--- description: Detaillierte Informationen über TestRail zu Benutzerfreundlichkeit, Funktionen, Kosten, Vor- und Nachteilen aus verifizierten Nutzer-Erfahrungen. Lies Ratings & Bewertungen und entdecke ähnliche Tools. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: TestRail Erfahrungen, Vor- und Nachteile – Capterra Deutschland 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Startseite](/) > [Testmanagement-Tools](/directory/34315/test-management-tools/software) > [TestRail](/software/128204/testrail) # TestRail Canonical: https://www.capterra.com.de/software/128204/testrail Seite: 1 / 8\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/128204/testrail?page=2) > Eine webbasierte Test-Case-Management-Software zum Verwalten, Verfolgen und Organisieren Ihres Softwaretestprozesses. > > Bewertung: **4.3/5** von 177 Nutzern. Top bewertet für **Weiterempfehlungsquote**. ----- ## Übersicht ### Wer verwendet TestRail? Moderne Test-Case-Management-Software für QA- und Entwicklungsteams. ## Kurzstatistiken und Ratings | Metrik | Bewertung | Detail | | **Gesamt** | **4.3/5** | 177 Nutzerbewertungen | | Bedienkomfort | 4.2/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Kundenbetreuung | 4.1/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis | 4.1/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Funktionen | 4.2/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Empfehlungsprozentsatz | 80% | (8/10 Weiterempfehlungsquote) | ## Über den Anbieter - **Unternehmen**: IDERA - **Gegründet**: 2011 ## Gewerblicher Kontext - **Startpreis**: 34,00 $ - **Preismodell**: (Kostenlose Testversion) - **Zielgruppe**: 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1.000, 1.001–5.000, 5.001–10.000, 10.000+ - **Bereitstellungen und Plattformen**: Cloud, SaaS, webbasiert, Mac (Desktop), Windows (Desktop), Linux (Desktop), Windows (On-Premise), Linux (On-Premise), Chromebook (Desktop) - **Unterstützte Sprachen**: Englisch - **Verfügbare Länder**: Afghanistan, Albanien, Algerien, Amerikanisch-Samoa, Amerikanische Jungferninseln, Andorra, Angola, Anguilla, Antigua und Barbuda, Argentinien, Armenien, Aruba, Aserbaidschan, Australien, Bahamas, Bahrain, Bangladesch, Barbados, Belarus, Belgien und 209 weitere ## Funktionen - Anforderungsmanagement - Automated Testing - Berichterstattung / Analyse - Continuous Integration - Lager-Management - Lasttests - Management von Softwaretests - Multiple Test Types - Qualitätssicherung - Rückverfolgbarkeit - Test-Management - Verfolgen von Fehlern - Werkzeuge zur Zusammenarbeit - Zugriffskontrollen / Berechtigungen - hierarchische Ansicht ## Integrationen (29 insgesamt) - Asana - Assembla - Axosoft - Azure DevOps Server - Bitbucket - Bugzilla - CircleCI - ClickUp - Confluence - Cypress - DesignWise - FogBugz - Functionize - GitHub - GitLab ... und 14 weitere Integrationen ## Optionen für Kundensupport - E-Mail/Helpdesk - FAQ/Forum - Wissensdatenbank - Chat ## Category - [Testmanagement-Tools](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/34315/test-management-tools/software) ## Ähnliche Kategorien - [Testmanagement-Tools](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/34315/test-management-tools/software) - [Programmiersoftware](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/30082/application-development/software) - [User Testing Software](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/32295/user-testing/software) - [Testing Tools](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/31124/performance-testing/software) - [Automated Testing Tools](https://www.capterra.com.de/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) ## Alternativen 1. [Tricentis qTest](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/173762/qtest) — 4.4/5 (27 reviews) 2. [SpiraTest](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/70008/spiratest) — 4.0/5 (104 reviews) 3. [Tricentis Tosca](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/120858/tricentis-tosca) — 4.2/5 (18 reviews) 4. [BrowserStack](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/162900/browserstack) — 4.6/5 (749 reviews) 5. [Xray](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/1049437/xray) — 4.0/5 (7 reviews) ## Nutzerbewertungen ### "If you are executing manual test cases on a large scale then Test Rail is for you" — 4.0/5 > **Neil** | *20. Dezember 2018* | Computer-Software | Empfehlungsbewertung: 9.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: I think report generation is the strong suit of Test rail, the percentage pie chart of passed, failed blocked cases at a glance make daily reporting for scrum stand up meetings ideal. Integration with Jira is excellent, although some room for improvement. > > **Nachteile**: Trying to do something simple like import test case steps from a .csv is not so easy. You can import a suite but that is not ideal. Trying to duplicate cases can be tedious, let's say you have a lot of cases, trying to copy paste them in to various projects is a lot of hassle, it is surprising they have not addressed issues like this after so many years. > > Having using various test management suites TestRail does excel in that it was built to run manual test cases and display results in an easy glance for the whole team. Linking to defects is simple, generating a report when the test run is complete. I feel like reusing regression suites could be improved, it does what it is meant to however you have to repeat several steps each time you want to generate a regression suite. Some areas for improvement would be a test case type for API tests, I am sure everyone needs this but struggles to find a way to record this data. ----- ### "TestRail usage review" — 4.0/5 > **Pavitra** | *13. Oktober 2025* | Computer-Software | Empfehlungsbewertung: 8.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: TestRail is a perfect solution for testcase management. Our team uses the features of milestone creation, test runs and execution analytics of the tool. My favorite feature of TestRail is the ability to add custom fields that can be specific to your project needs. > > **Nachteile**: 1. I would like to use TestRail to expand the capabilities to add confluence documentations as well along with the Jira Tasks 2. Another thing I am not a fan of is the attachments maintenance. It is very hard to navigate to the attached documents or files from a testcase 3. Customer service is not great, we opened couple of issues over the period of time but the responses and updates were too slow or none. In short website performance is good but when you hit bugs there is a gap > > It is good, our company is using TestRail for over 5 years now. We like the easy of use of the tool. We use it for testcase management, test run creation and execution for functional and regression tests. Value for money is good. ----- ### "TestRail in 4 years" — 5.0/5 > **Rakhi** | *30. März 2026* | Informationstechnologie & -dienste | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: it brings structure and consistency to testing by keeping test cases organized in a clear hierarchy, which makes it easy to maintain coverage over time. I also really value the way it supports repeatable execution through test runs and results tracking—so regression cycles feel more controlled, progress is visible at a glance, and there’s a reliable history of what was tested and what needs re-testing after the dev fixes. > > **Nachteile**: maintaining a large test library can feel a bit manual—bulk updates, reorganizing sections, or refactoring lots of cases takes time and can be tedious. The UI can also feel a little clunky in places (especially around editing steps and keeping formatting consistent), and reporting is sometimes not as flexible as you’d want without extra effort to slice results the way a team needs for release readiness. > > It’s a dependable tool for keeping test cases structured and making regression cycles repeatable, and it gives good visibility into what’s been executed and what still needs attention. Even though some parts could be smoother—especially around bulk maintenance and reporting—it’s still effective for organizing QA work and keeping a clear history of testing over time. ----- ### "Mid-level testing tool" — 1.0/5 > **isaac** | *23. Oktober 2025* | Computer-Software | Empfehlungsbewertung: 0.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: I liked that it's been around for a long time so it has a lot of legacy features that have been around for a long time. > > **Nachteile**: The fact that it is a legacy tool, it feels old and complex to use. It's also very expensive. And customer service has paywalls. > > Generally mid, not impressed by it but it is a tool that has been around for a long time so it has a lot of general features. ----- ### "Quality Assured" — 5.0/5 > **Gerrit** | *2. Dezember 2024* | Computer-Software | Empfehlungsbewertung: 9.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: It helps our QA team with managing regression testing between multiple remote QA engineers. Adding new test cases is easy, and being able to go back and see who tested each case is extremely valuable. > > **Nachteile**: Getting all of our test cases moved over to TestRail was a huge undertaking, but once done, maintaining has been easy. > > TestRail was a huge step up from our previous process which was a Google Sheet. ----- Seite: 1 / 8\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/128204/testrail?page=2) ## Links - [Auf Capterra anzeigen](https://www.capterra.com.de/software/128204/testrail) ## Diese Seite ist in den folgenden Sprachen verfügbar | Sprache | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | ko | | | nb | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | | tr | | ----- ## Strukturierte Daten