Bewertet am 26.12.2018
Great for automating audit processes
Vorteile: Good for managing multiple organizations. User-friendly, with good analytics and reports.
Nachteile: Multi-org setup is too expensive compared to single-org setup.
Bewertet am 16.6.2013
Great for GRC+ERP combination
Head of erp systems, clalit health services
Kommentare: We completed end-to-end business process modeling, and IT-GRC management, covering the entire scope of our SAP solution. Thanks to ProcessGene's ease of use, our business users were able to capture and document IT risks and controls, and ERP implementation components with a minimal expenditure on professional services
- Management of GRC activities, while connected to the ERP system
- Structured ERP configuration management
- Structured rollouts
- Easy control
- Reusable for ongoing changes
Nachteile: Requires connectivity to the web (SaaS)
Bewertet am 23.6.2013
Very user friendly and helpful
Kommentare: The software is very user friendly, featuring powerful GRC workflows, analytics and reporting capabilities. The related consulting services were well organized, and demonstrated professional practices and methodologies. ProcessGene solutions simplified our work and saved us time and money
-very user friendly
-helpful analytics and reporting capabilities
-excellent professional services
-simplified our work
-saved us time and money
Nachteile: No cons-we are very pleased with the software!
Bewertet am 23.4.2013
The solution is good, but...
Erine bookholtz, cro
Kommentare: This SaaS GRC has it all, but we did not appreciate the fact that no discount was given- although we purchased a large number of licenses.
Vorteile: Technically the suite is excllent and we chose it after a very detalied RFP. The implementation was simple and fast, and service is good.
Nachteile: No discount from price list for a large volumes of subscriptions. If we will not get discount before next renewal we will reduce number of subscriptions.
Bewertet am 13.1.2013
FIEA Compliance with ProcessGene™ GRC
We have been getting excellent J-SOX results with this solution - for the assessment and verification of internal controls related to financial reporting. We used ProcessGene for the two main J-SOX requirements:
1. the establishment of internal control rules to ensure proper disclosures and reporting on internal accounting procedures
2. Verification that these rules are being complied with, and for auditing firms to conduct the relevant audits
The most useful feature was automation and multi subsuduary support.
An excellen solution.
Bewertet am 19.9.2013
Much more than GRC, but...
I cannot deny that they offer a lot more GRC and most of it (except SAP connector) cone out of the box .
We implemented for 300 workers (SOX+ risk management), and we were happy we (I) chose this software because of the ease of use. I still recommend to use it but... I have one problem. Defining complex workflows took a lot of time when not using Multi-Org and the company charges more for Multi-Org.
Nachteile: Multi-Org version more expensive
Bewertet am 2.6.2013
Good SAP connectivity
Christina, risk manager uk
Kommentare: Top solution and excellent service.
Vorteile: Technically and seviecewise A top solution - we found most of the features very usefull- mainly the automated compliance workflows, tasks and dashboards.
Nachteile: There is an additional payment for SAP Connector if you do not buy the Enterprise edition- we were not sure if to choose pro or enterprise- eventually enterprise is lower cost.
Bewertet am 22.11.2013
For large scale workflows
Nora galihan, orc
Kommentare: Easy collaboration- for 800 agents , and the self assessment surveys was very efficient. Supports any amount of users (other GRC solutions are just not planned for that)
Vorteile: We are happy we chose this software and recomend to use it when more than few workers are involved. Plan to extend to several thousands.
Nachteile: Works very well - but costly compared to other (e.g SAP GRC/ Oracle)
Bewertet am 15.7.2013
Excellent for Performance Appraisal- Self Service GRC
Kommentare: Best solution we found for Self-assessments relating to risk and internal controls management
Vorteile: Self explenatory - Easy implementation - Web based - Supports thousands of users - best solution we found for Self-assessments relating to risk and internal controls management
Nachteile: Multi- tennant SaaS- and we wanted on site. It was possible but more expensive
Bewertet am 1.12.2013
The upgrade to ProcessGene
Tom nahle, cpa
Kommentare: We had a different solution for our ERM / GRC (not saying which)- and upgraded to ProcessGene after we were not able to configure.
Does everything we need - but easily.
Heatmaps, configurable charts, financial operational.... (focus on financial compliance)
and: Service. Service. Service.
Nachteile: That we did not know about this company earlier.
Bewertet am 13.1.2014
Implementation and setup
Kommentare: We purchased after hearing good things about the software, had problems with the implementer (another IT company). Important to choose a good consultant to support
Vorteile: Very software solution for GRC, MArisk and compliance.
Nachteile: We chose a German business partner of ProcessGene to implement (an IT company) and that specific consultant did not have sufficient skills.
Bewertet am 11.3.2014
Best-Kept Secret of GRC
Kommentare: After more than two years of silence, I'm going to let you in on the IT industry best-kept GRC secrets: ProcessGene GRC.
Vorteile: ProcessGene software and service are so good that, for a long time, I didn't want to be the one to "out" this company. Once a GRC company gets too popular, it starts to go downhill....
Bewertet am 15.7.2013
The most Cost-effective GRC software
Kommentare: This is the most Cost-effective GRC software we found in the market - we got all functionality we wanted (risk management, diagrams, and control management), and it costs less than other offers we received. Users like to use this tool-because it is easy and friendly.
Vorteile: Very recommended for risk management and SOX
Nachteile: SaaS (in general, we prefer non SaaS software)
Bewertet am 20.2.2014
Workflow for 800 different store locations
Irvin menash- msca it
The workflow works good for 800 concurrent locations- sent and collected monthly.
- All technical aspects covered.
- Did not require implementation time.
- Service very good.
- Very simple to operate
- Pricy compared to other solutions.
- Several features we do not need.
Bewertet am 12.1.2013
Providing a solution for our E-SOX requirements
We use PG for E-SOX for the following requirements:
- collective responsibility of board members for financial statements and key non-financial information
- transparency of transactions with related parties
- qualified special-purpose vehicles (QSPE)
- An annual corporate governance statement So far - very pleased- I assume there are many features we are not using yet.
Bewertet am 21.5.2013
Automated our compliance enforcement
Samina amgab - controller
Kommentare: Automated our compliance enforcement, saved us the cost of pricly consultants
Vorteile: Thsi company (ProcessGene) is 100% Service Oriented. Not only the technology is great, but the professional services were provided bu high quality consultants.
Why do they charge in Euro and not $?...
Amyhow- an excellent app.
Bewertet am 4.7.2013
Great collaboration capabilities
Kommentare: Great for collaboration-we involved ~20 workers in our process modeling project + risk management, and collaboration was very efficient. The automatic correction and updates of flowchrts saved us time. We are very happy we chose this software and recomend to use it when more than few workers are involved in the BPM+risk mgt.project.
Vorteile: Great collaborative features
Bewertet am 28.7.2013
Helped us collaborate on GRC
Kommentare: We managed a large scale project improvement project with this tool. As project lead I liked very much the fact that I could use my old Visio documentation and add the PG capabilities on top. Highly recommended.
Vorteile: I liked very much the fact that I could use my old Visio documentation and add the PG capabilities on top
Bewertet am 28.2.2013
Track compliance audits
Kommentare: Untill PG we used Excel and a combination of basic office tools for this tracking.
Vorteile: Tracking of exceptions/errors. FDIC/ Compliance approved. Ability to attach documents from within software and forward through email. The ability to highlight errors and forward errors.
Bewertet am 8.4.2013
Our ERM solution
Jennifer ashby smior
We are a financial organization, that deals with insurance and actuaries.
We found the ERM module very useful.
- Actuarial modul
- Enterprise risk management very comprehensive
Nachteile: The ERM risk module has many features but is a bit complex and requires training
Bewertet am 10.10.2013
Best software for SOX
Kommentare: We use this software for SOX both for internal audits and for 302 certification surveys. The software is very easy to use and mad it easier to manage our SOX complex project
Vorteile: Very easy to use, full functionality both for internal audits and for 302 certification surveys
Bewertet am 28.7.2013
Lean management software
Kommentare: We looked for several apps to support our Lean mgt initiative and they were not meant for enterprise wide, multi-subsidiary operation. ProcessGene may seem a bit complex at first, but as you move along in the project it becomes clear that almost every feature is a MUST.
Vorteile: Multi-subsidiary support
Bewertet am 6.6.2013
GRC+BPM in one software
Kommentare: We chose this solution since it is the only one that really combined BPM + GRC functionality as an integrated solution. Both our process analysts and risk managers work on the same process model.
Vorteile: Great software, all inclusive
Nachteile: Web-based (the internal server option costs a lot more)
Bewertet am 7.10.2013
Automated our Internal Audit process
Alessandro dama, cpa
Automated our Internal Audit process including risk assessment,
audit and personnel scheduling,
and of audit reports.
Others promised. These guys delivered.
Great value for money. simple and intuitive.
Nachteile: that we did not know about this company earlier
Bewertet am 23.9.2013
The ISO functionality needs a change
Mortimer hartis, quality manager
Kommentare: When we use ISO certs we were required to amend the initial model- instead of a customized one- and this takes more time. The Workflow and Dashboards very useful.
Nachteile: Need to change initial Model (instead of loading the final one from Excel)