCELLENT value for money - it much more than pays for itself in the developer time saved on app deployment tasks.

Juan
Software Consultant in Niederlande
Computer-Software, 2–10 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen:

Works for you, and not against you.

5,0 vor 3 Jahren

Kommentare: Never had any issues, and it's my go-to CI/CD for mobile apps. Period.
Even in clients where they have already something setup, those solutions always have hiccups, fail time to time, and then we end-up using CodeMagic.

Vorteile:

Multiple workflows on the same branch. Flutter out of the box. Multiple distribution mechanism on the same build

Nachteile:

Device testing farm, so we can test on real devices would be great, although understandably will not be cheap.

Ivan
CEO in USA
Unterhaltung, 11–50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

Powerful CI/CD tool, beats the competition - but customer service is amazing

5,0 vor 3 Jahren

Kommentare: Once we started to get set up, Codemagic offered us a free 45 minute online 1-on-1 with a tech expert to review and advise on our configuration, and offered to come back for more if we needed it. This is customer service excellence - love the product, love the support - TY

Vorteile:

It was a lot easier to set up our flows using codemagic compared to the jenkins options we had been considering

Nachteile:

More targets please - and better integration with both sides of the android / google publications environments, firebase and the google store

Antwort von Nevercode

vor 3 Jahren

Kuddos on your kind words! This means a lot to our team. We just made it even much cooler by adding Firebase app distribution which should make the publishing quite easy. Please find the docs here: https://docs.codemagic.io/publishing-yaml/distribution/#publishing-an-app-to-firebase-app-distribution Happy building with Codemagic!

Bohdan
Flutter developer in Estland
Bankwesen, 11–50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

Almost perfect

4,0 vor 3 Jahren

Kommentare: Codemagic works as part of development pipeline, works almost on all steps of development.

Vorteile:

* Easy to set up * Almost full documentation * Static analyzer works is great * Deployment feature is great

Nachteile:

* Setup of environment some time crash wich broken pipeline * Runned test not always match with local machine * Some issue with IOS distributions

Steven
Owner in USA
Gastgewerbe, 2–10 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

Good bang-for-the-buck for Ionic Capacitor Apps

5,0 vor 3 Jahren

Kommentare: End of the day, very pleased with Codemagic. While the setup effort is non-trivial for Capacitor, it is worth the effort and a far more cost-effective option vs. alternatives.

Vorteile:

Codemagic was one of the few cloud-based CI/CD solutions that supported the Ionic Capacitor build flow for iOS & Android apps. Once setup & validated, it is extremely easy to use for day-to-day builds. It is also quite cost-effective for small-time developers - amazing amount of functionality at the free tier.

Nachteile:

Setup for Capacitor is not easy. There are some helpful blogs, but it was still a significant challenge to get things up & running the first time. It would be very helpful to have a 'canned' Capacitor flow that worked out of the box to hit the ground running.

Andrew
Senior Software Engineer in USA
Computer-Software, 11–50 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 1-5 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

Removes the hassle of maintaining a build server

5,0 vor 3 Jahren

Kommentare: The overall experience I have had while using the product has been positive it really makes it easy to use, however there are a few features I would like see in the future however not having these features would not detract me from using the product in other deployments.

Vorteile:

I like the simple UI that made it easy to integrate into our existing products. Also many of the common options such as Slack and S3 are supported for when the artifacts are completed.

Nachteile:

Some of the common stuff like build number increases could be better addressed rather than needing to create a codemagic file or custom scripts. Would also like to see Google Drive supported in the future.

Gustavo
Hybrid Mobile Developer in Kanada
Computer-Software, 51–200 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

Best Flutter CI/CD

5,0 vor 3 Jahren

Vorteile:

We use daily in our applications to create builds for developers test, debug and evaluate, also to ensure that our QA team has the same application that the final user will have it

Nachteile:

Sometimes you may have some latency between ticket and solution, but we understand that there is a timezone difference

Nick
Principal Engineer in Neuseeland
Versorgungsunternehmen, 201–500 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 2 Jahre
Herkunft der Bewertung

Easy to use build service

5,0 vor 3 Jahren

Kommentare: Overall it's been an awesome product to use. Save us lots of time and money. Great community support. Great support from CodeMagic itself.

Vorteile:

Easy to set up through the web console or as code. Code signing is handled perfectly.

Nachteile:

Debugging is still hard. Role based access set up for team members is not very clear.

Sovit
Full Stack Developer in Nepal
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, 2–10 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

Highly recommend CodeMagic for Flutter apps

5,0 vor 3 Jahren

Kommentare: Definitely the best CI/CD platform for Flutter apps.

Vorteile:

- Intuitive User interface, - Thorough consideration of deployment process for both Google Play and Apple Store, - Excellent documentations and Customer Support, - Pretty good API for automating things

Nachteile:

I honestly couldn't think of anything that I do not like about CodeMagic. It's a great product!

Antwort von Nevercode

vor 3 Jahren

Thank you for your support!

Martin
Developer in Deutschland
Computer-Software, Selbstständig
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

Simple and useful

5,0 vor 3 Jahren

Kommentare: Awesome product. If I would need the paid version I would definitly pay for this tool.

Vorteile:

The simplicity to setup an pipeline. It's super easy to setup everythink the way I need it. Also the signing part for iOS is pretty easy which is complicated with other pipelines

Nachteile:

Not much, maybe some syntax highlighting in the shell script parts.

Siddharth
Full stack developer in Indien
Informationstechnologie & -dienste, Selbstständig
Verwendete die Software für: 1-5 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

Flutter CI/CD

4,0 vor 3 Jahren

Kommentare: I just have 2 words, Life Saving

Vorteile:

The ease of use and what it provides. Not having a mac made me really worried about compiling an app for ios but codemagic came to the rescue. Its quick, easy to use, and can be easily customised according to one's need. It is one of the best deployment tools out there

Nachteile:

Everything was great, but I had one really big problem. To be honest I am not even sure if it is a valid problem. While compile for ios, I get a .app file instead of .ipa. I know I need to put in my apple developer iD, but I would love it if they can provide a default ID as theirs. I am not sure if thats even feasible but wanted to put it out there

Antwort von Nevercode

vor 3 Jahren

Thank you for your suggestion! It's needed to make sure that the artifacts section is properly set up. You can provide build links in the community Slack channel, and then we are happy to take a look into it. Happy building, Marie

Lennart
CTO in Deutschland
Computer-Software, 2–10 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 6-12 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

Decent tool, high cost

4,0 vor 3 Jahren

Vorteile:

Easy and quick to set up. Easy to use. Does all you need.

Nachteile:

It's rather expensive compared to other tools. And build times are quite high (although it should be stated that i don't have any experience with any other comparable tool). Building our apps takes approximately 5-7 times longer than on my mac book pro. When using the faster - even more expensive - build machine it's a little bit faster.

Viktor
Freelance Developer in UK
Computer-Software, 2–10 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: 1-5 Monate
Herkunft der Bewertung

Good for handling my react-native deployment

4,0 vor 3 Jahren

Kommentare: The setup is not straightforward and I would prefer a more detailed step by step documentation into setting up the deployment process.
However the complexities are linked to App Store/Play Console rather than Codemagic. I had some issues with deployment and I was helped quickly on the codemagic support Slack channel even when I am on the free tier currently.
The debugging capabilities for failed builds are quite nice and clear and it seems highly configurable.

Vorteile:

I am using this software to deploy react-native app to App store and Play Console. This allows me to save a lot of time, as I can handle the releases automatically for both platforms. The support Slack channel was very good at helping me sort out an issue quickly too.

Nachteile:

I would prefer more thorough step by step configuration into react native builds for android/ios.

Robert
Technical Co-founder in USA
Verbraucherdienste, 2–10 Mitarbeiter
Verwendete die Software für: Mehr als 1 Jahr
Herkunft der Bewertung

Necessary for your Flutter Toolbelt

5,0 vor 3 Jahren

Vorteile:

It is the perfect "set it and forget it" tool for deploying Flutter apps to the Play Store and App Store.

Nachteile:

When manually triggering a build, I wish I could select a tag instead of a branch.